Knowledge, attitudes, practices and barriers of medical research among undergraduate medical students in Jordan: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Integrating medical students in research at an early stage of their program is a crucial step to enhance the ability of future physicians to employ critical thinking and problem-solving processes, which in turn improves patients' health outcomes. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was administered to medical school students at Al-Balqa Applied University. This study aims to analyze the attitudes, practices, and barriers faced by medical students in regard to engaging in medical research. RESULTS: A total of 333 students participated in the study with a mean age of 21.2 ± 1.5 years. A total of 60.1% were females. Female students had significantly higher knowledge scores (µ = 3.97, SD ± 1.81, P = 0.009) than males (µ = 3.44, SD ± 1.69). As students progress to higher academic years of their clinical program, their knowledge in research significantly increases in comparison to their knowledge in basic medical years (P < 0.001). Student age and academic year significantly correlated with the knowledge scores; each additional year of study increased the knowledge score by 0.25 (ß = 0.25, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.63). The percentage of students who correctly answered each question on the knowledge scale was 37.5% (SD ± 12.5%). The most reported barriers to research participation were insufficient training in medical research, lack of sufficient research opportunities, and lack of stimulation and support from faculty. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students demonstrated a positive attitude toward research starting from their second year of study, despite having limited knowledge on the topic. They identified barriers that could be utilized to promote greater involvement of students in research. The implications for clinical practice suggest that policymakers and educators should consider the outcomes of this study and implement improvements in medical education, specifically by encouraging the early participation of students in the research process.

Histiocytic sarcoma in renal transplant patients: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is defined as neoplasm resembling morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics of mature histiocytes. It is a rare form of lymphoid neoplasms. Despite advances in treatment and diagnosis of histiocytic sarcoma, majority of cases had poor prognosis due to progressive nature of the disease. In the following article, all reported cases of histiocytic sarcoma in renal transplant patients are reviewed. METHODS: In our literature review, all relevant reports were collected electronically by entering the necessary keywords. A Boolean approach using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) keywords was implemented. After establishing the inclusion/exclusion criteria, article titles and abstracts were evaluated by Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards for 2020. All cases of histiocytic sarcoma in renal transplant patients were included. RESULT: Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria 4 case reports were yielded in this review. Two were males and 2 were females with the mean age of 42.25 years. Fever was the most common symptom. Although tumor originated from the native kidney on one patient, the site of the primary tumor was thorax, oropharynx, and transplanted kidney in the rest. Metastasis was detected in all cases. Prednisone was used for all cases. EBV was positive in 2 cases and negative in one of them. Histology was diagnostic and similar in all cases. Immunohistochemistry was done for 3 cases. Although chemotherapy was done for 3 patients, all 4 cases ended in mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that neoplasms are post renal transplant complications, histiocytic sarcoma is a scarce and fatal entity in such patients. Histological and immunohistochemistry tests are the corner stone in diagnosis of histiocytic sarcoma.