Impact of diabetes in patients waiting for invasive cardiac procedures during COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, elective invasive cardiac procedures (ICP) have been frequently cancelled or postponed. Consequences may be more evident in patients with diabetes. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to identify the peculiarities of patients with DM among those in whom ICP were cancelled or postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to identify subgroups in which the influence of DM has higher impact on the clinical outcome. METHODS: We included 2,158 patients in whom an elective ICP was cancelled or postponed during COVID-19 pandemic in 37 hospitals in Spain. Among them, 700 (32.4%) were diabetics. Patients with and without diabetes were compared. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes were older and had a higher prevalence of other cardiovascular risk factors, previous cardiovascular history and co-morbidities. Diabetics had a higher mortality (3.0% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (1.9% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.001). Differences were especially important in patients with valvular heart disease (mortality 6.9% vs 1.7% [p < 0.001] and cardiovascular mortality 4.9% vs 0.9% [p = 0.002] in patients with and without diabetes, respectively). In the multivariable analysis, diabetes remained as an independent risk factor both for overall and cardiovascular mortality. No significant interaction was found with other clinical variables. CONCLUSION: Among patients in whom an elective invasive cardiac procedure is cancelled or postponed during COVID-19 pandemic, mortality and cardiovascular mortality is higher in patients with diabetes, irrespectively on other clinical conditions. These procedures should not be cancelled in patients with diabetes.

Consequences of canceling elective invasive cardiac procedures during Covid-19 outbreak.

BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic in Spain, elective procedures were canceled or postponed, mainly due to health care systems overwhelming. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of interrupting invasive procedures in patients with chronic cardiac diseases due to the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain. METHODS: The study population is comprised of 2,158 patients that were pending on elective cardiac invasive procedures in 37 hospitals in Spain on the 14th of March 2020, when a state of alarm and subsequent lockdown was declared in Spain due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These patients were followed-up until April 31th. RESULTS: Out of the 2,158 patients, 36 (1.7%) died. Mortality was significantly higher in patients pending on structural procedures (4.5% vs. 0.8%, respectively; p < .001), in those >80 year-old (5.1% vs. 0.7%, p < .001), and in presence of diabetes (2.7% vs. 0.9%, p = .001), hypertension (2.0% vs. 0.6%, p = .014), hypercholesterolemia (2.0% vs. 0.9%, p = .026) [Correction added on December 23, 2020, after first online publication: as per Dr. Moreno's request changes in p-values were made after original publication in Abstract.], chronic renal failure (6.0% vs. 1.2%, p < .001), NYHA > II (3.8% vs. 1.2%, p = .001), and CCS > II (4.2% vs. 1.4%, p = .013), whereas was it was significantly lower in smokers (0.5% vs. 1.9%, p = .013). Multivariable analysis identified age > 80, diabetes, renal failure and CCS > II as independent predictors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Mortality at 45 days during COVID-19 outbreak in patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases included in a waiting list due to cancellation of invasive elective procedures was 1.7%. Some clinical characteristics may be of help in patient selection for being promptly treated when similar situations happen in the future.

Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization Strategy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate sex differences in procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)- and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularization strategies. BACKGROUND: An iFR-guided strategy has shown a lower revascularization rate than an FFR-guided strategy, without differences in clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate stenosis to guide Revascularization) study, in which 601 women and 1,891 men were randomized to iFR- or FFR-guided strategy. The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: Among the entire population, women had a lower number of functionally significant lesions per patient (0.31 ± 0.51 vs. 0.43 ± 0.59; p < 0.001) and less frequently underwent revascularization than men (42.1% vs. 53.1%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean iFR value according to sex (0.91 ± 0.09 vs. 0.91 ± 0.10; p = 0.442). However, the mean FFR value was lower in men than in women (0.83 ± 0.09 vs. 0.85 ± 0.10; p = 0.001). In men, an FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than an iFR-guided strategy (57.1% vs. 49.3%; p = 0.001), but this difference was not observed in women (41.4% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.757). There was no difference in MACE rates between iFR- and FFR-guided strategies in both women (5.4% vs. 5.6%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 2.43; p = 0.805) and men (6.6% vs. 7.0%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.46; p = 0.919). CONCLUSIONS: An FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than iFR-guided strategy in men, but not in women. However, iFR- and FFR-guided strategies showed comparable clinical outcomes, regardless of sex. (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to guide Revascularization [DEFINE-FLAIR]; NCT02053038).

Tratamiento endovascular del quilopericardio recurrente: demostración in vivo de conexiones quilopericárdicas / Endovascular treatment of recurrent chylopericardium: in vivo demonstration of chylopericardial connections

No disponible

Comparison of Major Adverse Cardiac Events Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Invasive physiologic indices such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, comparative prognostic outcomes of iFR-guided and FFR-guided treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes have not yet been fully investigated. Objective: To compare 1-year clinical outcomes of iFR-guided or FFR-guided treatment in patients with and without diabetes in the Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularization (DEFINE-FLAIR) trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The DEFINE-FLAIR trial is a multicenter, international, randomized, double-blinded trial that randomly assigned 2492 patients in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either iFR-guided or FFR-guided coronary revascularization. Patients were eligible for trial inclusion if they had intermediate coronary artery disease (40%-70% diameter stenosis) in at least 1 native coronary artery. Data were analyzed between January 2014 and December 2015. Interventions: According to the study protocol, iFR of 0.89 or less and FFR of 0.80 or less were used as criteria for revascularization. When iFR or FFR was higher than the prespecified threshold, revascularization was deferred. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 1 year. The incidence of MACE was compared according to the presence of diabetes in iFR-guided and FFR-guided groups. Results: Among the total trial population (2492 patients), 758 patients (30.4%) had diabetes. Mean age of the patients was 66 years, 76% were men (1868 of 2465), and 80% of patients presented with stable angina (1983 of 2465). In the nondiabetes population (68.5%; 1707 patients), iFR guidance was associated with a significantly higher rate of deferral of revascularization than the FFR-guided group (56.5% [n = 477 of 844] vs 46.6% [n = 402 of 863]; P < .001). However, it was not different between the 2 groups in the diabetes population (42.1% [n = 161 of 382] vs 47.1% [n = 177 of 376]; P = .15). At 1 year, the diabetes population showed a significantly higher rate of MACE than the nondiabetes population (8.6% vs 5.6%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.28-2.64; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in MACE rates between iFR-guided and FFR-guided groups in both the diabetes (10.0% vs 7.2%; adjusted HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.78-2.25; P = .30) and nondiabetes population (4.7% vs 6.4%; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51-1.35; P = .45) (interaction P = .25). Conclusions and Relevance: The diabetes population showed significantly higher risk of MACE than the nondiabetes population, even with the iFR-guided or FFR-guided treatment. The iFR-guided and FFR-guided treatment showed comparable risk of MACE and provided equal safety in selecting revascularization target among patients with diabetes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02053038.

Complicaciones neurológicas tras intervencionismo cardíaco percutáneo / Neurological complications following percutaneous coronary intervention

Resumen Introducción: Las complicaciones neurológicas agudas del intervencionismo cardiaco percutáneo (ICP) son variadas e infrecuentes, pero pueden resultar fatales. Casos: Presentamos un ictus isquémico -II- (caso 1), y dos casos de encefalopatía por contraste -EC- (2 y 3). Dos varones (1 y 2) y una mujer (3), con FRCV y edad media de 76 años. Los tres pacientes debutaron con focalidad neurológica aguda (FNA) al finalizar el procedimiento, lo que motivó la activación de código ictus intrahospitalario desde cardiología. 2 y 3 asociaron, además, agitación. El TC multimodal fue normal en 2 y 3, y mostró oclusión de M1 izquierda en 1. Se desestimó tratamiento de reperfusión cerebral en 1 por anticoagulación. El EEG fue normal en 2 y mostró paroxismos focales en hemisferio izquierdo de baja persistencia en 3.2 y 3 fueron tratados con sueroterapia y anticomiciales (3), quedando asintomáticos en las primeras doce horas. 1 falleció a los diez días por infección respiratoria. Conclusiones: En presencia de FNA tras ICP, la sospecha clínica resulta vital para establecer un diagnóstico diferencial precoz entre II y EC, y considerar tratamiento específico urgente, ya que puede modificar el pronóstico del paciente.

Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) related neurological complications are wide and rare, but may be fatal. Cases: We present an ischaemic stroke -IS- (case 1), and two cases of contrast induced encephalopathy-CIE- (2 and 3). Two males (1 and 2) and one woman (3), with vascular risk factors and an average age of 76. All of them presented with acute focal neurological symptoms at the end of the procedure and Stroke Code was activated inmediately. 2 and 3 also associated psychomotor agitation. Multimodal CT head was normal in 2 and 3, whereas it showed a left Ml occlusion in 1. Reperfusion treatment was contraindicated 1 due to anticoagulation. EEG was normal in 2 and showed focal paroxisms in left hemisphere in 3.2 and 3 were successfully treated with fluids and antiepileptics (3). 1 died due to respiratory infection. Conclusions: Acute focal neurological symptoms following PCI should make us consider IS and CIE and provide the patient with urgent specific treatment.

Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Physicians are not always comfortable deferring treatment of a stenosis in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery because of the perception that there is a high risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The authors describe, using the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) trial, MACE rates when LAD lesions are deferred, guided by physiological assessment using fractional flow reserve (FFR) or the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish the safety of deferring treatment in the LAD using FFR or iFR within the DEFINE-FLAIR trial. METHODS: MACE rates at 1 year were compared between groups (iFR and FFR) in patients whose physiological assessment led to LAD lesions being deferred. MACE was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization at 1 year. Patients, and staff performing follow-up, were blinded to whether the decision was made with FFR or iFR. Outcomes were adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: A total of 872 patients had lesions deferred in the LAD (421 guided by FFR, 451 guided by iFR). The event rate with iFR was significantly lower than with FFR (2.44% vs. 5.26%; adjusted HR: 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22 to 0.95; p = 0.04). This was driven by significantly lower unplanned revascularization with iFR and numerically lower MI (unplanned revascularization: 2.22% iFR vs. 4.99% FFR; adjusted HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.93; p = 0.03; MI: 0.44% iFR vs. 2.14% FFR; adjusted HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.05 to 1.07; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: iFR-guided deferral appears to be safe for patients with LAD lesions. Patients in whom iFR-guided deferral was performed had statistically significantly lower event rates than those with FFR-guided deferral.

Optimismo de los pacientes cardiológicos respecto a la reanimación cardiopulmonar. Posibles causas y consecuencias / Optimism regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation among patients with heart disease. Possible causes and consequences

OBJETIVO: El pronóstico predicho por los cardiópatas españoles respecto a la reanimación cardiopulmonar se aleja significativamente de la realidad. Buscamos determinar si existen diferencias de percepción con respecto a otros pacientes y elaborar hipótesis que puedan justificarlo. MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo mediante encuesta a una serie consecutiva de pacientes cardiológicos, no cardiológicos y a estudiantes de medicina. RESULTADOS: Tras una parada cardiorrespiratoria intrahospitalaria los pacientes cardiológicos refirieron una supervivencia media al alta total (76 vs.62%; p < 0,01) y libre de deterioro cognitivo (65 vs.55%; p = 0,02) significativamente superior a la de los pacientes no cardiológicos, a pesar de tener una edad media superior y haber presenciado en más ocasiones maniobras de reanimación. Los estudiantes de medicina refieren supervivencias (62 y 48% respectivamente) que también se encuentran muy alejadas de la realidad. Aunque ambos grupos de pacientes referían que el médico era su principal fuente de información sobre la salud (91 y 90%), el contacto principal con la reanimación había sido a través de series o películas de televisión. Ningún paciente rechazó la participación en el estudio. CONCLUSIONES: El paciente cardiológico tiene una visión de los resultados de la reanimación cardiopulmonar más optimista que el resto. Este hecho debe tenerse en cuenta, puesto que podría comprometer el desarrollo de las conversaciones sobre sus cuidados al final de la vida

OBJECTIVE: The outcomes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation predicted by Spanish cardiac patients are far from the reality. We sought to determine differences of perception with respect to other patients and develop hypotheses that might justify them. Method: Descriptive study using an interview-guided survey with a consecutive series of cardiac patients, non-cardiac patients, and medical students. RESULTS: Following in-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiac patients reported a significantly higher mean survival to discharge (76 vs.62%, p < 0.01) and free from neurological disability (65 vs.55%, p = 0.02) than non-cardiac patients, despite being older and having more frequently undergone resuscitation manoeuvres. Medical students also reported survivals (62 and 48%, respectively) that are also far from the reality. Although both groups of patients reported that physicians were their main source of health information (91 and 90%), their main contact with resuscitation had been through TV series and/or movies. No patient declined to participate in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac patients have a more optimistic vision of the results of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This fact should be taken into account in planning conversations about end-of-life care

Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients deferred from coronary revascularization on the basis of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in stable angina pectoris (SAP) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: Assessment of coronary stenosis severity with pressure guidewires is recommended to determine the need for myocardial revascularization. METHODS: The safety of deferral of coronary revascularization in the pooled per-protocol population (n = 4,486) of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) and iFR-SWEDEHEART (Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris or Acute Coronary Syndrome) randomized clinical trials was investigated. Patients were stratified according to revascularization decision making on the basis of iFR or FFR and to clinical presentation (SAP or ACS). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 1 year. RESULTS: Coronary revascularization was deferred in 2,130 patients. Deferral was performed in 1,117 patients (50%) in the iFR group and 1,013 patients (45%) in the FFR group (p < 0.01). At 1 year, the MACE rate in the deferred population was similar between the iFR and FFR groups (4.12% vs. 4.05%; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.79; p = 0.60). A clinical presentation with ACS was associated with a higher MACE rate compared with SAP in deferred patients (5.91% vs. 3.64% in ACS and SAP, respectively; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61 in favor of SAP; 95% confidence interval: 0.38 to 0.99; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, deferral of revascularization is equally safe with both iFR and FFR, with a low MACE rate of about 4%. Lesions were more frequently deferred when iFR was used to assess physiological significance. In deferred patients presenting with ACS, the event rate was significantly increased compared with SAP at 1 year.

Complicaciones neurológicas tras intervencionismo cardíaco percutáneo / Neurological complications following percutaneous coronary intervention

Resumen Introducción: Las complicaciones neurológicas agudas del intervencionismo cardiaco percutáneo (ICP) son variadas e infrecuentes, pero pueden resultar fatales. Casos: Presentamos un ictus isquémico -II- (caso 1), y dos casos de encefalopatía por contraste -EC- (2 y 3). Dos varones (1 y 2) y una mujer (3), con FRCV y edad media de 76 años. Los tres pacientes debutaron con focalidad neurológica aguda (FNA) al finalizar el procedimiento, lo que motivó la activación de código ictus intrahospitalario desde cardiología. 2 y 3 asociaron además agitación. El TC multimodalfue normal en 2y 3, y mostró oclusión de M1 izquierda en 1. Se desestimó tratamiento de reperfusión cerebral en 1 por anticoagulación. El EEG fue normal en 2 y mostró paroxismos focales en hemisferio izquierdo de baja persistencia en 3.2 y 3 fueron tratados con sueroterapia y anticomiciales (3), quedando asintomáticos en las primeras doce horas. 1 falleció a los diez días por infección respiratoria. Conclusiones: En presencia de FNA tras ICP, la sospecha clínica resulta vital para establecer un diagnóstico diferencial precoz entre II y EC, y considerar tratamiento específico urgente, ya que puede modificar el pronóstico del paciente.

Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) related neurological complications are wide and rare, but may be fatal. Cases: We present an ischaemic stroke -IS- (case 1), and two cases of contrast induced encephalopathy -CIE- (2 and 3). Two males (1 and 2) and one woman (3), with vascular risk factors and an average age of 76. All of them presented with acute focal neurological symptoms at the end of the procedure and Stroke Code was activated inmediately. 2 and 3 also associated psychomotor agitation. Multimodal CT head was normal in 2 and 3, whereas it showed a left Ml occlusion in 1. Reperfusion treatment was contraindicated 1 due to anticoagulation. EEG was normal in 2 and showed focal paroxisms in left hemisphere in 3.2 and 3 were successfully treated with fluids and antiepileptics (3). 1 died due to respiratory infection. Conclusions: Acute focal neurological symptoms following PCI should make us consider IS and CIE and provide the patient with urgent specific treatment.