Absolute telomere length in peripheral blood lymphocytes of workers exposed to construction environment.

Construction environment is composed of various substances classified as carcinogens. Thus, workers exposed in this environment can be susceptible to genomic instability that can be evaluated by absolute telomere length (TL). In this work, we evaluated TL in construction workers compared to a non-exposed group performed by qPCR assay. The TL was evaluated in 59 men exposed to the construction environment (10 years of exposure) and 49 men non-exposed. Our data showed that individuals exposed to the construction environment exhibited a significantly lower TL in relation to non-exposed group (p = 0.009). Also, on the multiple linear regression model, we observed that TL was significantly influenced by the construction environment exposure (p ≤ 0.001). Additionally, the arsenic exposure is associated to a shortening telomere (p ≤ 0.001), and the lead exposure caused an increase in TL (p ≤ 0.001). Thus, our findings suggest a modulation in TL by construction environment exposure, mainly by arsenic and lead exposure.

Reassessment of low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer reports by gynecological pathologists increases risk classification without impacting outcome.

OBJECTIVES: A lack of agreement is often observed in pathological reviews performed by specialized and general pathologists. Four histopathological variables influence the risk classification of endometrial cancer: histological type; histological grade; myometrial invasion; lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI). This study aimed to evaluate if changes in the risk classification after a specialized pathological review of low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer (LIREC) samples may impact disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 195 patients diagnosed with LIREC at Barretos Cancer Hospital was obtained. Two gynecologic pathologists re-evaluated the pathological reports. Through the histology report reviewed, we could determine their new risk classification. The Kappa concordance score was used to verify the concordance between the general's and specialized pathologists' reports, and the new risk classification was correlated with the patients' DFS. RESULTS: The final reports led to changes in the histological type, histological grade, myometrial invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion in 13.3 %, 62,8%, 18.3 %, and 11.1 % of cases, respectively. The Kappa concordance score for all variables was less than 0.7. In 54 patients (30 %), the risk classification was modified (κ = 0.396), of which 30 (55.5 %) cases upstaged. There was no difference in DFS for patients who had an upstaging in their European Society of Medical Oncology modified classification compared to those who maintained their initial risk classification (86.7 % vs 88.0 %, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in the reports reassessed by expert gynecological pathologists and the change (30%) in patients' risk classification, there was no difference in their DFS.