Is immediate weight bearing safe for subtrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients treated by cephalomedullary nailing? A multicentric study in one hundred eighty-two patients.

PURPOSE: Biomechanical superiority of intramedullary nails over extramedullary implants has been proved for subtrochanteric fractures. Nevertheless, postoperative management of these patients has not changed, with high rates of protected weight-bearing after intramedullary nailing. The purpose of this study is to determine the mechanical complications of immediate postoperative full weigh-bearing for subtrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients treated with a cephalomedullary nail. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case series study from patients treated with a cephalomedullary nail for subtrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31A.3 and 32A-32C) over a nine-year period. Patients in the immediate full weight-bearing (IFWB) group received orders for immediate full weight bear as tolerated on postoperative 48 h. Patients in the non- or limited- weight-bearing (NLWB) group received orders not to full weight bear in the immediate postoperative. RESULTS: There were five (2.7%) cases of implant failure including four cutouts and one nail breakage that needed a reoperation. Of them, one (2.2%) followed the NLWB protocol and four (2.9%) followed the IFWB protocol. Mean length of stay was 7.9 days (median 8, range 3-21) in the NLWB group and 10.7 days (median 8, range 2-60) in the IWBAT group. The NLWB group observed a 2.8-day shorter postoperative length of stay when compared to the IFWB, but the median remained equal. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that geriatric patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nailing and in which a good fracture reduction was achieved, may be able to tolerate immediate postoperative full weight-bearing, not increasing reoperation rates due to implant failure.

Fluoroscopic landmarks to recognize iatrogenic varus displacement (wedge effect) during cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures.

AIMS: Iatrogenic varus malreduction after intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures (wedge effect) may be more common than previously reported. The aim of study is to determine its incidence and to define easy fluoroscopic landmarks to recognize it intraoperatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included surgical procedures with residual varus malreduction and sufficient intraoperative fluoroscopy images to assess an intraoperative anatomical reduction at the beginning of the procedure. Two intraoperative fluoroscopic landmarks were defined to assess varus in the anteroposterior view: the position of the greater trochanter (GT) related to the femoral shaft (medialized GT sign), and the position (superior, centre or inferior) of the guide wire in both the neck and the head of the femur (cross wire sign). We describe our current method of treatment to avoid this complication. RESULTS: A total of 369 extracapsular hip fractures were treated using PFNA and Gamma 3 systems. We found 55 (14.9%) fractures with a varus malreduction. Six were underreduced and fixed in varus. Thirty-five (9.48%) were well reduced by closed reduction but suffered a iatrogenic varus displacement when introducing the nail. 31 were female; mean age was 86.6 (range 70-97). Mean postoperative head-shaft angle was 119,2° range (113°-123°). Mean TAD was 24,37 range (14-36 mm). CONCLUSION: Wedge effect (iatrogenic varus displacement of a well reduced intertrochanteric fracture when introducing the nail) could occur in at least 10% of intertrochanteric fractures. The medialized GT and the "crossing wire sign" seem to be good predictors of iatrogenic varus malalignement.

Comparative study of the second and third generation of gamma nail for trochanteric fractures: review of 218 cases.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the complications of the trochanteric gamma nail (TGN) and the Gamma3 Nail (G3), focusing on cutout failure. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort analysis. SETTING: Level II Teaching Trauma Center academic trauma center. PATIENTS/METHODS: Two hundred eighteen trochanteric fractures with a mean follow-up of 15 months were included in the study. They were treated either with the TGN or the G3 between January 2005 and December 2010. Bivariate, stratified, and logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association between cutout and the independent variables. INTERVENTION: Proximal anterograde nailing with either the TGN or the G3. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patient age, sex, type of intramedullary device, stability fracture pattern, tip-apex distance (TAD), distraction at the fracture site, cervical angle, and cutout. RESULTS: The relative risk (RR) of cutout was 4.71 times higher in the group treated with G3 (P < 0.01). RR of cutout for unstable fractures compared with stable fractures was 3.07 (1.01-9.35). In unstable fractures, the RR of cutout was 8.78 times higher in patients with G3 (P < 0.01). RR of cutout was 1.54 times higher with TAD >25 mm (P = 0.4). DISCUSSION: We have not found any relationship between cutout rate and TAD. Only the fracture pattern and the type of implant have shown to be associated with cutout risk. In our study, Gamma3 Nail has higher cutout rates than TGN in unstable fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.