Adjunctive Dental Procedures and Pain Assessment Among a Group of Patients Attending Dental University Hospital at King Saud University: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background/purpose A large percentage of people still experience discomfort and pain during dental visits, even with advancements in instrumental techniques that enable dentists to manage patients in a pain-free manner. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and levels of pain induced by various dental procedures, including adjunctive dental procedures. Material and methods A structured, custom-made questionnaire composed of 20 questions written in Arabic with accompanying pictures of instruments to simplify instrument identification for the patients was designed. The questionnaire was designed to investigate and determine the factors that cause pain and discomfort during dental procedures and was introduced to adult patients attending their dental appointments at the College of Dentistry. All data were collected using an online link that was distributed to patients attending dental clinics at the Dental University Hospital at King Saud University either through their mobile phones or the researcher's tablet. All data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results A total of 158 patients participated in the study. The findings revealed that 50% of participants experienced pain from mouth mirror retraction and 28.48% experienced pain from suction. Participants also reported that the most common instruments associated with pain were the ultrasonic scaler (88.57%) and the periodontal probe (87.88%). Conclusion The findings provided valuable insights into the prevalence of pain during dental procedures and the factors that may contribute to this experience. Adjunctive dental procedures appeared to be causing a high prevalence of pain that could be avoided if dentists/dental assistants were more aware of it. These findings may have important implications for dental practitioners looking to reduce pain and improve patient experience during the provision of dental care.

Injury risk profile of amateur Irish women soccer players and players' opinions on risk factors and prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To explore injury profile, opinions on risk factors and injury prevention, among Irish amateur women soccer players. DESIGN: A cross-sectional online survey. SETTING: Irish amateur winter league. PARTICIPANTS: Active players ≤18 years of age. MAIN OUTCOMES: Differences were found between injured and uninjured groups, and risk factors that significantly predict soccer injury were identified. RESULTS: 168 injuries were reported by 83 respondents during the winter season. An increased prevalence of competition anxiety was observed in (53.8%:n = 85 of respondents) compared to other risk factors. There was a negative association between injuries and players' general health state (OR = 0.820, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p = 0.007). Players' knowledge about some risk factors including playing position, joint hypermobility, and playing during menses contradicts current evidence. 50%; n = 67 of the respondents had not received any education on injury risk or prevention. CONCLUSION: This study identified that Irish amateur women soccer players that responded have different characteristics, prevalence of risk factors and injury profiles to women players from different levels and countries. The findings suggest that some players may not be aware of the existing evidence base pertaining to common risk factors for injury. Further research is required to confirm the findings and explore the implementation of injury prevention strategies.

Elementary school staff knowledge about management of traumatic dental injuries.

AIM: This study investigated the knowledge of elementary school staff regarding the management of traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) in children. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study analyzed data collected between September 2016 and April 2017. The sample consisted of 2,027 elementary school staff members in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A stratified cluster random sampling technique was used to select the required sample. Those who agreed to participate in the study completed a 4-part self-administered questionnaire comprising questions regarding demographic data, knowledge on management of tooth fracture, and avulsion using photographs of TDI cases. RESULTS: The majority of the school staff showed inadequate basic knowledge regarding the importance of saving the broken piece of the tooth and identifying the tooth involved in the trauma (67% and 66.3%, respectively), P<0.05. However, they had a significantly high number of correct responses regarding the immediate management of TDIs for the 2 case scenarios presented in the questionnaire (P<0.05), and the majority (41%) reported normal saline as a suitable storage medium (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: This study revealed a lack of knowledge in certain aspects of TDIs among elementary school staff.