Long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of fingolimod over 5 years in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 5-year real-world benefit-risk profile of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) in Germany. METHODS: Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA) is a non-interventional real-world study to prospectively assess the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in routine clinical practice in Germany. The follow-up period comprised 5 years. Patients were included if they had been diagnosed with RRMS and had been prescribed fingolimod as part of clinical routine. There were no exclusion criteria except the contraindications for fingolimod as defined in the European label. The effectiveness and safety analysis set comprised 4032 and 4067 RRMS patients, respectively. RESULTS: At the time of the 5-year follow-up of PANGAEA, 66.57% of patients still continued fingolimod therapy. Annualized relapse rates decreased from baseline 1.5 ± 1.15 to 0.42 ± 0.734 at year 1 and 0.21 ± 0.483 at year 5, and the disability status remained stable, as demonstrated by the Expanded Disability Status Scale mean change from baseline (0.1 ± 2.51), the decrease of the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score from 5.1 ± 2.59 at baseline to 3.9 ± 2.31 at the 60-months follow-up, and the percentage of patients with 'no change' in the Clinical Global Impression scale at the 60-months follow-up (78.11%). Adverse events (AE) occurring in 75.04% of patients were in line with the known safety profile of fingolimod and were mostly non-serious AE (33.62%) and non-serious adverse drug reactions (50.59%; serious AE 4.98%; serious ADR 10.82%). CONCLUSIONS: PANGAEA demonstrated the sustained beneficial effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in the long-term real-world treatment of patients with RRMS.

Descriptive Analysis of Real-World Data on Fingolimod Long-Term Treatment of Young Adult RRMS Patients.

Background: Fingolimod (Gilenya®) is approved for adult and pediatric patients with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Objectives: The objective was to describe the effectiveness of fingolimod in young adults compared to older patients in clinical practice. Methods: PANGAEA is the largest prospective, multi-center, non-interventional, long-term study evaluating fingolimod in RRMS. We descriptively analyzed demographics, MS characteristics, and severity in two subgroups of young adults (≤20 and >20 to ≤30 years) and older patients (>30 years). Results: Young adults had lower Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores compared to older patients (1.8 and 2.3 vs. 3.2) at baseline. The mean EDSS scores remained stable over 5 years in all subgroups. Young adults had higher annual relapse rates (2.0 and 1.7 vs. 1.4) at study entry, which were reduced by approximately 80% in all subgroups over 5 years. The proportion of patients with no clinical disease activity in year 4 was 52.6 and 73.4 vs. 66.9% in patients ≤20, >20 to ≤30 years and >30 years, respectively. The symbol digit modalities test score increased by 15.25 ± 8.3 and 8.3 ± 11.3 (mean ± SD) from baseline in patients >20 to ≤30 and >30 years. Conclusions: Real-world evidence suggests a long-term treatment benefit of fingolimod in young RRMS patients.

Long-term real-world evidence for sustained clinical benefits of fingolimod following switch from natalizumab.

BACKGROUND: The risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy limits the duration over which patients can receive natalizumab before requiring a switch to other therapies such as fingolimod. To date, no studies have assessed the long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of fingolimod following a switch from natalizumab. We aimed to investigate the benefit-risk profile of fingolimod over 48 months in patients switching from natalizumab, and the impact of washout duration after natalizumab discontinuation on outcomes during fingolimod treatment. METHODS: This analysis used data from PANGAEA, an ongoing German multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, observational study. In total, 3912 patients were included: 530 had switched from natalizumab (natalizumab subpopulation), and a reference population of 3382 had switched from other treatments or were treatment-naïve (non-natalizumab subpopulation). The natalizumab subpopulation was stratified by washout duration (30-89 days, 90-149 days, and ≥ 150 days) prior to fingolimod initiation. RESULTS: In the natalizumab subpopulation over 48 months of fingolimod treatment, 58.2% (n = 227/390) of patients remained on fingolimod. Over this period, mean annualized relapse rates (ARRs) and proportions of patients who relapsed were similar across washout durations, and ranged from 0.455 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.363-0.571) to 0.546 (95% CI: 0.446-0.669) and 54.1% (n = 92/170) to 60.2% (n = 127/211), respectively. Overall, 17.1% (n = 36/211) had 6-month confirmed disability worsening. In the non-natalizumab subpopulation, ARR was 0.300, 40.9% (n = 1325/3237) of patients relapsed, and a similar proportion to the natalizumab subpopulation had 6-month disability worsening (16.6% [n = 232/1394]). In both subpopulations, the safety profile of fingolimod was consistent with that observed in randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: In patients discontinuing natalizumab, fingolimod has a favorable benefit-risk profile over 48 months. These findings also suggest using a short washout following natalizumab discontinuation, consistent with guidelines and current clinical practice in Germany.

Real-world persistence and benefit-risk profile of fingolimod over 36 months in Germany.

Objective: To assess the long-term real-world benefit-risk profile of fingolimod in patients with relapsing MS in Germany. Methods: This analysis used data from the noninterventional real-world study, Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA), to assess prospectively the persistence, effectiveness, and safety of fingolimod over 36 months (±90 days) in Germany. For inclusion in the effectiveness analysis (n = 2,537), patients were required to have received fingolimod for the first time in PANGAEA, to have at least 12 months of data, and to have completed each 12-month follow-up period. For the safety analysis (n = 3,266), patients were additionally allowed to have received fingolimod before enrollment. Results: At baseline, 94.7% of patients in the effectiveness analysis had received a previous disease-modifying therapy. After 36 months, 70.4% of patients were still receiving fingolimod. Over this period, annualized relapse rates decreased to 0.265 (95% CI: 0.244-0.286) from 1.79 (95% CI: 1.75-1.83), and mean Expanded Disability Status Scale scores remained stable (mean change from baseline: +0.049 [95% CI: -0.015 to +0.114]). In total, 16% of patients had 6-month confirmed disability improvement, 12.5% had 6-month confirmed disability worsening, and 52.4% were free from relapses and 6-month confirmed disability worsening. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were experienced by up to 23.4% and 3.9% of patients, respectively, during any of the 12-month follow-up periods. The frequency and nature of AEs were in line with previous findings. Conclusions: Using systematically collected data from PANGAEA, this analysis demonstrates the sustained effectiveness, high persistence, and manageable safety profile of fingolimod over 36 months.

Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit-Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA.

The population with multiple sclerosis receiving treatment in clinical practice differs from that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An assessment of the real-world benefit-risk profile of therapies is needed. This analysis used data from the large, noninterventional, observational German study Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA) to assess prospectively baseline characteristics and outcomes after 12 months (± 90 days) of fingolimod treatment. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: fingolimod starter [first received fingolimod in PANGAEA (n = 3315)] and previous study [received fingolimod before enrollment in PANGAEA in RCTs (n = 875), some of whom also had baseline data at entry into RCTs (n = 505)]. At PANGAEA baseline, patients in the fingolimod starter versus the previous study cohort had a higher annualized relapse rate [ARR (95% confidence interval): 1.79 (1.75-1.83) vs 1.32 (1.25-1.40)] and Expanded Disability Status Scale score [3.11 (3.04-3.17) vs 2.55 (2.44-2.66)]. A greater proportion in the fingolimod starter versus previous study cohort had diabetes (2.0% vs 0.7%). After 12 months of fingolimod, ARRs were lower than in the 12 months before PANGAEA enrollment in the fingolimod starter [0.386 (0.360-0.414)] and previous study [0.276 (0.238-0.320)] cohorts. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were stable versus baseline. Adverse events were experienced by similar proportions in both cohorts during fingolimod treatment. Relevant differences exist in disease activity and comorbidities between patients receiving fingolimod in clinical practice versus RCTs. Irrespective of baseline differences indicating a higher proportion at an advanced stage of multiple sclerosis in the real world versus RCTs, fingolimod remains effective, with a manageable safety profile.

Acquired pendular nystagmus in multiple sclerosis: an examiner-blind cross-over treatment study of memantine and gabapentin.

A prospective examiner-blind, cross-over study was conducted to compare the efficacy of memantine (40 or 60 mg/day) and gabapentin (1,200 mg/day) as therapy for acquired fixational pendular nystagmus (APN) in 11 patients with multiple sclerosis. APN was documented in 20 eyes by electrooculography (EOG). The primary objective of the study was an at least 50% reduction in amplitude and/or frequency of APN compared with baseline values in EOG. This aim was reached for 17 of 20 APN-affected eyes with memantine 40-60 mg and for 11 eyes with gabapentin up to 1,200 mg. A complete cessation of APN was achieved in eight eyes (four patients) with memantine 40 mg and in a further four eyes (two patients) with memantine 60 mg. One patient achieved the same benefit with memantine 40 mg and gabapentin. In two other eyes APN completely subsided with gabapentin 1,200 mg only, but not with memantine. Near visual acuity, a secondary outcome parameter, improved by at least 0.1 in 11 of 17 eyes treated with memantine and in 8 out of 16 eyes treated with gabapentin. In summary, memantine and gabapentin are safe and effective treatment options for APN.