Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 7(1): e2, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36755548

RESUMEN

Introduction: The effectiveness of community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships to address health inequities is well documented. CBPR integrates knowledge and perspectives of diverse communities throughout the research process, following principles that emphasize trust, power sharing, co-learning, and mutual benefits. However, institutions and funders seldom provide the time and resources needed for the critical stage of equitable partnership formation and development. Methods: Since 2011, the Detroit Urban Research Center, collaborating with other entities, has promoted the development of new community-academic research partnerships through two grant programs that combine seed funding with capacity building support from community and academic instructors/mentors experienced in CBPR. Process and outcomes were evaluated using mixed methods. Results: From 2011 to 2021, 50 partnerships received grants ranging from $2,500 to $30,000, totaling $605,000. Outcomes included equitable partnership infrastructure and processes, innovative pilot research, translation of findings to interventions and policy change, dissemination to multiple audiences, new proposals and projects, and sustained community-academic research partnerships. All partnerships continued beyond the program; over half secured additional funding. Conclusions: Keys to success included participation as community-academic teams, dedicated time for partnership/relationship development, workshops to develop equity-based skills, relationships, and projects, expert community-academic instructor guidance, and connection to additional resources. Findings demonstrate that small amounts of seed funding for newly forming community-academic partnerships, paired with capacity building support, can provide essential time and resources needed to develop diverse, inclusive, equity-focused CBPR partnerships. Building such support into funding initiatives and through academic institutions can enhance impact and sustainability of translational research toward advancing health equity.

3.
Health Promot Pract ; 21(4): 552-563, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30596283

RESUMEN

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an equitable partnership approach that links academic researchers, community organizations, and public health practitioners to work together to understand and address health inequities. Although numerous educational materials on CBPR exist, few training programs develop the skills and knowledge needed to establish effective, equitable partnerships. Furthermore, there are few professional development opportunities for academic researchers, practitioners, and community members to obtain these competencies in an experiential co-learning process. In response, the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center developed the CBPR Partnership Academy, an innovative, yearlong capacity-building program facilitated by experienced community and academic partners, involving an intensive short course, partnership development, grant proposal preparation and funding, mentoring, online learning forums, and networking. Three diverse cohorts (36 teams) from 18 states and 2 tribal nations have participated. We describe the rationale and components of the training program and present results from the first two cohorts. Evaluation results suggest enhanced competence and efficacy in conducting CBPR. Outcomes include partnerships established, grant proposals submitted and funded, workshops and research conducted, and findings disseminated. A community-academic partner-based, integrated, applied program can be effective for professional development and establishing innovative linkages between academics and practitioners aimed at achieving health equity.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Equidad en Salud , Creación de Capacidad , Humanos , Michigan , Investigadores
4.
Am J Public Health ; 98(8): 1407-17, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18556617

RESUMEN

Although the intent of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is to include community voices in all phases of a research initiative, community partners appear less frequently engaged in data analysis and interpretation than in other research phases. Using 4 brief case studies, each with a different data collection methodology, we provide examples of how community members participated in data analysis, interpretation, or both, thereby strengthening community capacity and providing unique insight. The roles and skills of the community and academic partners were different from but complementary to each other. We suggest that including community partners in data analysis and interpretation, while lengthening project time, enriches insights and findings and consequently should be a focus of the next generation of CBPR initiatives.


Asunto(s)
Participación de la Comunidad/métodos , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Relaciones Investigador-Sujeto , Participación de la Comunidad/psicología , Conducta Cooperativa , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Salud Ambiental/métodos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Indígenas Norteamericanos , Masculino , Michigan , New Mexico , Ciudad de Nueva York , North Carolina , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Relaciones Investigador-Sujeto/psicología , Universidades
5.
Health Promot Pract ; 5(4): 395-403, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15358912

RESUMEN

Health educators can play a critical role in bringing together the partners and resources to successfully make videos using principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR). This article is a "how-to" guide for making videos using community-based participatory research principles. The authors describe video-making and CBPR, then outline six steps on how to make a video using principles of CBPR: (a) engaging stakeholders, (b) soliciting funding and informed consent, (c) creation of shared ownership, (d) building cross-cultural collaborations, (e) writing the script together, and (f) pulling it all together: editing and music selection. Still photographs and key themes from the video A Bridge Between Communities are presented as a running case study to illustrate these steps. The article concludes with implications for health promotion research and practice.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Participación de la Comunidad , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Grabación en Video/métodos , Humanos , Michigan , Investigación
6.
Ethn Dis ; 14(3 Suppl 1): S27-37, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15682769

RESUMEN

Diabetes is prevalent among African-American and Latino Detroit residents, with profound consequences to individuals, families, and communities. The REACH Detroit Partnership engaged eastside and southwest Detroit families in focus groups organized by community, age, gender, and language, to plan community-based participatory interventions to reduce the prevalence and impact of diabetes and its risk factors. Community residents participated in planning, implementing, and analyzing data from the focus groups and subsequent planning meetings. Major themes included: 1) diabetes is widespread and risk begins in childhood, with severe consequences for African Americans and Latinos; 2) denial and inadequate health care contribute to lack of public awareness about pre-symptomatic diabetes; 3) diabetes risks include heredity, high sugar, fat and alcohol intake, overweight, lack of exercise, and stress; and 4) cultural traditions, lack of motivation, and lack of affordable, accessible stores, restaurants, and recreation facilities and programs, are barriers to adopting preventive lifestyles. Participants identified community assets and made recommendations that resulted in REACH Detroit's multi-level intervention design and programs. They included development of: 1) family-oriented interventions to support lifestyle change at all ages; 2) culturally relevant community and health provider education and materials; 3) social support group activities promoting diabetes self-management, exercise, and healthy eating; and 4) community resource development and advocacy.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Participación de la Comunidad , Diabetes Mellitus/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus/prevención & control , Grupos Focales , Programas Gente Sana , Hispánicos o Latinos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Federación para Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA