Preemptive treatment in the acute and early subacute phase of uncomplicated type B aortic dissections with poor prognosis factors.

Objective: Due to its favorable outcome regarding late morbidity and mortality, thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is becoming more popular for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). This study aimed to compare preemptive endovascular treatment and optimal medical treatment (OMT) and OMT alone in patients presenting uncomplicated TBAD with predictors of aortic progression. Design: Retrospective multicenter study. Methods: We analyzed patients with uncomplicated TBAD and risk factors of progression in two French academic centers. Aortic events [defined as aortic-related (re)intervention or aortic-related death after initial hospitalization], postoperative complications, non-aortic events, and radiologic aortic progression and remodeling were recorded and analyzed. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Between 2011 and 2021, preemptive endovascular procedures at the acute and early subacute phase (<30 days) were performed on 24 patients (group 1) and OMT alone on 26 patients (group 2). With a mean follow-up of 38.08 ± 24.53 months, aortic events occurred in 20.83% of patients from group 1 and 61.54% of patients from group 2 (p < .001). No patient presented aortic-related death during follow-up. There were no differences in postoperative events (p = 1.00) and non-aortic events (p = 1.00). OMT patients had significantly more aneurysmal progression of the thoracic aorta (p < .001) and maximal aortic diameter (p < .001). Aortic remodeling was found in 91.67% of patients in group 1 and 42.31% of patients in group 2 (p < .001). A subgroup analysis of patients in group 1 showed that patients treated with preemptive TEVAR and STABILISE had reduced maximum aortic diameters at the 1-year (p = .010) and last follow-up (p = .030) compared to those in patients treated with preemptive TEVAR alone. Conclusion: Preemptive treatment of uncomplicated TBAD with risk factors of progression reduces the risk of long-term aortic events. Over 60% of medically treated patients will require intervention during follow-up, with no benefit in terms of postoperative events. Even after surgical treatment, patients in the OMT group had significantly more aneurysmal progression, along with poorer aortic remodeling.

Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Lesions by Aortic Robotic Surgery: Learning Curve and Midterm Outcome.

BACKGROUD: The learning curve and midterm results of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) revascularization by robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) surgery may be known. METHODS: A prospective single-center study was conducted in the vascular surgery department of Georges Pompidou European Hospital (Paris, France). Patients with AIOD treated by RAL from February 2014 to February 2019 were included. Demographic characteristics, past medical history, Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) lesions classifications, mortality, primary and secondary patency, as well as complication rates were collected. Safety was analyzed by the cumulative sum control chart method with a conversion rate of 10%, operative time by cumulative average-time model, and primary and secondary patency by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included, 18 (25.7%) with TASC C lesions and 52 (74.3%) with TASC D lesions. Before discharge, 14 (24.3%) patients had surgical complications. Among them, 10 (14.3%) required at least one reintervention. One (1.4%) patient died during the hospitalization. The learning curve in terms of safety (conversion rate) was 13 cases with an operating time of 220 minutes after 35 patients. During follow-up (median 37 months [21; 49]), 63 patients (91.3%) improved their symptoms, 53 (76.8%) became asymptomatic, and 3 graft limb occlusions occurred. The primary patency at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months was 94%, 92%, 92%, and 92%, respectively, while the secondary patency for the same intervals was 100%, 98.1%, 98.1%, and 98.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery in AIOD revascularization seems safe and effective; allowing to treat patients with few comorbidities and severe lesions, in a dedicated center experienced in RAL, with excellent patency. Prospective clinical trials should be performed to confirm safety.

Thoracic Endovascular Repair after Total Aortic Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant Trunk for Type a Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: The management of residual aortic dissection after initial type A repair with the Frozen elephant trunk technique remains mostly unexplored. This work aimed to evaluate endovascular second-stage surgery for patients with residual aortic dissection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients that underwent Type A aortic repair with Frozen elephant trunk, followed by a second-stage endovascular procedure was done from March 2016 to December 2021. The primary outcome was aortic-related adverse events or mortality, and secondary outcomes were aortic remodeling and perioperative complications. Remodeling was assessed by comparing the difference in ratios for true lumen/total aortic diameters on pre-operative and follow-up scans. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients underwent second-stage surgery after Type A repair during the study period (7 thoracic endovascular aortic repair extensions, 1 STABLE/PETTICOAT, and 26 STABILISE). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 2-66 months). There were no perioperative deaths or major complications and 1 reoperation for left subclavian re-embolization. At the last follow-up, there was no aortic-related mortality. There were 5 aortic-related adverse events, including another subclavian re-embolization and a preplanned open conversion. Risk factors were connective tissue disorders (P = 0.01) and aortic aneurysms >55 mm (P = 0.03). Distal remodeling reached statistical significance in all segments (P < 0.01) and was greater for patients treated with the STABILISE technique when compared to extended thoracic endovascular aortic repair (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Second-stage endovascular management of residual aortic dissection after initial Frozen elephant trunk repair showed excellent perioperative and good midterm outcomes and induced significant remodeling of the entire aorta in most cases, particularly with the STABILISE procedure.

Involvement of an IgE/Mast cell/B cell amplification loop in abdominal aortic aneurysm progression.

AIMS: IgE type immunoglobulins and their specific effector cells, mast cells (MCs), are associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) progression. In parallel, immunoglobulin-producing B cells, organised in tertiary lymphoid organs (TLOs) within the aortic wall, have also been linked to aneurysmal progression. We aimed at investigating the potential role and mechanism linking local MCs, TLO B cells, and IgE production in aneurysmal progression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Through histological assays conducted on human surgical samples from AAA patients, we uncovered that activated MCs were enriched at sites of unhealed haematomas, due to subclinical aortic wall fissuring, in close proximity to adventitial IgE+ TLO B cells. Remarkably, in vitro the IgEs deriving from these samples enhanced MC production of IL-4, a cytokine which favors IgE class-switching and production by B cells. Finally, the role of MCs in aneurysmal progression was further analysed in vivo in ApoE-/- mice subjected to angiotensin II infusion aneurysm model, through MC-specific depletion after the establishment of dissecting aneurysms. MC-specific depletion improved intramural haematoma healing and reduced aneurysmal progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that MC located close to aortic wall fissures are activated by adventitial TLO B cell-produced IgEs and participate to their own activation by providing support for further IgE synthesis through IL-4 production. By preventing prompt repair of aortic subclinical fissures, such a runaway MC activation loop could precipitate aneurysmal progression, suggesting that MC-targeting treatments may represent an interesting adjunctive therapy for reducing AAA progression.

Assessment of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Relay Proximal Scallop: Results of a French Prospective Multicentre Study.

OBJECTIVE: A proximal scallop design allows aortic arch repair without complex endovascular manipulation in the aortic arch. The aim was to assess the safety and efficacy at one year of the Relay proximal scallop stent graft. METHODS: A prospective multicentre study evaluated consecutive patients treated with the Relay proximal scallop stent graft in 10 French aortic centres. All consecutive patients eligible for elective thoracic endovascular repair with proximal scallop in the 10 participating centres between January 2015 and July 2018 were included. Primary endpoints were 30 day mortality, stroke, and spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) rates. Outcomes including safety and efficacy, technical and clinical success, all cause death, neurological events, vessel patency, and device specific complications were analysed. Survival and survival without severe complications were estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: Ten aortic centres treated 40 patients for thoracic aortic aneurysm (45%), penetrating atherosclerotic aneurysm (30%), and dissection (25%). Half of the procedures (50%) targeted zone 0 of the aortic arch (zone 0 in 17.5% and zones 0/1 in 32.5%), 37.5% targeted zone 2 (35% zone 2 alone; 2.5% zones 1/2), and 15% targeted zone 1 (12.5% zone 1 alone). Median follow up was one year. Thirty day mortality, stroke, and SCI rates were 10%, 5%, and 0% respectively. Primary technical success was 95%. Type Ia, Ib, and III endoleaks rates were 5.4%, 0%, and 0% respectively at one month. The overall mortality rate at one year was 17.5%. Aneurysm expansion was > 5 mm in one case at one year associated with type Ia endoleak (3%). There was no supra-aortic trunk thrombosis, one (2%) graft kink, and no migration. CONCLUSION: One year outcomes showed that the Relay proximal scallop stent graft is an acceptable answer to thoracic aortic disease to deal with short proximal landing zones.

Is carotid web an arterial wall dysplasia? A histological series.

INTRODUCTION: Described for 60 years under various names, the carotid web is a suspected cause of cryptogenic stroke, especially in young patients. The web creates an intraluminal protrusion that may contribute to turbulent flow and thrombus embolization into cerebral arteries. Although the carotid web has frequently been related to arterial fibrodysplasia, its natural history and pathological description remain unclear. PATIENTS: Among all consecutive patients admitted to the stroke unit of Sainte-Anne Hospital and referred to the vascular surgery department from January 2015 to December 2022, we retrospectively identified 9 patients with a carotid web. The surgical specimens of the 9 patients were submitted to systematic pathological analysis. RESULTS: The patients with a histologically confirmed carotid web were young (median age was 42 years), prominently women (7/9), and presenting with low cardiovascular risk. Eight patients had a stroke proven by a magnetic resonance imaging, and 1 had transient monocular amaurosis. The typical pathological lesion supporting the imaging pattern of the carotid web was a focal eccentric intimal hyperplasia forming a protruding lesion characterized by a population of vascular smooth muscle cells intermingled in an abundant, most often loose extracellular matrix. Pathologically proven thrombus was observed in 4 cases. Importantly atherosclerosis was absent. CONCLUSION: Histological features in our 9 cases strengthen carotid web characterization as a homogeneous pattern of localized intimal hyperplasia. It is a unique entity consistent with intimal fibroplasia, distinct from medial fibromuscular dysplasia and early atherosclerosis.

Aortic thrombosis as a dramatic vascular complication in COVID-19 disease.

OBJECTIVE: To report clinical outcomes of COVID-19 related acute aortic thrombosis (AAT). METHODS: Consecutive COVID-19 patients presenting with AAT between April 2020 and August 2021 were included retrospectively. Clinical and radiological data were prospectively collected. RESULTS: Ten patients (men, 90%; mean age, 64 ± 2 years) were included. At the time of AAT diagnosis, four patients were in intensive care unit. Median time between diagnosis of COVID-19 and AAT was 5 days [IQR 0-8.5]. Clinical presentation was acute lower limb ischaemia (n=9) and mesenteric ischaemia (n=2). Thrombus localization was the abdominal aorta (n=5), the thoracic aorta (n=2) or both (n=3), with the following embolic sites: lower limbs (n=9), renal arteries (n=3), superior mesenteric artery (n=2), splenic artery (n=1), cerebral arteries (n=1). Revascularization was performed in 9 patients, using open (n=6), endovascular (n=2) or hybrid techniques (n=1). Three patients required reinterventions. The 30-day mortality was 30%. Three major amputations were performed in two patients, resulting in a free-amputation survival rate of 50% after a median follow-up of 3,5 months [IQR 2-4.1]. CONCLUSION: AAT is a rare and devastating complication of COVID-19 disease, responsible for high mortality and amputation rates.

Thrombosis of Medium-Sized and Large Arteries During Covid-19 Infection: Results of the COVIVASC Study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 infection is associated not only with venous thromboses but also with arterial thromboses (COV-ATs) in relation with an endothelial dysfunction, a coagulopathy and rhythm disorders. The incidence, the topography, and the prognosis of COV-ATs remain poorly known. The objective of this study was to report the overall experience of the Greater Paris University Hospitals (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, AP-HP) during the first pandemic wave of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: After approval by the ethics committee, a study using the AP-HP clinical data warehouse was carried out between March and May 2020. Overall, 124,609 patients had a polymerase chain reaction for COVID-19 in our hospitals, of which 25,345 were positive. From 20,710 exploitable stays, patients tested positive for COVID who presented an episode of acute COV-AT (except coronary and intracranial arteries) were selected on the basis of the French medical classification for clinical procedures codes. The data are presented as absolute values with percentages and/or means with standard deviation. RESULTS: Over the studied period, 60 patients (aged 71±14 years, 42 men) presented a COV-AT at the time of their hospitalization, an incidence of 0.2%. The arterial complication occurred 3±7 days after the COVID infection and was inaugural in 30% of the cases (n = 18). The sites of COV-AT were the lower extremities (n = 35%, 58%), the abdominal aorta (n = 10%, 17%), the thoracic aorta (n = 7%, 12%), the upper limbs (n = 7%, 12%), the cerebral arteries (n = 7%, 12%), the digestive arteries (n = 6%, 10%), the renal arteries (n = 2%, 3%), and the ophthalmic artery (n = 1%, 2%). Multiple COV-ATs were observed in 13 patients (22%). At the time of diagnosis, 20 (33%) patients were in intensive care, including six (10%) patients who were intubated. On computed tomography angiography, COVID lesions were classified as moderate and severe in 25 (42%) and 21 (35%) cases, respectively. Revascularization was attempted in 27 patients (45%), by open surgery in 16 cases, using endovascular techniques in 8 cases and with a hybrid approach in three cases. Six patients (22%) required reinterventions. The duration of hospitalization was 12±9 days. Early mortality (in-hospital or at 30 days) was 30% (n = 18). Nine (15%) patients presented severe nonlethal ischemic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial involvement is rare during COVID-19 infection. The aorta and the arteries of the limbs are the privileged sites. The morbi-mortality of these patients is high. Future studies will have to determine if the systematization of anticoagulation therapy decreases the incidence and the severity of the condition.

Carotid Plaque Vulnerability Assessed by Combined Shear Wave Elastography and Ultrafast Doppler Compared to Histology.

Ultrafast ultrasound imaging (UUI) provides an estimation of carotid plaque stiffness by shear wave elastography (SWE) and the quantification of wall shear stress (WSS) by ultrafast Doppler. We aimed to evaluate the combined criteria of plaque stiffness and WSS applied on the plaque as potential biomarkers of plaque vulnerability assessed by histology. We included patients for whom carotid endarterectomy had been decided by a multidisciplinary team. UUI was performed within 48 h before surgery, and acquisitions were obtained on a carotid longitudinal view. After endarterectomy, gross examination and histological analysis were performed on each removed plaque. Forty-six plaques with SWE data and 29 with WSS data were analyzed. Histological analysis revealed 29 vulnerable and 17 stable plaques. Gray-scale median analysis by B-mode, mean, and standard deviation of stiffness by SWE did not differ between vulnerable and stable plaques. SWE analysis revealed that the percentage of stiffness range of 3-5 m/s was significantly increased in vulnerable plaques (p = 0.048). WSS alone showed no difference between stable and vulnerable plaques regardless of the segment of the plaque which was analyzed. A multiparametric score using maximal WSS at the peak of the plaque associated with SWE texture analysis parameters was calculated by stepwise regression, leading to a score with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 78%. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.85. A multiparameter scoring system including plaque stiffness and flow analysis using UUI allows to effectively identify histologically vulnerable carotid plaques. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03234257.

Outcomes of Same-Day Discharge with Manual Compression and 5F Sheath Compatible Devices for Lower Extremity Arterial Endovascular Treatment.

BACKGROUND: For same-day discharge lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) endovascular procedures, femoral manual compression could be an alternative to arterial closure devices. The aim of this study was to assess the security and efficacy of same-day discharge after manual compression in patients treated for LEAD endovascular revascularization with 5F sheath. METHODS: FREEDOM OP was a national multicenter, prospective, single arm study. Patients with symptomatic LEAD (Rutherford 2-5) and eligible for same-day discharge were included. The primary endpoint was the total in-hospital admission rate, which includes overnight surveillance and rehospitalization rate at 1 month. RESULTS: Between September 2017 and August 2019, 114 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 66 ± 10 years and most of them were claudicant (103; 94%). Mainly femoropopliteal lesions were treated (178; 70%) and the technical success was 97%. One hundred forty-two 5F stents and fifty one 5F drug coated balloon were delivered. The mean manual compression duration was 13 ± 4 min. Major access-related complications rate was 4.5%. Total in-hospital admission rate was 11%. Seven patients had overnight surveillance and 5 were rehospitalized (2 for the target lesion). No rehospitalisation was carried out within 24 hr after discharge. No major cardiovascular event, including death, was observed. The patients were significantly improved in term of clinical status (P < 0.0001) and hemodynamic (P < 0.0001) in comparison to baseline. CONCLUSION: FREEDOM OP showed that manual compression is feasible and safe for same-day discharge after LEAD revascularization with 5F sheath femoral approach.

"Ranger BTK" a Prospective Single-Centre Cohort Study on a New Drug-Coated Balloon for Below the Knee Lesions in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia.

PURPOSE: Restenosis remains a limitation of endovascular angioplasty with a patency of 30% in BTK at 12 months. Several studies on drug-coated balloons have not demonstrated any improvements in terms of patency and target lesions revascularization in BTK lesions. This prospective single-centre cohort study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a new generation low-dose drug-coated balloon (DCB) with a reduced crystalline structure to treat below the knee (BTK) lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2016 and November 2017, 30 consecutive patients (mean 68.8 ± 12.7 years, 6 female) with BTK lesions and CLI were included in this single-centre, prospective non-randomized cohort study. All patients with rest pain and/or ischemic wound associated with BTK lesions were included in the study. Mean lesion length was 133.6 ± 94.5 mm and 18(60%) were chronic total occlusions. The primary safety outcome parameter was a composite of all-cause mortality and major amputation at 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome parameter was the primary angiographic patency at 6 months (defined as freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization and the absence of significant restenosis (> 50%) as determined by core laboratory angiography assessment. Immediate technical success, late lumen loss (LLL), clinical target lesion revascularization (TLR) and ulcer healing rates at 12 months were also evaluated. RESULTS: Immediate technical success was 97%(29/30): one patient had an acute thrombosis at the completion of index procedure. Primary safety outcome parameter was 94%(28/30): one patient underwent major amputation and one patient died of other comorbidities at 2 months. Another patient had a major amputation at 7.5 months. Angiographic follow-up was available in 20 patients. Primary angiographic patency was 57%(12/21 lesions), and LLL was 0.99 ± 0.68 mm at 6 months. Freedom from TLR was 89% at 12 months. The rate of ulcer healing was 76% at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Ranger DCB balloons to treat CLI patients demonstrated a positive trend with good safety outcomes parameters. Further randomized studies are needed to understand the usefulness compared to POBA.

D-dimer at hospital admission for COVID-19 are associated with in-hospital mortality, independent of venous thromboembolism: Insights from a French multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with coagulation disorders, in particular high concentrations of D-dimer, and increased frequency of venous thromboembolism. AIM: To explore the association between D-dimer at admission and in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalised for COVID-19, with or without symptomatic venous thromboembolism. METHODS: From 26 February to 20 April 2020, D-dimer concentration at admission and outcomes (in-hospital mortality and venous thromboembolism) of patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in medical wards were retrospectively analysed in a multicenter study in 24 French hospitals. RESULTS: Among 2878 patients enrolled in the study, 1154 (40.1%) patients had D-dimer measurement at admission. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a D-dimer concentration>1128ng/mL as the best cut-off value for in-hospital mortality (area under the curve 64.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60-69), with a sensitivity of 71.1% (95% CI 62-78) and a specificity of 55.6% (95% CI 52-58), which did not differ in the subgroup of patients with venous thromboembolism during hospitalisation. Among 545 (47.2%) patients with D-dimer concentration>1128ng/mL at admission, 86 (15.8%) deaths occurred during hospitalisation. After adjustment, in Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, D-dimer concentration>1128ng/mL at admission was also associated with a worse prognosis, with an odds ratio of 3.07 (95% CI 2.05-4.69; P<0.001) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.11 (95% CI 1.31-3.4; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: D-dimer concentration>1128ng/mL is a relevant predictive factor for in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in a medical ward, regardless of the occurrence of venous thromboembolism during hospitalisation.

Anticoagulation Before Hospitalization Is a Potential Protective Factor for COVID-19: Insight From a French Multicenter Cohort Study.

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory disease associated with thrombotic outcomes with coagulation and endothelial disorders. Based on that, several anticoagulation guidelines have been proposed. We aimed to determine whether anticoagulation therapy modifies the risk of developing severe COVID-19. Methods and Results Patients with COVID-19 initially admitted in medical wards of 24 French hospitals were included prospectively from February 26 to April 20, 2020. We used a Poisson regression model, Cox proportional hazard model, and matched propensity score to assess the effect of anticoagulation on outcomes (intensive care unit admission or in-hospital mortality). The study enrolled 2878 patients with COVID-19, among whom 382 (13.2%) were treated with oral anticoagulation therapy before hospitalization. After adjustment, anticoagulation therapy before hospitalization was associated with a better prognosis with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.55-0.88). Analyses performed using propensity score matching confirmed that anticoagulation therapy before hospitalization was associated with a better prognosis, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.29-0.63) for intensive care unit admission and adjusted hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61-0.98) for composite criteria intensive care unit admission or death. In contrast, therapeutic or prophylactic low- or high-dose anticoagulation started during hospitalization were not associated with any of the outcomes. Conclusions Anticoagulation therapy used before hospitalization in medical wards was associated with a better prognosis in contrast with anticoagulation initiated during hospitalization. Anticoagulation therapy introduced in early disease could better prevent COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and endotheliopathy, and lead to a better prognosis.

Dealiasing High-Frame-Rate Color Doppler Using Dual-Wavelength Processing.

Doppler ultrasound is the premier modality to analyze blood flow dynamics in clinical practice. With conventional systems, Doppler can either provide a time-resolved quantification of the flow dynamics in sample volumes (spectral Doppler) or an average Doppler velocity/power [color flow imaging (CFI)] in a wide field of view (FOV) but with a limited frame rate. The recent development of ultrafast parallel systems made it possible to evaluate simultaneously color, power, and spectral Doppler in a wide FOV and at high-frame rates but at the expense of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). However, like conventional Doppler, ultrafast Doppler is subject to aliasing for large velocities and/or large depths. In a recent study, staggered multi-pulse repetition frequency (PRF) sequences were investigated to dealias color-Doppler images. In this work, we exploit the broadband nature of pulse-echo ultrasound and propose a dual-wavelength approach for CFI dealiasing with a constant PRF. We tested the dual-wavelength bandpass processing, in silico, in laminar flow phantom and validated it in vivo in human carotid arteries ( n = 25 ). The in silico results showed that the Nyquist velocity could be extended up to four times the theoretical limit. In vivo, dealiased CFI were highly consistent with unfolded Spectral Doppler ( r2=0.83 , y=1.1x+0.1 , N=25 ) and provided consistent vector flow images. Our results demonstrate that dual-wavelength processing is an efficient method for high-velocity CFI.

[Aortic dissection at the acute phase]. / Dissection aortique à la phase aiguë.

ACUTE AORTIC DISSECTION Acute aortic dissection is the most common and dramatic of aortic emergencies. The many complications that it generates, such as rupture or malperfusion, make it a complex pathology to be managed in the context of an emergency, which requires many medical and surgical skills. Its medical management is based on the control of arterial pressure, and its surgical treatment on the replacement of the ascending aorta when damaged, or the endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta by aortic stentgraft. The clinical and radiological features of its prevention in the general population are unfortunately still little recognized.

DISSECTION AORTIQUE À LA PHASE AIGUË La dissection aortique est la plus fréquente et la plus dramatique des urgences aortiques. Les nombreuses complications qu'elle génère, à type de rupture ou de malperfusion d'organe, en font une pathologie complexe, à prendre en charge dans le cadre de l'urgence, qui nécessite de nombreuses compétences médico-chirurgicales. Son traitement médical repose sur le contrôle de la pression artérielle, et son traitement chirurgical sur le remplacement de l'aorte ascendante, lorsqu'elle est atteinte, ou la réparation de l'aorte thoracique descendante par endoprothèse aortique. Les éléments cliniques et radiologiques de sa prévention dans la population générale sont encore malheureusement peu reconnus.

[SOS Aorte : a filiarisation of the management of aortic dissections in Île-de-France]. / SOS Aorte : une filiarisation de la prise en charge des dissections aortiques en Île-de-France.

SOS AORTE: A FILIARISATION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF AORTIC DISSECTIONS IN ÎLE DE FRANCE Creation of a dedicated Aortic network for patients with an aortic emergency in Ile de France, via the SOS AORTE program, not only improves the times of immediate care and their 30-day mortality, but also offers a specialized and multidisciplinary follow-up, dedicated to chronic aortic pathology. The multidisciplinary "Aortic team" of cardiologists, radiologists, resuscitators, cardiac and vascular surgeons optimizes the patient's chances of benefiting from the most suited treatment to the type of dissection and its complications. After the acute phase, specialized rehabilitation to stress, psychological support and patient's education about his aortic pathology, allow his resumption of activity in the best conditions. Specialized monitoring of arterial hypertension associated with family and genetic investigations are the pledge of optimal medical treatment. Monitoring of chronic aortic disease using CT angiography should be continued, in order to avoid the risk of secondary aortic rupture.

SOS AORTE: UNE FILIARISATION DE LA PRISE EN CHARGE DES DISSECTIONS AORTIQUES EN ÎLE-DE-FRANCE La création d'une filière de soins des patients avec une urgence aortique en Île-de-France, via le programme SOS Aorte, permet non seulement d'améliorer leurs délais de prise en charge immédiate et leur mortalité à trente jours mais également de proposer un suivi spécialisé et multidisciplinaire dédié à la pathologie aortique chronique. Le travail en équipe multidisciplinaire de cardiologues, radiologues, réanimateurs, chirurgiens cardiaques et vasculaires permet d'optimiser les chances du patient de bénéficier du traitement initialement le plus adapté au type de sa dissection, et à ses complications. Au décours de la phase aiguë, une réadaptation à l'effort au sein d'un service spécialisé, un soutien psychologique et une éducation du patient à sa maladie permettent sa reprise d'activité dans les meilleures conditions. Un suivi spécialisé de l'hypertension artérielle, associé à une enquête familiale et génétique, est le gage d'un traitement médical optimal. La surveillance par angioscanner de la maladie aortique chronique doit être poursuivie, afin de parer aux risques de rupture aortique secondaire.

[Aortic dissection after the acute phase]. / Dissection aortique après la phase aiguë.

AORTIC DISSECTION AFTER THE ACUTE PHASE After the acute phase, it is imperative that patients who have presented with aortic dissection can be followed clinically and morphologically. The antihypertensive medical treatment must be adapted, and the dissected aorta must be monitored by CT scans, given the risk of aneurysmal development and secondary rupture it represents. Certain predictive factors of aneurysmal progression could make it possible to offer a subgroup of patients at risk a more aggressive surgical management of their aortic dissection, using endovascular procedures currently under evaluation.

DISSECTION AORTIQUE APRÈS LA PHASE AIGUË Après la phase aiguë d'une dissection aortique, il est impératif que les patients puissent être suivis sur le plan clinique et morphologique. Le traitement médical antihypertenseur doit être adapté, et les portions d'aorte disséquée doivent être surveillées par imagerie scanner, compte tenu du risque d'évolution anévrismale et de rupture secondaire qu'elles représentent. Certains facteurs prédictifs d'évolution anévrismale identifiés pourraient permettre de proposer à un sous-groupe de patients à risque une prise en charge chirurgicale d'emblée plus agressive de leur dissection aortique, au moyen de procédures endovasculaires en cours d'évaluation.

Wall Shear Stress Measurement by Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging for Atherosclerotic Carotid Stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid plaque vulnerability assessment could guide the decision to perform endarterectomy. Ultrafast ultrasound imaging (UF) can evaluate local flow velocities over an entire 2D image, allowing measurement of the wall shear stress (WSS). We aimed at evaluating the feasibility of WSS measurement in a prospective series of patients with carotid stenosis. METHODS: UF acquisitions, performed with a linear probe, had an effective frame rate of 5000 Hz. The flow velocity was imaged over the entire plaque area. WSS was computed with the vector field speed using the formula: with the blood velocity and µ, the blood viscosity. The WSS measurement method was validated using a calibrated phantom. In vivo, WSS was analyzed in 5 areas of the carotid wall: common carotid artery, plaque ascent, plaque peak, plaque descent, internal carotid artery. RESULTS: Good correlation was found between in vitro measurement and the theoretical WSS values (R2 = 0.95; p < 0.001). 33 patients were prospectively evaluated, with a median carotid stenosis degree of 80 % [75-85]. The maximum WSS value over the cardiac cycle follows the shape of the plaque with an increase during the ascent, reaching its maximum value of 3.25 Pa [2.26-4.38] at the peak of the plaque, and a decrease after passing of the peak (0.93 Pa [0.80-1.19]) lower than the WSS values in the non-stenotic areas (1.47 Pa [1.12-1.77] for the common carotid artery). CONCLUSION: UF allowed local and direct evaluation of the plaque's WSS, thus better characterizing local hemodynamics to identify areas of vulnerability. KEY POINTS: · Ultrafast vector Doppler allows calculation of the wall shear stress (WSS) by measuring velocity vectors over the entire 2D image.. · The setup to measure the WSS has been validated in vitro on a linear flow phantom by comparing measurements to in silico calculations.. · Applying this method to carotid plaque allows us to better describe the hemodynamic constraints that apply along the entire length of the plaque..

Stent-assisted balloon dilatation of chronic aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of complicated chronic aortic dissection remains controversial. We previously reported encouraging early results with the stent-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) technique for treating complicated acute aortic dissections. However, to date there have been no specific reports on the treatment of complicated chronic aortic dissections with this technique. The aim of this study was to assess the results of the STABILISE technique to treat complicated chronic aortic dissection. METHODS: A single-center prospectively maintained database enrolled all patients hospitalized for aortic dissection at our institution. Inclusion criteria for the STABILISE procedure at the chronic stage of dissection (>3 months) were postdissection aneurysm with a diameter >55 mm or rapid aortic diameter growth >5 mm/6 months. We reviewed all patients treated for complicated chronic aortic dissection with the STABILISE technique. Patients were monitored at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter with clinical, imaging, and laboratory studies. Outcome analyses included survival, rupture, spinal cord ischemia, endoleak, morbidity (cardiac, renal, or pulmonary), reinterventions, false lumen patency, and aneurysm growth. RESULTS: Between September 2015 and December 2018, 17 patients underwent a STABILISE procedure for complicated chronic aortic dissection of the descending aorta. Fifteen patients were treated for remaining chronic distal thoracoabdominal aortic dissection after acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection repair, and 2 patients were treated for chronic type B aortic dissection. The median patient age was 61 years (range, 46-67 years). The median interval between the onset of acute symptoms and the procedure was 9 months (range, 3-67 months). Indications for the STABILISE procedure were a rapidly growing dissected aortic diameter >5 mm/6 months in 13 patients and aneurysmal evolution of the descending thoracic aorta >55 mm in 4 patients. There were no cases of in-hospital death, stroke, spinal cord ischemia, ischemic colitis, or renal failure necessitating dialysis. The median duration of follow-up was 17 months (range, 5-28.5 months). At the last computed tomography scan, 15 patients (88%) had complete false lumen thrombosis of the treated thoracoabdominal aorta down to the renal arteries. None of the patients had aortic growth at treated thoracoabdominal aorta level. One patient developed a proximal type 1 endoleak and required reintervention. Regarding the untreated aortoiliac level below the renal arteries, 11 patients had persistent false lumen patency, and 1 patient developed a common iliac artery aneurysm. All the other patients had stable infrarenal aortoiliac diameters. No late deaths were reported during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The STABILISE technique is a safe and effective means of performing immediate, complete aortic remodeling of the thoracoabdominal aorta in patients with complicated chronic aortic dissection, stabilizing the diameter of the dissected aorta.