Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in People Living With HIV Following in Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia.

Backgrounds People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at a greater risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) compared to people not having HIV. Evaluating the prevalence of CKD in people living with HIV in Dammam, Saudi Arabia was the main objective of this study. Methods This cross-sectional study included adult HIV patients who were followed at Dammam Medical Complex. The patients' demographic data, comorbid conditions, and HIV history were reviewed from their electronic medical records. Results A total of 729 patients were counted. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 235 patients could not be estimated. The data for the remaining 494 patients were analyzed. The cohort consisted of 406 male patients (82.19%) and 88 female patients (17.81%). The mean ± standard deviation for the patients' age and HIV duration were 39.08±10.93 years and 4.37±3.15 years, respectively. Ten patients (2.02%) had a GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Among 136 patients who had an estimated GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and were tested by a urine examination, 27 patients (19.85%) had albuminuria. Combining the two figures resulted in an estimated prevalence of CKD in HIV patients of 21.47%. Only one patient (0.02%) was receiving dialysis. Conclusions The prevalence of CKD in people living with HIV in Dammam, Saudi Arabia was higher than the general population. The findings highlight the elevated risk of CKD among people living with HIV and emphasize the importance of regular monitoring and early detection of kidney dysfunction in this population.

Prevalence of the HLA-B*5701 Allele and Abacavir Hypersensitivity in Saudi HIV Patients: A Multicenter Study.

Introduction Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence and prevalence are increasing in Saudi Arabia, with a total prevalence of 12,000 in 2020. Treatment of HIV patients includes multiple regimens that may involve abacavir (ABC), which is a potent drug for treating HIV and can be used as a single or combined pill. Unfortunately, its use was limited by the known associated hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). A worldwide literature review over the past decades reported that the incidence of ABC-related HSR is 5-8%. Methods The study was a cross-sectional multicentric study involving five governmental hospitals in Saudi Arabia and included all HIV patients who were following in these centers. Results Out of 3082 patients, 1293 were tested for HLA-B*5701. The prevalence for ABC-HSR is 1.59%, with variability among the five hospitals, with the highest in King Fahad Hospital in Hafuf (KFH-H) at 4.00% and the lowest in Dammam Medical Complex (DMC) at 0.49%. In previous studies, HLA-B*5701 associated with ABC-HSR varied among different ethnic groups. Our study showed that two patients developed ABC-HSR clinically while they were both negative for HLA-B*5701. Conclusion The fact that patients with negative genetic testing are still at risk of developing ABC-HSR makes continuing screening for HLA-B*5701 status essential, as the consequences of missing such a life-threatening HSR could be detrimental.

Successful Treatment of Infective Endocarditis With Oral Antibiotics: A Case Report.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious and potentially life-threatening infection of the heart valves. It is commonly treated with prolonged courses of intravenous antibiotics, and in some cases, surgical intervention may also be necessary. While the use of oral antibiotics in the treatment of IE is generally limited, there are select cases where they may be considered as an alternative treatment option. Here, we report a case of staphylococcal right-sided IE successfully treated with oral antibiotics (linezolid and rifampicin). Our case highlights the potential for oral antibiotics to be used as step-down therapy for select patients with IE.

Prevalence of Hepatitis B Virus, Hepatitis C Virus, and HIV Infections in Hemodialysis Patients at Kano Kidney Center.

Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections are more prevalent in hemodialysis patients compared to the general population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of HBV, HCV, and HIV infections in hemodialysis patients dialyzing regularly at Kano Kidney Center (KKC) in the Eastern Health Cluster of Saudi Arabia in 2022. Methods This retrospective study included all hemodialysis patients who were dialyzed regularly at KKC during 2022. Their electronic medical records were reviewed for the results of HBV, HCV, and HIV along with the patient's demographics, comorbid conditions, and dialysis history. The study was approved and monitored by the Institutional Review Board of Dammam Medical Complex. Results A total of 239 regular hemodialysis patients were included, consisting of 142 males and 97 females (59.41% and 40.59%, respectively), with a mean age of 52.71±15.83 years. Most of the patients were Saudis (156 patients, 65.27%) with the non-Saudi patients being composed mostly of Arabian patients. Nine patients (3.77%) tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), the serologic hallmark of HBV infection. Two patients (0.84%) had resolved HBV infections as evidenced by positive hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs). However, the majority (226 patients, 94.56%) were never tested for anti-HBc. Anti-HBs, which can imply long-term immunity against HBV from prior immunizations or infections, were positive in 165 patients (69.04%). A protective anti-HBs level of ≥ 10 IU/L was detected in 158 patients (66.11%) including 104 patients (43.51%) having ≥ 100 IU/L. Eighteen patients (7.53%) had reactive HCV antibodies. Four patients (1.67%) had chronic HCV infection as they had detectable HCV RNA. The remaining 14 patients (5.86%) cleared HCV either spontaneously (seven patients, 2.93%) or by medications (seven patients, 2.93%). HIV screening tests were negative in all 239 patients (100%). HBsAg-positive patients did not have any statistically significant differences from HBsAg-negative patients. On the other hand, the patients who were positive for HCV antibodies were older than the patients who were negative for HCV antibodies (60.66 vs 52.05 years on average, p-value <0.05). They also contained a statistically larger proportion of non-Saudi patients than the patients with no evidence of prior infections (61.11% vs 32.13%, p-value <0.05). Conclusions The study found that the prevalence of HBV and HCV infections among hemodialysis patients in KKC at 3.77% and 1.67%, respectively, is higher than that reported in the general population in Saudi Arabia, with non-Saudis having a higher prevalence rate of HCV infection than Saudis. However, the current prevalence rate is lower compared to the previous studies that were conducted in Saudi Arabia in the first decade of the 21st century, and there were no cases of HIV infections. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients had unprotective or negative anti-HBs antibody titers, indicating the need for strict vaccination protocols and monitoring of antibody titers to ensure optimal protection.

Paxlovid for Treating COVID-19 Patients: A Case-Control Study From Two Hospitals in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease that shortly progressed into an unprecedented pandemic spreading all over the world and causing millions of deaths. Many new COVID-19-specific therapies were suggested for the treatment of the patients at increased risk of progression to severe disease, especially those who were unvaccinated and those with a likely inadequate vaccine response. One of the preferred therapies in this setting is Paxlovid, a combination of the oral protease inhibitors nirmatrelvir and ritonavir. Paxlovid was authorized by the Saudi Ministry of Health for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. This study aimed to report the effects of Paxlovid on the mortality of the COVID-19 patients at Dammam Medical Complex (DMC) and Qatif Complex Hospital (QCH), two hospitals in the Eastern Provence of Saudi Arabia, and compare the results with the international data. Methods The study was a retrospective study that included all the COVID-19 patients who were treated with Paxlovid at DMC and QCH between January and December 2022. Those patients were compared with control COVID-19 patients who did not receive Paxlovid. The patients were included irrespective of their COVID-19 vaccination status. All the patients were managed according to the Saudi Ministry of Health guidelines. They were followed up through the infectious disease virtual clinics and were monitored for ICU admissions and death of any cause for three months following their COVID-19 infections. Results A total of 92 COVID-19 patients were included. The patients consisted of 47 male and 45 female patients (51.09% and 48.91%, respectively). The mean ± standard deviation for the patients' age was 55.58±19.25 years. Twenty-eight patients were given Paxlovid (30.43%). Eighteen patients (19.57%) died. The use of Paxlovid was associated with lower ICU admissions (0.0% vs. 18.75%, P value <0.05) and with lower deaths (3.57% vs 26.56%, P value <0.05) but the Paxlovid group included less immunocompromised patients (7.14% vs. 60.94%, P value <0.001), cancer patients (0.0% vs. 42.19%, P value <0.001), and chronic kidney disease patients (7.14% vs. 29.69%, P value <0.05) than the control group. Conclusion This study suggests that Paxlovid is highly effective in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 or mortality. However, larger studies with better qualities are needed for a full assessment of the role of Paxlovid in COVID-19 management in Saudi Arabia.

Gastric Cancer With Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report With More Than Five Years of Follow-Up.

In Saudi Arabia, gastric cancer is a major health burden, ranking as the thirteenth most common cancer type. Situs inversus totalis (SIT), which is a very rare congenital anomaly, refers to a completely reversed location of the abdominal and thoracic organs (mirror image of the normal). Here, we present the first reported case of gastric cancer in an SIT patient in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, and highlight the challenges faced by the surgical team in the removal of such cancer in this patient population.

A Surge in Malaria Cases in the Eastern Health Region of Saudi Arabia During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background Malaria transmission was stopped on most of the vast area of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. However, the pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has negatively affected the efforts to control malaria. For instance, COVID-19 was reported to induce a relapse of malaria that is caused by Plasmodium vivax. Furthermore, physicians' attention toward COVID-19 can only result in neglect and delayed diagnosis of complicated malaria cases. These factors, among others, might have contributed to an increase of malaria cases in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Thus, this study was conducted to examine the effects of COVID-19 on malarial cases. Methods The medical records of all patients who were treated at Dammam Medical Complex for malaria between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2022, were reviewed. Malaria cases were compared between the pre-COVID-19 period (between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2020) and the COVID-19 period (between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022). Results A total of 92 malaria cases occurred in the total study period. There were 60 cases of malaria in the COVID-19 period as opposed to only 32 cases in the pre-COVID-19 period. All the cases were imported from the endemic Saudi southern areas or from outside the country. Eighty-two patients (89.1%) were males. Most of them were Sundaneses (39 patients, 42.4%), Saudis (21 patients, 22.8%), and tribal peoples (14 patients, 15.2%). Fifty-four patients (58.7%) were infected with Plasmodium falciparum. Seventeen patients (18.5%) were infected with Plasmodium vivax. Another 17 patients (18.5%) had a mixed infection with both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. A trend toward more infected stateless tribal patients was observed in the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period (21.7% vs 3.1%). A similar trend was noticed for mixed malarial infections with both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax (29.8% vs 0%) with a P value of less than 0.01. Conclusion Malaria cases were almost doubled during the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to the pre-pandemic era signifying the negative effects of the pandemic on malaria epidemiology. The cases increased for a variety of causes that include alternation of health-seeking behaviors, changes in healthcare structures and regulations, and the interruption of malaria preventive services. Future research is needed to study the long-term effects of the changes imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic and to mitigate the effects of any future pandemic on malaria control. As two patients from our cohort were diagnosed with malaria based on blood smears, although they had negative rapid detection tests (RDTs), we recommend testing all the patients who are suspected to have malaria with both RDTs and peripheral blood smears.

Endoscopic Assessment Prior to Bariatric Surgery in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: There are marked local inconsistencies in the Arabian Peninsula about the role of preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in bariatric surgery. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the frequency of endoscopic and histological findings in the Saudi population presenting for pre-bariatric surgery evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included all the patients who were evaluated by EGD at Dammam Medical Complex, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, between 2018 and 2021 as a part of their pre-bariatric-surgery evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 684 patients were included. They consisted of 250 male and 434 female patients (36.5% and 63.5%, respectively). The mean ± standard deviation for the patients' age and body mass index (BMI) were 36.4±10.6 years and 44.6±5.1 kg/m2, respectively. Significant endoscopic or histopathological findings as defined by the presence of large (≥ 2 cm) hiatus hernia, esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett esophagus, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, or intestinal metaplasia were found in 143 patients (20.9%); 364 patients (53.2%) were diagnosed to have Helicobacter pylori infection. CONCLUSION: The high number of significant endoscopic and histopathological findings in our study supports the routine use of preoperative EGD in all bariatric surgery patients. However, omitting EGD before Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in asymptomatic patients is still reasonable as the most frequently found significant findings, esophagitis, and hiatus hernia, are less likely to impact the operative plans in RYGB. Similarly, active surveillance and treatment of H. pylori infections in obese patients are important but it is not clear whether H. pylori eradication should be done before bariatric surgery.

Elevated plasma level of the glycolysis byproduct methylglyoxal on admission is an independent biomarker of mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients.

Biomarkers to identify ICU COVID-19 patients at high risk for mortality are urgently needed for therapeutic care and management. Here we found plasma levels of the glycolysis byproduct methylglyoxal (MG) were 4.4-fold higher in ICU patients upon admission that later died (n = 33), and 1.7-fold higher in ICU patients that survived (n = 32),compared to uninfected controls (n = 30). The increased MG in patients that died correlated inversely with the levels of the MG-degrading enzyme glyoxalase-1 (r2 = - 0.50), and its co-factor glutathione (r2 = - 0.63), and positively with monocytes (r2 = 0.29). The inflammation markers, SSAO (r2 = 0.52), TNF-α (r2 = 0.41), IL-1ß (r2 = 0.25), CRP (r2 = 0.26) also correlated positively with MG. Logistic regression analysis provides evidence of a significant relationship between the elevated MG upon admission into ICU and death (P < 0.0001), with 42% of the death variability explained. From these data we conclude that elevated plasma MG on admission is a novel independent biomarker that predicts mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients.

Relation Between Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and COVID-19 Severity.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor serves as a receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing COVID-19, to enter the lungs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may increase the expression of ACE2, resulting in concerns that patients with COVID-19 who are receiving these agents may be at increased risk of severe disease. This study was conducted to further investigate the effects of ACEIs and ARBs on the severity of COVID-19 in hospitalized hypertensive patients. METHODS: The study was a retrospective observational study. The medical records of all adult hypertensive patients who were hospitalized at Dammam Medical Complex (DMC) between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, due to COVID-19 were reviewed. The hypertensive patients who were receiving ACEIs or ARBs were compared with the other hypertensive patients who were not on ACEIs or ARBs. RESULTS: A total of 148 hypertensive patients were included in the analysis. They consisted of 106 male and 42 female patients (72% and 28%, respectively). Nearly half of the patients were Saudi (75 patients, 50%). A total of 81 patients were in the ACEI/ARB group, and 67 patients were in the control group. There were no differences between the two groups in age, diabetic status, history of chronic kidney disease, initial blood pressure measurements, and initial oxygen requirements, but the control group contained fewer female patients (18% versus 37%) and Saudi patients (36% versus 63%) than the ACEI/ARB group (p-values = 0.017 and 0.002, respectively). The use of ACEIs or ARBs was associated with significant reductions in ICU admission (9% versus 31%, p-value = 0.001), need for intubation (7% versus 28%, p-value = 0.002), and death (2% versus 24%, p-value = 0.000). A significant negative association between the use ACEIs or ARBs and mortality was also observed in the multivariate analysis after the adjustment for the possible confounders, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.087 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.017-0.449. CONCLUSIONS: ACEIs and ARBs have no adverse effects on the clinical prognosis of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. Their use might be even beneficial and protective, but future larger studies are needed to confirm these effects. In the meanwhile, they should be continued in COVID-19 hypertensive patients unless their use is contraindicated for other reasons (e.g., hypotension, hyperkalemia, or acute kidney injury (AKI)).

The Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines in Improving the Outcomes of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

Background With the rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), most countries took extreme measures to control the disease. Equitable access to safe and effective vaccines is critical to ending the COVID-19 pandemic. The Ministry of Health program in Saudi Arabia aimed to cover 17.4 million adults (70% of the adult population of Saudi Arabia) by the third quarter of 2021. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine on the clinical course and outcomes of the admitted confirmed COVID-19 patients, in comparison to non-vaccinated patients. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional record review was conducted for all hospitalized confirmed COVID-19 patients at Dammam Medical Complex (Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia) from June to July 2021. Two groups were studied according to the vaccination status (i.e., vaccinated and non-vaccinated). Information regarding comorbidities, length of stay, high oxygen requirements, ICU admission, and mortality data were collected and analyzed using the Python programming language (version 3.7.6) with the use of SciPy library (1.4.1) and Statsmodels module (v0.11.1). Results The sample included a total of 260 admitted confirmed COVID-19 cases. The mortality was significantly lower in the vaccinated group versus the non-vaccinated group with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.378 (CI 0.154-0.928). In addition, the OR of ICU admission was 0.476 (CI 0.218-1.042) and OR of endotracheal intubation was 0.561 (CI 0.249-1.265), but these did not reach statistical significance. We also detected a statistically significant relationship between mortality - regardless of vaccination status - and age ≥ 65 years (P=0.000, OR=7.51; 95%CI 3.13 to 18.04), chronic kidney disease (P=0.010, OR=5.62; CI 1.52 to 20.79), and renal transplant (P=0.037, OR=10.17; CI 1.15 to 89.76). Of note, most of our vaccinated patients received only a single dose (85%). Conclusion There is a significant reduction in mortality cases as well as less complicated hospital courses among the vaccinated group, in spite of the fact that most of our admitted patients had only a single vaccine shot. Suboptimal response to the vaccines was observed in the elder, chronic kidney disease, and renal transplant patients, hence the poorer outcomes in comparison to other patients.