Air pollution and health prevention: A document of reflection / Calidad del aire ambiente y prevención de la salud: Un documento de reflexión

Ambient air quality, pollution and its implication onhealth is a topic of enormous importance that is normallydealt with by major specialists in their particular areas of interest. In general, it is not discussed from multidisciplinary approaches or with a language that can reach everyone. For thisreason, the Health Sciences Foundation, from its preventionarea, has formulated a series of questions to people with veryvaried competences in the area of ambient air quality in orderto obtain a global panorama of the problem and its elementsof measurement and control. The answers have been produced by specialists in each subject and have been subjected to ageneral discussion that has allowed conclusions to be reached on each point. The subject was divided into three main blocks:external ambient air, internal ambient air, mainly in the workplace, and hospital ambient air and the consequences of itspoor control. Along with the definitions of each area and theindicators of good and bad quality, some necessary solutionshave been pointed out. We have tried to know the current legislation on this problem and the competences of the differentadministrations on it. Despite its enormous importance, ambient air quality and health is not usually a topic of frequentpresence in the general media and we have asked about thecauses of this. Finally, the paper addresses a series of reflections from the perspective of ethics and very particularly in thelight of the events that the present pandemic raises. This workaims to provide objective data and opinions that will enablenon-specialists in the field to gain a better understanding ofthis worrying reality. (AU)

La calidad del aire ambiente y su implicación en la salud esun tema de enorme importancia que normalmente es tratadopor grandes especialistas en sus particulares áreas de interés.En general, no es discutido desde enfoques multidisciplinaresni con un lenguaje que pueda llegar a todos. Por ese motivo, laFundación de Ciencias de la Salud desde su área de prevención,ha formulado una serie de preguntas a personas con competencias muy variadas en el área de la calidad del aire ambientepara obtener un panorama global del problema y de sus elementos de medida y control. Las respuestas han sido producidas por especialistas en cada tema y han sido sometidas a unadiscusión general que ha permitido alcanzar conclusiones encada punto. El tema ha sido dividido en tres grandes bloques:el aire ambiente externo, el aire ambiente interno, principalmente en el medio laboral, y el aire ambiente hospitalario ylas consecuencias de su mal control. Junto con las definicionesde cada área y los indicadores de buena y mala calidad, se haapuntado a algunas necesarias soluciones. Hemos tratado deconocer la legislación vigente sobre este problema y las competencias de las distintas administraciones sobre el mismo.Pese a su enorme importancia, la calidad del aire ambiente yla salud no suele ser un tema de frecuente presencia en losmedios de comunicación generales y hemos preguntado sobrelas causas de ello. Finalmente, el documento aborda una seriede reflexiones desde la perspectiva de la ética y muy particularmente a la luz de los acontecimientos que la presente pandemia plantea. Este trabajo pretende aportar datos objetivos yopinión que permitan a los no especialistas en el tema conocermejor esta preocupante realidad. (AU)

Pulmonologists' Opinion on the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Introduction: Identifying the variables that guide decision-making in relation to the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) can contribute to the appropriate use of these drugs. The objective of this study was to identify the clinical variables that physicians consider most relevant for prescribing or withdrawing ICS in COPD. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Spain from November 2020 to May 2021. Therapeutic decisions on the use of ICS in 11 hypothetical COPD patient profiles were collected using an online survey answered by specialists with experience in the management of patients with COPD. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of patients' characteristics in the therapeutic decision for prescribing ICS or proceeding to its withdrawal. Results: A total of 74 pulmonologists agreed to collaborate in the survey and answered the questionnaire. The results showed great variability, with only 2 profiles achieving consensus for starting or withdrawing the treatment. The frequency and severity of exacerbations influenced the decision to prescribe ICS in a dose-response fashion (1 exacerbation odds ratio (OR) = 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 3.43, two exacerbations OR = 11.6, 95% CI: 4.47 to 30.2 and three OR = 123, 95% CI: 25 to 601). Similarly, increasing blood eosinophils and history of asthma were associated with ICS use. On the other hand, pneumonia reduced the probability of initiating treatment with ICS (OR = 0.54 [0.29 to 0.98]). Lung function and dyspnea degree did not influence the clinician's therapeutic decision. The results for withdrawal of ICS were similar but in the opposite direction. Conclusion: In accordance with guidelines, exacerbations, blood eosinophils and history of asthma or pneumonia are the factors considered by pulmonologist for the indication or withdrawal of ICS. However, the agreement in prescription or withdrawal of ICS when confronted with hypothetical cases is very low, suggesting a great variability in clinical practice.

Use of Antivirals in SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Critical Review of the Role of Remdesivir.

The aim of this report is to review the literature and shed light on the uncertainties surrounding the use of antiviral agents in general and remdesivir in COVID-19 patients. This review evaluated a battery of antiviral compounds and their effectiveness in the treatment of COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic. Remdesivir is the only antiviral approved by the EMA and FDA for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This work extensively reviews remdesivir data generated from clinical trials and observational studies, paying attention to the most recent data, and focusing on outcomes to give readers a more comprehensive understanding of the results. This review also discusses the recommendations issued by official bodies during the pandemic in the light of the current knowledge. The use of remdesivir in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection is justified because a virus is the causative agent that triggers the inflammatory responses and its consequences. More trials are needed to improve the management of this disease.

ANTES: Un año después en la EPOC / ANTES Program: One Year on

No disponible

[Translated article] ANTES Program: One Year on / ANTES: Un año después en la EPOC

No disponible

Changes in Control Status of COPD Over Time and Their Consequences: A Prospective International Study / Cambios en el estado de control de la EPOC a lo largo del tiempo y sus consecuencias: un estudio internacional prospectivo

INTRODUCTION: Control status may be a useful tool to assess response to treatment at each clinical visit in COPD. Control status has demonstrated to have long-term predictive value for exacerbations, but there is no information about the short-term predictive value of the lack of control and changes in control status over time. METHOD: Prospective, international, multicenter study aimed at describing the short-term (6 months) prognostic value of control status in patients with COPD. Patients with COPD were classified as controlled/uncontrolled at baseline and at 3,6-month follow-up visits using previously validated criteria of control. Moderate and severe exacerbation rates were compared between controlled and uncontrolled visits and between patients persistently controlled, uncontrolled and those changing control status over follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients were analyzed: 80 (29.8%) were persistently controlled, 43 (16%) persistently uncontrolled and 144 (53.7%) changed control status during follow-up. Persistently controlled patients were more frequently men, with lower (not increased) body mass index and higher FEV1(%). During the 6 months following an uncontrolled patient visit the odds ratio (OR) for presenting a moderate exacerbation was 3.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.47-4.69) and OR = 4.25 (95%CI 2.48-7.27) for hospitalization compared with a controlled patient visit. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of control status at each clinical visit provides relevant prognostic information about the risk of exacerbation in the next 6 months. Lack of control is a warning signal that should prompt investigation and action in order to achieve control status

INTRODUCCIÓN: El estado de control de la enfermedad puede ser una herramienta útil para evaluar la respuesta al tratamiento de la EPOC en cada asistencia a consulta. El estado de control de la enfermedad ha demostrado tener valor predictivo a largo plazo para las exacerbaciones, pero no existe información sobre el valor predictivo a corto plazo de la falta de control de la EPOC y los cambios en dicho control a lo largo del tiempo. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo, internacional, multicéntrico enfocado en describir el valor pronóstico a corto plazo (6 meses) del estado de control de la enfermedad en pacientes con EPOC. Los pacientes con EPOC se clasificaron como con enfermedad controlada/sin controlar al inicio del estudio y en las 3 visitas de seguimiento separadas 6 meses, utilizando criterios de control previamente validados. Se compararon las tasas de exacerbación moderada y grave entre visitas en las que la enfermedad estaba controlada y aquellas en las que no y entre pacientes con control persistente de la enfermedad, pacientes sin control de la enfermedad y aquellos cuyo estado de control cambió durante el seguimiento. RESULTADOS: Se analizó a un total de 267 pacientes: 80 (29,8%) presentaron control persistente de la enfermedad, 43 (16%) permanecieron con enfermedad no controlada de manera persistente y 144 (53,7%) presentaron un cambio en el estado de control de su EPOC durante el seguimiento. Los pacientes con control persistente de su enfermedad fueron con mayor frecuencia hombres, con un índice de masa corporal más bajo (no elevado) y un FEV1 (%) más alto. Durante los 6 meses posteriores a una visita en la que la enfermedad del paciente no estaba controlada, la odds ratio (OR) para presentar una exacerbación moderada fue de 3,41 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 2,47 a 4,69) y la OR = 4,25 (IC del 95%: 2,48 a 7,27) para la hospitalización, en comparación con una visita en la que la EPOC estaba controlada. CONCLUSIONES: La evaluación del estado de control de la EPOC en cada asistencia a consulta proporciona información pronóstica relevante sobre el riesgo de exacerbación en los próximos 6 meses. La falta de control es una señal de alarma que debe motivar la investigación y la acción para lograr el control de la enfermedad

Blood Eosinophil Counts and Their Variability and Risk of Exacerbations in COPD: A Population-Based Study / Recuento de eosinófilos en sangre y variabilidad de este y el riesgo de exacerbaciones en la EPOC: un estudio poblacional

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the role of blood eosinophil levels as a biomarker of exacerbation risk in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our aim was to quantify blood eosinophil levels and determine the risk of exacerbations associated with these levels and their variability. METHODS: Observational, retrospective, population-based study with longitudinal follow-up in patients with COPD identified in a primary care electronic medical record database in Catalonia, Spain, covering 80% of the general population. Patients were classified into 4 groups using the following cut-offs: (a) < 150cells/Mul; (b) ≥ 150 and < 300cells/Mul; (c) ≥ 300 and < 500cells/Mul; (d) ≥ 500cells/Mul. RESULTS: A total of 57,209 patients were identified with a mean age of 70.2 years, a mean FEV1(% predicted) of 64.1% and 51.6% had at least one exacerbation the previous year. The number of exacerbations in the previous year was higher in patients with the lowest and the highest eosinophil levels compared with the intermediate groups. During follow-up the number of exacerbations was slightly higher in the group with the lowest blood eosinophil levels and in those with higher variability in eosinophil counts, but ROC curves did not identify a reliable threshold of blood eosinophilia to discriminate an increased risk of exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support the use of blood eosinophil count as a reliable biomarker of the risk of exacerbation in COPD in a predominantly non-exacerbating population. Of note was that the small group of patients with the highest variability in blood eosinophils more frequently presented exacerbations

CONTEXTO GENERAL: Existe cierta controversia con respecto al papel de los niveles de eosinófilos en sangre como biomarcador del riesgo de exacerbación en la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Nuestro objetivo fue cuantificar los niveles de eosinófilos en sangre y determinar el riesgo de exacerbaciones asociadas con estos niveles y su variabilidad. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo y poblacional con seguimiento longitudinal en pacientes con EPOC identificados en una base de datos electrónica de historiales médicos de atención primaria en Cataluña, España, que abarca el 80% de la población general. Los pacientes se clasificaron en 4 grupos utilizando los siguientes puntos de corte: a) < 150 células/mil; b) ≥ 150 y < 300 células/mil; c) ≥ 300 y < 500 células/mil, y d) ≥ 500 células/mil. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron un total de 57.209 pacientes con una edad media de 70,2 años, un FEV1 medio (% del predicho) el 64,1 y el 51,6% habían sufrido al menos una exacerbación el año anterior. El número de exacerbaciones en el año previo fue mayor en aquellos pacientes con los niveles más bajos y los más altos de eosinófilos en comparación con los grupos intermedios. Durante el seguimiento, el número de exacerbaciones fue ligeramente mayor en el grupo con los niveles más bajos de eosinófilos en sangre y en aquellos con mayor variabilidad en el recuento, pero las curvas ROC no identificaron un umbral fiable de eosinofilia en sangre para discriminar un mayor riesgo de exacerbaciones. CONCLUSIONES: Nuestros resultados no apoyan el uso del recuento de eosinófilos en sangre como un biomarcador fiable del riesgo de exacerbación de la EPOC en una población predominantemente no exacerbada. Cabe destacar que el pequeño grupo de pacientes con mayor variabilidad en los niveles de eosinófilos en sangre presentaba exacerbaciones con mayor frecuencia

Blood Eosinophil Counts and Their Variability and Risk of Exacerbations in COPD: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the role of blood eosinophil levels as a biomarker of exacerbation risk in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our aim was to quantify blood eosinophil levels and determine the risk of exacerbations associated with these levels and their variability. METHODS: Observational, retrospective, population-based study with longitudinal follow-up in patients with COPD identified in a primary care electronic medical record database in Catalonia, Spain, covering 80% of the general population. Patients were classified into 4 groups using the following cut-offs: (a) <150cells/µl; (b) ≥150 and <300cells/µl; (c) ≥300 and <500cells/µl; (d) ≥500cells/µl. RESULTS: A total of 57,209 patients were identified with a mean age of 70.2 years, a mean FEV1(% predicted) of 64.1% and 51.6% had at least one exacerbation the previous year. The number of exacerbations in the previous year was higher in patients with the lowest and the highest eosinophil levels compared with the intermediate groups. During follow-up the number of exacerbations was slightly higher in the group with the lowest blood eosinophil levels and in those with higher variability in eosinophil counts, but ROC curves did not identify a reliable threshold of blood eosinophilia to discriminate an increased risk of exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support the use of blood eosinophil count as a reliable biomarker of the risk of exacerbation in COPD in a predominantly non-exacerbating population. Of note was that the small group of patients with the highest variability in blood eosinophils more frequently presented exacerbations.

Changes in Control Status of COPD Over Time and Their Consequences: A Prospective International Study.

INTRODUCTION: Control status may be a useful tool to assess response to treatment at each clinical visit in COPD. Control status has demonstrated to have long-term predictive value for exacerbations, but there is no information about the short-term predictive value of the lack of control and changes in control status over time. METHOD: Prospective, international, multicenter study aimed at describing the short-term (6 months) prognostic value of control status in patients with COPD. Patients with COPD were classified as controlled/uncontrolled at baseline and at 3,6-month follow-up visits using previously validated criteria of control. Moderate and severe exacerbation rates were compared between controlled and uncontrolled visits and between patients persistently controlled, uncontrolled and those changing control status over follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients were analyzed: 80 (29.8%) were persistently controlled, 43 (16%) persistently uncontrolled and 144 (53.7%) changed control status during follow-up. Persistently controlled patients were more frequently men, with lower (not increased) body mass index and higher FEV1(%). During the 6 months following an uncontrolled patient visit the odds ratio (OR) for presenting a moderate exacerbation was 3.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.47-4.69) and OR=4.25 (95%CI 2.48-7.27) for hospitalization compared with a controlled patient visit. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of control status at each clinical visit provides relevant prognostic information about the risk of exacerbation in the next 6 months. Lack of control is a warning signal that should prompt investigation and action in order to achieve control status.

Predictive value of control of COPD for risk of exacerbations: An international, prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The concept of clinical control in COPD has been developed to help in treatment decisions, but it requires validation in prospective studies. METHODS: This international, multicentre, prospective study aimed to validate the concept of control in COPD. Patients with COPD were classified as controlled/uncontrolled by clinical criteria or CAT scores at baseline and followed up for 18 months. The main outcome was the difference in rate of a composite endpoint of moderate and severe exacerbations or death over the 18-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 307 patients were analysed (mean age = 68.6 years and mean FEV1 % = 52.5%). Up to 65% and 37.9% of patients were classified as controlled by clinical criteria or CAT, respectively. Controlled patients had significantly less exacerbations during follow-up (by clinical criteria: 1.1 vs 2.6, P < 0.001; by CAT: 1.1 vs 1.9, P = 0.014). Time to first exacerbation was significantly prolonged for patients controlled by clinical criteria only (median: 93 days, IQR: 63; 242 vs 274 days, IQR: 221; 497 days; P < 0.001). Control status by clinical criteria was a better predictor of exacerbations compared to CAT criteria (AUC: 0.67 vs 0.57). CONCLUSION: Control status, defined by easy-to-obtain clinical criteria, is predictive of future exacerbation risk and time to the next exacerbation. The concept of control can be used in clinical practice at each clinical visit as a complement to the current recommendations of initial treatment proposed by guidelines.

COPD clinical control as a predictor of future exacerbations: concept validation in the SPARK study population.

The concept of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) control has been proposed to guide treatment decisions in COPD. In this study, we aimed to validate the prospective value of this concept in the SPARK study population. Control was assessed based on COPD stability and impact. Patients with low impact and stability during weeks 1-12 were classified as controlled, and exacerbations were measured during a 52-week follow-up. Of the 2044 patients included a majority were non-controlled (80%), frequently due to high impact. During the follow-up, the rate of moderate/severe exacerbations was significantly lower in controlled patients (rate ratio, 0.56, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.65 p<0.0001) and time-to-first moderate/severe exacerbation was significantly delayed. This study demonstrated an association between control status and risk of exacerbations.

Control clínico en la EPOC: ¿un nuevo objetivo terapéutico? / Clinical Control in COPD: A New Therapeutic Objective?

No disponible

Evaluation of Changes in Control Status in COPD: An Opportunity for Early Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Control has been proposed as a dynamic tool that can capture changes in the clinical status of patients with COPD. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, observational study aimed to compare changes in control over a 3-month period with changes in risk level, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage, and clinical phenotype (nonexacerbator, asthma-COPD overlap, or exacerbator with emphysema or with chronic bronchitis). Control was defined as the presence of low clinical impact, assessed according to the degree of dyspnea, use of rescue medication, physical activity and sputum color, and clinical stability assessed by clinical changes and exacerbations in the last 3 months. Impact and stability were alternatively assessed with COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores. RESULTS: We included 354 patients, with a mean FEV1 of 49.8% ± 16.9%. At 3 months, the proportion of controlled patients was 50.3% according to clinical evaluation and 47.8% according to CAT score. Eighty-seven patients (29.2%) changed their control status as assessed by clinical variables, and 85 patients (28.5%) changed their status according to CAT score. In contrast, the risk level only changed in 26 patients (8.7%) (P < .001), 27 patients (9.1%) experienced changes in their clinical phenotype (P < .001), and 59 patients (19.8%) experienced changes in their GOLD stage (P = .008). Patients who showed an improvement in control status had better CAT scores at the end of follow-up (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In only 3 months, almost one-third of patients experienced changes in their control status. Changes in control status were significantly more frequent than changes in phenotype, risk level, and GOLD stage, and resulted in significant changes in health status.

[Telephone Support for Copd Patients During COVID-19]. / Soporte telefónico al paciente con EPOC en tiempos de la COVID-19.

The state of alarm declared by the Spanish government as the main measure for preventing contagion has involved a change in the clinical management of chronic patients. Although new communication technologies offer us many ways to establish direct but remote contact, the peculiarities of the COPD patient often mean that their healthcare is reduced to telephone calls. The challenge of caring for COPD patients is made even more complex when it has to be delivered over the phone. The interview must be conducted without examining the patient, without performing additional tests, and without checking their inhalation technique. Therefore, healthcare providers who conduct these interviews must be trained to perform them properly in order to make the right decisions. This document is aimed at healthcare professionals who need to provide some form of telephone care to COPD patients during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and is based on the authors' experience in telephone interviews conducted during this period. It summarizes essential aspects of how this interview should be approached, how to conduct it, what factors should be kept in mind, how to organize the interview, and how to keep patients informed. It is very likely that from now on this type of interview will be common practice in the care of our patients, so we need to learn how to structure a new model of healthcare for many of the clinical visits that have until now been conducted face-to-face.

Comparison of clinical baseline characteristics between Asian and Western COPD patients in a prospective, international, multicenter study.

We aimed to compare clinical characteristics between Asian and Western chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. This was a sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study. Asian patients were enrolled in Singapore and South Korea. Western patients were enrolled in Spain, Poland, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Malta. A total of 349 patients were analyzed. Among them, 110 (32%) patients were Asian and 239 (68%) Western. Male sex was more predominant in Asian than in Western (95% versus 63%, respectively; P<0.01). Body mass index was significantly lower in Asian (23.5 versus 27.1; P<0.01). The proportion of patients with a history of exacerbation was lower in Asian (12% versus 64%; P<0.01). Although patients were enrolled by same inclusion criteria, there were several differences between Asian and Western COPD patients. Our study has shown unbiased real-world differences between Asian and Western COPD patients. Since prospective follow-up study is currently ongoing, the result of this study can be fundamental base of future analysis.