Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 42: 103560, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37031900

RESUMEN

AIMS: The existing study aimed to assess the survival rate of S.mutans and shear bond strength (SBS) of resin adhesive restoration bonded to carious affected dentin (CAD) after using different cavity disinfectants (Chitosan, Fotoenticine®, and CO2 laser) in comparison to Chlorhexidine (CHX). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included human mandibular molars assessed on International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) score 4 and 5. The cusp part of the clinical crown was cut off until the reduction reaches the central fossa while being continuously supplied with water coolant till the tooth cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The root sections were embedded in polymethyl methacrylate acrylic resin followed by culturing S.mutans biofilm on the CAD surface. Specimens were arbitrarily allocated into four groups(n = 10) based on the type of disinfection. Group 1 (2% CHX), Group 2 (Chitosan), Group 3 (Fotoenticine), and Group 4 (CO2 laser). S.mutans survival rate was assessed and CAD was restored with a composite restorative material. Thermoocycling of the samples was performed and a universal testing machine (UTM) and Stereomicroscope were used to identify bond integrity and type of fracture. ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison tests were used to assess SBS. Data on the survival rate of S. mutans were compared between groups using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test RESULTS: Outcomes revealed that Group 1 (CHX) displayed the highest survival rate (0.65 ± 0.10). However, lowest survival rate was demonstrated by Group 3 (Fotoenticine) treated specimens (0.25 ± 0.06). It was also discovered that CHX unveiled highest bond strength values (21.48 ± 1.39 MPa). Nevertheless, Group 2 (Chitosan) showed lowest SBS (11.01 ± 1.00 MPa). Intergroup comparison analysis presented that group 1, and group 4 (Co2 laser) (17.76 ± 0.41 MPa) displayed no significant difference in their bond integrity achieved. (p > 0.05). However, group 3 (Fotoenticine) (16.28 ± 0.51 MPa) and group 2 demonstrated comparable outcomes of SBS. (p > 0.05) CONCLUSION: The use of CHX and CO2 lasers as disinfectants on the CAD surface resulted in a positive impact on the SBS of resin composite, according to the study's findings. However, it is worth noting that Fotoenticine exhibited better antimicrobial efficacy against S. mutans.


Asunto(s)
Quitosano , Desinfectantes , Fotoquimioterapia , Humanos , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Dióxido de Carbono , Susceptibilidad a Caries Dentarias , Cementos de Resina/química , Dentina , Ensayo de Materiales , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes , Clorhexidina/farmacología
2.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237630, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32813692

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dental offices are among the highest risk for transmission of the COVID-19, having the potential to transmit the virus via routine dental procedures. This cross-sectional study assessed the preparedness and perception of infection control measures against the COVID-19 pandemic by dentists in Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This online survey addressed the impact and perception of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental practice in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire comprised 26 closed-ended questions. Descriptive statistics included frequency distributions with percentages. In addition, the significance between the different demographic variables and questions about dentists' perception of the COVID-19 pandemic was tested using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: COVID-19 management in dental clinics varied in terms of adherence to the Ministry of Health (MOH) guidelines. Dental clinics' screening questionnaire for patients showed good adherence (67%), while the lowest agreement was detected with the question on the existence of an airborne infection in the isolation room (15%). Almost two-thirds of the respondents agreed that the dental reception area adopted the proper COVID-19 preventive measures. Greatest accord was observed in their answers on questions about dentists' perception of the COVID-19 pandemic, ranging from 64%-89%. In addition, there were statistically significant differences in questions about the perception of dentists towards the COVID-19 pandemic by different demographic variables such as age and years of work experience (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The response of most dentists regarding the preparedness and perception of infection control measures against the COVID-19 pandemic was positive. Dental clinics need to adhere more to the MOH recommendations in preparedness of their facilities or by educating their dentists and staff.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Atención Odontológica/organización & administración , Odontólogos/psicología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/organización & administración , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Estudios Transversales , Clínicas Odontológicas , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...