Psychological distress among unemployed migrants settling in southwestern Spain: A cross-sectional study.

Migrants living in the informal settlements of Southern Spain tend to have precarious employment and poor living conditions, making then vulnerable to mental health issues. This study aimed to assess psychological distress in a sample of unemployed migrants residing in informal settlements in the province of Huelva (southern Spain), during the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted during the months of April to June 2021, through a heteroadministered questionnaire, in informal settlements. The measurement instrument was the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), used to analyze psychological distress, and other sociodemographic and health-related variables. Univariate and bivariate descriptive data analysis were performed, using the nonparametric statistics Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and Tau ß correlation. A categorical regression analysis was performed to study the relationship between psychological distress and the rest of the variables. The sample consisted of 317 subjects, 83.9% of whom were males, and the mean age was 33.4 years (SD = 10.7 years). The mean score obtained in the GHQ-12 questionnaire was 13.69 points (SD = 3.86). Significant differences were found between levels of psychological distress and substance abuse (H = 14.085; P = .049), people who wished to stay in Spain (t = 6987; P = .049), people who experienced isolation due to COVID-19 contact (t = 1379.5; P = .001), people who needed medical assistance due to COVID-19 (t = 7.990; P = .018), and those who reported having chronic illnesses (t = 2686.5, P = .02). The mean score of psychological distress indicates general high levels of psychological distress. Participants who had experienced isolation due to COVID-19 contact, who consumed substances, and who had chronic illnesses reported the highest levels of psychological distress.

Prevalence of NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: This research quantitatively explored the prevalence of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses related to the care of patients experiencing heart failure. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted with the systematic review protocol registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022382565). METHODS: Systematic searches were performed between March and April 2022, including peer review for selection, quality assessment, data extraction, and analysis of all included studies. A subsequent meta-analysis was performed, focusing on the proportion of nursing diagnoses in patients with heart failure. The logistic random effects model with maximum likelihood estimation assessed the combined proportion, and heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. The goodness-of-fit of the meta-analysis results was assessed using the leave-one-out method and by evaluating publication bias through contour-enhanced funnel plots. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, WOS, and Embase were used. RESULTS: Of the 11 studies that met the eligibility criteria, 44 nursing diagnoses were identified as most frequently occurring in patients experiencing heart failure, and only 16 diagnoses appeared in more than one publication. The combined mean proportion was 35.73% (95% CI = [26.67%; 48.56%]), indicating the presence of heterogeneity based on the I2 value. However, no publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: The results of the meta-analysis suggest priority diagnoses in individuals with heart failure, such as deficient knowledge (00126). Additionally, secondary diagnoses, such as activity intolerance (00092), excess fluid volume (00026), and ineffective breathing pattern (00032), were identified as responses to decreased cardiac output (00029). Less prevalent nursing diagnoses were associated with deterioration of health status and the need for hospitalization. OBJETIVO: Investigar cuantitativamente la prevalencia de diagnósticos de enfermería NANDA-I asociados con la atención de pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca. DISEÑO: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis. El protocolo de revisión sistemática quedó registrado en PROSPERO) número de registro: CRD42022382565). MÉTODOS: Se realizaron búsquedas sistemáticas entre marzo y abril de 2022, llevándose a cabo una revisión por pares sobre la selección, evaluación de calidad, extracción de datos y análisis de todos los estudios incluidos. Se realizó un metanálisis posterior centrado en la proporción de diagnósticos de enfermería en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca. El modelo logístico de efectos aleatorios con estimación de máxima verosimilitud evaluó la proporción combinada y la heterogeneidad entre los estudios se evaluó mediante el estadístico I2. La bondad de ajuste de los resultados del metanálisis se evaluó mediante el método Leave-one-out y la evaluación del sesgo de publicación mediante gráficos de embudo (funnel plot), denominado Contour-Enhanced Funnel Plot. FUENTES DE DATOS: PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, WOS, Embase. RESULTADOS: En los 11 estudios que cumplieron con los criterios de elegibilidad, se identificaron 44 diagnósticos de enfermería aunque sólo 16 diagnósticos aparecieron en más de una publicación. La proporción media combinada fue del 35,73% (IC del 95%) = [26,67%; 48,56%]), y el valor de I2 indica la presencia de heterogeneidad, aunque no hay sesgo de publicación. CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados de este metaanálisis indican que habría diagnósticos prioritarios en personas con insuficiencia cardíaca, como Conocimientos deficientes (00126). Además, se han identificado otros diagnósticos de enfermería como diagnósticos secundarios: Intolerancia a la actividad (00092), Exceso de volumen de líquidos (00026) y Patrón respiratorio ineficaz (00032), que sería la respuesta a Disminución del gasto cardíaco (00029). Además de diagnósticos de enfermeríaa menos prevalentes relacionados con el deterioro del estado de salud y la necesidad de hospitalización.

[End of the use of masks in public spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on the mental health of pregnant women]. / Fin del uso de la mascarilla en espacios públicos durante la pandemia por la COVID-19: impacto en la salud mental de las mujeres embarazadas.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 has affected the entire population, generating a greater impact on certain vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of fear and anxiety regarding the COVID-19 disease in pregnant women, using the AMICO_Pregnant scale, in the final phase of the health crisis caused by the disease, marked by the relaxation of isolation measures in public spaces. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study using the self-reported questionnaire AMICO_Pregnant was developed between March 24 and April 18, 2022. This was followed by a univariate and bivariate statistical analysis of the data collected. RESULTS: A total of 479 surveys of pregnant women of different gestational ages were obtained. The bivariate analysis showed statistical significance in the AMICO_Pregnant scale score about several variables over the previous year: contact with the disease (p=0.025); number of previous pregnancies (p=0.019); changes in the birth plan (p=0.001); and vaccination status (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted pregnant women's mental health, producing a negative effect on emotions. The research carried out shows a statistically significant relationship between the levels of fear and anxiety in pregnant women and factors such as the number of previous pregnancies, contact with the previous disease, vaccination level or expectations regarding the delivery or birth plan.

OBJECTIVE: La COVID-19 ha afectado a toda la población, generando un mayor impacto en determinados grupos vulnerables, como es el caso de las mujeres gestantes. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los niveles de miedo y ansiedad a la COVID-19 en la mujer gestante, mediante la escala AMICO_Gestante, en la fase final de la crisis sanitaria causada por dicha enfermedad, marcada por el relajamiento de las medidas de aislamiento en espacios públicos. METHODS: Se realizó un estudio transversal descriptivo mediante el uso de cuestionario autoinformado AMICO_Gestante, desarrollado entre el 24 de marzo y el 18 de abril de 2022. Tras ello, se ejecutó un análisis estadístico univariado y bivariado de los datos recogidos. RESULTS: Se obtuvieron un total de 479 encuestas de mujeres gestantes de diferente edad gestacional. El análisis bivariado mostró significación estadística en la puntuación de la escala AMICO_Gestante en relación con varias variables en relación al año anterior: contacto con la enfermedad (p=0,025); número de embarazos previos (p=0,019); cambios en el plan de parto (p=0,001); y estado vacunacional (p=0,01). CONCLUSIONS: La pandemia por la COVID-19 tiene un impacto en la salud mental de la mujer gestante, produciendo un efecto negativo en las emociones. La investigación realizada muestra una relación estadísticamente significativa entre los niveles de miedo y ansiedad en la mujer gestante y factores como el número de embarazos previos, el contacto con la enfermedad previa, el nivel de vacunación o las expectativas en relación al plan de parto o nacimiento.

Fin del uso de la mascarilla en espacios públicos durante la pandemia por la COVID-19: impacto en la salud mental de las mujeres embarazadas / End of the use of masks in public spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on the mental health of pregnant women

Background: COVID-19 has affected the entire population, generating a greater impact on certain vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of fear and anxiety regarding the COVID-19 disease in pregnant women, using the AMICO_Pregnant scale, in the final phase of the health crisis caused by the disease, marked by the relaxation of isolation measures in public spaces. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study using the self-reported questionnaire AMICO_Pregnant was developed between March 24 and April 18, 2022. This was followed by a univariate and bivariate statistical analysis of the data collected. Results: A total of 479 surveys of pregnant women of different gestational ages were obtained. The bivariate analysis showed statistical significance in the AMICO_Pregnant scale score about several variables over the previous year: contact with the disease (p=0.025); number of previous pregnancies (p=0.019); changes in the birth plan (p=0.001); and vaccination status (p=0.01). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted pregnant women’s mental health, producing a negative effect on emotions. The research carried out shows a statistically significant relationship between the levels of fear and anxiety in pregnant women and factors such as the number of previous pregnancies, contact with the previous disease, vaccination level or expectations regarding the delivery or birth plan.(AU)

Fundamentos: La COVID-19 ha afectado a toda la población, generando un mayor impacto en determinados grupos vulnerables, como es el caso de las mujeres gestantes. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los niveles de miedo y ansiedad a la COVID-19 en la mujer gestante, mediante la escala AMICO_Gestante, en la fase final de la crisis sanitaria causada por dicha enfermedad, marcada porel relajamiento de las medidas de aislamiento en espacios públicos. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal descriptivo mediante el uso de cuestionario autoinformadoAMICO_Gestante, desarrollado entre el 24 de marzo y el 18 de abril de 2022. Tras ello, se ejecutó un análisis estadístico univariado y bivariado de los datos recogidos. Resultados: Se obtuvieron un total de 479 encuestas de mujeres gestantes de diferente edad gestacional. El análisis bivariado mostró significación estadística en la puntuación de la escala AMICO_Gestante en relación con varias variables en relación al año anterior: contacto con la enfermedad (p=0,025); número de embarazos previos (p=0,019); cambios en el plan de parto (p=0,001); y estado vacunacional (p=0,01). Conclusiones: La pandemia por la COVID-19 tiene un impacto en la salud mental de la mujer gestante, produciendo un efecto negativo en las emociones. La investigación realizada muestra una relación estadísticamente significativa entre los niveles de miedo y ansiedad en la mujer gestante y factores como el número de embarazos previos, el contacto con la enfermedad previa, el nivel de vacunación o las expectativas en relación al plan de parto o nacimiento.(AU)

Assessment of Levels of Anxiety and Fear of Covid-19 in a Population of Pregnant Women in Spain.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the levels of fear and anxiety in the particularly vulnerable population group of women during pregnancy. Methods: Cross-sectional study between March 2022 and July 2022 involving 978 pregnant women aged 16 to 50 years. It was carried out based on the scale for the assessment of fear and anxiety in pregnant women (AMICO_Pregnant) and the collection of sociodemographic data. Normality analysis was performed prior to univariate and bivariate statistical analysis. Results: The sample was composed of a total of 978 pregnant women. The mean of the AMICO_Pregnant scale was intermediate (5.04 points; SD=2.36). The bivariate analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between the AMICO_Pregnant scale and the following variables: vaccination schedule status, contact with the disease, weeks of gestation, altered delivery or birth plan. Conclusion: Women with pregnancies closer to term, with no contact with the disease, without a complete vaccination schedule, or who had undergone changes in their delivery or birth plans, showed higher levels of fear and anxiety.

Adaptation and psychometric study of the scale for the measurement of fear and anxiety of COVID-19 disease in pregnant women (AMICO_Pregnant).

Objective: The aim of this research was to adapt and explore the psychometric properties of a specific scale to assess the levels of fear and anxiety of COVID-19 disease in pregnant women. Methods: An adaptation phase, by a panel of experts, and a psychometric descriptive cross-sectional study were carried out on the final version of the 16-item, self-administered AMICO_Pregnant scale. Univariate and bivariate analyses were carried out, followed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The consistency of the scale was assessed using the Omega coefficient and Cronbach's Alpha. Results: With a sample of 1,013 pregnant women living in Spain and over 18 years of age, the mean age was 33 years. The scale showed a bifactor structure (anxiety and fear) that was confirmed with good fit parameters. Reliability was assessed in terms of internal consistency by calculating Cronbach's Alpha coefficient (0.95) and McDonald's Omega coefficient (0.94) as indicators of robustness of the scale's reliability. Conclusion: The AMICO_Pregnant scale of 16 items with scores ranging from 1 to 10 is a valid and reliable tool to assess levels of anxiety and fear of COVID_19 in Spanish pregnant women. Pregnant women have shown moderate levels of anxiety and fear regarding the COVID_19 disease in the final phase of the pandemic.

Stress, fear, and anxiety among construction workers: a systematic review.

Objectives: The aim of this review was to assess the possible risk factors arising from working conditions, that could have an impact on the stress, fear, and anxiety of construction workers. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA format in the Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycInfo electronic databases on February 3, 2023, using the following key words: anxiety, stress, fear, and construction workers. Methodological quality was assessed using the critical appraisal tools of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: A total of 35 studies were included. The results showed a number of conditioning factors for stress, anxiety, and fear among construction workers such as age, inappropriate safety equipment, safety culture, high workload and long working hours, physical pain, low social support from direct supervisor or co-workers, lack of organizational justice and lack of reward, financial situation, maladaptive coping strategies, and characteristics of the pandemic. Conclusions: There are a number of risk factors related to working conditions, organizations, and individuals that can affect the levels of stress, anxiety, and fear among construction workers, such as age, work hardship, safety culture and, especially, the long hours that construction professionals work. This may lead to an increase in the number of occupational accidents and higher associated fatality rates. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022367724, identifier: CRD42022367724.

[Sources used to obtain information on COVID-19 and its impact on mental health.] / Fuentes utilizadas para obtener información sobre la COVID-19 y su impacto en la salud mental.

With the rise of COVID-19, the society has had the need to search for information about the pandemic and the sources used to obtain information have been very diverse, with a greater predominance of social media, traditional media and consultation with loved ones. In addition, an excess of information has been observed in the media that made access and understanding difficult, as well as a constant concern and anxiety about health that caused a need to search excessively or repeatedly for information on health and disease. This information was not always endorsed by the scientific community and during the pandemic there has been the spread of misinformation, fake news and conspiracy theories about COVID-19 disseminated, mainly through social media. In this sense, both the knowledge and the beliefs apprehended have been able to impact the mental health of the population.

Con la aparición de la COVID-19, la sociedad ha tenido la necesidad de buscar información sobre la pandemia y las fuentes de información usadas para ello han sido muy diversas, con un mayor predominio de las redes sociales, los medios tradicionales y la consulta a las personas allegadas. Además, se ha observado un exceso de información en los medios de comunicación que dificultaba el acceso y el entendimiento, así como una constante preocupación y ansiedad por la salud, lo cual provocaba una necesidad de búsqueda de información excesiva o repetida sobre la salud y la enfermedad. Esta información no siempre estaba avalada por la comunidad científica y durante la pandemia se han sucedido la difusión de información errónea, de las llamadas fake news y de las teorías de conspiración sobre la COVID-19 difundidas, principalmente, a través de las redes sociales. En este sentido, tanto los conocimientos como las creencias aprehendidas han podido impactar en la salud mental de la población.

Fuentes utilizadas para obtener información sobre la COVID-19 y su impacto en la salud mental / ources used to obtain information on COVID-19 and its impact on mental health

Con la aparición de la COVID-19, la sociedad ha tenido la necesidad de buscar información sobre la pandemia y las fuentes de informa-ción usadas para ello han sido muy diversas, con un mayor predominio de las redes sociales, los medios tradicionales y la consulta alas personas allegadas. Además, se ha observado un exceso de información en los medios de comunicación que dificultaba el accesoy el entendimiento, así como una constante preocupación y ansiedad por la salud, lo cual provocaba una necesidad de búsquedade información excesiva o repetida sobre la salud y la enfermedad. Esta información no siempre estaba avalada por la comunidadcientífica y durante la pandemia se han sucedido la difusión de información errónea, de las llamadasfake news y de las teorías deconspiración sobre la COVID-19 difundidas, principalmente, a través de las redes sociales. En este sentido, tanto los conocimientoscomo las creencias aprehendidas han podido impactar en la salud mental de la población.(AU)

With the rise of COVID-19, the society has had the need to search for information about the pandemic and the sources used to obtaininformation have been very diverse, with a greater predominance of social media, traditional media and consultation with lovedones. In addition, an excess of information has been observed in the media that made access and understanding difficult, as well asa constant concern and anxiety about health that caused a need to search excessively or repeatedly for information on health anddisease. This information was not always endorsed by the scientific community and during the pandemic there has been the spreadof misinformation, fake news and conspiracy theories about COVID-19 disseminated, mainly through social media. In this sense, boththe knowledge and the beliefs apprehended have been able to impact the mental health of the population.(AU)

Fear and Anxiety in Pregnant Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the impact of the 2020-2022 pandemic on the levels of fear and anxiety in pregnant women and to identify risk and protective factors. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Electronic databases were consulted for studies published between January 2020 and August 2022. The methodological quality was assessed using a critical appraisal tool for non-randomised studies. Results: Seventeen studies were included in the review. A high prevalence of levels of fear and anxiety were observed. Risk factors such as unplanned pregnancy, poor support from partners, or intolerance of uncertainty were identified for high levels of fear. Regarding anxiety, risk factors such as maternal age, social support, financial status, or concern about being able to maintain antenatal follow-ups were identified. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the mental health of pregnant women through increased levels of fear and anxiety. It has not been possible to establish a relationship between significant factors such as gestational age or health emergency control measures with high levels of fear or anxiety.

Anxiety and fear of COVID-19 in the UK general population: A cross-sectional study.

There is still a generalized feeling of uncertainty in the population due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, as restrictions on daily routines and social contact, accompanied by a large number of infections, negatively affect different areas of people's lives and, therefore, their mental health. The aim of the present study was to assess the presence of anxiety and fear of COVID-19 in the general UK population, using the Anxiety and Fear to COVID-19 Assessment Scale (Ansiedad y Miedo al COVID-19) (AMICO) scale. A descriptive, cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire was conducted in a sample of the UK general population in 2021. Socio-demographic and employment variables were included. The AMICO scale was included to measure fear and anxiety about COVID-19. The relationship between variables was studied with a categorical regression analysis. In general, participants regarded themselves as well-informed about the pandemic, although 62.6% had only received 1 dose of the vaccine. Regarding the AMICO scale the total score was 4.85 (out of 10; standard deviation 2.398). Women showed higher scores for the AMICO than men. The bivariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences in relation to self-confidence, amount of information received, and vaccination variables as related to the mean AMICO scores. An average level of anxiety and fear of COVID-19 is shown in the general UK population, which is lower than most of the studies that assessed the impact of the pandemic on the general population.

Adaptation and initial psychometric study of the anxiety and fear of COVID-19 scale in the United Kingdom population.

Objective: The aim of the study was the initial psychometric study to validate the anxiety and fear of COVID-19 (AMICO) assessment scale in the general population of the United Kingdom population. Materials and methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional, psychometric validation and descriptive study was conducted, performing univariate and bivariate analyses, as well as exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The sample was 658 people living in the United Kingdom over 16 years. Of the total, 80.5% were female, with a mean age of 48.25 years (SD = 14.861). A mean score for the AMICO scale of 4.85 (SD = 2.398) was obtained, with a range of scores from 1 to 10. The study of percentiles and quartiles allowed for the identification of three proposed levels of anxiety. Conclusion: The AMICO_UK scale is reliable to measure the presence of anxiety and fear related to the COVID-19 disease in the United Kingdom population. The majority of the United Kingdom population presented low levels of anxiety and fear at the time the scale was administered.

Tecnologías de la información y la comunicación para el abordaje de los problemas de salud mental / Information and communication technologies for approach to the mental health problems

Las nuevas tecnologías junto con las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación permiten el intercambio de información entre los usuarios y pueden aportar muchos beneficios a las personas que padecen problemas de salud mental, ya que internet permite acceder a información sobre la salud y brinda la posibilidad de recibir el apoyo de fuentes variadas. El objetivo de este manuscrito es evaluar el impacto de las nuevas tecnologías en la sociedad española, describir las ventajas y desventajas de su aplicación para la atención y el control de la salud mental como problemática de salud pública, además de identificar la tipología de las nuevas tecnologías y su utilidad en los principales trastornos de salud mental.En psicología clínica se han desarrollado algunos sistemas tecnológicos como la realidad virtual, la realidad aumentada y la telemedicina, con el objetivo de promocionar, monitorizar y mejorar el estado de salud de las personas, ayudando a su vez a los profesionales de la salud en el logro de esta compleja tarea. (AU)

New technologies together with Information and Communication Technologies allow the exchange of information between users and can bring many benefits to people suffering from mental health problems, as the internet allows access to health information and provides the possibility of receiving support from a variety of sources. The aim of this manuscript was to assess the impact of new technologies in the Spanish society, to describe the advantages and disadvantages of their application for the care and control of mental health as a public health problem, and to identify the typology of new technologies and their usefulness in the main mental health disorders.In clinical psychology, some technological systems have been developed, such as virtual reality, augmented reality, and telemedicine, with the aim of promoting, monitoring, and improving people’s state of health, in turn helping health professionals to achieve this complex task. (AU)

Emotional health assessment related to COVID-19 in older people: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the presence of anxiety, fear and psychological distress in the population of people over 65 years of age and to study possible differences with a sample of subjects aged between 60 and 65 years. METHODS: A descriptive and psychometric cross-sectional study. The total sample used consisted of 1112 subjects from university training programmes for the old people from all over Spain. Anxiety and fear of COVID-19 were measured using the AMICO scale and psychological distress using the GHQ-12 instrument. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the AMICO (p = 0.006) and GHQ-12 (p = 0.03) measures between age subgroups, with lower values in older age groups. Contrast statistics showed significant differences on both measures (AMICO and GHQ) in women, single or widowed subjects, and those who had not been infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. LIMITATIONS: It would be desirable to increase the sample size, especially in the lower age group (<65). The establishment of the age limit between the two groups could be located at 60 years of age. The use of new technologies to get information should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, moderate levels of fear and anxiety of COVID-19 were present. Women tended to have higher levels of both general psychological distress and fear and anxiety of COVID-19. Especially in those over 65, higher levels of distress and fear/anxiety of COVID-19 were associated with being widowed or single, and not having been infected before with SARS-CoV-2.

Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.

Background: COVID-19 has caused a series of economic, social, personal, and occupational consequences that may affect the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs), with the consequent risk of developing suicidal ideation and behaviors. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the main risk factors that may predispose HCWs to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A systematic review of studies published between January 2020 and August 2022 was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines in the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Methodological quality was assessed using the critical appraisal tools for non-randomized studies of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The followed protocol is listed in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with code CRD42022340732. Results: A total of 34 studies were included in this review. There are a number of underlying factors such as higher rates of depression, anxiety, pre-pandemic lifetime mental disorders or previous lifetime suicide attempt, living alone, having problems with alcohol and/or other drugs, etc. that favor the emergence of suicidal tendencies and ideation in times of COVID-19. Similarly, the pandemic may have precipitated a series of factors such as economic concerns, assessing one's working conditions as poor, having family members or friends infected, changes in services or functions, and feeling discriminated against or stigmatized by society. Other factors such as age, sex, or type of healthcare worker show differences between studies. Conclusion: Organizations should ensure the adoption of strategies and programmes for early detection of suicides as well as increased attention to the mental health of professions with a high workload. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022340732.

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of rehabilitation area professionals: A systematic review.

Background: The role of the physiotherapist is vital in the recovery of post-COVID-19 patients, but fear of contagion is a possible feeling among healthcare professionals. The objective of this study is to assess the mental health effects that COVID-19 has had on healthcare workers, including rehabilitation care, in times of pandemic. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA format in the Pubmed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases between July and September 2022. Keywords included were "healthcare providers," "COVID-19," "Mental Health," and "Psychological Distress." Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Results: A total of 14 studies were included in this review. The study population was healthcare professionals including the rehabilitation services. In total, 4 studies reported exclusively on anxiety and stress levels in physiotherapists providing care during the pandemic. Conclusions: The mental health of healthcare professionals has been compromised during the pandemic. However, initially, research was only focused on physicians and nurses, so the need arises to include those professionals, such as physiotherapists, who are also in direct contact with COVID-19 patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=367664, identifier: CRD42022367664.

Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a Sample of Active Health Care Professionals in Spain.

Purpose: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the working, personal and health conditions of health professionals has been highlighted, although it is necessary to verify whether certain instruments used in research on this topic have sufficient psychometric support for their use. This need was the main motivation for undertaking the present study. We aimed to analyse the psychometric properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a sample of active health care workers during the pandemic. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to August 2020 with 2326 active health care workers (78.7% women). The instruments that were applied included the UWES-9 scale, the Sense of Coherence scale (SOC-13), the Goldberg General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and an item on self-perceived health. Results: The three-factor structure related to the correlation of pairs of errors presented the best fit. The reliability of the UWES-9 was highlighted by the adequate internal consistency of the items, the existence of invariance according to gender, and its convergent and discriminant validity. Conclusion: The findings of this work support the use of the UWES-9 to assess the work engagement of health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify it as an adequate measure of this psychological variable and the constructs that comprise it.

Initial Psychometric Development of the Fear and Anxiety to COVID-19 Scale in Nursing Professionals: An Occupational Health Assessment Tool.

Objective: The effects caused by COVID-19 on the physical and mental health show the need to renew and create tools that specifically measure the fear and anxiety caused by the pandemic in healthcare professionals. The aim of the study was to measure fear and anxiety of COVID-19 in the nursing population group using a specific assessment scale. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out in Spain based on questionnaires. The sample was selected by non-probabilistic snowball sampling. Univariate and bivariate descriptive analyses were performed. For qualitative variables, a categorical regression analysis was performed. Results: The sample consisted of 1012 nurses residing in Spain, 86.6% of whom were women, with a mean age of 40.84 years (SD = 11.51). The bivariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences in the mean score of the scale and the variables sex, level of education, m2 of the dwelling, and work area. Conclusion: The validation of this scale provides a new management tool that should enable managers to assess anxiety and fear among their nurses, whether in the current COVID-19 pandemic or in other possible epidemiological situations to come.

Social Determinants of Health in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context of the Migrant Population Living in Settlements in Spain.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate the sociodemographic profile and assess the levels of anxiety and fear, work engagement, and psychological distress on a sample of migrants living in settlements in the province of Huelva (Spain) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 623 migrants during the months of April to June 2021, based on the Anxiety and Fear of COVID-19 (AMICO) assessment scale, the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale to assess work engagement, and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to analyse psychological distress. Results: A low level of education, dwelling of less than 3 m2 and the desire to return to the country of origin may be related to the presence of anxiety and fear of COVID-19 and lower levels of work engagement. Conclusion: There is a need to improve the study of the concept of health of the migrant population residing in the settlements of Huelva (Spain) and the assessment of their physical and mental health, in an official way.