STEMI Due to Big Ostial Left Main Thrombus Extending Into Aorta: Challenging Situation With No Clear Guidelines.

Extensive left main (LM) coronary artery thrombus is a rare and life-threatening angiographic finding with usual dramatic clinical presentation including hemodynamic instability and sudden cardiac death. The proper management of a big LM thrombus extending into aorta remains a challenging issue with no clear guidelines. In the following case report we present a 45-year-old patient with no apparent risk factors for coronary artery disease who presented with acute infero-lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The examination was performed using a right transfemoral approach and it revealed the presence of a large mobile, hazy mass within the left main coronary artery (LMCA) extending into the aorta. To confirm the extension of that structure we performed intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) which revealed a circumferential mass in the LMCA extending with its two-thirds into the aorta with no evidence of atherosclerotic plaques. After a long discussion within our Heart team we decided to transfer the patient for urgent surgical removal. Such decision was made with regard to the large size of the mass and in order to avoid systemic or distal embolization into coronary arteries. Perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) confirmed diagnosis and excluded presence of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Surgical removal was done successfully with complete resolution of ST-segment elevation and rapid fall of cardiac enzymes to normal levels. Postoperative course was uneventful. The mass was defined as a thrombus by pathophysiology examination. Patient was discharged well from our hospital after 1 week.

Intracardiac versus transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage occlusion with watchman.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is mostly performed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) may be an alternative imaging modality for LAAO that precludes the need for general anesthesia or sedation. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive single center, single operator LAAO candidates were analyzed. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between patients in whom a Watchman was implanted with ICE vs. TEE guidance. In 76 consecutive patients the Watchman device was deployed under ICE in 32 patients (42%) and under TEE guidance in 44 patients (58%). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, except that patients in the TEE group were older (81 [75-85] years vs. 75 [68-80] years, P = 0.007). Total injected contrast media as well as fluoroscopy time were comparable between groups (90 ml [54-140] vs. 85 ml [80-110], P = 0.86 and 7.9 min [6.4-15.5] vs. 9.8 min [7.0-13.2], P = 0.51, for TEE vs. ICE, respectively). However, time from femoral venous puncture to transseptal puncture and to closure was longer in the ICE group (14 min [7.3-20] vs. 6 min [3.3-11], P = 0.007 and 48 min [40-60] vs. 34.5 min [27-44], P = 0.003, respectively). In the TEE group one patient suffered esophageal erosion with bleeding, which was managed conservatively and one non-LAAO related in-hospital mortality occurred in an 88-year-old patient. Device implantation success rate was 100% in both groups. No device embolization, no significant peri-device leak, no tamponade, no stroke, and no access site bleeding occurred in any patient. Total hospital stay for stand-alone LAAO was comparable between groups (2 days [2-2] vs. 2 days [2-3.3], P = 0.17, in ICE vs. TEE, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ICE guidance for LAAO with the Watchman device is feasible and comparable to TEE and may become the preferred imaging modality for LAAO. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Successful versus unsuccessful antegrade recanalization of single chronic coronary occlusion: eight-year experience and outcomes by a propensity score ascertainment.

AIMS: The effectiveness of revascularization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains intriguing. Thus, we sought to investigate whether a successful PCI for single CTO improves outcomes in a setting of stable angina and chronic occlusion of single coronary artery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 11 957 consecutive patients referred for nonurgent PCI between 2003 and 2010, 1110 displayed single CTO and were enrolled to the central CTO-registry database. The primary end-point included all-cause mortality, the secondary end-point a composite of safety outcome measure of all-cause death, nonfatal-MI, the need for urgent revascularization and stroke. The major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) records were extracted from the national administrative database and all patients were linked to the long-term follow-up. Since the patient assignment was not random, we performed the propensity scoring to minimize selection bias; 734 patients (66%) had a successful PCI-CTO. Compared with successful procedures, unsuccessful procedures had similar rates of all-cause death both in crude (HR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.49-1.25; P = 0.30) and adjusted analysis (HR, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.50-1.28; P = 0.34). A similar, significant reduction in overall MACE was noted with successful PCI-CTO compared with unsuccessful procedure in unadjusted (HR, 0.74; 95%CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.020) and adjusted calculation (HR, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.019). Patients after successful PCI-CTO as compared with failed recanalization less frequently underwent surgical revascularization. The benefit was sustained at 3 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Successful PCI for single CTO does not improve long-term survival, nonetheless, is associated with reduced overall MACE and the need for surgical revascularization.

Coronary myocardial bridge: an innocent bystander?

Myocardial bridge (MB) or tunneled coronary artery is an inborn abnormality, which implicates a systolic vessel compression with a persistent mid-late diastolic diameter reduction. Myocardial bridges are often observed during coronary angiography with an incidence of 0.5%-5.5%. The most involved coronary artery is the left anterior descending artery followed by the diagonal branches, the right coronary artery, and the left circumflex. The overall long-term prognosis is generally benign. However, several risk or precipitating factors (e.g., high heart rate, left ventricular hypertrophy, decreased peripheral vascular resistance) may trigger symptoms (most frequently angina). Herein, we describe two cases of symptomatic myocardial bridge, where medical treatment (i.e., inotropic negative drug) and coronary stenting were successfully utilized to treat this pathology. We also focus on the clinical presentation, and the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities to correctly manage this frequently observed congenital coronary abnormality, underlining the fact that in cases of typical angina symptoms without any significant coronary artery disease, MB should be considered as a possible differential diagnosis.

Successful angioplasty of an occluded aberrant coronary artery: a rare cause of acute myocardial infarction.

A 48-year-old woman was admitted for an acute infero-lateral myocardial infarction (AMI). The coronary angiography showed an occluded aberrant left circumflex artery taking off from the right sinus of Valsalva of the aortic root. This rare coronary anomaly represents a challenge for interventional cardiologists, especially in the setting of AMI, since it may be difficult to identify an aberrant occluded vessel, to predict its origin and course and finally to choose the material which offers an adequate support during the revascularization procedure. In this particular case, the percutaneous treatment of initially occluded aberrant circumflex artery was performed successfully.