Disease and Non-Battle Injury in Deployed Military: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Disease and non-battle injury (DNBI) has historically been the leading casualty type among service members in warfare and a leading health problem confronting military personnel, resulting in significant loss of manpower. Studies show a significant increase in disease burden for DNBI when compared to combat-related injuries. Understanding the causes of and trends in DNBI may help guide efforts to develop preventive measures and help increase medical readiness and resiliency. However, despite its significant disease burden within the military population, DNBI remains less studied than battle injury. In this review, we aimed to evaluate the recently published literature on DNBI and to describe the characteristics of these recently published studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review is reported in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database. The systematic search for published articles was conducted through July 21, 2022, in Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Cochrane Library, Defense Technical Information Center, Embase, and PubMed. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, the investigators independently screened the reference lists on the Covidence website (covidence.org). An article was excluded if it met any of the following criteria: (1) Published not in English; (2) published before 2010; (3) data used before 2001; (4) case reports, commentaries, and editorial letters; (5) systematic reviews or narrative reviews; (6) used animal models; (7) mechanical or biomechanical studies; (8) outcome was combat injury or non-specified; (9) sample was veterans, DoD civilians, contractors, local nationals, foreign military, and others; (10) sample was U.S. Military academy; (11) sample was non-deployed; (12) bioterrorism study; (13) qualitative study. The full-text review of 2 independent investigators reached 96% overall agreement (166 of 173 articles; κ = 0.89). Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted from each article. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis of pooled estimates of incidence rates for disease (D), non-battle injury (NBI), and combined DNBI was created using random-effects models. RESULTS: Of the 3,401 articles, 173 were included for the full review and 29 (16.8%) met all inclusion criteria. Of the 29 studies included, 21 (72.4%) were retrospective designs, 5 (17.2%) were prospective designs, and 3 (10.3%) were surveys. Across all studies, the median number of total cases reported was 1,626 (interquartile range: 619.5-10,203). The results of meta-analyses for 8 studies with reported incidence rates (per 1,000 person-years) for D (n = 3), NBI (n = 7), and DNBI (n = 5) showed pooled incidence rates of 22.18 per 1,000 person-years for D, 19.86 per 1,000 person-years for NBI, and 50.97 per 1,000 person-years for combined DNBI. Among 3 studies with incidence rates for D, NBI, and battle injury, the incidence rates were 20.32 per 1,000 person-years for D, 6.88 per 1,000 person-years for NBI, and 6.83 per 1,000 person-years for battle injury. CONCLUSIONS: DNBI remains the leading cause of morbidity in conflicts involving the U.S. Military over the last 20 years. More research with stronger designs and consistent measurement is needed to improve medical readiness and maintain force lethality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Level III.

Missing in action: A bibliometric analysis of military research in the medical literature since 1950.

BACKGROUND: Top-tier general and specialty scientific journals serve as a bellwether for national research priorities. We hypothesize that military-relevant publications are underrepresented in the scientific literature and that such publications decrease significantly during peacetime. METHODS: We identified high impact journals in the fields of Medicine, Surgery and Critical Care and developed Boolean searches for military-focused topics using National Library of Medicine Subject Headings terms. A PubMed search from 1950 to 2020 returned the number of research publications in relevant journals and the rate of military-focused publications by year. Rates of military publications were compared between peacetime and wartime. Publication rate trends were modeled with a quadratic function controlling for the start of active conflict and total casualty numbers. Baseline proportions of military physicians relative to the civilian sector served to estimate expected publication rates. Comparisons were performed using Pearson's χ 2 and Mann-Whitney U test, with p < 0.05 considered a significant difference. RESULTS: From 1950 to 2020, a total of 716,340 manuscripts were published in the journals queried. Of these, military-relevant manuscripts totaled 4,052 (0.57%). We found a significant difference in the rate of publication during times of peace and times of war (0.40% vs. 0.69%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis found significantly reduced rates of publication in medical and critical care journals during peacetime. For each conflict, the percentage of military-focused publications peaked during periods of war but then receded below baseline levels within a median of 2.5 years (interquartile range, 1.5-3.8 years) during peacetime. The proportion of military-focused publications never reached the current proportion of military physicians in the workforce. CONCLUSION: There is marked reduction in rates of publication for military-focused articles in high impact journals during peacetime. Military-focused articles are underrepresented in high-impact journals. Investigators of military-relevant topics and editors of high-impact journals should seek to close this gap.

Female-Specific Health Care of Military Female-Designated Service Members and Veterans: A Systematic Overview of Reviews.

INTRODUCTION: Since the War in Afghanistan began in 2001, service members have faced significant health effects related to service during war, with female-designated service members facing unique challenges. Numerous high-quality review articles have been published on the health and care of female-designated service members and veterans. Given the increasing volume of literature, we completed an overview of reviews on the health and health care of female-designated military populations. Our objective was to conduct an overview of reviews on the obstetrics and gynecologic health and health care of female-designated military populations since 2000 to understand female-specific health consequences of military service during war and make clinical recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On May 10, 2022, a medical librarian performed a comprehensive search across five databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Ovid All EBM Reviews, and Web of Science) for all relevant reviews published from 2000 to May 10, 2022. Results were limited to English language. After the removal of duplicates, 2,438 records were reviewed, and 69 studies were included in the final review. The search strategy and methods were registered with PROSPERO and are reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) guidelines. Two independent reviewers conducted title and abstract screening and subsequent full text review using Covidence Systematic Review Software. Reviews addressing female-specific and obstetrics and gynecologic health of female-designated service members or veterans, utilizing a clear and systematic methodology, were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment was conducted by teams of two reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 69 studies were included in the final review. Themes included mental health and impact of sexual assault on service members or veterans, veteran health care, issues of menstruation, pregnancy, and urogenital concerns. Areas with few reviews included occupational risks of military service and impact on obstetric outcomes, eating disorders, and menopause. There were insufficient or no reviews on the impact of military service on fertility, access to abortion care, reproductive health outcomes of lesbian, bisexual and transgender service members, surgical treatment of gynecologic conditions, and screening and treatment for breast, gynecologic, and non-pelvic organ cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Female-designated military populations serving during periods of war face unique health challenges that should be considered in screening practices and the delivery of trauma informed care. Further research and reviews are needed for female-specific oncology, fertility, abortion access, and sexual and non-binary and expansive gender identities to better capture female-designated service member and veteran health during wartime and beyond.

PHQ-9 and GAD-7 Score Response After Parathyroidectomy for Primary Hyperparathyroidism: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, the relationship between parathyroidectomy and objective neuropsychiatric outcomes are not clearly defined. The purpose of this study is to perform the first ever Meta-analysis of preoperative and postoperative PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing parathyroidectomy with the goal of identifying a specific psychometric score that could be used as an indication for surgical intervention. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Ovid All EBM Reviews. REVIEW METHODS: Studies met inclusion criteria if they evaluated preoperative and postoperative PHQ-9 and/or GAD-7 scores in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing parathyroidectomy. Random effects Meta-analyses were used to analyze the compiled data. RESULTS: The literature search returned 1433 articles for initial review of which 6 (1105 participants) met criteria for inclusion and Meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that primary hyperparathyroidism patients had significantly higher presurgical PHQ-9 scores when compared to control groups. Additionally, patients experienced a statistically significant and sustained decrease in PHQ-9 scores following parathyroidectomy. Notably, there was a dramatic decrease in the percentage of patients with PHQ-9 scores ≥10 (considered clinically significant for depression) following parathyroidectomy. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism experience a statistically significant and sustained improvement in PHQ-9 scores following parathyroidectomy. Additionally, symptoms of anxiety and suicidal ideation appear to decrease after parathyroidectomy. We propose that a PHQ-9 score ≥10 could potentially be used as an indication for parathyroidectomy in patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism.