Assessment of Hounsfield Units and Factors Associated with Fragmentation of Renal Stones by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Computerized Tomography Study.

The success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is influenced by various factors, including stone density, and is determined through computed tomography scans in terms of Hounsfield units (HU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study was conducted in the King Fahad Hospital. Sixty-seven adult patients with renal and ureteric stones were selected randomly and enrolled in the study. Their ages ranged from 20 to 69 years. The patients were examined with non-contrast enhancement (NCCT) to assess the HU of their stones and were consequently treated with ESWL. RESULTS: Of the 67 patients, 37.3% had stones that were completely fragmented, while 62.7% had stones that were partially fragmented. The HU, location of the stone, multiplicity of the stone, and patient age were found to be significant factors contributing to stone fragility (p-values < 0.05). The HU data were found to have a positive significant linear correlation with serum calcium (r = 0.28, p-value = 0.036), while serum acid had a negative correlation (r = -0.55, p-value < 0.001). Thus, the probability of calcium-containing stone formation increases with increased HU. In contrast, uric acid stone formation likely develops with decreasing HU with serum uric acid. Renal stones in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension were not completely fragmented compared to those without clinical history. CONCLUSIONS: Mean HU, location of the stone, laterality, stone status, and the number of ESWL sessions are the most significant factors affecting stone fragility. CT attenuation values can predict the composition of stones from serum calcium and uric acid examinations. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are risk factors for renal stone fragmentation.

Investigation Study of Ultrasound Practitioners' Awareness about Artefacts of Hepatobiliary Imaging in Almadinah Almunawwarah.

Objectives: To investigate the knowledge and awareness of ultrasound practitioners' concerning ultrasound artefacts in evaluating the hepatobiliary system. Methods: This electronic questionnaire-based comparative study involved the ultrasound practitioners' who work in the radiology departments in Almadinah Almunawwarah governmental hospitals during the period from 1 November 2020 to 30 April 2021. Spearman's rho correlation test was used to correlate between knowledge and job, academic qualification, and years of experience. A T-test and cross tabulation test were done to compare the knowledge about artefacts among radiologists and radiologic technologists. Results: This study involved 94 participants distributed as 22 (23.4%) radiologists and 72 (76.6%) radiologic technologists. The results shows that 85%, 71%, 73%, 69%, 54% and 53% of the participants assigned the acoustic shadowing, acoustic enhancement, ring down, side lobe, reverberation and mirror artefacts, as artefacts respectively. However, 68%, 53%, 19%, 19%, 18%, and 40% of the participants gave correct final diagnosis of acoustic shadowing, acoustic enhancement, ring down, side lobes, reverberation, and mirror artifacts, respectively. Spearman's rho correlation test shows significant correlation between participants with more than three years experience and knowledge related mirror artefacts (r=0.328, p=0.001). It shows significant correlation between radiologists with knowledge related mirror artefacts (r=0.367, p<0.001). A significant correlation was found between highly qualified participants and knowledge related mirror artefacts (r=0.336, p=0.001) and side lobe artefacts (r=0.237, p=0.008). Conclusion: The questionnaire-based comparative study of knowledge about artefacts of hepatobiliary ultrasound imaging reveals a high level of Ultrasound practitioners' knowledge in differentiating artefacts from pathology with a high level of knowledge in identifying hepatobiliary acoustic shadowing and acoustic enhancement artefacts. However, insufficient knowledge was noted in identifying mirror, side lobe, reverberation and ring down artefacts. A direct link was found between academic qualification, years of experience and practioners' knowledge among.