[Beneficial effects of enalapril on the diastolic ventricular function in Chagas myocardiopathy]. / Ação benéfica do enalapril sobre a função diastólica ventricular na miocardiopatia da doença de Chagas.

PURPOSE: To verify the effect of enalapril on ventricular function and on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with Chagas' disease with congestive heart failure. METHODS: We studied 20 patients with Chagas' disease, aged between 24 to 64 (mean 44) years. There were 17 male. All patients have positive serologic blood tests for Chagas' disease (immunofluorescence and Machado-Guerreiro test), left ventricular diastolic diameter superior to 55mm and ejection fraction less than 0.60. The patients were divided aleatory in two groups: control group (CG) with 9 patients receiving conventional treatment (digital and diuretics) and enalapril group (EG), with 11 patients where enalapril was added to conventional treatment. The treatment was maintained during two months and the patients were evaluated at the beginning and at the end, when they were submitted to clinical examination, echo-doppler-cardiogram, stress test and 24h Holter monitoring. At two dimensional echocardiographic study we evaluate left ventricular and left atrial diameters, at doppler study the E/A relations, the systolic volume and cardiac index. At the stress test and Holter monitoring we evaluate the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. RESULTS: The comparison between initial and final evaluations, showed that there was a significant improvement of diastolic function (p = 0.04) and a trend to improvement of systolic function (great systolic volume and cardiac index) at EG. The incidence of non sustained ventricular tachycardia was the same in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In Chagas' disease enalapril improves significantly diastolic dysfunction in patients with heart failure. After two months of treatment we observed tendency to improvement of systolic dysfunction and the incidence of arrhythmias induced by stress test.

Prognostic significance of silent myocardial ischemia after a first uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Forty asymptomatic patients were studied after a first uncomplicated myocardial infarction. They were 36 men and 4 women, with a mean age of 52.6 yr; the location of myocardial infarction was in the anterior wall in 18 (45%) patients and in the inferior wall in 22 (55%). The patients were submitted to: (1) 48-h Holter monitoring, during the 2nd and 8th weeks after the acute event; (2) exercise testing during the same periods; (3) cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography. Patients with clinical conditions associated with cardiac rhythm disturbances or repolarization abnormalities were excluded. The electrocardiographic methods identified 11 (27.5%) patients with silent myocardial ischemia. Patients with and without silent ischemia were similar in relation to sex, age, coronary risk factors, arrhythmias, left ventricular function and follow-up. Patients with silent ischemia had more inferior wall myocardial infarctions, but the difference was not statistically significant. Patients with silent ischemia had significantly more extensive coronary artery disease (45.5% multivessel disease) when compared to those without ischemia (14.8% multivessel disease) (p < 0.05). After a 2-yr follow-up, 4 (36.4%) patients with and 1 (3.4%) without silent ischemia had a coronary event (p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative probability of not experiencing a new coronary event for the patients without silent ischemia (96.5%) as compared to those with silent ischemia (62.3%) (p < 0.01). Our results suggest that silent myocardial ischemia after a first uncomplicated myocardial infarction carries an adverse prognosis and should be routinely investigated.

[Silent ischemia after an uncomplicated myocardial infarct. A study in asymptomatic patients]. / Isquemia silenciosa após infarto do miocárdio não complicado. Estudo em pacientes assintomáticos.

PURPOSE: To verify the prognostic value of silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) after an uncomplicated myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Forty asymptomatic patients were studied after a first uncomplicated MI. They were submitted to 48 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and exercise-testing, during the 2nd and 8th weeks after the acute event. Thirty-nine patients were submitted to cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography; one patient was submitted to necropsy. The electrocardiographic study identified 11 (27.5%) individuals with SMI (group A); the other 29 patients were considered group B. RESULTS: Groups A and B were similar in relation to clinical characteristics, infarct site and ventricular function. Group A had significantly more extensive coronary artery disease when compared to group B. After a two-year follow-up, patients from group A had significantly more coronary events (36.3%) when compared to group B (3.4%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative probability of not experiencing a new coronary event for the group B patients. CONCLUSION: SMI may have a prognostic value after uncomplicated MI, as in other clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease.