Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Treated with Upadacitinib: Analysis of Data from Clinical Trials and Postmarketing Reports.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Upadacitinib is indicated for diseases affecting persons of childbearing potential including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, atopic dermatitis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis; however, teratogenicity was observed in animal studies. Given the potential for human fetal risk, pregnancy avoidance measures were required during clinical trials. This analysis describes pregnancy outcomes in patients exposed to upadacitinib during pregnancy. METHODS: Clinical trial and postmarketing cases of in utero exposure to upadacitinib were identified in AbbVie's safety database through 25 April, 2023. Analysis of clinical trial cases and postmarketing reports are presented separately; prospective and retrospectively reported pregnancy outcomes are integrated for each. Descriptive rates are presented to summarize outcomes. RESULTS: There were 128 maternal upadacitinib-exposed pregnancies with known outcomes identified; 80 and 48 pregnancies were reported in clinical trials and the postmarketing setting, respectively. In clinical trials (mean in utero exposure of 5 weeks, 3 days), live births (54%), spontaneous abortions (24%), elective terminations (21%), and ectopic pregnancy (1%) were reported. There was one report of a congenital malformation: a 35-week infant with an atrial septal defect. In postmarketing cases, live births (46%), spontaneous abortions (38%), elective terminations (15%), and ectopic pregnancy (2%) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: As the data are limited for in utero exposure to upadacitinib, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the effect of upadacitinib on pregnancy outcomes. Rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes with upadacitinib exposure were comparable to rates observed in the general population or patients with autoimmune inflammatory diseases. To date, no apparent evidence of teratogenicity exists in the analyses of human pregnancies exposed to upadacitinib during the first trimester.

Real-World Use and Effectiveness Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Upadacitinib: An Analysis from the CorEvitas Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Data assessing longer-term real-world effectiveness and treatment patterns with upadacitinib (UPA), a Janus kinase inhibitor, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are lacking. We assessed improvement in clinical and patient-reported outcomes and treatment patterns for up to 12 months among adult patients with RA initiating UPA. METHODS: Data were collected from the CorEvitas® RA Registry (08/2019-04/2022). Eligible patients had moderate to severe RA (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] > 10) and follow-up visits at 6 or 12 months after UPA initiation. Outcomes were mean change from baseline, percentage achieving minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in clinical and patient-reported outcomes, and disease activity at follow-up. We evaluated clinical outcomes and therapy changes among patients with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) experience and among those receiving UPA as first-line therapy, as well as those receiving UPA as monotherapy versus as part of combination therapy. We further evaluated whether outcomes were similar among those that remained on therapy. RESULTS: Patients treated with UPA (6-month cohort, N = 469; 12-month cohort, N = 263) had statistically significant improvements (p < 0.001) in mean CDAI, tender/swollen joint counts, pain, and fatigue at follow-up. At 12 months, 46.0% achieved MCID in CDAI and 40.0% achieved low disease activity/remission. Overall, 43.0% discontinued UPA at 12 months; of those receiving combination treatment (N = 90) with conventional therapies and UPA, 42.2% (N = 38) discontinued conventional therapy. Findings were similar in the 6-month cohort and among subgroups. Changes from baseline and proportions of patients achieving MCID or clinical outcomes tended to be numerically lower among patients with TNFi experience and numerically higher among those receiving UPA as first-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS: UPA initiation was associated with improvements in clinical and patient-reported outcomes, with meaningful clinical improvements regardless of prior TNFi experience, line of therapy, or concomitant use of conventional therapies. Further research is needed to better understand sustained response of UPA over longer treatment periods.

Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the importance of treatment sequencing in SELECT-COMPARE, assessing potential differences between starting upadacitinib or adalimumab therapy following inadequate MTX response. METHODS: Patients from SELECT-COMPARE were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg. Per protocol, patients with <20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts (weeks 14, 18, 22) or failure to achieve Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) at week 26 were blindly switched from upadacitinib to adalimumab or vice versa. Treatment outcomes, including clinical remission/LDA, physical function, pain and a novel combined endpoint for deep response, were evaluated through 48 weeks and corresponding time-averaged response rates determined. Data were analysed by initial randomized group regardless of any subsequent switch in therapy. RESULTS: This post hoc analysis included 651 patients initially randomized to upadacitinib (of whom 252 switched to adalimumab) and 327 patients initially randomized to adalimumab (of whom 159 switched to upadacitinib). At week 48, patients randomized to either therapy demonstrated similar achievement of most treatment endpoints. Greater improvements in the total time spent in a lower disease state were observed for initial upadacitinib vs initial adalimumab therapy across most clinical and patient-reported outcomes through 48 weeks, and the median time to DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 occurred 6-8 weeks earlier among those randomized to upadacitinib. CONCLUSION: Following a modified treat-to-target strategy, rates of CDAI remission/LDA and DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 at 48 weeks were similar, regardless of starting therapy. However, patients initially receiving upadacitinib reached treatment targets more quickly and spent more time in clinical targets over the initial 48 weeks of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02629159.

Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Long-Term Upadacitinib Therapy in Five Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: The Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a patient-reported outcome tool recommended for the assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. This analysis evaluated the long-term effect of upadacitinib vs. comparators on RAPID3 scores in patients with RA in the phase 3 SELECT clinical trial program. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included data from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily (QD) as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). The proportions of patients reporting RAPID3 remission (scores ≤ 3) were assessed at week 60. Correlations between absolute scores for RAPID3 and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) at week 60 were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 3117 patients were included from the SELECT-NEXT, -BEYOND, -MONOTHERAPY, -COMPARE, and -EARLY trials. By week 60, 32-52% of methotrexate-naïve and csDMARD inadequate responder (IR) patients treated with either upadacitinib 15 mg QD or upadacitinib 30 mg QD reported RAPID3 scores consistent with remission. The proportions were slightly lower in the biologic DMARD-IR SELECT-BEYOND population (19-28%). RAPID3 scores highly correlated (Spearman correlation values ≥ 0.58) with CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28(CRP) scores through week 60 (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib, as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs, was associated with patient-reported remission assessed by RAPID3 over 60 weeks across the SELECT RCTs in patients with RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: SELECT-BEYOND (NCT02706847); SELECT-NEXT (NCT02675426); SELECT-MONOTHERAPY (NCT02706951); SELECT-EARLY (NCT02706873); SELECT-COMPARE (NCT02629159).

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disease that causes inflammation of the joints. Doctors have several ways of assessing how bad a patient's disease is, and these often use a combination of signs and symptoms to develop a 'score'. One method is called RAPID3, which is a score based on an overall assessment of the disease by the patient, the level of pain, and the amount of physical disability. An advantage of RAPID3 is that it is quick and easy to use, and since it uses only patient-reported symptoms, it can be measured easily via telemedicine, without the need for an in-person consultation. In this study, we decided to look into the effect of upadacitinib, a drug used for the treatment of RA, on RAPID3 score in patients with RA. We also investigated whether RAPID3 correlates with other ways of measuring RA severity, including scores that use physician-measured factors such as number of affected joints, as this can help show whether RAPID3 is a valid and useful tool. We found that upadacitinib led to long-term improvements in RAPID3 score, and that results were the same in different studies and patient groups, including patients who had not responded well to other treatments. We also found that RAPID3 correlated well with other measures, i.e., improvements in RAPID3 happened in parallel with improvements in other scores. Overall, these results suggest that RAPID3 can be a useful tool in patients with RA.

TGF-β1 signal pathway in the regulation of inflammation in patients with atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE@#To observe the expression changes of inflammatory markers TGF-β1, Smad3 and IL-6 in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and to explore the significance of TGF-β1 signaling pathway in the structural remodeling of AF.@*METHODS@#The expression of TGF-β1, Smad3 and IL-6 in 50 cases with AF and 30 normal cases were detected by RT-PCR and ELISA.@*RESULTS@#The TGF-β1, Smad3 and IL-6 mRNA and protein expression levels in patients with AF were significantly higher than that in the control group (P0.05). The TGF-β1mRNA expression in the ⩾ 50 years subgroup was significantly higher than that in the <50 years subgroups, and it was higher in the NYHA III subgroup than in the I/II grade subgroup. It was also higher in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% subgroup than in LVEF ⩾ 50% group, and it was significantly higher in the AF time ⩾ 36 months subgroup than that in <36 months subgroup (P<0.05). The Smad3 and IL-6 expressions in the in the LVEF <50% subgroup were both high that than that in LVEF ⩾ 50% group, and higher in the AF time ⩾ 36 months subgroup than that in <36 months subgroup (P<0.05). There were a positive correlation between TGF-β1, Smad3 and IL-6 (r=0.687, r=0.547). There were also a positive correlation between Smad3 and IL-6 mRNA (r=0.823).@*CONCLUSIONS@#AF is associated with inflammation, and the inflammation is also involved in the fibrillation and sustain of AF. The TGF-β1 signal pathway may be involved in the process of atrial structural remodeling in patients with AF, and iss related with the occurrence and maintenance of AF.