Acanthamoeba keratitis in Mexico: Report of a clinical case and importance of sensitivity assays for a better outcome.

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a sight-threatening corneal infection. The early symptoms include redness, pain, photophobia and intense tearing. Chronic infection usually progresses to stromal inflammation, ring ulcers, corneal opacification and hypopyon. Here we document an AK case in a high myopic 38-year-old woman from Mexico City, with a history of wearing contact lenses while swimming. Corneal scrapes cultures were positive only for amoebae, consequently a treatment including netilmicin 0.3% and oral itraconazole 100 mg/12 h was prescribed. The infection was resolved after 8 months, leaving a slight leucoma outside the visual axis, with a visual acuity of 20/150. In the laboratory, the amoebic isolate was axenized in PYG medium, with an optimal growth at 30 °C, and was identified morphologically as Acanthamoeba polyphaga according to the taxonomic criteria of Page (1988) and placed in the T4 group by genotyping. The virulence of this strain (40%) was determined by intranasal inoculation of 1 × 106/20 µl trophozoites in BALB/c mice recovering from brain, proving their invasion ability and by the interaction with monolayers of epithelial cells of the established MDCK line of canine kidney origin (1:2 ratio of interaction), at 1, 3, 6, 8 and 24 h; trophozoites migrated to cell junctions inducing few lytic zones. In addition to the biological characterization, in vitro drug sensitivity tests were performed using chlorhexidine, itraconazole, netilmicin and voriconazole. Results revealed that voriconazole was the most effective compound. A. polyphaga remains as one of the most frequently isolated species producing AK. The treatment of AK case using netilmicin and oral itraconazole solved the disease, but the healing process was wide-ranging (8 months). The use of voriconazole and chlorhexidine may be an alternative treatment of future AK cases in Mexico.

Support of the laboratory in the diagnosis of fungal ocular infections.

This is a retrospective, and descriptive study about the support that the laboratory of microbiology aids can provide in the diagnosis of ocular infections in patients whom were attended a tertiary-care hospital in México City in a 10-year-time period. We describe the microbiological diagnosis in palpebral mycose; in keratitis caused by Fusarium, Aspergillus, Candida, and melanized fungi; endophthalmitis; one Histoplasma scleritis and one mucormycosis. Nowadays, ocular fungal infections are more often diagnosed, because there is more clinical suspicion and there are easy laboratory confirmations. Correct diagnosis is important because an early medical treatment gives a better prognosis for visual acuity. In some cases, fungal infections are misdiagnosed and the antifungal treatment is delayed.