HbA1c changes in a deprived population who followed or not a diabetes self-management programme, organised in a multi-professional primary care practice: a historical cohort study on 207 patients between 2017 and 2019.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes self-management (DSM) helps people with diabetes to become actors in their disease. Deprived populations are particularly affected by diabetes and are less likely to have access to these programmes. DSM implementation in primary care, particularly in a multi-professional primary care practice (MPCP), is a valuable strategy to promote care access for these populations. In Rennes (Western France), a DSM programme was designed by a MPCP in a socio-economically deprived area. The study objective was to compare diabetes control in people who followed or not this DSM programme. METHOD: The historical cohort of patients who participated in the DSM programme at the MPCP between 2017 and 2019 (n = 69) was compared with patients who did not participate in the programme, matched on sex, age, diabetes type and place of the general practitioner's practice (n = 138). The primary outcome was glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change between 12 months before and 12 months after the DSM programme. Secondary outcomes included modifications in diabetes treatment, body mass index, blood pressure, dyslipidaemia, presence of microalbuminuria, and diabetes retinopathy screening participation. RESULTS: HbA1c was significantly improved in the exposed group after the programme (p < 0.01). The analysis did not find any significant between-group difference in socio-demographic data, medical history, comorbidities, and treatment adaptation. CONCLUSIONS: These results, consistent with the international literature, promote the development of DSM programmes in primary care settings in deprived areas. The results of this real-life study need to be confirmed on the long-term and in different contexts (rural area, healthcare organisation).

Characteristics of self-management education and support programmes for people with chronic diseases delivered by primary care teams: a rapid review.

BACKGROUND: Primary care actors can play a major role in developing and promoting access to Self-Management Education and Support (SMES) programmes for people with chronic disease. We reviewed studies on SMES programmes in primary care by focusing on the following dimensions: models of SMES programmes in primary care, SMES team's composition, and participants' characteristics. METHODS: For this mixed-methods rapid review, we searched the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to identify articles in English and French that assessed a SMES programme in primary care for four main chronic diseases (diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease and/or respiratory chronic disease) and published between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2021. We excluded articles on non-original research and reviews. We evaluated the quality of the selected studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We reported the study results following the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: We included 68 studies in the analysis. In 46/68 studies, a SMES model was described by focusing mainly on the organisational dimension (n = 24). The Chronic Care Model was the most used organisational model (n = 9). Only three studies described a multi-dimension model. In general, the SMES team was composed of two healthcare providers (mainly nurses), and partnerships with community actors were rarely reported. Participants were mainly patients with only one chronic disease. Only 20% of the described programmes took into account multimorbidity. Our rapid review focused on two databases and did not identify the SMES programme outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the limited implication of community actors and the infrequent inclusion of multimorbidity in the SMES programmes, despite the recommendations to develop a more interdisciplinary approach in SMES programmes. This rapid review identified areas of improvement for SMES programme development in primary care, especially the privileged place of nurses in their promotion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021268290 .

Early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains largely underdiagnosed. AIM: To assess whether the use of Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) questions and COPD coordination, either alone or combined, would detect new COPD cases in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: GPs in Brittany, France, systematically enrolled patients aged 40-80 years over a 4-month period in this French multicentre cluster randomised controlled study. METHOD: GPs were randomly allocated to one of four groups: control (standard of care), GOLD questions (adapted from symptoms and risk factors identified by GOLD), COPD coordination, and GOLD questions with COPD coordination. New cases of COPD were those confirmed by spirometry: post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second over forced vital capacity of <0.7. RESULTS: In total, 11 430 consultations were conducted by 47 GPs, who enrolled 3162 patients who did not have prior diagnosed asthma or COPD. Among these, 802 (25%) were enrolled in the control, 820 (26%) in the GOLD questions, 802 (25%) in the COPD coordination, and 738 (23%) in the GOLD questions with COPD coordination groups. In the control group, COPD was not evoked, and no spirometry was prescribed. All new cases of COPD diagnosed (n = 24, 0.8%) were in the intervention groups, representing 6.8% of patients who performed spirometry. Statistically significantly more new cases of COPD were detected with COPD coordination (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Interventions that can be easily implemented, such as the GOLD questions and COPD coordination, can identify new cases of COPD. Studies are needed to identify the most appropriate case-finding strategies for GPs to detect COPD in primary care for each country.

Changes in French family medicine residents' perspectives about patient partners' participation in teaching: A qualitative study in co-facilitated practice exchange groups.

PURPOSE: The patient partner in teaching method is progressively developing for clinical training in France. Practice exchange groups (PEG) co-facilitated by patient partners in teaching are used during the training of family medicine (FM) residents. This study explored the FM residents' perspectives about patient partner in teaching's participation in co-facilitated PEGs and how they changed over time. STUDENTS AND METHODS: In 2020, qualitative focus groups were carried out with 26 FM residents before and after a 5-month intervention based on monthly PEGs co-facilitated by patient partners in teaching. A reflective thematic analysis of the focus group interviews was performed according to Braun and Clarke's approach. RESULTS: FM residents supported patient partners in teaching's facilitation role and had high expectations concerning their contribution to the development of their skills and competencies. They expected patient partners in teaching to bring their individual experience and also a collective knowledge. Some limitations mentioned by FM residents disappeared over time, such as the loss of the medical group feeling among physicians, while others persisted and required pedagogical support targeted to FM residents before PEG initiation. CONCLUSION: This study shows the good acceptance of patient partners in teaching by FM residents in the context of PEGs. Attention should be paid to make FM residents aware of patient partners in teaching's missions before their introduction.

Perspectives of patient educators about their participation in an interprofessional program for healthcare students and postgraduate medical students.

Including patients in interprofessional education (IPE) programs adds value to healthcare students' education. However, little is known about the perspective and experience of the involved patient educators (PEs). An IPE program (Interprofessional Seminars, IPS) that includes PEs was developed in France in 2009. The aim of this study was to describe the PEs' perspectives about their involvement in IPS. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 32 experienced PEs, and analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis in the framework of an inductive approach. PEs had an identifiable profile. They were motivated by a sense of civic service, had well-developed communication skills, and were prepared to share their experiential knowledge with students. They were concerned about their capacity to express themselves in front of students and the need to consolidate their involvement through a structured partnership that involves briefing, collaboration, remuneration, and feedback. They proposed to establish compulsory interprofessional training for all students and to strengthen the collaboration between an interprofessional group of students and a PE. Our results highlight the PEs' desire to be involved in IPE and to develop a genuine patient-student partnership. These insights should support the systematic integration of PEs in IPE.

Intégration des patients enseignants dans les études de médecine.

INTRODUCTION: In a social context supportive of patient engagement throughout society, many scientific claims are in favour of developing patient engagement in medical education. However, few studies have objectively investigated current practices and the obstacles to patient engagement from the point of view of medical educators. PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: This study aimed at investigating medical educators' practices regarding patient engagement, and their expectations and self reported obstacles. METHOD: This study's design was observational, cross-sectional and monocentered. Survey responses were queried by email from 565 academic medical educators at the Rennes Medical School in 2019. Patient engagement was ranked in four levels based on Pomey's theoretical frame, ranging from use of health data to cocreation of training programs. RESULTS: The response rate was 23% (N = 128). The educator's profiles were diverse in age, specialty and status. 35 declared involving patients in their teachings, 4 of them declared cocreating courses with the patients. The remaining 93 educators did not involve patients in their course and reported some obstacles. The main obstacles were: never thought about it (60%), difficulties selecting the patient (36%) and lack of time (21%). The patient's role as a teacher was not disregarded. CONCLUSIONS: This first study about academic educator's perspectives toward patient engagement in medical training identified obstacles and pathways to promote patient engagement.

The expectations of transgender people in the face of their health-care access difficulties and how they can be overcome. A qualitative study in France.

AIM: Our objective was to explore the difficulties experienced by transgender people in accessing primary health-care services and their expectations towards primary care providers to improve their health-care access. BACKGROUND: Because transgender people are exposed to many discriminations, their health-care access is particularly poor. Guidelines recommend greater involvement of primary care providers in the processes because of the accessibility feature of primary care services. METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-directed interviews was conducted among 27 transgender people (February 2018 - August 2018). These voluntary participants were recruited through different means: local trans or LGBTI (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and/or intersex) associations, primary care providers, and social networks. The data analysis was based on reflexive thematic analysis in an inductive approach. FINDINGS: Difficulties in accessing health-care occurred at all the levels of the primary health-care system: primary care providers - transgender people interaction, access to the primary care team facility (starting with the secretariat), access to secondary care specialists, and continuity of care. Transgender people report ill-adapted health-care services as a result of gender-based identification in health-care settings. Their main expectation was depsychiatrization and self-determination. They supported mixed health network comprising primary care providers and transgender people with a coordinating role for the general practitioner. These expectations should be priorities to consider in our primary health-care system to improve access to health-care for transgender people.

Perspectives of deprived patients on diabetes self-management programmes delivered by the local primary care team: a qualitative study on facilitators and barriers for participation, in France.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an effective intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); nevertheless, patient participation in this type of programme is low. Implementation of DSME programmes in primary care practices by the local multi-professional team is a potential strategy to improve access to DSME for T2DM patients. The aim of this study was to identify perceived facilitators and barriers by patients to participation in local DSME delivered by primary care professionals in France. METHOD: T2DM patients, informed and recruited during consulting with their usual care provider, who had attended a structured and validated DSME programme delivered by 13 primary care providers within a multi-professional primary care practice in a deprived area of 20,000 inhabitants, were invited to participate in this study. A qualitative study with semi-structured, in-depth interviews was conducted with study participants, between July 2017 and February 2018. A reflexive thematic analysis of the interviews was carried out. Coding schemes were developed to generate thematic trends in patient descriptions of facilitators and barriers to DSME participation. RESULTS: Nineteen interviews (mean length 31 min; [20-44 min]) were completed with T2DM patients. Four themes on facilitators for programme participation emerged from the data: geographical proximity of a DSME programme held in the local multi-professional primary care practice; effective promotion of the DSME programme by the local multi-professional team; pre-existing relationship between patients and their healthcare providers; and potential to establish new social interactions within the neighbourhood by participating in the programme. Three themes on barriers to attendance emerged: integrating the DSME programme into their own schedules; difficulties in expressing themselves in front of a group; and keeping the motivation for self-managing their T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: From the patient perspective, the programme geographical proximity and the pre-existing patient-healthcare provider relationship were important factors that contributed to participation. Healthcare providers should consider these factors to improve access to DSME programmes and diabetes self-management in deprived populations. Longitudinal studies should be performed to measure the impact of these programmes.

[Health expectations of the inhabitants of a health priority area: a qualitative study]. / Les attentes d'usagers d'un quartier prioritaire en termes de santé : une enquête qualitative.

INTRODUCTION: French law of 4 March 2002 instituted health democracy, making health system users a real partner and active stakeholder in the healthcare system. This role of health system users must be taken into account particularly in health priority areas in order to reduce social inequalities in health. In the context of primary care, multidisciplinary clinics would appear to be ideal places to develop the expression of health democracy. OBJECTIVE: Identify the health expectations of the users of the Villejean clinic (Brittany, France) situated in a health priority area. METHOD: Qualitative study based on individual and group interviews, conducted with Villejean health system users. Transcripts were analysed thematically by a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Five group interviews and twenty-one individual interviews were conducted in 49 users. The interviewees described high expectations in terms of a quality relationship with healthcare professionals, who were considered to be real educative partners. Users also formulated high expectations in relation to facilitated access to cares, especially concerning financial aspects. CONCLUSION: Identification of users' expectations constitutes the first step in developing a primary care health democracy, in which access to care is a major priority. New multidisciplinary clinic projects must take these users' expectations into account. The creation of user committees could allow the citizen-users' views to be really taken into account.

[What are the main factors assisting general practitioners in the development of educational strategies?] / Quels sont les facteurs prioritaires à mettre en œuvre pour développer une démarche éducative en médecine générale ?

General practitioners (GP) are in a special position to conduct educational strategies for their patients with chronic disease. Despite the GP's desire to be involved in patient education, this approach remains underdeveloped.Objective: To determine the factors required support the development of educational strategies in general practice from the GPs' perspective.Methods: Qualitative study based on a "modified nominal group technique" carried out among 21 GPs (not specifically trained in patient education) participating as investigators in an interventional study testing a structured educational strategy. The interventional study based on processes and tools specifically developed to suit general practice was held during their usual consultations. Thirty one patients with COPD were followed for 9 months.Results: GPs identified 23 specific factors restructured after the clarification-reformulation step in 6 main factors required for the development of educational strategies in general practice. The consensus revealed that reinforcement of initial and continuing medical training was the most frequently cited factor and was considered to be a priority. The development of inter- and intra-professional cooperation was the second leading factor to be taken into account.Conclusion: The improvement of GP training and the promotion of areas of cooperation could help GPs to develop educational strategies during their consultations. These results may provide insight to regional health agencies concerning the deployment of patient education in primary care.

[What Are the Main Factors Assisting General Practitioners in the Development of Educational Strategies?]

General practitioners (GP) are in a special position to conduct educational strategies for their patients with chronic disease. Despite the GP's desire to be involved in patient education, this approach remains underdeveloped.Objective: To determine the factors required support the development of educational strategies in general practice from the GPs' perspective.Methods: Qualitative study based on a "modified nominal group technique" carried out among 21 GPs (not specifically trained in patient education) participating as investigators in an interventional study testing a structured educational strategy. The interventional study based on processes and tools specifically developed to suit general practice was held during their usual consultations. Thirty one patients with COPD were followed for 9 months.Results: GPs identified 23 specific factors restructured after the clarification-reformulation step in 6 main factors required for the development of educational strategies in general practice. The consensus revealed that reinforcement of initial and continuing medical training was the most frequently cited factor and was considered to be a priority. The development of inter- and intra-professional cooperation was the second leading factor to be taken into account.Conclusion: The improvement of GP training and the promotion of areas of cooperation could help GPs to develop educational strategies during their consultations. These results may provide insight to regional health agencies concerning the deployment of patient education in primary care.

[Patient's preferences for repeat prescriptions in general practice]. / Consultation de renouvellement d'ordonnance en médecine générale : qu'en attendent les patients ?

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of chronic diseases regularly increases thus focusing quality of care as a priority in chronically illness. In 2014, prescription renewal was the first reason of outpatient visit in French general practice. In fact, the follow-up of chronic disease may be somewhat longer and more complex than other standard cares. This work aimed to explore patients' preferences with regard to prescription renewal and its variation according to their own illness profiles. METHODS: Between June and July 2014, patient perceptions were collected through a self-administered questionnaire addressed to adults from 14 French GPs offices. RESULTS: In one month, 307 questionnaires were returned. More than two-third patients (69.7%) evaluated the physician intervention as important as for another reason. The prescription was essential or very important for 70%. Priority points were those related to share therapeutic options with the physician and to obtain more information on their own illness. Older were more seeking for information on symptoms and disease than younger (OR=1.14 [1.03-1.23]). CONCLUSION: Patients are dealing with their own monitoring of chronic diseases. They expect more information and they look for shared decisions. The term "renewal" does not match their expectations thus leading against patient preference: we advocate substituting it to "prescription revaluation".