RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is the leading infectious cause of death in children worldwide, accounting for 15% of all deaths in children under the age of five. Hypoxemia is a major cause of death in patients suffering from pneumonia. There is strong evidence that using pulse oximetry and having reliable oxygen sources in health care facilities can reduce deaths due to pneumonia by one-third. Despite its importance, hypoxemia is frequently overlooked in resource-constrained settings. Aside from the limited availability of pulse oximetry, evidence showed that healthcare workers did not use it as frequently to generate evidence-based decisions on the need for oxygen therapy. As a result, the goal of this study was to assess the availability of medical oxygen devices, operating manuals, guidelines, healthcare workers' knowledge, and skills in the practice of hypoxemia diagnosis and oxygen therapy in piloted health centers of Ethiopia. METHODS: A pre-post non-experimental study design was employed. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect primary data and review medical record charts. A chi-square test with a statistical significance level of P < 0.05 was used as a cut-off point for claiming statistical significance. RESULTS: Eighty one percent of healthcare workers received oxygen therapy training, up from 6% at baseline. As a result of the interventions, knowledge of pulse oximetry use and oxygen therapy provision, skills such as oxygen saturation and practices of oxygen therapy have significantly improved among healthcare workers in the piloted Health Centers. In terms of availability of oxygen devices (e.g. cylinders, concentrators, and pulse oximeters) in the facilities, seven (58%) facilities did not have any at baseline, but due to the interventions, all facilities were equipped with the oxygen devices. CONCLUSIONS: Given the prevalence of pneumonia and hypoxemia, a lack of access to oxygen delivery devices, as well as a lack of knowledge and skills among healthcare workers in the administration of oxygen therapy, may represent an important and reversible barrier to improving child survival. Therefore, scaling up clinician training, technical support, availability of oxygen devices, guidelines, manuals, strengthening maintenance schemes, and close monitoring of healthcare workers and health facilities is strongly advised.
Asunto(s)
Oxígeno , Neumonía , Niño , Etiopía/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipoxia/diagnóstico , Hipoxia/terapia , Oximetría , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/terapia , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oxygen therapy is a lifesaving treatment, however, in Ethiopia, oxygen is not readily available in many healthcare facilities. In 2015, the Federal Ministry of Health launched a national roadmap to increase access to oxygen. This study aims to evaluate whether availability of oxygen and its clinical practice in public hospitals of Ethiopia changed during the time the roadmap was being implemented. METHODS: Between December 2015 and December 2019, a multifaceted approach was undertaken to increase access to oxygen in public facilities in Ethiopia. The activities included formation of new policies, development of guidelines, procurement and maintenance of oxygen equipment, and training of healthcare workers. To evaluate whether access and use of oxygen changed during this period, facility-based surveys were conducted between December 2015 to December 2019. Primary data, including medical record reviews, were collected from 32 public hospitals bi-annually. A chi-square test that claimed P < 0.05 used to assess the statistical significance differences. RESULTS: The study was conducted in 32 public hospitals of Ethiopia, where capacity building and technical support interventions implemented. Of these 32 facilities, 15 (46.9%) were general hospitals, 10 (31.2%) were referral hospitals, and 7 (21.9%) were primary hospitals. Functional availability of oxygen has shown a statistically significant increase from 62 to 100% in the pediatric in-patient departments of general and referral hospitals (p-value < 0.001). Similarly, functional availability of pulse oximetry has shown a statistically significant increase from 45 to 96%. With regard to clinical practices, the blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurement at diagnosis increased from 10.2 to 75%, and SpO2 measurement at admission increased 20.5 to 83%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the intervention results, we conclude that multifaceted approaches targeting policy, healthcare workers' capacity, increased device procurement, and device maintenance programs with on-site mentorship, can improve the availability of medical oxygen and pulse oximetry, as well as clinical practice of oxygen therapy in health facilities. Therefore, ensuring device availability along with regular technical support and close follow-up of healthcare workers and facilities are critical, and these interventions should be scaled further.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Oxígeno , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Etiopía , Hospitales Generales , Hospitales Públicos , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women's decision-making power influences the use of family planning. It is one of the denied fundamental rights of women, particularly in developing countries. OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to assess married women's decision-making power in the use of family planning and its associated factors among married reproductive age women in Basoliben, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2018. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among married reproductive age women from March 1 to 30, 2018. A multistage simple random sampling technique was employed in selecting study participants. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed through SPSS 20 software. The binary and multiple variable logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors associated with women's decision-making power on family planning use. Statistical significance was declared at p-value less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 734 married women aged 18-49 years are making a 98% response rate included in this study. The level of married women's decision-making power in family planning among married women was 80%; 95% CI (76.9, 82.8). Monthly income (AOR=2.2; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.2), husband's desired number of children of <3 (AOR=9.9; 95% CI: 3.6), husband's desired time for additional child after 3 years postbirth (AOR=4.0; 95% CI: 1.9, 8.5) and women's information on any contraceptive (AOR=9.6; 95% CI: 2.4, 39.0) were factors significantly associated with married women's decision-making power in family planning. CONCLUSION: Married women's decision-making power in family planning use was optimal. Household monthly income, husband's desired ideal number of children, husband's desired time when to have another child and information about any contraceptive methods were predictors of their decision-making power on family planning use. There should be awareness creation of family planning methods to increase its utilization.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia, a fatal condition characterized by low concentration of oxygen in the blood, is strongly associated with death among children with pneumonia. Ethiopia's Federal Ministry of Health launched its first National Oxygen and Pulse Oximetry Scale-up road map to improve access and utilization of pulse oximetry and oxygen. This study aimed to describe the use of pulse oximetry during the initial patient assessment among children under five diagnosed with pneumonia and serves as a benchmark to measure progress of the road map. METHODS: The study design was an observational study using retrospective review of patient medical records at 14 hospitals. Medical records of 443 children age 0-59 months with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia were randomly selected for review. The primary outcome was whether an arterial blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurement was recorded in the patient's medical record at the initial assessment. RESULTS: Overall, 10% (95% confidence interval CI = 4%-22%) of patient medical records had a SpO2 measurement. Admitted patients were more likely to have a SpO2 measurement recorded in their medical records than patients treated in the outpatient department (P<0.01). Among admitted patients, 19% (95% CI = 8%-38%) had a SpO2 measurement compared to 3% (95% CI = 1%-11%) of patients treated in the outpatient department. CONCLUSION: In Ethiopia, patients under five with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia are rarely screened for hypoxemia with a pulse oximeter, and hypoxemia may be severely underdiagnosed. Much needs to be done to improve the routine use of pulse oximetry.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the costs associated with the use of long-acting insulin analogues (LAIAs) compared with non-LAIA agents, including human insulin, oral antidiabetic drugs, and other injectable therapies, in the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of the medical literature (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, EconLit) conducted from 2004 to 2016. METHODS: The review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria for studies were: patients with T1D and/or T2D, LAIA intervention, and comparators, including oral antidiabetics (OADs) or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH). Outcomes of interest were adherence measures; economic outcomes, including total costs, cost savings, and willingness-to-pay; and cost-effectiveness or incremental cost-effectiveness analyses. Real-world costs of individual LAIAs were also evaluated and are often compared against those of other LAIAs in the economic analyses. RESULTS: We identified and included 117 relevant studies. Patients using LAIAs had higher drug costs than those using OADs and NPH but had neutral or reduced total and diabetes-related costs compared with patients using non-LAIAs. Use of LAIA pen-delivery systems may lead to improved adherence and reduction in costs. Patients receiving insulin glargine demonstrated higher adherence and persistence than patients on insulin detemir. Economic models suggest that LAIAs are more cost-effective than NPH for T1D; for T2D, insulin glargine is more costly than NPH but less so than insulin detemir. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher drug costs, the real-world overall medical costs of LAIAs are not significantly different from those of NPH in patients with diabetes. The findings may be helpful for formulary decision making for patients with diabetes in a cost-constrained environment.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de los Medicamentos , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Insulina de Acción Prolongada/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Insulina Glargina/administración & dosificación , Insulina Glargina/economía , Insulina de Acción Prolongada/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
AIMS: To characterize survival in relation to achieved glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level within alternative glucose-lowering regimens with differing risks of hypoglycaemia. METHODS: Data were extracted from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and the corresponding Hospital Episode Statistics. Patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed glucose-lowering therapy in monotherapy or dual therapy with metformin between 2004 and 2013 were identified. Risk of all-cause mortality within treatment cohorts was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model, introducing mean HbA1c as a quarterly updated, time-dependent covariable. RESULTS: There were 6646 deaths in a total follow-up period of 374 591 years. Survival for lower (<7%) vs moderate HbA1c levels (≥7%, <8.5%) differed by cohort: metformin, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.12); sulphonylurea, aHR 1.11 (95% CI 0.99-1.25); insulin, aHR 1.47 (95% CI 1.25-1.72); combined regimens with low hypoglycaemia risk, aHR 1.02 (95% CI 0.94-1.10); and combined regimens with higher hypoglycaemia risk excluding insulin, aHR 1.24 (95% CI 1.13-1.35) and including insulin, aHR 1.28 (95% CI 1.18-1.37). Higher HbA1c levels were associated with increased mortality in regimens with low hypoglycaemia risk. Post hoc analysis by HbA1c deciles revealed an elevated risk of all-cause mortality for the lowest deciles across all cohorts, but particularly in those regimens associated with hypoglycaemia. High HbA1c was associated with no difference, or a small increase in mortality risk in regimens with increased risk of hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of mortality risk across the range of HbA1c differed by glucose-lowering regimen. Lower HbA1c was associated with increased mortality risk compared with moderate control, especially in those regimens associated with hypoglycaemia. High levels of HbA1c were associated with the expected elevated mortality risk in regimens with low hypoglycaemia risk.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidad , Hipoglucemiantes/clasificación , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Angiopatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Angiopatías Diabéticas/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate diabetes-related healthcare resource use and associated costs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated with a sulfonylurea (SU), with and without hypoglycemia. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients 18years or older receiving SU monotherapy or as add-on to metformin were identified from a US healthcare claims database (MarketScan®). Of 113,743 patients (56.8% male, average age 62.6years), 61.6% were on SU/metformin dual therapy and 38.4% were on SU monotherapy, and 5% had one or more episodes of hypoglycemia during the 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Adjusted for baseline characteristics, patients with hypoglycemia were three times more likely than those without to use emergency room services (OR 3.04, 95% CI: 2.82, 3.25), almost four times more likely to have inpatient admissions (OR 3.84, 95% CI: 3.58, 4.12), and had more frequent physician office visits (4.3 vs 3.0 visits, p<0.01) in the 12-month follow-up period. The adjusted annual diabetes-related medical expenditure was three times higher in patients with hypoglycemia compared with those without ($6884 vs $2392, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the higher healthcare utilization and costs associated with hypoglycemia in patients with T2DM treated with an SU.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Gastos en Salud , Recursos en Salud , Hipoglucemia/terapia , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Recursos en Salud/economía , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/economía , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Formulario de Reclamación de Seguro , Masculino , Metformina/efectos adversos , Metformina/economía , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Jubilación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/economía , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/uso terapéutico , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved intravenous esomeprazole 0.5 mg/day for children aged >1 month and oral esomeprazole for infants aged 1 month to <1 year at doses of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg based on weight. Prior to 2011, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were not approved for use in infants aged <1 year. This study determined PPI usage rates prior to the FDA approval among newborns and infants in both the inpatient and outpatient settings and compared PPI and histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) usage in the inpatient setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of PPI prescribing patterns for newborns and infants from 2003 to 2008 using data from the Premier Perspective Inpatient Hospital Database and the PharMetrics Patient-Centric Database for inpatient and outpatient data, respectively. PPI use and diagnoses were determined from clinical and charge records from more than 500 hospitals. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that PPIs were prescribed for approximately 5000 newborns (0.13%) and 15,000 infants (2.65%) each year in the hospital setting and 1.6% of newborns and infants, as a group, in the outpatient setting. Newborns and infants receiving PPIs most often had diagnoses of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and were generally prescribed an adult PPI dose, although the actual dose administered could not be substantiated. CONCLUSIONS: Although no PPI was approved by the FDA for patients aged <1 year at the time of this study, results of this analysis indicate that PPIs were commonly prescribed for newborns and infants, mostly in hospital, but also in outpatient settings. Most PPIs were prescribed for infants with a diagnosis of GERD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Differences in treatment patterns, health care resource use, and costs are expected among patients newly treated with quetiapine extended release (XR) or quetiapine immediate release (IR). OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment patterns, health care resource use, and costs in patients with bipolar disorder newly treated with quetiapine XR or quetiapine IR. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study that used HealthCore Integrated Research Database-identified patients (age range, 18-64 years) with an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision diagnosis of bipolar disorder and ≥1 pharmacy claim for quetiapine XR or quetiapine IR between October 2, 2008, and July 31, 2010. Outcomes were as follows: patient characteristics at the index date (first claim for quetiapine XR or quetiapine IR); 12-month preindex clinical characteristics, health care resource use, and costs; and 12-month postindex treatment patterns, health care resource use, and costs, assessed using generalized linear models (adjusted for index date and preindex patient demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, health care resource use, and costs). RESULTS: In total, 3049 patients with bipolar disorder were analyzed (651 in the quetiapine XR group and 2398 in the quetiapine IR group). Of patients initiating treatment with quetiapine XR, 8.8% had no change in or discontinuation of their index therapy compared with 5.7% of patients treated with quetiapine IR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.00; P = 0.0317). The average daily dose (adjusted mean) of quetiapine XR was higher than quetiapine IR (225 vs 175 mg/d, P < 0.0001). An average daily dose of 300 to 800 mg was reached sooner (15.6 vs 30.8 days, P = 0.0049) and in more patients (44.2% vs 27.2%, P < 0.0001) who were taking quetiapine XR compared with patients taking quetiapine IR. No differences in total health care costs were found between the cohorts; however, patients taking quetiapine XR were less likely to be hospitalized for mental health-related reasons (12.1% vs 18.3%, P = 0.0022) and incurred lower mental health-related costs (US $6686 vs US $7577, P = 0.0063) compared with patients taking quetiapine IR. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns and dosing differ in patients with bipolar disorder treated with quetiapine XR compared with those treated with quetiapine IR. Mental health-related hospitalizations and costs may be reduced in the 12 months after patients initiating treatment with quetiapine XR compared with initiating treatment with quetiapine IR.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/economía , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/economía , Dibenzotiazepinas/economía , Dibenzotiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Dibenzotiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Esomeprazole was excluded from the United Healthcare formulary for all commercial health plan members January 1, 2007. A retrospective analysis of the Ingenix LabRx database (September 1, 2005, through June 30, 2007) evaluated the effect of this exclusion on health care utilization and costs in a real-world setting. Total medical care services, including pharmacy claims, were examined for 6 months before and after the esomeprazole exclusion. Patients aged ≥ 18 years were included if they had continuous health plan enrollment (September 1, 2005, through June 30, 2007), ≥ 1 esomeprazole prescription during the index period (March 1 through August 31, 2006), and ≥ 2 esomeprazole prescriptions (with no switch to another proton pump inhibitor [PPI]) during the baseline period (sliding 6-month window from September 1 through August 31, 2006). During the 6-month post-exclusion period (January 1 through June 30, 2007), 19.5% of patients remained on esomeprazole, 43% switched to another PPI, and 37.5% had no prescription PPI claims. Compared with the previous 6 months, post-exclusion was associated with increased health care utilization, including a 4.2% increase in number of inpatient visits, and a 2.7% increase in other services (eg, laboratory testing, ambulatory procedures). Esomeprazole prescriptions decreased by 76.5%, whereas overall pharmacy claims for all drug classes (including gastrointestinal drugs) increased by 5.2%. Six-month prescription drug costs decreased by $177/patient (95% confidence interval [CI], $160-$194/patient), whereas costs for total medical services increased by $450/patient (95% CI, $259-$640/patient), resulting in a net increase of $273/patient (95% CI, $137-$408/patient). Total and gastrointestinal-related medical services costs were significantly higher for those switching to another PPI versus those continuing esomeprazole. Inpatient utilization contributed most (44.5%) to increased costs of nongastrointestinal comorbidities. This study provides real-world evidence that formulary exclusions can lead to unintended increases in overall health care utilization and costs that exceed anticipated pharmacy budget savings.
Asunto(s)
Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Esomeprazol/administración & dosificación , Esomeprazol/economía , Formularios Farmacéuticos como Asunto , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/economía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Differences in treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs between patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated by oncologists and those treated by urologists were examined. METHODS: Patients aged ≥40 with CRPC were identified using claims from a large US managed health care plan between July 2001 and December 2007. A 6-month baseline period was used to assess patient characteristics. Patients with visits to an urologist, without visits to an oncologist, were assigned to the urology cohort, and patients with visits to an oncologist, with or without visits to an urologist, were assigned to the oncology cohort. Treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs during a variable follow-up period were compared between cohorts using descriptive statistics and Lin's regression. RESULTS: The urology cohort had fewer comorbid illnesses (P < 0.001) and patients were less likely to have other cancers during baseline (P < 0.001) or to die during follow-up (P = 0.004) compared with the oncology cohort. The oncology cohort patients were significantly more likely to have a claim for hormones (74.5% vs 61.1%; P < 0.001), chemotherapy (46.9% vs 10.2%, P < 0.001), and radiation (22.3% vs 3.7%, P < 0.0001) over follow-up. Mean unadjusted health care costs were higher in the oncology vs the urology cohort (US$31,896 vs US$15,318, respectively; P < 0.001). At 6 years follow-up, cumulative adjusted CRPC-specific costs were significantly higher among patients treated by oncologists with chemotherapy than among patients treated by urologists. CONCLUSION: CRPC patients treated by oncologists had greater use of hormones, chemotherapy, and radiation; higher percentages of patients with inpatient stays, emergency room, and ambulatory visits; and higher health care costs, than patients treated by urologists.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between cost sharing and adherence to antidiabetic medications in patients with type 2 diabetes and to examine the relationship between medication adherence and outcomes, including complication rates, medical service utilization, and workplace productivity measures. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzing the healthcare experience of patients with type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic medication (OAD) with or without insulin (n = 96,734) and patients on OAD only (n = 55,356) with employer-sponsored insurance in the 2003-2006 MarketScan Database. METHODS: Using a 2-stage residual inclusion model, the first stage estimated the effects of cost sharing on adherence to antidiabetic medications in an 18-month time frame (January 2003 through June 2004). Adherence was determined from the percentage of days covered. The second stage estimated the effects of adherence on complication rates (eg, retinopathy, neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease), medical service utilization rates, and measures of productivity (absence days and short-term disability days) in the subsequent 2 years (July 2004 through June 2006). RESULTS: A $10 increase in the patient cost-sharing index resulted in a 5.4% reduction in adherence to antidiabetic medications for patients on OAD only and a 6.2% reduction in adherence for patients on OAD with or without insulin. Adherence was associated with lower rates of complications (eg, amputation/ulcers, retinopathy) and also was associated with fewer emergency department visits and short-term disability days. CONCLUSIONS: Medical plans, employers, and policy makers should consider implementing interventions targeted to improve antidiabetic medication adherence, which may translate to better outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Seguro de Costos Compartidos/economía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervalos de Confianza , Seguro de Costos Compartidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Eficiencia , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the incremental economic burden of privately insured patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in 2000 and 2005 in the United States. METHODS: Adults with T2DM and 24 months of continuous health plan enrollment were identified in the MarketScan databases (2000 and 2005). Control groups of persons without diabetes were selected for comparison using propensity score matching. Total adjusted health care costs were estimated using generalized linear modeling. RESULTS: Adjusted health care costs of patients with T2DM in 2005 were 136% higher than those of the matched controls ($12,733 vs $5406, P < 0.001). Similarly, costs of patients with T2DM in 2000 were 146% higher than those of the matched controls ($12,423 vs $5058, P < 0.001). Expenditures were similar for individuals with T2DM in 2000 and 2005. CONCLUSIONS: T2DM continues to impose a substantial economic burden to self-insured employers.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Sector Privado , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare daily insulin use, glycemic control, and health care costs in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated treatment with either insulin detemir or insulin glargine. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of health care claims data and laboratory results for adult, insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes who were enrolled in a large US managed care organization and initiated basal therapy with insulin detemir or insulin glargine between May 1, 2006, and December 31, 2006. The daily average consumption (DACON) of insulin was calculated as the total number of units dispensed (excluding the last fill) divided by the number of days between the index date and the date of the last fill of the index insulin. Glycemic control was evaluated by comparing mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) values in the preindex period (the 180 days before the index date) and the follow-up period (the 180 days after the index date). Mean all-cause and diabetes-related health care costs in the preindex and follow-up periods were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The analysis included 48 patients initiating therapy with insulin detemir and 258 initiating therapy with insulin glargine. The mean age of the 2 cohorts was approximately 54 years, and most patients in each cohort were male (52.1% and 59.7%, respectively). Few patients in either cohort had a baseline HbA(1c) value <7% (13% and 10%), suggesting poor glycemic control at the time of insulin initiation. After adjustment for confounders (eg, preindex diabetes medication), the DACON of insulin was comparable between cohorts (29.3 and 29.6 U/d; P = NS), as were follow-up HbA(1c) values (8.2% and 7.9%). Insulin detemir and insulin glargine also were associated with comparable mean adjusted all-cause pharmacy costs ($3074 and $2899), medical costs ($2319 and $3704), and total health care costs ($6014 and $7023). However, insulin glargine was associated with significantly higher mean adjusted diabetes-related medical costs compared with insulin detemir ($1510 vs $707, respectively; P = 0.03), as well as significantly higher mean adjusted total diabetes-related health care costs ($3408 vs $2261; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this managed care population of insulin-naive patients who initiated therapy with insulin detemir or insulin glargine, the daily insulin dose and glycemic control did not differ significantly between the 2 insulins. However, patients receiving insulin detemir incurred lower diabetes-related medical and total health care costs.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/análogos & derivados , Biomarcadores/sangre , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Costos de los Medicamentos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Insulina/economía , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Insulina Detemir , Insulina Glargina , Insulina de Acción Prolongada , Masculino , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to corroborate an earlier study that explored the relationship between a health plan's Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) score for glycolated hemoglobin (HbA1c) control in diabetes patients and its utilization of insulin and oral diabetes products. Prescription volumes were tracked for four categories of diabetes drug therapy: analog insulin, human insulin, single-source brand oral products, and multisource generic oral products, for calendar years 2005 and 2006. The prescription shares of each of the four drug categories for each health plan were matched to the health plan's HEDIS measurements of HbA1c control for each year. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed between the health plan's HbA1c -based HEDIS score and its prescription share of each drug category. A favorable and statistically significant (p < 0.01) relationship was found between plan HbA1c HEDIS score and plan prescription share of analog insulin in both 2005 and 2006. The correlation between HEDIS scores and human insulin was not statistically significant. Unfavorable relationships were found between HEDIS scores and both the single-source brand (statistically significant) and the multisource generic oral category prescription shares (not significant). These results corroborate the relationships found in our earlier study, although a cause and effect relationship cannot be confirmed.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Hemoglobina Glucada/efectos de los fármacos , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/normas , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Glucemia , Seguro de Costos Compartidos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Insulina/análogos & derivados , Análisis Multivariante , Análisis de Regresión , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This study sought to determine the correlation between a health plan's Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) score for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) control in patients with diabetes and its utilization of analog insulin, human insulin, and oral drug therapy as determined by the share of prescriptions of each therapy. Prescription volumes were tracked for four categories of diabetes drug therapy: (1) analog insulin, (2) human insulin, (3) single-source brand oral products, and (4) multisource generic oral products, for the three months ending January 2005 and January 2006 and matched to the 2004 and 2005 HEDIS scores. A correlation analysis conducted between the HbA1c-based HEDIS score and the prescription share of each drug category found a favorable and statistically significant (P < .0001) correlation between plan HbA1c HEDIS score and plan prescription share of analog insulin in both 2004 and 2005. The correlation between HEDIS scores and human insulin was not statistically significant. Unfavorable correlations were found between HEDIS scores and both the single-source brand and the multisource generic oral category prescription shares, although these correlations were found to be significant only for the single-source products in 2005.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud , Estadística como Asunto , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the magnitude and age distribution of lifetime health care expenditures. DATA SOURCES: Claims data on 3.75 million Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan members, and data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the Michigan Mortality Database, and Michigan nursing home patient counts. DATA COLLECTION: Data were aggregated and summarized in year 2000 dollars by service, age, and gender. STUDY DESIGN: We use life table models to simulate a typical lifetime's distribution of expenditures, employing cross-sectional data on age- and sex-specific health care costs and the mortality experience of the population. We determine remaining lifetime expenditures at each age for all initial members of a birth cohort. Separately, we calculate remaining expenditures for survivors at all ages. Using cross-sectional data, the analysis holds disease incidence, medical technology, and health care prices constant, thus permitting an exclusive focus on the role of age in health care costs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Per capita lifetime expenditure is USD $316,600, a third higher for females (USD $361,200) than males (USD $268,700). Two-fifths of this difference owes to women's longer life expectancy. Nearly one-third of lifetime expenditures is incurred during middle age, and nearly half during the senior years. For survivors to age 85, more than one-third of their lifetime expenditures will accrue in their remaining years. CONCLUSIONS: Given the essential demographic phenomenon of our time, the rapid aging of the population, our findings lend increased urgency to understanding and addressing the interaction between aging and health care spending.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tablas de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Planificación en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Michigan , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dinámica Poblacional , Distribución por SexoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) has been validated and widely used in assessing quality of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but it is time-consuming and complicated to score. A more concise instrument, the Airways Questionnaire (AQ), was developed to measure quality of life (QoL) among patients with asthma and COPD. The shorter version of this instrument has 20 items (AQ20) and the longer version has 30 items (AQ30). The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between QoL scores measured by the AQ20/30 or the SGRQ scale and utilization of health-care services by COPD patients and to evaluate the comparative advantage of any one of these instruments in measuring the QoL of COPD patients. METHODS: Results from a survey of 1000 patients participating in a pilot COPD health management program were used for this analysis. A total of 303 patients completed both the AQ20/30 and the SGRQ questionnaires. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between utilization of health care services and QoL scores while controlling for a set of covariates. Spearman's rank correlation was used to determine whether the AQ30 and the SGRQ scores for symptoms, activity, and impact, and the overall scores were correlated. RESULTS: The regression results demonstrate that there is a strong relationship between quality-of-life scores and health-care utilization variables. Moreover, the degree of association between the AQ20/30 scores and utilization variables and the SGRQ and utilization variables are comparable. Both the AQ20 and the AQ30 were highly correlated with the overall SGRQ score and with symptoms, activity, and impact component scores. CONCLUSION: The AQ20/30 and the SGRQ scores are comparable in terms of measuring QoL in COPD patients and are equally useful in determining the association between utilization of health-care services and QoL.