Social determinants of the non-use of the explicit health guarantees plan (the GES plan).

INTRODUCTION: The public policy called Explicit health guarantees (GES) could serve as a basis for the future implementation of universal health coverage in Chile. An improvement in the quality of health of the Chilean population has been observed since the launching of the GES, which has a high adherence (84% of the beneficiary population uses this health program). This work seeks the social determinants related to a portion of the remaining 16% of people who do not use the GES. METHODS: This secondary analysis study used a sample of GES recipients (n = 164,786) from the National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey (CASEN) 2020. The GES recipients included in the study responded that they had been under medical treatment for 20 of the 85 pathologies included in the GES, and they had not had access to such policy due to "trust in physician/facility," "decided not to wait," or "lack of information." The CASEN survey chose the 20 pathologies. The Average Marginal Effects of social determinants of the non-use of the GES health plan were predicted using multivariable and panel multinomial probit regression analyses, where the outcome variable assumed three possible values (the three reasons for not accessing) while taking those variables reported in previous studies as independent variables. RESULTS: A higher probability of non-access due to distrust in the physician/facility among adults with higher economic income was found. Among those who prefer not to wait are vulnerable groups of people: women, people with a lower-middle income, those who belong to groups with longer waiting times, and ethnic groups. The people who least access the GES due to lack of information correspond to part of the migrant population and those belonging to the lowest income group. CONCLUSIONS: The GES policy must necessarily improve the timeliness and quality of the services to make them attractive to groups that currently do not have access to them, managing waiting times rather than referrals and using patient-centered evaluations, especially in those most vulnerable groups that do not access GES because they choose not to wait or lack the necessary information, thereby improving their health literacy.

Social determinants of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations deficiency in older Chilean people.

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations deficiency is a growing health problem that affects a significant part of the world's population, with particularly negative consequences in children and older adults. Public health has prioritized healthy aging; thus, an investigation of the social determinants related to deficient and insufficient Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in older adults is needed to contribute to the implementation of comprehensive social programs focused on addressing those conditions adversely affecting the health of this group. This study was conducted using a sample of older adults (age ≥ 65 years, n = 1283) from the National Health Survey (NHS 2016-2017). The Average Marginal Effects of the social determinants of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations deficiency in older adults were predicted using a probit model in which the outcome variable assumed two values (deficiency or not deficiency), taking as independent variables those reported in previous studies. The model showed an adequate goodness of fit, Count R2 = 0.65, and the independent variables explained between 11% (Cox-Snell) and 14% (Nagelkerke) of the variance of the outcome variable. The social determinants associated with a greater likelihood of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations deficiency are the following conditions: women, people of native origin, urban dwellers, shorter sunlight exposure, and greater geographical latitude. Implications are discussed, and limitations are considered. Promotion and prevention programs should preferentially target older adults in the southernmost regions who live in urban areas, with a special focus on women. Due to the country's characteristics (17°-57° south latitude), it is necessary to review in future research the three zones shown in this study as relevant social determinants for the older adults living in them to generate inputs in formulating public health policies. The authorities must define the cut-off points for considering the difference between the country's ranges of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations insufficiency and deficiency.

Social Determinants of the Non-Utilization of the Supplementary Feeding Program (PACAM) Aimed at Older Adults' Nutritional Support.

Chile has implemented the PACAM program to support older people with nutrition and for the prevention of malnutrition and frailty. This work aims to identify the social determinants of older persons not withdrawing PACAM food in order to obtain helpful knowledge for improving the program. First, the CASEN Survey 2017 was used (960,498 observations); the inclusion criterion was PACAM recipients (Yes/No). Next, a probit model was performed with a dichotomous response to determine the marginal effects of each independent variable (e.g., demographic, health, and social). The model shows a good fit (64.4%) with an explained variance between 10.5% to 14.1%. Those variables with more significant marginal effects are people aged 70-75, having tertiary and secondary education, urban living, not participating in social organizations, immigrants, and living in the austral zone. On the other hand, a higher likelihood of consumption was found among people of greater vulnerability (lowest income, lowest education, low health insurance, and aged over 80) and, therefore, in greater fragility. To conclude, the program achieves effective targeting, although improvement actions are required to expand coverage in some groups (indigenous people, immigrants, and people with disabilities). Moreover, authorities should evaluate and reinforce the program with tailored strategies for the older adults who actually withdraw food.

[Social determinants of access to the explicit guarantees health program implemented in Chile]. / Determinantes sociales que influyen en el acceso en Chile al Plan GES, según CASEN 2017.

BACKGROUND: In Chile, an eventual implementation of a plan with universal health coverage is a challenge. The already implemented explicit health guarantees plan (GES) could be a benchmark. For this reason, it is important to obtain information about the results of its implementation. AIM: To identify the social determinants of health that influence the access to GES. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey performed in 2017 was used as a data source. The beneficiaries of 20 diseases covered by GES and inquired in the survey were considered for the present study. RESULTS: People with the higher probability of access to GES plan belong to the lowest income quintiles, are nationals, live in the central-southern metropolitan Santiago, have lower education, have a public health insurance program (FONASA) and are aged mostly over 60 years. The diseases with the highest probability of access to the program are primary arterial hypertension, type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, acute myocardial infarction, moderate and severe bronchial asthma, breast cancer, colon cancer, and bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The access probability to the GES program is in line with the epidemiological profile of the Chilean population, and with a greater social vulnerability.

Social determinants of malnutrition in Chilean children aged up to five.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to ascertain the Social Determinants (SDs) of malnutrition (over and undernutrition) of Chilean children aged up to five. METHODS: The study was carried out using a sample of children from zero to five years old (n = 1,270,485; 52.2% female) from the National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey (CASEN) 2017. A multinomial logistic regression model was used, where the "child nutritional status" outcome variable assumed three possible values: normal nutrition, overnutrition, and undernutrition, while taking those variables reported in previous literature as independent variables. RESULTS: The model, by default, set normal nutrition as the reference group, Count R2 = 0.81. Results show a higher likelihood of both overnutrition and undernutrition among male children from the lowest quintiles, with native ethnic backgrounds, reporting health problems, having public health insurance, and who attend kindergarten. Additionally, higher probabilities of undernutrition in younger than two and living in the north of the country, while overnutrition is more likely in the south. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic variables are fundamentally related to both over and undernutrition; the current single schema program to prevent malnutrition should consider SDs such as ethnicity and geographical location, among others; moreover, successful nutritional programs-which focused on the lowest quintiles, need to be expanded to other vulnerable groups and pay more attention to overnutrition.

Determinantes sociales que influyen en el acceso en Chile al Plan GES, según CASEN 2017 / Social determinants of access to the explicit guarantees health program implemented in Chile

BACKGROUND: In Chile, an eventual implementation of a plan with universal health coverage is a challenge. The already implemented explicit health guarantees plan (GES) could be a benchmark. For this reason, it is important to obtain information about the results of its implementation. AIM: To identify the social determinants of health that influence the access to GES. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey performed in 2017 was used as a data source. The beneficiaries of 20 diseases covered by GES and inquired in the survey were considered for the present study. RESULTS: People with the higher probability of access to GES plan belong to the lowest income quintiles, are nationals, live in the central-southern metropolitan Santiago, have lower education, have a public health insurance program (FONASA) and are aged mostly over 60 years. The diseases with the highest probability of access to the program are primary arterial hypertension, type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, acute myocardial infarction, moderate and severe bronchial asthma, breast cancer, colon cancer, and bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The access probability to the GES program is in line with the epidemiological profile of the Chilean population, and with a greater social vulnerability.

Evaluación del desempeño del APACHE II y SAPS III, en una unidad de cuidados intensivos / Performance evaluation of APACHE II and SAPS III in an intensive care unit / Avaliação de desempenho do APACHE II e SAPS III, em unidade de terapia intensiva

RESUMEN Objetivo El objetivo principal de este trabajo, fue validar y comparar la capacidad predictiva de mortalidad de los indicadores de gravedad APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, Score II) y SAPS III (Simplified Acute Physiology, Score III) en una muestra de pacientes admitidos en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Adulto (UCI) del Hospital de Curicó, entre los años 2011 y 2013. Materiales y Métodos Estudio analítico, observacional de cohorte histórica de casos consecutivos desde la admisión a la UCI hasta el egreso hospitalario. Para el análisis, se usó el Modelo de Regresión Logística Binaria. De un total de 1 042 pacientes ingresados a la UCI, se incluyó a 793 pacientes sobrevivientes, y a 249 pacientes fallecidos, que representaban el 76,1% y 23,9% respectivamente, del total. Resultados El SAPS III presenta mejor capacidad predictiva que el APACHE II, según el área bajo la curva de características operativas del receptor 0,81 y 0,80 respectivamente. La sensibilidad para el modelo SAPS III es 0,95 y para APACHE II es 0,93. El índice de especificidad es 0,3 para el SAPS III y 0,4 para el APACHE II, con probabilidad superior a 0,5. Conclusión Los indicadores de predicción de mortalidad en UCI; APACHE II y SAPS III tienen una buena capacidad predictiva general, pero ambos indicadores presentan una baja especificidad.(AU)

ABSTRACT Objective The main objective of this work was to validate and compare the predictive capacity of mortality of the severity score systems APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, Score II) and SAPS III (Simplified Acute Physiology, Score III) in a sample of patients admitted to the Adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the Hospital de Curicó between 2011 and 2013. Materials and Methods Analytical, observational, retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases since admission to the ICU until hospital discharge. A binary logistic regression model was used for the analysis. Out of 1 042 patients admitted to the ICU, 793 surviving patients and 249 deceased patients were included, representing 76.1% and 23.9%, respectively, of the total sample. Results The SAPS III score has a better predictive capacity than the APACHE II, according to the area under the curve and the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. Sensitivity for the SAPS III model was 0.95 and for APACHE II was 0.93. The specificity index was 0.3 for SAPS III and 0.4 for APACHE II, with a probability above 0.5. Conclusion APACHE II and SAPS III, as ICU mortality prediction indicators, have a good predictive power but low specificity.(AU)

RESUMO Objetivo O objetivo principal deste trabalho foi validar e comparar a capacidade preditiva de mortalidade dos sistemas de escore de gravidade APACHE II (Fisiologia Aguda e Avaliação Crônica de Saúde, Escore II) e SAPS III (Fisiologia Aguda Simplificada, Escore III) em uma amostra de pacientes internado na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Adulto (UTI) do Hospital de Curicó entre 2011 e 2013. Materiais e métodos Estudo de coorte analítico, observacional e retrospectivo de casos consecutivos desde a admissão na UTI até a alta hospitalar. Um modelo de regressão logística binária foi usado para a análise. Dos 1.042 pacientes admitidos na UTI, foram incluídos 793 pacientes sobreviventes e 249 falecidos, representando 76,1% e 23,9%, respectivamente, do total da amostra. Resultados O escore SAPS III tem melhor capacidade preditiva do que o APACHE II, de acordo com a área sob a curva e a curva de característica de operação do receptor: 0,81 e 0,80, respectivamente. A sensibilidade para o modelo SAPS III foi de 0,95 e para APACHE II foi de 0,93. O índice de especificidade foi de 0,3 para SAPS III e 0,4 para APACHE II, com probabilidade superior a 0,5. Conclusão APACHE II e SAPS III, como indicadores de predição de mortalidade em UTI, apresentam bom poder preditivo, mas baixa especificidade.(AU)

[Performance evaluation of APACHE II and SAPS III in an intensive care unit]. / Evaluación del desempeño del APACHE II y SAPS III, en una unidad de cuidados intensivos.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this work was to validate and compare the predictive capacity of mortality of the severity score systems APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, Score II) and SAPS III (Simplified Acute Physiology, Score III) in a sample of patients admitted to the Adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the Hospital de Curicó between 2011 and 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analytical, observational, retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases since admission to the ICU until hospital discharge. A binary logistic regression model was used for the analysis. Out of 1 042 patients admitted to the ICU, 793 surviving patients and 249 deceased patients were included, representing 76.1% and 23.9%, respectively, of the total sample. RESULTS: The SAPS III score has a better predictive capacity than the APACHE II, according to the area under the curve and the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. Sensitivity for the SAPS III model was 0.95 and for APACHE II was 0.93. The specificity index was 0.3 for SAPS III and 0.4 for APACHE II, with a probability above 0.5. CONCLUSION: APACHE II and SAPS III, as ICU mortality prediction indicators, have a good predictive power but low specificity.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo principal de este trabajo, fue validar y comparar la capacidad predictiva de mortalidad de los indicadores de gravedad APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, Score II) y SAPS III (Simplified Acute Physiology, Score III) en una muestra de pacientes admitidos en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Adulto (UCI) del Hospital de Curicó, entre los años 2011 y 2013. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio analítico, observacional de cohorte histórica de casos consecutivos desde la admisión a la UCI hasta el egreso hospitalario. Para el análisis, se usó el Modelo de Regresión Logística Binaria. De un total de 1 042 pacientes ingresados a la UCI, se incluyó a 793 pacientes sobrevivientes, y a 249 pacientes fallecidos, que representaban el 76,1% y 23,9% respectivamente, del total. RESULTADOS: El SAPS III presenta mejor capacidad predictiva que el APACHE II, según el área bajo la curva de características operativas del receptor 0,81 y 0,80 respectivamente. La sensibilidad para el modelo SAPS III es 0,95 y para APACHE II es 0,93. El índice de especificidad es 0,3 para el SAPS III y 0,4 para el APACHE II, con probabilidad superior a 0,5. CONCLUSIÓN: Los indicadores de predicción de mortalidad en UCI; APACHE II y SAPS III tienen una buena capacidad predictiva general, pero ambos indicadores presentan una baja especificidad.

Determinación y análisis de costos reales de tratamientos intensivos por paciente y día cama / Analysis of real costs of intensive treatments per patient and bed/day

El objetivo del trabajo es medir los costos reales asociados a las patologías tratadas en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Adulto de los Hospitales Públicos de la Región del Maule, y compararlos con el costo asignado por Fonasa al día cama para el año 2011. Materiales y métodos: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo, aplicando el Sistema de Costos Basado en Actividades (ABC). Se incluyó 469 pacientes, 222 pacientes de la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital de Curicó y 247 pacientes la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital de Talca entre el 01 de enero y 30 de agosto de 2011, los que de acuerdo a edad y APACHE, representan los niveles de complejidad de pacientes de Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos a nivel nacional. Los pacientes se clasificaron según las patologías: sepsis, cardiovascular, respiratorias, neurológicas, trauma, digestivos, renales y otros. Resultados: Las patologías que presentan mayor mediana de costos por día cama son: sepsis ($362.115), respiratorias ($352.793), trauma ($348.442), renales ($341.928) y cardiovascular ($291.061). La estructura de costos del día cama está conformada principalmente por el costo asociado al recurso humano, cuyo valor máximo asciende a 64 por ciento, seguido del costo asociado a los medicamentos con un valor máximo de 15 por ciento. Los pacientes con sepsis y trauma absorben la mayor proporción de recursos en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos en estudio; 35 por ciento y 19 por ciento respectivamente y una proporción significativa de dichos costos es utilizada por pacientes que fallecen (34 por ciento y 19 por ciento) respectivamente. Conclusión: Todas las patologías en estudio tienen desviación desfavorable de costos, con respecto al arancel fijado por Fonasa, que sólo asciende a $192.160, para el año 2011.

The aim of the study is measures the real costs associated with the pathologies treated in the of Intensive Care Unid (ICU) Adults of the Public Hospitals of the region of the Maule, and to compare them with the cost assigned by Fonasa to the bed/day for the year 2011. Materials and methods: it is a question of a market study, applying the Activity-based costing (ABC). There was included 469 patients, 222 patients of the ICU of the Curicó’s Hospital and 247 patients the ICU of the Talca’s Hospital between January 01 and August 30, 2011, which in agreement to age and APACHE II, represent the levels of patients’ complexity of ICU to national level. The patients qualified according to the pathologies: sepsis, cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, trauma, digestive, renal and others. Results: The pathologies that present major median of costs per day bed are: sepsis ($362.115), respiratory ($352.793),trauma ($348.442), renal ($341.928) and cardiovascular ($291.061). The structure of costs of the day bed is shaped principally by the cost associated with the human resource, which maximum value promotes 64 percent, followed by the cost associated with the medicines with a maximum value of 15 percent. The patients with sepsis and trauma absorbed the major proportion of resources in the ICU in our study; 35 percent and 19 percent respectively and a significant proportion of the abovementioned costs is used by patients who die (34 percent and 19 percent)respectively. Conclusion: All the pathologies in study have unfavorable diversion of costs, with regard to the duty fixed by Fonasa, which only promotes to $192.160, for the year2011.