Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; : 502218, 2024 Jun 08.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857753

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have been widely placed for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (UDMBO). However, the dysfunction rate is 19-40% and its treatment is controversial. We aimed asses the efficacy and safety of a secondary biliary stents (uncovered (UC) versus fully-covered (FC) stent) for the management of occluded SEMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2015 and June 2023, 41 patients with UDMBO underwent secondary biliary stent placement as "stent-in-stent" (20 FCSEMS and 21 UCSEMS). The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success of SEMS placement. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), patency and survival. Patients were prospectively followed until death or loss of follow-up. RESULTS: Technical (100% vs 85.5%) and clinical (100% vs 95.2%) success rates were similar in FCSEMS and UCSEMS groups. The median follow-up period was 510 days (range 290-630). The median duration of stent patency of FCSEMS (220 days, IQR 137.5-442.5) was longer than UCSEMS (150 days, IQR 110-362.5) (P=0.395), although stent dysfunction within 6 months was not different between groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that sex (HR=0.909, 0.852-0.970), antitumor treatment (HR=0.248, 0.032-0.441), stent patency (HR=0.992, 0.986-0.998) and clinical success (HR=0.133, 0.026-0.690) were significant factors for overall survival. There were no remarkable differences in AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of additional biliary stent using the stent-in-stent method is an effective and safe rescue treatment for patients with UDMBO and occluded stent. In addition, the use of FCSEMS compared UCSEMS has unclear benefits regarding stent patency and overall survival.

2.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis ; 32(2): 143-149, 2023 06 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37345592

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the presence of malignant dysphagia in non-surgical candidates, a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) represents a safe and effective approach. Recently, a through-the-scope (TTS) SEMS was launched. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and safety of the TTS versus over-the-wire (OTW) SEMS in patients with malignant dysphagia. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with malignant dysphagia undergoing esophageal TTS and OTW-SEMS from 2012 to May-2022. The primary outcomes were the technical and the clinical success of the SEMS placement. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, patency, and survival. Patients were prospectively followed until death or loss of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were enrolled, including 34 patients in the TTS group and 64 patients in the OTW group. TTS and OTW SEMS placement were feasible in 33 (97.1%) and 64 (100%) procedures , respectively (p=0.118). Overall, 32 patients (94.1%) in the TTS group and 62 patients (96.9%) in the OTW group showed an improvement in Ogilvie score (p=0.432). Recurrent dysphagia occurred in 30 patients, 12 in TTS group and 18 in OTW group, due to migration (4 vs. 5), stent deformation (1 vs. 1), tissue ingrowth (5 vs. 5) and overgrowth (2 vs. 7). No patient died from a stent-related cause. Median survival was 123 days (IQR: 59-209) in TTS group and 113 days (IQR: 73-271) in OTW group (p=0.349). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of esophageal TTS and OTW stents resulted in similar technical and clinical outcomes, stent patency and survival in patients with malignant dysphagia.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía
4.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 114(8): 509-510, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35297265

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has delayed medical consultation, possibly leading to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of SARS-Cov-2 pandemic on new diagnosis and short-term survival of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: All consecutive patients who had a suspected diagnosis of pancreatic lesion before (from March to September 2019) and during COVID 19 pandemic (from March to September 2020). Demographics, clinical and treatment were collected and compared. Short-term survival was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients (n=13 men) with diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and a median age of 70 years (IQR 62-74) were included. An increase was observed in the number of patients with newly diagnosed PC (n= 12 [19.1%] versus n=13 [20.9%]; P= 0.603). The subgroup analysis revealed a tendency toward a longer diagnosis (11 versus 12 days; P= 0.219) and treatment (28 versus 44; P= 0.375) delay for patients with PC during COVID-19 pandemic. A significant increase was observed for number of cases of advanced stage III and IV (n=4 [30.8%] versus n=7 [53.8%]; P= 0.006). Palliative treatment was the most frequent approach during COVID-19 period. During 1-year follow-up, 6 (50%) and 7 (61.5%) deaths were observed among patients diagnosed before and after COVID-19 (P= 0.449), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to delays in diagnosis and treatment in PC, which translates into an advanced staging and a worse prognosis. These data should stimulate health care provider to facilitate procedures for detection pancreatic cancer.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Anciano , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
5.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 111(7): 566-568, jul. 2019. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-190106

RESUMEN

El drenaje guiado por ecoendoscopia (USE) de colecciones pélvicas es una alternativa al drenaje percutáneo o quirúrgico. Se presenta nuestra experiencia con el uso de prótesis de aposición luminal (LAMS) en el drenaje de abscesos pélvicos posquirúrgicos


Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided drainage of pelvic collections is an alternative to percutaneous or surgical drainage. We present our experience using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for the drainage of postoperative pelvic abscesses


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/métodos , Absceso/cirugía , Infección Pélvica/cirugía , Succión/métodos , Endosonografía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía
6.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 111(7): 566-568, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31215214

RESUMEN

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided drainage of pelvic collections is an alternative to percutaneous or surgical drainage. We present our experience using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for the drainage of postoperative pelvic abscesses.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal/terapia , Drenaje/instrumentación , Drenaje/métodos , Endosonografía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...