The Outcomes of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients with Synchronous and Early Central Nervous System Involvement: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most commonly diagnosed subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). R-CHOP has significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with DLBCL, however, its indication in the prevention of CNS relapse and recurrence is still inconsistent. Moreover, prophylactic methotrexate and/or cytarabine have been used prophylactically for DLBCL patients is at high risk of CNS relapse and to treat CNS DLBCL, however, their efficacy remains unclear. METHODS: The aim of our retrospective study was to determine the incidence of CNS in-volvement in patients with DLBCL and to describe its risk factors and survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 406 patients with DLBCL were identified, and 17 (4.2%) of DLBCL patients had CNS involvement i.e. 9 (2.2 %) at diagnosis and 8 (~2%) at relapse. The patients were younger, had advanced stage, high CNS-IPI, and had extra nodal involvement. Seven out of the 17 patients who survived received chemotherapy and a prophylactic methotrexate. Considering the CNS-IPI, of the 146 patients with high CNS-IPI at presentation, 18 received the prophylactic HDMTX and 3 (16.7%) of them had CNS relapse. Two (1.6%) out of 128 who did not receive the prophylactic HDMTX had CNS relapse. On the other hand, of the 223 patients with intermediate CNS-IPI, 25 received the prophylactic HDMTX and 2 (8%) of them had CNS relapse and in 198 patients who did not receive the prophylactic HDMTX, 2 (1.01%) had CNS relapse. The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates for the entire cohort were 73% and 84%, respectively. The median OS for those who had CNS involvement was 17 months and the 2-year OS was 40%. CONCLUSION: CNS involvement in DLBCL has a poor prognosis, thus, aggressive CNS-directed therapy should be considered, especially in young patients.

Quality of reporting of modern randomized controlled trials in medical oncology: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines were developed in the mid-1990s for the explicit purpose of improving clinical trial reporting. However, there is little information regarding the adherence to CONSORT guidelines of recent publications of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in oncology. METHODS: All phase III RCTs published between 2005 and 2009 were reviewed using an 18-point overall quality score for reporting based on the 2001 CONSORT statement. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify features associated with improved reporting quality. To provide baseline data for future evaluations of reporting quality, RCTs were also assessed according to the 2010 revised CONSORT statement. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A total of 357 RCTs were reviewed. The mean 2001 overall quality score was 13.4 on a scale of 0-18, whereas the mean 2010 overall quality score was 19.3 on a scale of 0-27. The overall RCT reporting quality score improved by 0.21 points per year from 2005 to 2009. Poorly reported items included method used to generate the random allocation (adequately reported in 29% of trials), whether and how blinding was applied (41%), method of allocation concealment (51%), and participant flow (59%). High impact factor (IF, P = .003), recent publication date (P = .008), and geographic origin of RCTs (P = .003) were independent factors statistically significantly associated with higher reporting quality in a multivariable regression model. Sample size, tumor type, and positivity of trial results were not associated with higher reporting quality, whereas funding source and treatment type had a borderline statistically significant impact. CONCLUSION: The results show that numerous items remained unreported for many trials. Thus, given the potential impact of poorly reported trials, oncology journals should require even stricter adherence to the CONSORT guidelines.