RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Denture stomatitis, frequently encountered, is generally addressed symptomatically, with limited exploration of preventive approaches involving antifungal medicinal plants. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the impact of Artemisia sieberi extracts on the candida growth of conventional and digitally processed acrylic materials. METHOD: Thirty acrylic resin discs (3 mm thickness × 10 mm diameter) were prepared by conventional or CAD/CAM technology (milling and 3D printing). The resin discs were exposed to simulated brushing, thermocycling, and immersion in Artemisia sieberi extract for 8 hours. The surface roughness of the discs was assessed at baseline and after immersion in Artemisia sieberi extract. Candida growth was quantified through colony-forming units (CFU/mL). Data was analyzed using SPSS v.22 (α⩽ 0.05). RESULTS: Irrespective of the material type, the post-immersion surface roughness was significantly higher compared to pre-immersion values (p< 0.05). Candida growth was significantly higher in conventional acrylic materials than digitally fabricated acrylics (p< 0.05). At × 3, Ra and CFU were found to be moderately positive and non-significantly correlated (R= 0.664, p= 0.149). At × 4, Ra and CFU were found to be weak positive and non-significantly correlated (R= 0.344, p= 0.503). CONCLUSION: Artemisia sieberi extracts had a notable impact on digitally fabricated denture acrylics, reducing candida albicans growth compared to conventional heat-cured acrylic. This suggests a potential role for these extracts in improving denture hygiene and preventing denture stomatitis, particularly in the context of digitally fabricated dentures.
RESUMEN
Purpose: The present study evaluated the marginal gap of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated through three different wax pattern techniques; Conventional, Milling and 3D-printing. Materials and Methods: Thirty stone models were replicated from a stainless-steel model representing a prepared tooth; ten were sent to make conventional wax patterns while the remaining were sent to a digital dental scanner. The computer aided design was completed and STL (Standard Tessellation Language) files were sent to either milling or 3D-printing machines. All wax patterns (n = 30) were pressed, and a stabilizing instrument was used to secure the crowns on the master model. The marginal gap was measured at 18 points for each crown using a digital microscope (µm) (n = 540) and compared using One-way ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the marginal gap value between all three groups (p < 0.01) where the milled group showed the least mean gap (28.87 ± 30.18 µm), followed by 3D printed (47.85 ± 27.44 µm), while the highest mean marginal gap was found in the conventional group (63.49 ± 28.05 µm). Conclusion: Milled and 3D-printed wax patterns produced better fitting crowns compared to conventional techniques.
