Effect of bulbospongiosus muscle injection with botulinum-A toxin for treatment of lifelong premature ejaculation; a randomized controlled trial.

This study aimed at assessing a new line of treatment for lifelong premature ejaculation which is botulinum-A toxin injection into the bulbospongiosus muscle. Sixty patients with lifelong premature ejaculation were independently randomized into 2 groups; group I, 100 U botulinum-A toxin at 10 U/ml saline was injected with ultrasound guidance into the bulbospongiosus muscle and group II which was injected with similar volume of saline. The primary outcome was to compare both groups for changes in the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) and partner's satisfaction at 1, 3 and 6 months after intervention. The second outcome was to compare the adverse events in both groups. Fifty-seven patients completed the study. In group I, the mean PEP increased significantly at 1- (P = 0.02) and 3- months (P = 0.04) with insignificant increase at 6-month (P = 0.6) of follow-up. Also, no significant changes had been noted in IELT or partner's satisfaction scores throughout the study duration (P > 0.05). In group II, no significant changes had been noted in the PEP, IELT and partner's satisfaction scores throughout the study duration (P > 0.05). There were insignificant differences in the changes in the mean PEP (P = 0.7, 0.6 and 0.4), IELT (P = 0.6,0.6 and 0.5) and partner's satisfaction scores (P = 0.5,0.7 and 0.3) in comparison to the baseline values at 1-, 3- and 6- months, respectively between both groups. Adverse events were observed in only 3 patients (5.3%). In group I, mild erectile dysfunction and post micturition dribbling were reported in one patient each. Where in group II, one patient reported bleeding per urethra (P = 0.5). To conclude, injection of botulinum-A toxin into bulbospongiosus seems to be safe but failed to prove clinical efficacy for treatment of lifelong premature ejaculation when compared to placebo.

Bilaterality of varicocele: The overlooked culprit in male infertility. Case series study.

OBJECTIVES: Varicocele is the most common correctable cause of male infertility that always has been a debatable subject as regards how it affects fertility and the best way to treat it. Proper assessment of the disease bilaterality is crucial not to miss one side and not to jeopardize treatment outcome. This study aimed to objectively assess varicocele bilaterality in infertile men aiming to improve treatment outcome in this cohort of patients. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between January 2019 and January 2022 including infertile males with varicoceles. Assessment of missed concomitant contralateral varicocele done pre-operatively by Color Doppler Ultrasound and intraoperatively by intraoperative Doppler device and measurement of maximal vein diameter of contralateral side. RESULTS: A total of 329 cases completed the study. A hundred cases (30.4%) were initially referred as unilateral varicoceles and 229 (69.6%) as bilateral varicoceles. After reassessment of the study population, bilaterality of varicocele was found to be as high as 98.5% (324/329). Repeat CDUS strongly correlated with the intraoperative measured varicocele diameter (r = 0.9, p < 0.001). Moreover, sperm parameters showed significant improvement 3 and 6 months post varicocelectomy. Normal pregnancy after 1 year of surgery occurred in 118 cases (35.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Varicocele bilaterality in infertile men is underreported. Thorough assessment by expert radiologists and andrologists is of paramount importance not to miss significant pathology or hazard treatment outcome.

Azoospermia and Sperm Retrieval in Post-Pubertal Testicular Torsion; Benefits and limitations.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of azoospermia development and the value of sperm retrieval in post-pubertal testicular torsion (TT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included patients with post-pubertal TT. Surgical exploration was urgently performed with either orchiopexy or orchiedectomy and contralateral orchiopexy. With the intention of cryopreservation, all cases underwent conventional testicular sperm extraction. Patients were followed-up after 1, 3, and 6 months with semen analysis and hormonal assay (FSH, LH and testosterone). Sperm retrieval rate (SRR), azoospermia rate and changes in hormonal profile were evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 62 patients with a median (IQR) age of 19 (18-20.7) years and duration of testicular torsion of 32.5 (18.3-48) hours. Testicular salvage was successful in 20 (32.3%) while orchiedectomy was performed on 42 patients. The duration of torsion [OR, 95% CI = 0.75 (0.61-0.93), P = .008] was the independent predictor of testicular salvage. Successful SR was achieved in 58 patients (93.5%); (40 from the affected testis and 18 from the contralateral side). After 6 months, 21 patients (33.8%) developed azoospermia [19 (45.2%) in orchidectomy group and 2 (10%) in orchiopexy group, P = .006]. Abnormal contralateral testis was the independent predictor of azoospermia [OR, 95% CI = 92(8.4-101.5), P < .001]. Azoospermia patients showed a statistically significant increase in FSH and LH and decrease in testosterone level as compared to the non-azoospermia group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Azoospermia is not rare in post-pubertal TT patients; therefore, SR at time of intervention seems to be a good option for them to preserve their fertility potentials.

Factors predicting the outcome of percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration in men with obstructive azoospermia.

OBJECTIVES: To report on the live birth rates (LBRs) following percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) in men with obstructive azoospermia (OA) and factors affecting treatment outcome which is under reported in the literature. METHODS: This is a multicenter study that was conducted in Egypt including all couples undergoing intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for OA using PESA-derived sperms. Men were subdivided according to aetiology into congenital, iatrogenic and idiopathic groups. Fertilization, pregnancy and LBRs were determined and compared in each group. The longitudinal LBR, crude and expected cumulative delivery rates (CCDR, ECDR) were calculated. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine significant associations between maternal, paternal and ICSI factors with successful live births. RESULTS: Ninety couples were included in the study. Viable sperm for ICSI was retrieved in 89 men (98.9%). A total of 155 ICSI cycles with 17 frozen embryo transfers resulted in 81 pregnan-cies and 55 live births. After 5 cycles, the longitudinal LBR, CCDR and ECDR were 30%, 57.3% and 88.6% respectively. Maternal age and number of fertilized eggs were the only fac-tors significantly affecting LBRs. CONCLUSIONS: PESA is a minimally invasive procedure for secur-ing viable sperm for ICSI in OA men, with high cumulative delivery rates. Maternal age and number of fertilized eggs are the only factors that significantly affecting LBR. The contempo-rary longitudinal and cumulative LBRs provide objective out-come data to counsel OA patients undergoing fertility treat-ments.

Effect of Direct-Acting Antiviral Drugs on Erectile Functions among Hepatitis C Patients: A Prospective Interventional Study.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C virus infection that greatly affects patients' quality of life. Unfortunately, some of the drugs used for HCV treatment may have a negative impact on the patient's erectile function, such as the pegylated interferon. Currently, with the introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs, there is scarce data in the literature about its potential impact on erectile function. In these settings, we aimed to assess the impact of sofosbuvir-based therapy on male erectile function. METHODS: This prospective interventional study was carried out in Benha University hospitals between January 2019 and May 2020. The study included all consecutive HCV patients with simultaneous ED coming to the hepatology outpatient clinic. Patients were divided into a study group who received sofosbuvir-based therapy (group A) or a control group who received silymarin therapy (group B). The International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) was used for the assessment of erectile function at different time points (pretreatment, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment). Different variables in both groups have been statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 75 patients who received sofosbuvir-based therapy and a control group (n = 35) matched for age and pretreatment variables (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and Fibrosis-4 score). There was no significant difference between both groups in the pretreatment data. On the other hand, the posttreatment IIEF-5 was significantly higher in the sofosbuvir arm compared to the silymarin arm both at six months (p<0.001) and at 12 months (p<0.001). Furthermore, the age and the stage of liver fibrosis were negatively correlated with IIEF-5 at all-time points. CONCLUSION: The age and the stage of liver fibrosis are significantly correlated with the degree of ED. Furthermore, sofosbuvir-based therapy may be associated with significant improvement in patients with erectile function.

Reporting on longitudinal live birth rates and cumulative delivery rates are more realistic outcome measures than sperm retrieval rates in couples undergoing mTESE-ICSI.

The live birth rates (LBRs) in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) undergoing microdissection TESE (mTESE) are under reported, with surgical sperm retrieval rate often used as the primary outcome measure. We analysed longitudinal and cumulative delivery rates following mTESE- intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in NOA. Sperm was retrieved in 45% of patients undergoing mTESE. Median male and female age were 42 years (IQR 37-47) and 35 years (IQR 31-38) respectively. A total of 141 ICSI cycles and 23 frozen embryo transfers resulted in 62 pregnancies and 37 LBRs. The longitudinal LBR, crude and expected cumulative delivery rates after five cycles were 15.5%, 48.7% and 71.1%, respectively. Reassuringly, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rate (PR) (p = 0.37) or LBR (p = 0.68) using fresh or frozen sperm or embryo (p = 0.74). Sperm retrieval was significantly correlated with Johnsen score (JS) (p = 0.006) and hypospermatogenesis (HS) (p = 0.04), whilst LBR only significantly correlated with female age (p = 0.04). The longitudinal LBR for a couple embarking on mTESE for azoospermia is only 15.5%, although the cumulative delivery rates are promising. Reassuringly, the outcomes using fresh versus frozen embryos or sperm are comparable. Reporting on delivery rates from a single mTESE procedure are more objective and realistic measures of treatment success in men with NOA.

Premature ejaculation: challenging new and the old concepts.

Premature ejaculation remains a difficult condition to manage for patients, their partners, and the clinician. Whilst prevalence rates are estimated to be 20-40%, determining a diagnosis of premature ejaculation is difficult, as the definition remains both subjective and ill-defined in the clinical context. As our understanding of the ejaculatory pathway has improved, new opportunities to treat the condition have evolved with mixed results. In this review, we explore some of these controversies surrounding the aetiology, diagnosis, and treatment of this condition and discuss potential novel therapeutic options.

Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy?

In men undergoing radical treatment for prostate cancer, erectile function is one of the most important health-related quality-of-life outcomes influencing patient choice in treatment. Penile rehabilitation has emerged as a therapeutic measure to prevent erectile dysfunction and expedite return of erectile function after radical prostatectomy. Penile rehabilitation involves a program designed to increase the likelihood of return to baseline-level erectile function, as opposed to treatment, which implies the therapeutic treatment of symptoms, a key component of post-radical prostatectomy management. Several pathological theories form the basis for rehabilitation, and a plethora of treatments are currently in widespread use. However, whilst there is some evidence supporting the concept of penile rehabilitation from animal studies, randomised controlled trials are contradictory in outcomes. Similarly, urological guidelines are conflicted in terms of recommendations. Furthermore, it is clear that in spite of the lack of evidence for the role of penile rehabilitation, many urologists continue to employ some form of rehabilitation in their patients after radical prostatectomy. This is a significant burden to health resources in public-funded health economies, and no effective cost-benefit analysis has been undertaken to support this practice. Thus, further research is warranted to provide both scientific and clinical evidence for this contemporary practice and the development of preventative strategies in treating erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

A prospective randomised controlled study comparing bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate to monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of bipolar transurethral plasma vaporisation (B-TUVP) as an alternative to the 'gold standard' monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a prospective randomised controlled study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 82 patients indicated for prostatectomy were assigned to two groups, group I (40 patients) underwent B-TUVP and group II (42 patients) underwent M-TURP. The safety of both techniques was evaluated by reporting perioperative changes in serum Na+, serum K+, haematocrit (packed cell volume), and any perioperative complications. For the efficacy assessment, patients were evaluated subjectively by comparing the improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score and objectively by measuring the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) before and after the procedures. RESULTS: In group II, there was a significant perioperative drop in serum Na+ (from 137.5 to 129.4 mmol/L) and haematocrit (from 42.9% to 38.2%) (both P < 0.001). Moreover, one patient in group II had TUR syndrome. The remote postoperative complication rate was (15%) in group I and comprised of stress urinary incontinence (5%), bladder outlet obstruction (5%), and residual adenoma (5%). In group II, the remote postoperative complication rate was (4.8%), as two patients developed urethral stricture. There were statistically significant improvements in micturition variables postoperatively in both arms, but the magnitude of improvement was statistically more significant in group II. CONCLUSION: B-TUPV seems to be safer than M-TURP; however, the lack of a tissue specimen and the relatively high retreatment rate are major disadvantages of the B-TUVP technique. Moreover, M-TURP appears to be more effective than B-TUPV and its safety can be improved by careful case selection and adequate haemostasis.