Atypical Haemorrhagic Presentation of Neuro-Retinitis and Serous Retinal Detachment Secondary to Cat-Scratch Disease.

Cat-scratch disease (CSD) is a self-limited disease caused by Bartonella henselae, a fastidious gram-negative intracellular bacillus bacterium. Neuroretinitis, a form of optic neuropathy characterised clinically by optic disc swelling and a macular star, is an uncommon manifestation of CSD occurring in approximately 1-2% of cases. We report a case of a 14-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of acute painless vision loss described as a large black spot in the centre of her right eye vision 2 weeks after being scratched by cats. Fundus examination revealed Frisen grade 5 disc oedema with an atypically diffuse disc and peripapillary haemorrhages with associated subretinal fluid and a macular star in the right eye. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macula and retinal nerve fibre layer showed subretinal fluid involving the fovea, a serous retinal detachment of the nasal macula, and significant optic disc oedema in the right eye. The patient was admitted and treated with doxycycline, rifampin, and prednisone taper. After completing the treatment course, the patient's vision improved, fundus examination showed significantly improved disc oedema and haemorrhages, and OCT demonstrated resolution of the subretinal fluid in the right eye.

Risk of ocular neovascular conversion and systemic bleeding complications in patients with AMD on DOACs or Warfarin.

PURPOSE: Conversion to neovascular disease in patients with non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) initiated on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared to matched patients treated with warfarin. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: The study included 20,300 patients and 13,387 patients with non-neovascular AMD initiated on DOACs or warfarin, respectively, before propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS, INTERVENTION, OR TESTING: TriNetX (Cambridge, MA, USA), was used to identify patients diagnosed with non-neovascular AMD stratified by treatment with DOACs or warfarin with at least six months of follow-up. Propensity score matching was performed to control for baseline demographics and medical comorbidities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk (RR) of developing neovascular AMD, macular hemorrhage (MH), vitreous hemorrhage (VH), and requiring an ocular intervention (intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV)) within six months and one year. Patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) on anticoagulation were separately evaluated for the same measures within 5 years after initiating therapy. RESULTS: Treatment with warfarin was associated with higher risk of developing neovascular AMD at six months (RR,1.24, 95% CI, 1.12 - 1.39; P<.001) and one year (RR, 1.26, 95% CI, 1.14 - 1.40; P<.001) when compared to matched patients treated with DOACs. There was an increased risk of requiring intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (6 months: RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13-1.49; P<.001; 1 year: RR, 1.31, 95% CI, 0.72 - 2.05; P<.001) and PPV (6 months: RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.16-3.94; P = .01; 1 year: RR, 2.29, 95% CI, 1.30 - 4.05; P=.003). Among patients with AMD and AF treated with warfarin, there was an increased risk of ocular complications (neovascular AMD: RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.14-1.38; P<.001; MH: RR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.47-2.35; P<.001; VH: RR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.51-3.26; P<.001) and need for intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18-1.52; P<.001) over an extended 5-year period. There was no significant difference in the development of major systemic hemorrhagic events between the two cohorts over five years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with non-neovascular AMD treated with warfarin were more likely to develop neovascular disease and require ocular intervention for hemorrhagic complications when compared to matched patients initiated on DOACs.

Progression to Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

Importance: The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol S suggested that vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage (VH) or tractional retinal detachment (TRD) was more common among eyes assigned initially to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). These clinical implications warrant further evaluation in the clinical practice setting. Objective: To explore outcomes of PDR treated with PRP monotherapy compared with matched patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study using an aggregated electronic health records research network. Patients with PDR who received PRP or anti-VEGF monotherapy between January and September 2023 were included before propensity score matching. Patients were excluded with 6 or fewer months' follow-up after monotherapy or with a combination of PRP and anti-VEGF. Data were analyzed in September 2023. Exposures: Patients with new PDR diagnoses stratified by monotherapy with PRP or anti-VEGF agents using Current Procedural Terminology code. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), VH, or TRD. Results: Among 6020 patients (PRP cohort: mean [SD] age, 64.8 [13.4]; 6424 [50.88%] female; 3562 [28.21%] Black, 6180 [48.95%] White, and 2716 [21.51%] unknown race; anti-VEGF cohort: mean [SD] age, 66.1 [13.2]; 5399 [50.52%] male; 2859 [26.75%] Black, 5377 [50.31%] White, and 2382 [22.29%] unknown race) who received treatment, PRP monotherapy was associated with higher rates of PPV when compared with patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy at 5 years (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36; RD, 1.37%; 95% CI, 0.39%-2.37%; P < .001), with similar associations at 1 and 3 years. PRP monotherapy was associated with higher rates of VH at 5 years (relative risk [RR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.52-1.95; risk difference [RD], 7.05; 95% CI, 5.41%-8.69%; P < .001) and higher rates of TRD at 5 years (RR, 2.76; 95% CI, 2.26-3.37; RD, 4.25%; 95% CI, 3.45%-5.05%; P < .001), with similar magnitudes of associations at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years, when compared with patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings support the hypothesis that patients with PDR treated with PRP monotherapy are more likely to develop VH, TRD, and undergo PPV when compared with matched patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy. However, given the wide range in relative risk, confounding factors may account for some of the association between PRP vs anti-VEGF monotherapy and outcomes evaluated.

Prostaglandin-Induced Macular Hole: A Brief Report.

This case series reports on two patients who developed macular holes while on prostaglandin analogs (PGA) therapy. The first case involves a 63-year-old woman with a history of a macular hole of the left eye that had spontaneously closed. After starting PGA therapy for elevated intraocular pressure, cystoid macular edema formed, which resulted in reopening of the macular hole. The second case involves a 64-year-old man with primary open-angle glaucoma, on PGA therapy, with a newly diagnosed small macular hole of the right eye that closed after cessation of the PGA therapy. These cases demonstrate an association between prostaglandin analogs and the formation or reopening of full-thickness macular holes. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:112-115.].