Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 2024 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564739

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric actinomycosis studies are limited to case reports or small case series. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to describe characteristics of skin and soft tissue actinomycosis in adolescents and children. METHODS: We conducted the study from January 2019 to December 2022, including patients aged ≤21 years with at least 1-year follow-up data. All clinical cultures obtained under sterile conditions with Actinomyces growth were included. RESULTS: One hundred four patients met inclusion criteria; median age 19 (interquartile range: 17-20) years, 68.3% female, 46.2% Black and 47.1% Hispanic. The median antibiotic treatment duration was 10 (7-10) days, and majority of patients received treatment with non-first-line Actinomyces antibiotics. Infectious disease consultation was requested for only 7 patients during their initial skin and soft tissue actinomycosis treatment. One-third of the patients with skin and soft tissue actinomycosis had documented recurrence within a median of 10 (interquartile range: 6-16) months of the initial episode. Monobacterial culture growth (85.7% vs. 63.8%, P = 0.02), patients with body mass index >25 (75% vs. 52.6%, P = 0.04) and patients with prior abscess in the same area (18.8% vs. 51.4%, P = 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with recurrent actinomycosis compared to the nonrecurrent group. In a univariate logistic regression model, they were found to be significantly associated with recurrence; monobacterial growth [odds ratio (OR): 3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-9.9], body mass index >25 (OR: 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-7.0) and prior abscess (OR: 4.6; 95% CI: 1.9-11.2). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results highlight the importance of considering Actinomyces species in skin and soft tissue infections, especially in recurrent ones, and risk factors for recurrence. Suboptimal antibiotic utilization, very low numbers of consultations with infectious diseases and high recurrence rate suggest that providers should be informed and updated regarding this rare but hard-to-treat infection.

2.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 12(5): 265-272, 2023 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37144945

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of healthcare-associated respiratory syncytial virus (HA-RSV) infections in children are well described, but less is known about sporadic HA-RSV infections. We assessed the epidemiology and clinical outcomes associated with sporadic HA-RSV infections. METHODS: We retrospectively identified hospitalized children ≤18 years old with HA-RSV infections in six children's hospitals in the United States during the respiratory viral seasons October-April in 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2018-2019 and prospectively from October 2020 through November 2021. We evaluated outcomes temporally associated with HA-RSV infections including escalation of respiratory support, transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and in-hospital mortality. We assessed demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions associated with escalation of respiratory support. RESULTS: We identified 122 children (median age 16.0 months [IQR 6, 60 months]) with HA-RSV. The median onset of HA-RSV infections was hospital day 14 (IQR 7, 34 days). Overall, 78 (63.9%) children had two or more comorbid conditions; cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, neurologic/neuromuscular, respiratory, and premature/ neonatal comorbidities were most common. Fifty-five (45.1%) children required escalation of respiratory support and 18 (14.8%) were transferred to the PICU. Five (4.1%) died during hospitalization. In the multivariable analysis, respiratory comorbidities (aOR: 3.36 [CI95 1.41, 8.01]) were associated with increased odds of escalation of respiratory support. CONCLUSIONS: HA-RSV infections cause preventable morbidity and increase healthcare resource utilization. Further study of effective mitigation strategies for HA-respiratory viral infections should be prioritized; this priority is further supported by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on seasonal viral infections.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Recién Nacido , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Lactante , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud , Hospitales
4.
Pediatrics ; 147(5)2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33883243

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Remdesivir shortens time to recovery in adults with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but its efficacy and safety in children are unknown. We describe outcomes in children with severe COVID-19 treated with remdesivir. METHODS: Seventy-seven hospitalized patients <18 years old with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection received remdesivir through a compassionate-use program between March 21 and April 22, 2020. The intended remdesivir treatment course was 10 days (200 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily subsequently for children ≥40 kg and 5 mg/kg on day 1 and 2.5 mg/kg daily subsequently for children <40 kg, given intravenously). Clinical data through 28 days of follow-up were collected. RESULTS: Median age was 14 years (interquartile range 7-16, range <2 months to 17 years). Seventy-nine percent of patients had ≥1 comorbid condition. At baseline, 90% of children required supplemental oxygen and 51% required invasive ventilation. By day 28 of follow-up, 88% of patients had a decreased oxygen-support requirement, 83% recovered, and 73% were discharged. Among children requiring invasive ventilation at baseline, 90% were extubated, 80% recovered, and 67% were discharged. There were 4 deaths, of which 3 were attributed to COVID-19. Remdesivir was well tolerated, with a low incidence of serious adverse events (16%). Most adverse events were related to COVID-19 or comorbid conditions. Laboratory abnormalities, including elevations in transaminase levels, were common; 61% were grades 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: Among 77 children treated with remdesivir for severe COVID-19, most recovered and the rate of serious adverse events was low.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adenosina Monofosfato/efectos adversos , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Alanina/efectos adversos , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/efectos adversos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Niño , Preescolar , Ensayos de Uso Compasivo , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 10(5): 629-634, 2021 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33388760

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In November 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provided Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) for 2 novel virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibody therapies, bamlanivimab and REGN-COV2 (casirivimab plus imdevimab), for the treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adolescents and adults in specified high-risk groups. This has challenged clinicians to determine the best approach to use of these products. METHODS: A panel of experts in pediatric infectious diseases, pediatric infectious diseases pharmacy, pediatric intensive care medicine, and pediatric hematology from 29 geographically diverse North American institutions was convened. Through a series of teleconferences and web-based surveys, a guidance statement was developed and refined based on review of the best available evidence and expert opinion. RESULTS: The course of COVID-19 in children and adolescents is typically mild and there is no high-quality evidence supporting any high-risk groups. There is no evidence for safety and efficacy of monoclonal antibody therapy for treatment of COVID-19 in children or adolescents, limited evidence of modest benefit in adults, and evidence for potential harm associated with infusion reactions or anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on evidence available as of December 20, 2020, the panel suggests against routine administration of monoclonal antibody therapy (bamlanivimab, or casirivimab and imdevimab), for treatment of COVID-19 in children or adolescents, including those designated by the FDA as at high risk of progression to hospitalization or severe disease. Clinicians and health systems choosing to use these agents on an individualized basis should consider risk factors supported by pediatric-specific evidence and ensure the implementation of a system for safe and timely administration that does not exacerbate existing healthcare disparities.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Aprobación de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug Administration
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(1): 84-88, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32703320
7.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 10(1): 34-48, 2021 Feb 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32918548

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a mild infection in most children, a small proportion develop severe or critical illness. Data describing agents with potential antiviral activity continue to expand such that updated guidance is needed regarding use of these agents in children. METHODS: A panel of pediatric infectious diseases physicians and pharmacists from 20 geographically diverse North American institutions was convened. Through a series of teleconferences and web-based surveys, a set of guidance statements was developed and refined based on review of the best available evidence and expert opinion. RESULTS: Given the typically mild course of COVID-19 in children, supportive care alone is suggested for most cases. For children with severe illness, defined as a supplemental oxygen requirement without need for noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), remdesivir is suggested, preferably as part of a clinical trial if available. Remdesivir should also be considered for critically ill children requiring invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO. A duration of 5 days is appropriate for most patients. The panel recommends against the use of hydroxychloroquine or lopinavir-ritonavir (or other protease inhibitors) for COVID-19 in children. CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral therapy for COVID-19 is not necessary for the great majority of pediatric patients. For children with severe or critical disease, this guidance offers an approach for decision-making regarding use of remdesivir.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/terapia , Niño , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico
8.
JACC Case Rep ; 2(15): 2348-2352, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33073245

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease-2019 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has been associated with myocardial dysfunction and heart failure in adult patients. We report a case of reversible myocardial injury and heart failure in an infant with SARS-CoV-2 infection. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

9.
Malar J ; 19(1): 376, 2020 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087130

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cerebral malaria (CM) is associated with morbidity and mortality despite the use of potent anti-malarial agents. Brain endothelial cell activation and dysfunction from oxidative and inflammatory host responses and products released by Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes (IE), are likely the major contributors to the encephalopathy, seizures, and brain swelling that are associated with CM. The development of adjunctive therapy to reduce the pathological consequences of host response pathways could improve outcomes. A potentially protective role of the nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) pathway, which serves as a therapeutic target in brain microvascular diseases and central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis was tested to protect endothelial cells in an in vitro culture system subjected to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) or infected red blood cell exposure. NRF2 is a transcription factor that mediates anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory responses. METHODS: To accurately reflect clinically relevant parasite biology a unique panel of parasite isolates derived from patients with stringently defined CM was developed. The effect of TNF and these parasite lines on primary human brain microvascular endothelial cell (HBMVEC) activation in an in vitro co-culture model was tested. HBMVEC activation was measured by cellular release of IL6 and nuclear translocation of NFκB. The transcriptional and functional effects of dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an FDA approved drug which induces the NRF2 pathway, on host and parasite induced HBMVEC activation was characterized. In addition, the effect of DMF on parasite binding to TNF stimulated HBMVEC in a semi-static binding assay was examined. RESULTS: Transcriptional profiling demonstrates that DMF upregulates the NRF2-Mediated Oxidative Stress Response, ErbB4 Signaling Pathway, Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor (PPAR) Signaling and downregulates iNOS Signaling and the Neuroinflammation Signaling Pathway on TNF activated HBMVEC. The parasite lines derived from eight paediatric CM patients demonstrated increased binding to TNF activated HBMVEC and varied in their binding and activation of HBMVEC. Overall DMF reduced both TNF and CM derived parasite activation of HBMVEC. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that targeting the NRF2 pathway in TNF and parasite activated HBMVEC mediates multiple protective pathways and may represent a novel adjunctive therapy to improve infection outcomes in CM.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Dimetilfumarato/farmacología , Células Endoteliales/parasitología , Malaria Cerebral/prevención & control , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/parasitología , Niño , Preescolar , Células Endoteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Lactante , Plasmodium falciparum/fisiología
11.
J Pediatr ; 223: 14-19.e2, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32407719

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical profiles and risk factors for critical illness in hospitalized children and adolescents with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). STUDY DESIGN: Children 1 month to 21 years of age with COVID-19 from a single tertiary care children's hospital between March 15 and April 13, 2020 were included. Demographic and clinical data were collected. RESULTS: In total, 67 children tested positive for COVID-19; 21 (31.3%) were managed as outpatients. Of 46 admitted patients, 33 (72%) were admitted to the general pediatric medical unit and 13 (28%) to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Obesity and asthma were highly prevalent but not significantly associated with PICU admission (P = .99). Admission to the PICU was significantly associated with higher C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and pro-B type natriuretic peptide levels and platelet counts (P < .05 for all). Patients in the PICU were more likely to require high-flow nasal cannula (P = .0001) and were more likely to have received Remdesivir through compassionate release (P < .05). Severe sepsis and septic shock syndromes were observed in 7 (53.8%) patients in the PICU. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was observed in 10 (77%) PICU patients, 6 of whom (46.2%) required invasive mechanical ventilation for a median of 9 days. Of the 13 patients in the PICU, 8 (61.5%) were discharged home, and 4 (30.7%) patients remain hospitalized on ventilatory support at day 14. One patient died after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy because of metastatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a higher than previously recognized rate of severe disease requiring PICU admission in pediatric patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica , Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Asma/epidemiología , Nitrógeno de la Urea Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , COVID-19 , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Creatinina/sangre , Disnea/virología , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Pandemias , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Recuento de Plaquetas , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sepsis/epidemiología , Choque Séptico/epidemiología , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adulto Joven
12.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 9(6): 701-715, 2020 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32318706

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is mild in nearly all children, a small proportion of pediatric patients develop severe or critical illness. Guidance is therefore needed regarding use of agents with potential activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in pediatrics. METHODS: A panel of pediatric infectious diseases physicians and pharmacists from 18 geographically diverse North American institutions was convened. Through a series of teleconferences and web-based surveys, a set of guidance statements was developed and refined based on review of best available evidence and expert opinion. RESULTS: Given the typically mild course of pediatric COVID-19, supportive care alone is suggested for the overwhelming majority of cases. The panel suggests a decision-making framework for antiviral therapy that weighs risks and benefits based on disease severity as indicated by respiratory support needs, with consideration on a case-by-case basis of potential pediatric risk factors for disease progression. If an antiviral is used, the panel suggests remdesivir as the preferred agent. Hydroxychloroquine could be considered for patients who are not candidates for remdesivir or when remdesivir is not available. Antivirals should preferably be used as part of a clinical trial if available. CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral therapy for COVID-19 is not necessary for the great majority of pediatric patients. For those rare cases of severe or critical disease, this guidance offers an approach for decision-making regarding antivirals, informed by available data. As evidence continues to evolve rapidly, the need for updates to the guidance is anticipated.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Niño , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
14.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 20(2): e12843, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29359845

RESUMEN

Acanthamoeba infections are difficult to diagnose and treat. We present a renal transplant patient who developed Acanthamoeba endophthalmitis on therapy with posaconazole and miltefosine for cutaneous acanthamobiasis. The patient was maintained on intracameral voriconazole injections, and oral azithromycin, fluconazole, and flucytosine. This case highlights novel presentations and treatments for acanthamoebic infection.


Asunto(s)
Amebiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Amebicidas/uso terapéutico , Endoftalmitis/parasitología , Trasplante de Riñón , Enfermedades Cutáneas Parasitarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Amebiasis/etiología , Amebicidas/administración & dosificación , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Endoftalmitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endoftalmitis/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Cutáneas Parasitarias/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...