RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Active surveillance for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) meeting criteria for surgical resection is uncommon. Which patients may prove reasonable candidates for this approach is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and safety of active surveillance for patients with known or suspected intrathyroidal PTC up to 4cm in diameter. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent non-operative active surveillance of suspicious or malignant thyroid nodules over a 20-year period from 2001-2021. We included patients with an initial US-FNA confirming either: a) Bethesda 5 or 6 cytology or, b) a "suspicious" AFIRMA molecular test. The primary outcomes and measures included the rate of adverse oncologic outcomes (mortality and recurrence), as well as the cumulative incidence of size/volume growth. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were followed with active surveillance for 1 year or longer (average 55 months), with 26 patients (38%) having nodules ≥ 2 cm. No patients were found to develop new incident occurrence of lymph node or distant metastasis. One patient however, demonstrated concern for progression to a dedifferentiated cancer on repeat core biopsy 17 years after initial start non-operative selection. 21% of patients had an increase in maximum diameter more than 3 mm, and volume increase ≥50% was noted in 25% of patients. Thirteen patients ultimately underwent delayed (rescue) surgery, and no disease recurrence was noted after such treatment. Age and initial nodule size were not predictors of nodule growth. CONCLUSIONS: These data expand consideration of active surveillance of papillary thyroid carcinoma in select patients with intrathyroidal suspected malignancy >1cm in diameter. Rescue surgery, if required at a later timepoint, appears effective.
RESUMEN
Background: While the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs) with tall cell features (PTCtcf) is often made for carcinomas with histological features intermediate between classic and tall cell subtypes of PTC (tcPTC), its comparative signature to that of either tcPTC or classic PTC is less clear. The objective of this study was to perform an integrative clinicopathologic and genomic analysis elucidating the spectrum of tcPTC, PTCtcf, and classic PTC. Methods: We analyzed all consecutive patients with tcPTC and PTCtcf evaluated at a tertiary academic referral center between 2005 and 2020, as well as a comparative cohort of classic PTC, in a retrospective observational cohort analysis. Clinicopathologic data were compared among the three groups, including progression-free survival (PFS), recurrent/persistent disease, and a negative composite outcome of death, progression, or need for advanced therapy. To specifically understand differences between tcPTC and PTCtcf, targeted next-generation sequencing was performed in a subset of these cohorts. Results: A total of 292 patients were analyzed (81 tcPTC, 65 PTCtcf, 146 classic PTC). Thirteen percent of tcPTC versus 8% of PTCtcf versus 1% of classic PTC had the advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (p = 0.002). Similarly, macroscopic extrathyroidal extension was observed in 38% of tcPTC, 14% of PTCtcf, and 12% of classic PTC (p < 0.001). The 5-year PFS was 76.5%, 81.5%, and 88.3% for tcPTC, PTCtcf, and classic PTC, respectively, while the rates of the negative composite outcome 40.2% for tcPTC, 20.7% for PTCtcf, and 11.2% for classic PTC (p < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, the negative composite outcome was independently associated with tcPTC (HR 4.3 [confidence interval 1.1-16.1], p = 0.03). tcPTC demonstrated substantially more hotspot TERT promoter mutations than PTCtcf (44% vs. 6%, p = 0.012). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a continuum of disease-specific risk of PTC, pointing at PTCtcf as an intermediate entity between tcPTC and classic PTC. These data provide a more refined understanding of risk at time of presentation, while better elucidating the diversity of genomic drivers.
