Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(34): e30110, 2022 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36042669

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Femoral nerve block is a widely accepted nerve block method with evident reduction in consumption of opioid painkiller and minimization of the duration of hospital stay but may cause weakness of quadriceps muscle strength. Adductor canal block is another nerve block technique that attracts the attention of scientific community nowadays because of its possible superiority over Femoral nerve block regarding mobility and muscle strength. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 studies, aiming to compare femoral nerve block with adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty regarding pain control and mobilization. RESULTS: Adductor canal block showed better preservation of quadriceps muscle strength (MD = 0.28, 95% CI [0.11, 0.46], P = .002), and better mobilization up to 2 days postoperatively. However, no significant difference was found between the 2 interventions regarding pain control (MD = 0.06, 95% CI [-0.06, 0.17], P = .33) or opioid consumption (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI [-0.06, 0.22], P = .28) up to 2 days postoperatively. The better mobilization results of adductor canal block did not translate into a significant difference in the risk of falls or patients' satisfaction; however, adductor canal block patients had less mean length of hospital stay than the patients with femoral nerve block. CONCLUSION: Both femoral nerve block and adductor canal block provide similar results regarding pain control and opioid consumption, however adductor canal block provides better preservation of quadriceps strength and mobilization, giving it more advantage over femoral nerve block.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Bloqueo Nervioso , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anestésicos Locales , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Nervio Femoral , Humanos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control
2.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 16(6): 102511, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35623229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To assess the safety and efficacy of semaglutide compared with placebo and other anti-hyperglycaemic agents in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare different doses, durations, and interventions in T2DM. We presented results as mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Twenty-six included RCTs studied different doses of subcutaneous (SC) and oral semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, sitagliptin, canagliflozin, and empagliflozin compared with placebo. Tirzepatide showed the highest efficacy, however, it was comparable to semaglutide. SC semaglutide 1 mg once-weekly showed higher reduction in HbA1c (MD = -1.72, 95% CI [-2.32; -1.12]), and fasting blood glucose (MD = -1.93, 95% CI [-2.81; -1.04]) versus placebo at 30 weeks and other timepoints. Adverse events (ADs) were comparable to placebo with oral and SC semaglutide, oral sitagliptin, SC liraglutide, and oral empagliflozin at most timepoints. However, SC semaglutide 0.8 mg and tirzepatide 10 mg groups had the highest gastrointestinal adverse events. CONCLUSION: Tirzepatide, oral and SC semaglutide has a favourable efficacy in treating T2DM. The adverse events were comparable to placebo; however, gastrointestinal adverse events were highly recorded in tirzepatide, oral and SC semaglutide groups.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Liraglutida , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes , Liraglutida/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis en Red , Fosfato de Sitagliptina/uso terapéutico
3.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(1): 85-93, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34217851

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal timing of vaginal dinoprostone administration before office hysteroscopy (OH) in nulliparous women. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 180 nulliparous women undergoing diagnostic OH. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly allocated the women to long-interval or short-interval dinoprostone groups: three mg dinoprostone was administered vaginally 12 hours before OH in the long-interval group and 3 hours before OH in the short-interval group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was pain during OH measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (0 = no pain; 100 = worst pain imaginable). The secondary outcomes were ease of hysteroscope passage, patient satisfaction score, and drug-related adverse effects. The patients in the long-interval dinoprostone group had lower pain scores during OH (p <.001). Contrarily, pain scores 30 minutes after the procedure were similar in both groups (p = .1). The patient satisfaction score was higher and clinicians found hysteroscope passage through the cervical canal easier and quicker in the long-interval dinoprostone group than in the short-interval group (p <.001, p = .003, and p <.001, respectively). Side effects were comparable in both study groups. CONCLUSION: Vaginal dinoprostone administered 12 hours before OH was more effective than that administered 3 hours before OH in reducing pain during OH in nulliparous women, with easier hysteroscope insertion, shorter procedure duration, and higher patient satisfaction score.


Asunto(s)
Misoprostol , Oxitócicos , Administración Intravaginal , Dinoprostona , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Histeroscopía/efectos adversos , Dimensión del Dolor , Embarazo
4.
Fertil Steril ; 115(3): 793-801, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33461754

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of carbetocin versus placebo in decreasing intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion during abdominal myomectomy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital from September 2019 to February 2020. PATIENT(S): A total of 138 women with symptomatic leiomyoma who were candidates for abdominal myomectomy (n = 69 in each group). INTERVENTION(S): We randomized the study participants in a 1:1 ratio to carbetocin and placebo groups. Intravenous 100 µg carbetocin or placebo was administered slowly after induction of anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, postoperative hemoglobin, operative time, length of hospitalization, and drug side-effects. RESULT(S): The baseline characteristics were similar among all groups. Carbetocin had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss compared with placebo (mean difference 184 mL). Hemoglobin level 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the placebo group than in the carbetocin group (9.1 ± 0.8 vs. 10.3 ± 0.6 g/dL). Eight women in the carbetocin group needed blood transfusion compared with 17 in placebo group. Operative time, length of hospitalization, and side-effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION(S): A single preoperative intravenous dose of 100 µg carbetocin is a simple, practical, and effective method of decreasing intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion during abdominal myomectomy, with tolerable, few, nonsignificant side-effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04083625.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Leiomioma/cirugía , Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Oxitocina/análogos & derivados , Miomectomía Uterina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Adulto , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Leiomioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxitocina/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Miomectomía Uterina/tendencias , Neoplasias Uterinas/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 50(1): 101798, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32479894

RESUMEN

Our objective was to assess and rank different pharmacological interventions for relieving endometriosis-related pain. We conducted an online bibliographic search in different databases from their inception until March 2019. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed different medical therapies in the management of endometriosis-related pain. We applied this network meta-analysis (NMA) based on the frequentist approach using statistical package "netmeta" (version 1.0-1) in R software. Our main outcomes were the change in severity of pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea score, non-menstrual pelvic pain score, and dyspareunia score. Overall, 36 RCTs were included in this study (patients no. = 7942). Dienogest (0.94), combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) (0.782), and elagolix (0.38) were the highest-ranked interventions for reducing the severity of pelvic pain at three months, while at six months, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (0.75), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) (0.73), and dienogest (0.65) were linked to more reduction in pelvic pain. The ranking p-score showed that GnRH analogues was the highest-ranked treatment for reducing dysmenorrhea at 3 months (1.00), while CHCs were the highest-ranked treatment at 6 months (0.97), followed by GnRH analogues (0.89). GnRH analogues (0.63) and elagolix (0.54) at three months while desogestrel (0.94) and CHCs (0.91) at six months were the highest-ranked treatment to reduce non-menstrual pelvic pain. GnRH analogues and elagolix were the highest-ranked pharmacologic therapies for reducing dyspareunia. In conclusion, CHCs, GnRH analogues, progesterone, and elagolix were the best approaches in reducing the pain of endometriosis.


Asunto(s)
Dismenorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Agentes Anticonceptivos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/uso terapéutico , Dismenorrea/etiología , Femenino , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Hidrocarburos Fluorados/uso terapéutico , Levonorgestrel/uso terapéutico , Nandrolona/análogos & derivados , Nandrolona/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis en Red , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Escala Visual Analógica
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33302842

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Type one diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune disease characterized by gradual destruction of beta cells in islets of Langerhans. Teplizumab is a humanized anti- CD3 monoclonal antibody, which may have beneficial effects for T1DM patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of teplizumab in T1DM patients. METHODS: We searched electronic databases using related keywords for randomized clinical trials assessing the safety and efficacy of teplizumab. We evaluated the retrieved citations for eligibility, and we extracted the data and then analyzed it using Review Manager Software. RESULTS: We included eight randomized clinical trials with 866 patients. Teplizumab was associated with lower insulin use than placebo at 6 months (MD = -0.17, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.09], P < 0.001), 12 months (MD = -0.12, 95% CI [-0.18, -0.06], P < 0.001), 18 months (MD = -0.22, 95% CI [-0.32, -0.11], P < 0.001) and 24 months (MD = -0.17, 95% CI [-0.28, -0.06], P = 0.003). The area under the curve of C-peptide was significantly increased in teplizumab group at 12 months (MD = 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.15], P = 0.03), 18 months (MD = 0.13, 95% CI [0.01, 0.25], P = 0.03) and 24 months (MD = 0.13, 95% CI [0.01, 0.24], P = 0.03). No significant effect of teplizumab on HbA1c levels was observed at any time point. Teplizumab was found to be associated with some side effects such as lymphopenia, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. CONCLUSION: Teplizumab is associated with lower insulin use and higher AUC of C-peptide in type 1 diabetic patients with no significant effect on Hb1c levels. Besides, teplizumab has shown some adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Insulina/metabolismo , Células Secretoras de Insulina/efectos de los fármacos , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 85(5): 388-395, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33075789

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Many pharmaceutical, surgical, and complementary medical interventions are used for primary dysmenorrhea treatment. However, no consensus has been reached about the most effective intervention. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of IV tramadol versus IV paracetamol in relieving acute pain of primary dysmenorrhea. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital and included 100 patients between 18 and 35 years old diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea. Patients received either 1-g paracetamol or 100-mg tramadol in 100-mL normal saline as an IV infusion over 10 min. Pain intensity was measured by using a visual analog scale at 15, 30, 60 min, and 2 h. We recorded drug side effects and requirements for rescue analgesics. RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly lower in the tramadol group compared with the paracetamol group at 15, 30, 60 min, and 2 h (p < 0.001). Fewer patients in the tramadol group needed rescue analgesics compared with the paracetamol group (p = 0.04). No significant differences were reported in side effects between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: IV tramadol is superior to IV paracetamol in relieving acute pain of primary dysmenorrhea with a comparable side effect profile.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dismenorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Acetaminofén/efectos adversos , Administración Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Tramadol/administración & dosificación , Tramadol/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
8.
Fertil Steril ; 114(4): 861-868, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732105

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE(S): To assess efficacy and safety of self-administered 3 mg dinoprostone vaginally in reducing pain during copper intrauterine device (IUD) insertion in parous women. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Family planning clinic in a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENT(S): Multiparous women who were attending a family planning clinic and requesting copper IUD insertion. INTERVENTIONS(S): We randomly assigned 160 participants into two groups: The dinoprostone group (n = 80) received 3 mg dinoprostone vaginally, and the placebo group (n = 80) received placebo vaginally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Our primary outcome was mean pain scores during IUD insertion. Our secondary outcomes were mean pain scores during tenaculum application, during uterine sounding, and 15 minutes after insertion, ease of insertion, satisfaction score, need for additional analgesics, and side-effects. RESULT(S): Both groups showed no significant difference in anticipated pain score (P=.41), pain during tenaculum placement (P=.22), and pain during sound insertion (P=.07). The dinoprostone group had significantly lower pain scores during IUD insertion (34.8 ± 10.1 vs. 57.8 ± 11.8) and 15 minutes after insertion (20.6 ± 6.4 vs. 29.6 ± 6.2), easier IUD insertion (43.6 ± 21.9 vs. 64.7 ± 18.1), and higher satisfaction (83.9 ± 11.6 vs. 63.0 ± 9.1) compared with the placebo group. Fewer patients required additional analgesics in the dinoprostone group compared with the placebo group (P=.01). Side-effects were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION(S): Self-administered 3 mg dinoprostone vaginally before copper IUD insertion in parous women reduces pain scores during IUD insertion, making insertion easier and increasing women's satisfaction, with tolerable side-effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04046302.


Asunto(s)
Dinoprostona/administración & dosificación , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre , Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Percepción del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Paridad/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Intravaginal , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/efectos adversos , Percepción del Dolor/fisiología , Paridad/fisiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoadministración , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Int Urogynecol J ; 31(9): 1735-1745, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32399905

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Most vaginal births are associated with trauma to the perineum. The morbidity associated with perineal trauma can be significant, especially when it leads to third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. We hypothesized that antenatal perineal massage could decrease the incidence of perineal trauma, particularly severe perineal tears and other postpartum complications. METHODS: We searched four different databases from inception until August 2019 for the available trials. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed the effect of antenatal perineal massage (intervention group) versus control group (no antenatal perineal massage) in perineal trauma patients. Data were extracted from eligible studies and meta-analyzed using RevMan software. Primary outcomes were the risk of episiotomies and perineal tears. Secondary outcomes were perineal pain, second stage of labor duration, wound healing, anal incontinence, and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with 3467 patients were analyzed. Women who received antenatal perineal massage had significantly lower incidence of episiotomies (RR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.72, 0.87], p < 0.001) and perineal tears (RR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.67, 0.94], p = 0.007), particularly the risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears (p = 0.03). Better wound healing and less perineal pain were evident in the antenatal perineal massage group. Antenatal perineal massage reduced the second stage of labor duration (p = 0.005) and anal incontinence (p = 0.003) with significant improvement in Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal perineal massage is associated with a lower risk of severe perineal trauma and postpartum complications.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Perineo , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Episiotomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masaje , Morbilidad , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/prevención & control , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
10.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 33(5): 559-565, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32330638

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of misoprostol and dinoprostone tablets administered vaginally 3 hours before copper intrauterine device (IUD) insertion vs placebo in reducing pain and increasing ease of insertion among nulliparous women. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 129 nulliparous women requesting a Copper T380A IUD insertion. INTERVENTIONS: Women were randomized to receive 200 µg misoprostol or 3 mg dinoprostone or placebo 3 hours before IUD insertion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome was patient-reported pain during IUD insertion using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include provider ease of insertion, women satisfaction level, and side effects. RESULTS: Participants' baseline characteristics were comparable between the study groups. Mean pain score during IUD insertion was lower with misoprostol than placebo (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 4.4 ± 2.2; P = .02) and dinoprostone compared to placebo (2.4 ± 1.8 vs 4.4 ± 2.2; P < .001). Clinicians reported easier IUD insertion with misoprostol than placebo (2.4 ± 1.7 vs 4.0 ± 2.4; P = .001) and dinoprostone compared to placebo (2.0 ± 1.5 vs 4.0 ± 2.4; P < .001). Women's satisfaction levels were higher with both misoprostol and dinoprostone than placebo (P < .001). Side effects did not differ among the 3 study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with vaginal misoprostol or dinoprostone effectively lowered pain during copper IUD insertion. However, the reduction in pain scores was clinically significant only in women who received dinoprostone. In both the misoprostol and dinoprostone groups, clinicians found the procedure easier, and women were more satisfied with IUD insertion. Side effects and complications were similar in all groups.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Dinoprostona/administración & dosificación , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/efectos adversos , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Administración Intravaginal , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Adulto Joven
11.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 33(4): 382-387, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32113878

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and efficacy of self-administered vaginal dinoprostone 12 hours before a 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) insertion in adolescents and young nulliparous women. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Nulliparous adolescents and young women aged 18-22 years. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned into 2 groups; the dinoprostone group (n = 65) received dinoprostone 3 mg vaginally, and the placebo group (n = 65) received placebo tablets vaginally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was pain scores during LNG-IUD insertion measured using a visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes were pain scores during speculum insertion, tenaculum placement, uterine sounding, and 20 minutes postprocedure, ease of insertion, Women's satisfaction score, need for additional analgesics, and side effects. RESULTS: The dinoprostone group had significantly lower pain scores during LNG-IUD insertion (2.83 ± 1.08 vs 3.95 ± 1.63), tenaculum placement (2.97 ± 1.41 vs 4.55 ± 1.53) and sounding of uterus (3.55 ± 1.71 vs 5.12 ± 1.37) compared with the placebo group (P < .001). No significant differences were found between both groups regarding anticipated pain scores (P = .85), pain during speculum insertion and 20 minutes postinsertion and insertion duration (P = .53). Women's satisfaction, provider reported ease of insertion, and need for additional analgesia were significantly better among dinoprostone users (P < .001, < .001, and .02, respectively). Side effects and procedure complications were similar for the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Self-administered dinoprostone 3 mg vaginally 12 hours before a 52-mg LNG-IUD insertion in nulliparous adolescent and young women effectively reduced pain during insertion and increased women's satisfaction and ease of insertion reported by clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Dinoprostona/administración & dosificación , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/efectos adversos , Administración Intravaginal , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Dolor/prevención & control , Autoadministración , Adulto Joven
12.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 34(10): 1633-1652, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31492986

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and Web of Science for relevant clinical trials discussing CT-P31 administration for IBD patients either naïve to biological therapy or switched from IFX therapy. Data of the rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and adverse events were extracted and pooled in a random effect model meta-analysis using CMA version 2. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies with a total of 3464 IBD patients treated with CT-P13 were identified. The pooled rates of clinical response among Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) at 8-14 weeks were 0.81 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.87) and 0.68 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.72), respectively, and at 48-63 weeks were 0.69 (95% CI = 0.48 to 0.85) and 0.54 (95% CI = 0.45 to 0.63) respectively. After switching from IFX to CT-P13, the pooled rates of sustained clinical response among CD and UC at 30-32 weeks were 0.84 (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.96) and 0.96 (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.99), respectively, and at 48-63 weeks were 0.51 (95% CI = 0.22 to 0.79) and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.99) respectively. Moreover, adverse events were reported (CD = 0.10, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.22; UC = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.15). CONCLUSION: CT-P13 is effective and well tolerated in short and long-term periods. Switching to CT-P13 is recommended for the management of IBD.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Inducción de Remisión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos
13.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 32(5): 541-545, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31195099

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of performing Zumba exercise on the severity and duration of pain in patients with primary dysmenorrhea. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Cairo University gynecology Hospital and Bahgat gym and fitness center. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-eight women diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea. INTERVENTIONS: Study participants were divided randomly into 2 equal groups: group I included women who engaged in Zumba exercise for 60 minutes twice weekly for 8 weeks, and group II was a control group with no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the menstrual pain intensity measured using the visual analogue scale scores at 4 and 8 weeks after starting Zumba exercise. The secondary outcome was the difference in the duration of pain in both groups. RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous regarding the baseline demographic characteristics. The severity of primary dysmenorrhea at the beginning of the study was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Menstrual pain intensity was significantly decreased in the Zumba group after 4 and 8 weeks of Zumba compared with the control group (mean difference, -2.94 [95% confidence interval, -3.39 to -2.48] and -3.79 [95% confidence interval, -4.16 to -3.43], respectively; P = .001). Also, the duration of pain was shorter in the Zumba group compared with the control group at 8 weeks (4.92 ± 1.90 vs 9.10 ± 2.92 hours, respectively; P = .001). CONCLUSION: The Zumba intervention can reduce the severity and duration of menstrual pain thus suggesting that regularly performing Zumba might be a possible complementary treatment for primary dysmenorrhea.


Asunto(s)
Dismenorrea/terapia , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Adulto Joven
14.
Fertil Steril ; 111(3): 547-552, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30711222

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence about the safety and efficacy of tramadol in pain relief during diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy (OH). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing diagnostic OH received tramadol versus those who were administered placebo. INTERVENTION(S): Electronic databases were searched using the following MeSH terms (tramadol OR opioids OR opioid OR narcotic OR narcotics) AND (hysteroscopy OR hysteroscopic). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pain assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) during OH, immediately and 30 minutes after the procedure. RESULT(S): One hundred thirteen studies were identified of which four randomized clinical trials were deemed eligible for this review (tramadol: n = 209; placebo: n = 209). The pooled estimate showed that tramadol significantly reduced VAS during procedure than placebo (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.78 to -0.88, I2 = 3%, P = .36). In addition, tramadol significantly reduced VAS immediately after the procedure (WMD = -1.05; 95% CI -1.49 to -0.61, I2= 0, P = .84) and 30 minutes after (WMD = -0.98; 95% CI -1.30 to -0.65, I2 = 0, P = .88). CONCLUSION(S): This meta-analysis suggests that tramadol is safe, effective, and gives favorable results in reducing pain during diagnostic OH.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Histeroscopía/efectos adversos , Dolor/prevención & control , Tramadol/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Tramadol/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...