Hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia after exposure to ustekinumab in a patient with Crohn's disease.

Crohn's disease can be characterized as a chronic inflammatory state causing various clinical presentations and long-term risks that should be considered when determining the optimal therapeutic strategy. To date, while a few case reports have been available regarding ustekinumab-induced thrombocytopenia, none are available regarding hypersplenism. We describe a 33-year-old woman who developed only Ileocolonic Crohn's disease on ustekinumab due to failure of anti-TNF with septic shock and thrombocytopenia. Abdominal computed tomography revealed hepatosplenomegaly, parasacral collection, and fistulization. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit and managed accordingly. Various treatment modalities were attempted, but none of them improved her platelet count. Our case report demonstrates that ustekinumab may induce hypersplenism and subsequently thrombocytopenia and should be considered a potential cause of low platelet count.

Subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal insulin for patients with diabetes mellitus on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: meta-analysis of non-randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is one of the leading causes of end stage renal disease. Use of intraperitoneal (IP) nsulin in diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) can restore glucose control to near normal values. The safety and efficacy of this method is unclear. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to study the safety and efficacy of IP insulin administration in diabetic patients on PD. The primary outcome measures is glycemic control: secondary outcome measures were plasma lipids, insulin dose requirement/day and the risk of peritonitis and hepatic subcapsular steatosis. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and reference lists of eligible studies were searched. Eligible studies included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials that allocated adult PD diabetic patients to IP insulin and subcutaneous (SC) insulin. RESULTS: Twenty one citations were identified and three met the eligibility criteria. Glycemic control with IP insulin, as assessed with HbA1C, was equal to or better than that obtained with SC insulin: weighted mean difference was -1.49 % (95% CI: -2.17 to - 0.27, p=0.0001). The insulin dose required was more than two-fold higher in the IP treatment. Serum HDL-cholesterol decreased during IP insulin therapy while serum triglyceride (TG) concentration tended to increase, in comparison with levels seen in patients treated with SC insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Use of IP insulin provides adequate glycemic control, which appears superior to that seen following treatment with conventional SC insulin. The plasma lipids are adversely affected by IP insulin, possibly contributing to increased cardiovascular risk. Data are limited and further studies are needed to assess for the long-term safety of this approach.