RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor serves as a receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing COVID-19, to enter the lungs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may increase the expression of ACE2, resulting in concerns that patients with COVID-19 who are receiving these agents may be at increased risk of severe disease. This study was conducted to further investigate the effects of ACEIs and ARBs on the severity of COVID-19 in hospitalized hypertensive patients. METHODS: The study was a retrospective observational study. The medical records of all adult hypertensive patients who were hospitalized at Dammam Medical Complex (DMC) between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, due to COVID-19 were reviewed. The hypertensive patients who were receiving ACEIs or ARBs were compared with the other hypertensive patients who were not on ACEIs or ARBs. RESULTS: A total of 148 hypertensive patients were included in the analysis. They consisted of 106 male and 42 female patients (72% and 28%, respectively). Nearly half of the patients were Saudi (75 patients, 50%). A total of 81 patients were in the ACEI/ARB group, and 67 patients were in the control group. There were no differences between the two groups in age, diabetic status, history of chronic kidney disease, initial blood pressure measurements, and initial oxygen requirements, but the control group contained fewer female patients (18% versus 37%) and Saudi patients (36% versus 63%) than the ACEI/ARB group (p-values = 0.017 and 0.002, respectively). The use of ACEIs or ARBs was associated with significant reductions in ICU admission (9% versus 31%, p-value = 0.001), need for intubation (7% versus 28%, p-value = 0.002), and death (2% versus 24%, p-value = 0.000). A significant negative association between the use ACEIs or ARBs and mortality was also observed in the multivariate analysis after the adjustment for the possible confounders, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.087 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.017-0.449. CONCLUSIONS: ACEIs and ARBs have no adverse effects on the clinical prognosis of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. Their use might be even beneficial and protective, but future larger studies are needed to confirm these effects. In the meanwhile, they should be continued in COVID-19 hypertensive patients unless their use is contraindicated for other reasons (e.g., hypotension, hyperkalemia, or acute kidney injury (AKI)).
RESUMEN
Background With the rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), most countries took extreme measures to control the disease. Equitable access to safe and effective vaccines is critical to ending the COVID-19 pandemic. The Ministry of Health program in Saudi Arabia aimed to cover 17.4 million adults (70% of the adult population of Saudi Arabia) by the third quarter of 2021. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine on the clinical course and outcomes of the admitted confirmed COVID-19 patients, in comparison to non-vaccinated patients. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional record review was conducted for all hospitalized confirmed COVID-19 patients at Dammam Medical Complex (Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia) from June to July 2021. Two groups were studied according to the vaccination status (i.e., vaccinated and non-vaccinated). Information regarding comorbidities, length of stay, high oxygen requirements, ICU admission, and mortality data were collected and analyzed using the Python programming language (version 3.7.6) with the use of SciPy library (1.4.1) and Statsmodels module (v0.11.1). Results The sample included a total of 260 admitted confirmed COVID-19 cases. The mortality was significantly lower in the vaccinated group versus the non-vaccinated group with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.378 (CI 0.154-0.928). In addition, the OR of ICU admission was 0.476 (CI 0.218-1.042) and OR of endotracheal intubation was 0.561 (CI 0.249-1.265), but these did not reach statistical significance. We also detected a statistically significant relationship between mortality - regardless of vaccination status - and age ≥ 65 years (P=0.000, OR=7.51; 95%CI 3.13 to 18.04), chronic kidney disease (P=0.010, OR=5.62; CI 1.52 to 20.79), and renal transplant (P=0.037, OR=10.17; CI 1.15 to 89.76). Of note, most of our vaccinated patients received only a single dose (85%). Conclusion There is a significant reduction in mortality cases as well as less complicated hospital courses among the vaccinated group, in spite of the fact that most of our admitted patients had only a single vaccine shot. Suboptimal response to the vaccines was observed in the elder, chronic kidney disease, and renal transplant patients, hence the poorer outcomes in comparison to other patients.
RESUMEN
Kidney transplantation is the most preferred treatment modality for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This study aims at understanding the awareness, attitudes, and beliefs among the medical and nonmedical students. The study population consisted of 500 medical students and 39 nonmedical controls, who were surveyed using a reliable questionnaire that examined their knowledge and attitudes. A 24-item self-administered questionnaire, which assessed the levels of knowledge, attitude regarding organ donation with dichotomous scale and demographic data were used. Of the 500 medical students who received the questionnaire, 376 (75.2%) with a mean age of 22.1 ± 2.5 years responded; 39% were male, 43.6% were Bahraini, and 32.2% were from Saudi Arabia, 51.3% were in Grades-5 and 6 and 58.8% resided in big cities. The medical students had a highly positive attitude and great willingness toward organ donation. Majority of them (75.3%) knew the treatment of ESRD, and 70.7% recognized correctly that kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for ESRD. However, only 10.4% knew that it is performed in Bahrain since 1995. A total of 241 participants (64.3%) reported positive attitude toward living kidney donation and 71.8% expressed their agreement to donation after death. More than half (66.8%) believed that their religion permits organ donation, although 56.6% of the participants believed that there is a danger after donating a kidney. When compared to nonmedical students, there was no statistically significant difference in the attitudes toward living kidney donation (P = 0.823) or organ donation after death (P = 0.066).