General versus domain-specific grit in the work context.

Researchers have questioned whether grit should be conceptualized and measured as a global (i.e., domain-general) or domain-specific construct. Although evidence is beginning to appear that grit in educational and sport contexts may be measured as domain-specific, it has not yet been explored in the organizational context. The objective of this research was to study the psychometric properties of grit as domain-specific for subsequently analyzing if such domain-specific grit (labor grit) improves the predictive validity of different organizational results. A sample of 326 active workers was used (Myears = 37.52; SD = 9.85). Their grit levels in the general domain and specific domain were evaluated, as well as their main personality traits and other organizational results such as work engagement and work performance. The grit instrument as domain-specific showed excellent reliability (ω = 0.92), and the unidimensionality of the instrument was confirmed. The results point to the fact that giving an organizational connotation to the grit items does not improve the predictability of the results. However, labor grit adds incremental validity over personality traits and work engagement to predict task and contextual performance (Δr2 = 0.13), but not to predict counterproductive behavior.

Evaluation of Different Doses in Inhaled Therapy: A Comprehensive Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a considerable degree of confusion over the dosage of inhaled medications. Here, we carried out a review of all the doses used for the devices used in inhalation therapy. METHODS: We first performed a systematic search of the different inhalation devices included on the July 2023 Spanish Ministry of Health Billing List. We then consulted the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products to find the updated official label and to obtain the information on the exact composition. RESULTS: We identified 90 unique products, of which 22 were long-acting bronchodilators (and combinations thereof) and 68 were products containing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Overall, 10 products with bronchodilators and 40 with ICS were marketed with the metered dose, while 11 with bronchodilators and 28 with ICS were marketed with the delivered dose. In addition, in some bronchodilators, the drug was referred to as a type of salt, whereas in others the information referred to the drug itself. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that for each inhaled drug there may be up to four different doses and that the marketed name may refer to any of these. Clinicians must be aware of these different dosages when prescribing inhaled medications.

Documento de consenso sobre asma y tabaquismo del Foro Autonómico de Asma de la SEPAR / Consensus document on asthma and smoking of the Regional Asthma Forum of SEPAR

La prevalencia de tabaquismo activo en adultos con asma es similar ala de la población general. El tabaquismo se asocia con un peor control clínico de la enfermedad, una disminución acelerada de la función pulmonar y una respuesta irregular a la terapia con glucocorticoides. El consumo de tabaco impacta negativamente en la calidad devida de los pacientes asmáticos y provoca un incremento en el númerode visitas y de hospitalizaciones por exacerbaciones. Además, el tabaquismo aumenta el riesgo de cáncer de pulmón, comorbilidades cardiovasculares y muerte en pacientes asmáticos. A pesar de todo ello,las guías actuales del manejo del asma no incluyen recomendacionesespecíficas para el manejo de los pacientes asmáticos fumadores. Poreste motivo, se procedió a una revisión narrativa de la literatura paraun consenso mediante metodología de grupo nominal desarrolladaa lo largo del año 2019 para extraer recomendaciones prácticas quepermitieran mejorar el diagnóstico y el tratamiento del asma en fumadores, así como el tratamiento del tabaquismo en asmáticos. Lasconclusiones y recomendaciones fueron validadas en el congreso nacional de la SEPAR del mismo año. Entre las más relevantes, se incidió en la necesidad de abordar el tabaquismo en las personas conasma mediante consejo sanitario, tratamiento farmacológico y terapiaconductual, al ser un factor que impacta negativamente en la sintomatología, el pronóstico y la respuesta al tratamiento del asma. En elfumador con sospecha de asma, se debe evaluar la presencia de enfisema y el diagnóstico diferencial de otras enfermedades y considerarel impacto del tabaquismo en el resultado de las pruebas diagnósticas.También se concluye que el hábito tabáquico reduce la respuesta altratamiento con corticoides inhalados, por lo que se recomienda terapia combinada con broncodilatadores. (AU)

The prevalence of active smoking in adults with asthma is similar inthe total population. Smoking is associated with worse clinical control of the disease, a rapid reduction of lung function and a variableresponse to corticoids. Tobacco consumption negatively affects thequality of life of asthmatic patients as well as increasing the numberof medical visits and hospital admissions due to exacerbations. Moreover, smoking entails a higher risk of developing lung cancer, cardiovascular comorbidities and death in asthmatic patients. Nevertheless,current asthma guidelines do not include specific recommendationson the management of smoking asthmatic patients and the treatmentof the smoking habit in this subpopulation. For this reason, a narrativereview of the literature was carried out for consensus using a nominalgroup methodology developed throughout 2019 to extract practicalrecommendations that would allow the diagnosis and treatment ofasthma in smokers, as well as the treatment of smoking in asthmatics,to be improved. The conclusions and recommendations were validated at the SEPAR national congress of the same year. Among the mostrelevant, the need to address smoking in people with asthma throughhealth advice, pharmacological treatment and behavioral therapy wasemphasized, as this is a factor that negatively impacts the symptoms,prognosis and response to asthma treatment. In smokers with suspected asthma, the presence of emphysema and the differential diagnosisof other diseases should be evaluated and the impact of smoking onthe result of diagnostic tests should be considered. It is also concluded that smoking reduces the response to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, which is why combined therapy with bronchodilators isrecommended (AU)

Human Resources Analytics: A systematic Review from a Sustainable Management Approach / La analítica de recursos humanos: una revisión sistemática desde la perspectiva de una gestión sostenible

Human Resources Analytics (HRA) is drawing more attention every year, and will be crucial to human resource development. However, the literature around the topic would appear to be more promotional than descriptive. With this in mind, we conducted a systematic literature review and content analysis with the following objectives: first, to address the current state of HRA and second, to propose a framework for the development of HRA as a sustainable practice. We analyzed 79 articles from research databases and found 34 empirical studies for subsequent content analysis. While the main results reflect the relative newness of the field of HRA, with the majority of the empirical articles focusing on financial aspects, they also reveal the growing importance given to ethics. Finally, we propose a framework for the development of sustainable HRA based on the triple bottom line and discuss the implications of our findings for researchers and practitioners.(AU)

La analítica de recursos humanos (ARH) atrae cada vez más atención en los últimos años y será crucial para el desarrollo del ámbito de los recursos humanos. No obstante, la literatura sobre el tema parece ser más promocional que descriptiva. Para comprobar esto, llevamos a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura y un análisis de contenido con los siguientes objetivos: primero, abordar el estado actual la ARH y segundo, proponer un marco para el desarrollo de la AHR como una práctica sostenible. Analizamos 79 artículos de investigación incluidos en las más prestigiosas bases de datos y encontramos 34 estudios empíricos para su posterior análisis de contenido. Los principales resultados reflejan la relativa novedad del campo de la ARH, estando centrados la mayoría de los artículos en los aspectos financieros. No obstante, también se observa la creciente importancia dada a la ética. Finalmente, proponemos un marco para el desarrollo de una ARH basada en la triple cuenta de resultados (económica, social y medioambiental, y se discuten las implicaciones prácticas y teóricas de nuestros hallazgos.(AU)

Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab in Patients with Severe Asthma with Inadequate Response to Omalizumab: A Multicenter, Open-Label Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe allergic and eosinophilic asthma could qualify for different biologic therapies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weight-based intravenous reslizumab dosing in patients who have previously failed therapy with omalizumab. METHODS: We carried out a 24-week prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-group, self-controlled study in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who had previously failed to respond to omalizumab. The main objective was to determine whether treatment with reslizumab significantly improved asthma symptoms assessed by the Asthma Control Test (ACT) at week 24. Secondary objectives were to evaluate symptoms at weeks 4 and 12, change in FEV1 at week 24, and the incidence of severe exacerbations over the study period. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (62.1% women, median age, 50.8 years) were included in the study. The median ACT score significantly increased from 13.0 (interquartile range, 8.0-18.0) at baseline to 21.0 (interquartile range, 14.0-24.0) at 24 weeks (P = .002). Only 2 of 29 patients developed at least 1 severe exacerbation during follow-up and none of them required hospitalization. Overall, 15 of 25 patients (60%) were considered as being controlled (ACT score of ≥20 and no exacerbations) at week 24. The percentage of patients who were receiving daily systemic corticosteroids significantly decreased from 72.4% to 52.0% (P = .019). Adverse events were mostly moderate and within the range of previously reported side effects with reslizumab. CONCLUSION: Reslizumab is an effective and safe option for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and a history of omalizumab failure.

Documento de consenso para el manejo del paciente asmático en urgencias / Management of asthma in the emergency department: a consensus statement

El presente documento de consenso se ha desarrollado con el objetivo de facilitar una herramienta para el manejo del paciente asmático en los servicios de urgencias españoles y mejorar la calidad asistencial. Un equipo multidisciplinar formado por tres especialistas en medicina de urgencias, tres especialistas en neumología y tres especialistas en alergología elaboró un listado de preguntas clínicas y utilizó cuatro guías de práctica clínica sobre el manejo del asma para responderlas. Después de un periodo de trabajo individual, se discutieron y consensuaron en una reunión los contenidos del presente documento. Las recomendaciones y los algoritmos incluidos en él van dirigidos a detectar al paciente asmático a su llegada al servicio de urgencias, establecer un diagnóstico correcto, unificar los criterios terapéuticos y realizar posteriormente una correcta derivación al neumólogo, alergólogo o al médico de atención primaria, según proceda. Las definiciones que se ofrecen en el presente documento proporcionan un lenguaje común que puede ayudar a unificar la actividad asistencial en los servicios de urgencias. Los criterios diagnósticos, las pautas de tratamiento y los criterios de alta y hospitalización recogidos en esta guía pueden ser de utilidad para el manejo del paciente asmático en los servicios de urgencias españoles

The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide a tool to assist in the management of asthma in Spanish emergency departments and to improve care of patients with asthma. A multidisciplinary team of 3 emergency medicine specialists, 3 respiratory medicine specialists, and 3 allergy specialists made a list of clinical questions and chose 4 clinical practice guidelines on asthma management to prioritize when answering the questions. The team members first worked individually and then discussed their findings in a meeting to reach consensus about the content of the present statement. The recommendations and clinical algorithms in the statement contribute to detecting the asthmatic patient on arrival at the emergency department, establishing the diagnosis, following unified treatment criteria, and referring the patient to a respiratory medicine specialist, an allergy specialist, or a primary care physician, as appropriate. The definitions used in this statement provide a common language for asthma in the interest of helping to unify care practices in emergency departments. The diagnostic criteria, treatment guidelines, and criteria for discharging and admitting patients provided should be useful for managing asthma in Spanish emergency departments

Management of asthma in the emergency department: a consensus statement. / Documento de consenso para el manejo del paciente asmático en urgencias.

EN: The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide a tool to assist in the management of asthma in Spanish emergency departments and to improve care of patients with asthma. A multidisciplinary team of 3 emergency medicine specialists, 3 respiratory medicine specialists, and 3 allergy specialists made a list of clinical questions and chose 4 clinical practice guidelines on asthma management to prioritize when answering the questions. The team members first worked individually and then discussed their findings in a meeting to reach consensus about the content of the present statement. The recommendations and clinical algorithms in the statement contribute to detecting the asthmatic patient on arrival at the emergency department, establishing the diagnosis, following unified treatment criteria, and referring the patient to a respiratory medicine specialist, an allergy specialist, or a primary care physician, as appropriate. The definitions used in this statement provide a common language for asthma in the interest of helping to unify care practices in emergency departments. The diagnostic criteria, treatment guidelines, and criteria for discharging and admitting patients provided should be useful for managing asthma in Spanish emergency departments.

El presente documento de consenso se ha desarrollado con el objetivo de facilitar una herramienta para el manejo del paciente asmático en los servicios de urgencias españoles y mejorar la calidad asistencial. Un equipo multidisciplinar formado por tres especialistas en medicina de urgencias, tres especialistas en neumología y tres especialistas en alergología elaboró un listado de preguntas clínicas y utilizó cuatro guías de práctica clínica sobre el manejo del asma para responderlas. Después de un periodo de trabajo individual, se discutieron y consensuaron en una reunión los contenidos del presente documento. Las recomendaciones y los algoritmos incluidos en él van dirigidos a detectar al paciente asmático a su llegada al servicio de urgencias, establecer un diagnóstico correcto, unificar los criterios terapéuticos y realizar posteriormente una correcta derivación al neumólogo, alergólogo o al médico de atención primaria, según proceda. Las definiciones que se ofrecen en el presente documento proporcionan un lenguaje común que puede ayudar a unificar la actividad asistencial en los servicios de urgencias. Los criterios diagnósticos, las pautas de tratamiento y los criterios de alta y hospitalización recogidos en esta guía pueden ser de utilidad para el manejo del paciente asmático en los servicios de urgencias españoles.