Prioritizing sexual and reproductive health research and care for people with cystic fibrosis: A 2023 workshop report from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Sexual Health, Reproduction, and Gender (SHARING) Research Working Group.

BACKGROUND: To address sexual and reproductive health (SRH) concerns among people with cystic fibrosis(PwCF), the CF Foundation created the Sexual Health, Reproduction, and Gender Research (SHARING) Working Group. This report summarizes CF community SRH research priorities and workshop discussions/future study planning. METHODS: Pre-workshop, we distributed a community prioritization survey on CF SRH research/care. During the workshop, we used results and reviewed existing research to establish research priorities and design studies to address identified knowledge gaps. RESULTS: A total of 303 respondents (85 % PwCF, 15 % caregivers) completed the survey. Highly-rated SRH topics were: 1) effects of CF modulator therapy on sex hormones; 2) effects of sex hormones on CF; 3) fertility; 4) pregnancy; and 5) SRH/mental health. Twenty-four workshop participants established the need for further research on sex hormones and CF, optimizing SRH care provision, and fertility/ART. CONCLUSION: SRH is an important and emerging area in CF and thoughtful consideration of community perspectives can ensure that future research is relevant and responsive.

Need to study simplification of gastrointestinal medication regimen in cystic fibrosis in the era of highly effective modulators.

INTRODUCTION: The success of highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) has led to consideration of simpler regimens for people with CF (PwCF) with opportunities to modify burdensome regimens. Despite the intuitive appeal of discontinuing chronic therapies no longer necessary, this process should be pursued systematically to ensure safety, adherence, and validate patient-centered preferences. We designed a questionnaire to determine the state of use of acid-suppressive medications (ASM) and pancreatic enzyme therapy (PERT), current self-withdrawal and provider-directed withdrawal practices, and interest in a standardized withdrawal study. METHODS: In collaboration with CF Foundation (CFF), a questionnaire was developed and distributed to members of Community Voice (CV, comprised of PwCF and their loved ones), and CF providers regarding the need to study simplifying the gastrointestinal (GI) regimen for PwCF on HEMT. RESULTS: Approximately 20-40% of CV or CF providers have decreased or stopped ASM for those on HEMT. For PERT, CV and CF providers have decreased dose (34%-48% and approximately 25%, respectively) more often than having stopped it altogether (13%-24% and 3%-12%, respectively). Cumulatively, there is interest in pursuing research in this area (86% CV and 89% CF providers) and willingness to enroll in such a study (80% CV and 89% CF providers). CONCLUSION: Systematically studying the withdrawal of common GI medications, ASM and PERT, is important to CV and CF providers. Decreases in dosing and withdrawal are already taking place without evidence to support this practice. This questionnaire is the first step in designing a GI medication simplification study in PwCF on HEMT.

Community Perspective on Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis.

People with cystic fibrosis (CF) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency must take pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) to prevent malnutrition and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Finding better ways to manage GI complaints is a high priority for the CF community. We fielded a survey to assess the perspective of people affected by CF regarding symptoms attributed to and challenges associated with current PERT, to identify factors that affect participation in PERT studies, and to understand attitudes toward an outcome measure that could be an alternative to the coefficient of fat absorption test. Persistent GI symptoms are commonly ascribed to PERT. Minimizing time commitment and maximizing patient safety were factors affecting participation in research. We demonstrate 4 generalizable ways to incorporate patient experience early in the research process to aid in development of new medications and help improve study enrollment.

Impact of COVID-19 on mental health: Effects on screening, care delivery, and people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are two to four times more prevalent in people with CF (pwCF) than the general population. COVID-19 may exacerbate mental health challenges, increasing demand for psychological services, while decreasing their availability. We assessed the impact of the pandemic on depression and anxiety in pwCF, including how COVID-19 affected the frequency of mental health screening and the types of services provided. METHODS: A 38-item internet survey, completed in June 2020, assessed how COVID-19 affected: 1) the mental health clinician's role and screening processes; 2) barriers to screening and resource needs; 3) impact of COVID-19 on depression and anxiety, and 4) positive outcomes and confidence in sustaining mental health screening and treatment, including telehealth services, after the pandemic. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 131 of the 289 US CF programs. Overall, 60% of programs (n=79) continued mental health screening and treatment, although less frequently; 50% provided individual tele-mental health interventions, and 9% provided telehealth group therapy. Clinically elevated depression symptoms (PHQ-9≥10; moderate to severe), were found in 12% of 785 pwCF, with 3.1% endorsing suicidal ideation. Similarly, elevated anxiety (moderate to severe; GAD-7≥10) was found in 13% of pwCF (n=779). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic created an opportunity to implement innovative solutions to disruptions in mental health screening and treatment in CF programs. We found that pwCF had increased access to psychological interventions during the pandemic via telehealth, supporting the continued integration of tele-mental health screening and treatment into CF care.

Perceptions of Diabetes Technology Use in Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes Management.

Background: Diabetes technologies are associated with improvements in glycemic control and health-related quality of life among people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Use and perceptions of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) and insulin pumps within the cystic fibrosis (CF) community have not been well studied. Methods: A 30-item online survey addressing cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) diagnosis, CGM and insulin pump use, and perceptions of diabetes technologies was sent to a CF community group, including people with CF (pwCF) and parents of children with CF (cwCF). Results: The response rate was 11% (n = 120; 83 pwCF, 35 cwCF). Sixty-one percent of pwCF and 34% of cwCF reported a diagnosis of CFRD. CGM use was reported by 75% (n = 47) of respondents with CFRD but was discontinued by 19% (n = 9), most commonly due to cost and increased worry about glycemia. Insulin pump therapy was reported by 29% (n = 18 of 62) of respondents with CFRD and was discontinued by 28% (n = 5), most commonly due to pain or skin irritation. Overall, 91% agreed or strongly agreed that CGM facilitated CFRD management. Eighty-one percent agreed with at least five of seven positive statements about CGM as compared with 22% for insulin pumps. Potential embarrassment over device wear, concerns about cost, and pain were commonly held negative perceptions of both technologies. Conclusions: As compared with T1D and despite perceived benefits, rates of sustained diabetes technology use are low in the CFRD community. Better insurance coverage to mitigate cost, better patient education, and confirmation that these technologies improve health and patient-reported outcomes may increase uptake.

Designing the GALAXY study: Partnering with the cystic fibrosis community to optimize assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) involvement among persons with cystic fibrosis (CF) is highly prevalent, representing a significant source of morbidity. Persons with CF have identified GI concerns as a top research priority, yet universal clinical outcome measures capturing many of the GI symptoms experienced in CF are lacking. The GALAXY study was envisioned to address this unmet need. METHODS: The GALAXY study team partnered with Community Voice, a community of patients with CF and their caregivers, to identify the patient reported outcome measures that most accurately reflected their experience with GI symptoms in CF. We also surveyed CF care teams to identify the comfort level of various team members (providers, nurses and dieticians) in managing a variety of GI conditions. RESULTS: Members of Community Voice identified the combination of PAC-SYM, PAGI-SYM, PAC-QOL and the Bristol Stool scale with three additional symptom-specific questions as patient-reported outcome measures that comprehensively captured the CF experience with GI disease. CF care team providers reported a high level of comfort in treating GI conditions including constipation (92%), GERD (93%), and gassiness (77%), however comfort level was limited to only first-line interventions. CONCLUSION: By partnering with persons with CF as well as their caregivers and medical providers, the GALAXY study is designed to uniquely capture the prevalence and severity of GI involvement among persons with CF in a manner that reflects the CF patient experience. The results of GALAXY will inform the development of future interventional trials and serve as a reproducible and objective study endpoint.

Hemoptysis from the perspective of people with cystic fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: People with cystic fibrosis (CF) are living longer, thus complications associated with age, such as hemoptysis, are increasing. The Institute of Medicine has emphasized the importance of patient-centeredness. Although guidelines about hemoptysis in people with CF are available, these focus on management of the complication and not the patient perspective. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand hemoptysis from the point of view of those who have experienced it. METHODS: We fielded an 11-question survey to adults with CF and asked those who had hemoptysis to respond. Four questions had open-ended options: (1) the person's first experience with hemoptysis, (2) how that experience affected the way they approach their CF, (3) how they deal with hemoptysis when it occurs outside the home and (4) a free text box for general comments. RESULTS: Thirty-one of 132 adults with CF who were sent a survey completed it (23% response rate); 63% F), indicated that they had experienced hemoptysis and described their triggers. In response to open questioning, 77% of respondents found their first experience with hemoptysis to be 'scary,' 'frightening,' 'worrying' or 'jarring.' Half of respondents reported quality of life being negatively affected by worsening stress or anxiety, fear of bleeding in public or other life impacts. CONCLUSIONS: Focusing on how to cope with future episodes of hemoptysis and the associated anxiety can be helpful to patients. Proactive communication and sensitivity to patient experience may deepen physician-patient rapport, increase self-efficacy to cope with future episodes and lead to more comprehensive care of hemoptysis.