Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 20515, 2023 11 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37993580

RESUMEN

Ultra-widefield retinal imaging is increasingly used in ophthalmology and optometry practices to image patients identifying peripheral abnormalities. However, the clinical relevance of these peripheral retinal abnormalities is unclear. This cross-sectional study aims to firstly validate a new grading system, secondly, assess the prevalence of peripheral retinal abnormalities in retinal patients, and finally understand how peripheral findings may associate with retinal disease. Ultra-widefield pseudocolor fundus images were taken from the eyes of clinic patients. Demographic data and clinical diagnosis for each patient was noted. The grading system was validated using masked retinal specialists. Logistic regression identified associations between retinal disease and peripheral retinal findings. Using the grading system, inter-observer agreement was 76.1% with Cohen's Kappa coefficient 0.542 (p < 0.0001) and the test-retest agreement was 95.1% with Kappa 0.677(p < 0.0001). 971 images were included, with 625 eyes (64.4%) having peripheral abnormalities. Peripheral drusen was the most common abnormality (n = 221, 22.76%) and correlated with age-related macular degeneration (p < 0.001). Novel correlations were also identified between diabetic retinopathy and retinal pigmentation as well as pigmentary degeneration. This study provides a validated system for identifying peripheral abnormalities and adds to literature highlighting peripheral retinal associations with retinal disease which would benefit from further study.


Asunto(s)
Retina , Drusas Retinianas , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Prevalencia , Retina/diagnóstico por imagen , Fondo de Ojo , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos
2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 14187, 2023 08 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648803

RESUMEN

Macular edema (ME), the accumulation of intraretinal fluid in the macula, is a common sight affecting sequelae of retinitis pigmentosa (RP). However, it is unclear why some patients develop ME, and others do not. This study aims to identify associations between clinical-genetic factors in RP with ME. Patients with clinically confirmed RP cases were identified from the inherited retinal disease database at a large tertiary referral academic center. Demographic and genetic testing findings were noted. Additionally, optical coherence tomography volume scans were graded using a validated grading system. One hundred and six patients (73.1%) were found to have ME in at least one eye (OD = 88, mean = 37.9%, OS = 98, mean = 31.7%). Structurally, the presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) (p < 0.007) and vitreo-macular traction (VMT) (p < 0.003) were significantly associated with ME. Additionally, X-linked (p < 0.032) and autosomal dominant inheritance (p < 0.039) demonstrated a significant association with ME, with RP1 (p < 0.045) and EYS (p < 0.017) pathogenic variants also significantly associated with ME. This study, in a large cohort of RP patients, confirms previous retinal structural associations for ME in RP and identifies potential new genetic associations.


Asunto(s)
Mácula Lútea , Edema Macular , Enfermedades de la Retina , Retinitis Pigmentosa , Humanos , Edema Macular/genética , Retinitis Pigmentosa/complicaciones , Retinitis Pigmentosa/genética , Retina/diagnóstico por imagen , Proteínas del Ojo
3.
Retina ; 43(9): 1590-1596, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37263185

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To understand the baseline and longitudinal microperimetry characteristics in foveal-sparing atrophic late-onset retinal degeneration. METHOD: Prospective, cross-sectional, longitudinal study in which patients from the retina clinics of two academic teaching hospitals were included. Mesopic microperimetry was performed using a Nidek MP-1 micro-perimeter. Mean total, foveal, inner ring, and outer ring sensitivities were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 20 eyes from 10 patients had baseline data. The subset of 10 eyes from five patients had follow-up data. The mean baseline macular sensitivity was 10.02 dB (± 5.26) with findings showing symmetry between both eyes. In the follow-up cohort, there was a significant loss of outer ring (0.83 dB per year; P = 0.0001), inner ring (0.67 dB per year; P = 0.034), and foveal sensitivity (0.92 dB loss per year; P = 0.015), whereas the mean sensitivity decreased significantly (0.66 dB per year; P = 0.0008) at 4-year follow-up. The drop in mean sensitivity was associated with significant increases in the number of deep scotoma points (6.20, P = 0.037) and a decrease in the number of normal points (-6.30, P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Microperimetry is a useful tool for macular function follow-up to measure disease progression in late-onset retinal degeneration.


Asunto(s)
Retina , Pruebas del Campo Visual , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica
4.
Ophthalmic Res ; 66(1): 885-891, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37271137

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate retinal layer thickness and vessel density differences between patients with reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) and intermediate dry age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). METHODS: Participants included in the study were patients diagnosed by retinal specialists with RPD, iAMD, and both RPD and iAMD at our academic referral center, seen from May 2021 until February 2022. The central 3 mm retinal thickness was measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg Spectralis HRA+OCT System; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Individual retinal thickness measurements were obtained from the innermost layer (nerve fiber layer) until the outermost layer (retinal pigment epithelium [RPE]). Each thickness measurement was subdivided into nine Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) sectors. For the vessel density, OCT angiography from the Heidelberg Spectralis System was measured using proprietary third-party software (AngioTool; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared across the three groups (iAMD, RPD, iAMD and RPD) and analyzed with necessary adjustments. Linear mixed-effects models with necessary corrections were employed to compare continuous eye-level measurements between our three groups as well as in pairwise fashion using the R statistical programming software (R version 4.2.1). RESULTS: A total of 25 eyes of 17 patients with RPD, 20 eyes of 15 patients with iAMD, and 14 eyes of 9 patients with both iAMD and RPD were analyzed. Retinal thickness analysis identified that the superior inner (p = 0.028) and superior outer (p = 0.027) maculas of eyes with both iAMD and RPD were significantly thinner than those with iAMD alone. In eyes with RPD, the superior inner and superior outer RPE (p = 0.011 and p = 0.05, respectively), outer plexiform layer (p = 0.003 and p = 0.013, respectively), and inner nuclear layer (p = 0.034 and p = 0, respectively) were noted to be thinner compared to eyes with iAMD alone. In addition, the macular deep capillary plexus vessel density was significantly reduced in eyes with RPD compared to eyes with iAMD (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Patients with RPD had inner retinal structural as well as vascular changes compared to iAMD patients. Inner retinal vascular attenuation should be investigated further to see if there is a causal association with retinal thinning.


Asunto(s)
Atrofia Geográfica , Degeneración Macular , Drusas Retinianas , Humanos , Coroides , Drusas Retinianas/diagnóstico , Retina , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos
5.
Ophthalmic Res ; 2022 Dec 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36481649

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have explored Multicolor™ imaging (MCI) in evaluating retinal vascular diseases, particularly branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). This study aimed to compare the identification of retinal vessel whitening in BRVO using MCI by scanning confocal laser versus conventional white flash color fundus photography (CFP). METHODS: Paired images of consecutive patients diagnosed with BRVO who underwent same-day MCI and CFP were reviewed. Visualization of vessel whitening on MCI and CFP was graded and scored using a scale by two masked graders. A longitudinal analysis of the vessel grading score was performed to evaluate the vessel whitening detection by MCI. A correlation analysis was conducted between vessel whitening on MCI and the measured area of retinal ischemia on fluorescein angiography to evaluate the MCI performance. RESULTS: Forty-four eyes of 41 patients (mean age 69±14 years; 61% female) were analyzed. MCI demonstrated superior vessel whitening visibility score than CFP (p<0.001). Longitudinal analysis showed no significant changes in vessel whitening visibility scores over a mean follow-up time of 430 ± 648 days (p=0.655). There was a significantly positive correlation between the grading score of vessels whitening by MCI and the area of ischemia by fluorescein angiography (r2=0.15; p=0.036). CONCLUSION: MCI appears to provide a superior detection of whitening BRVO compared to CFP, serving as a rapid and non-invasive correlate of retinal ischemia.

6.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21784, 2021 11 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34750415

RESUMEN

Comparing automated retinal layer segmentation using proprietary software (Heidelberg Spectralis HRA + OCT) and cross-platform Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) segmentation software (Orion). Image segmentations of normal and diseased (iAMD, DME) eyes were performed using both softwares and then compared to the 'gold standard' of manual segmentation. A qualitative assessment and quantitative (layer volume) comparison of segmentations were performed. Segmented images from the two softwares were graded by two masked graders and in cases with difference, a senior retina specialist made a final independent decisive grading. Cross-platform software was significantly better than the proprietary software in the segmentation of NFL and INL layers in Normal eyes. It generated significantly better segmentation only for NFL in iAMD and for INL and OPL layers in DME eyes. In normal eyes, all retinal layer volumes calculated by the two softwares were moderate-strongly correlated except OUTLY. In iAMD eyes, GCIPL, INL, ONL, INLY, TRV layer volumes were moderate-strongly correlated between softwares. In eyes with DME, all layer volume values were moderate-strongly correlated between softwares. Cross-platform software can be used reliably in research settings to study the retinal layers as it compares well against manual segmentation and the commonly used proprietary software for both normal and diseased eyes.


Asunto(s)
Retina/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Retina/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Retina/anatomía & histología , Retina/patología , Enfermedades de la Retina/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Retina/patología , Programas Informáticos
8.
Retina ; 41(6): 1309-1313, 2021 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33141787

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Lidocaine gel was suggested to be highly effective in providing anesthesia for intravitreal injections but adverse effects include a possibility of making sterilization of the conjunctiva difficult. Hence, we wished to determine the effect of using 0.5% proparacaine drops alone over the use of 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride gel anesthesia during office-based intravitreal injections. METHODOLOGY: This was a case-control study in patients who came routinely to the clinic for antivascular endothelial growth factor injections. Eyes were treated with one of two anesthesia modalities. A total of 216 injections in 120 patients were reviewed. One group (N = 107) underwent anesthesia with 0.5% proparacaine drops, and the control group (N = 109) received 3.5% lidocaine gel. The pain perceived after injection was graded using the numerical rating scale, and score was immediately recorded by the "masked" injecting physician. RESULTS: The mean pain score (±SD) for the proparacaine-only group versus gel group was 1.97 (±1.17) versus 1.76 (±0.92), P value = 0.3174. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: 3.5% lidocaine gel is not superior to 0.5% proparacaine drops as patients attained good pain control and excellent rates of overall satisfaction with proparacaine drops alone.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local/métodos , Sustitución de Medicamentos/métodos , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Propoxicaína/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA