[Refractive outcomes of out-of-the-bag intraocular lens implantation]. / Refraktsionnye rezul'taty vnekapsul'noi implantatsii intraokulyarnykh linz.

For the moment, the refractive outcomes of out-of-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation remain insufficiently studied. PURPOSE: To study and compare the refractive outcomes of retropupillary implantation of an iris-claw lens and transscleral suture fixation of IOL in complicated phacoemulsification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 70 patients (73 eyes) after complicated phacoemulsification in combination with grade 2 lens subluxation. The first group included 36 patients (39 eyes) who underwent complicated phacoemulsification using torsional ultrasound and retropupillary implantation of an iris-claw lens. The second group included 34 patients (34 eyes) after complicated phacoemulsification using torsional ultrasound and transscleral suture fixation of an elastic hydrophobic IOL. In the postoperative period we performed a comparative evaluation of uncorrected visual acuity and best corrected visual acuity, the average absolute error of IOL optical power calculation, the precision of postoperative refraction within ±0.5 diopters, the degree of induced astigmatism, and the tilt of the IOL. RESULTS: At three months after surgery uncorrected visual acuity of 0.8-1.0 was achieved in 33.3% of cases in the first group and 17.6% in the second group, the average absolute error of IOL optical power calculation was 0.34±0.08 diopters in the first group and 0.63±0.19 diopters in the second group, the precision of postoperative refraction within ±0.5 diopters was 94.9% in the first group and 85.3% in the second group, the tilt of the IOL was 0.69±0.21° in the first group and 3.19±0.97° in the second group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in best corrected visual acuity and the degree of induced astigmatism 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Implantation of an iris-claw lens in the course of complicated phacoemulsification in lens subluxation significantly improves refractive outcomes of the implantation in comparison with transscleral IOL fixation.

[Bandage lamellar-optical keratoplasty for post-excimer laser keratectasia]. / Bandazhnaia lechebno-opticheskaia keratoplastika v lechenii iatrogennoi keratéktazii.

INTRODUCTION: According to various sources, occurrence rate of keratectasia (KE) after Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) ranges from 0.04 to 0.2%. No known technique for keratorefractive surgery eliminates the probability. Neither corneal cross-linking, nor implantation of polymeric segments can completely prevent its development. PURPOSE: To treat KE after LASIK with bandage lamellar-optical keratoplasty (BLOK) surgery and to evaluate the results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 22 patients with KE after LASIK divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 6 patients; they underwent BLOK surgery using a segment transplant 1.5 mm in width and 180-220 µm in thickness. The second group included 16 patients who underwent BLOK surgery using 2.75 mm wide, 290-350 µm thick allogeneic transplant of individual length. The follow-up lasted 4 years. RESULTS: In the first group, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) improved by 0.4±007, in the second group - by 0.46±0.15. After two years, two patients had their transplant exchanged for a wider one due to ectasia progression. Corneal refraction was stable at 45.36±1.47 Diopters in all other patients of the first group. In the second group, it was consistently between 40.6 and 45.7 Diopters. The main complication of the BLOK surgery was displacement of the edge of the corneal flap formed during LASIK - occurred in 4 patients. CONCLUSION: Bandage lamellar-optical keratoplasty proved effective in treating patients with KE after LASIK, leading to improvement of visual acuity, strengthening of the cornea and normalization of its surface; it slows further progression of ectasia.