RESUMEN
(1) Background: Lung cancer's high mortality due to late diagnosis highlights a need for early detection strategies. Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly for lung cancer, offers promise by analyzing medical data for early identification and personalized treatment. This systematic review evaluates AI's performance in early lung cancer detection, analyzing its techniques, strengths, limitations, and comparative edge over traditional methods. (2) Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines rigorously, outlining a comprehensive protocol and employing tailored search strategies across diverse databases. Two reviewers independently screened studies based on predefined criteria, ensuring the selection of high-quality data relevant to AI's role in lung cancer detection. The extraction of key study details and performance metrics, followed by quality assessment, facilitated a robust analysis using R software (Version 4.3.0). The process, depicted via a PRISMA flow diagram, allowed for the meticulous evaluation and synthesis of the findings in this review. (3) Results: From 1024 records, 39 studies met the inclusion criteria, showcasing diverse AI model applications for lung cancer detection, emphasizing varying strengths among the studies. These findings underscore AI's potential for early lung cancer diagnosis but highlight the need for standardization amidst study variations. The results demonstrate promising pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87, signifying AI's accuracy in identifying true positives and negatives, despite the observed heterogeneity attributed to diverse study parameters. (4) Conclusions: AI demonstrates promise in early lung cancer detection, showing high accuracy levels in this systematic review. However, study variations underline the need for standardized protocols to fully leverage AI's potential in revolutionizing early diagnosis, ultimately benefiting patients and healthcare professionals. As the field progresses, validated AI models from large-scale perspective studies will greatly benefit clinical practice and patient care in the future.
RESUMEN
Hypertension treatment should involve non-pharmacological interventions such as dietary salt restriction, weight loss, exercise, limiting alcohol intake, and dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet. Significant impacts of these interventions have been suggested for a long time. This systematic review aims to assess the influence of non-pharmacological therapies on hypertension patients' ability to control their blood pressure. The review will concentrate on randomized controlled trials examining how non-pharmacological therapies affect blood pressure regulation in hypertension patients. A systematic review was conducted to investigate the impact of non-pharmacological interventions on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. A comprehensive search for relevant studies was conducted. The following electronic databases were searched: EMBASE, OVID-MEDLINE, and PubMed. The search covered the period between January 2000 and August 2023. The search strategy included a combination of keywords related to hypertension, non-pharmacological interventions, and blood pressure control. A thorough literature evaluation of papers from the EMBASE, OVID-MEDLINE, and PubMed databases was part of the procedure for choosing the studies. Combinations of the keywords telemedicine, primary care, and effectiveness were used for the search. Only studies published in English between January 2000 and August 2023 were included in the search. Through database searching, 862 entries were found, of which 321 were from EMBASE, 112 from OVID-MEDLINE, and 429 from PubMed. After duplicate records were eliminated, 117 records were checked for eligibility. Of these, 100 were disregarded for a variety of reasons, including not relevant to the objectives of the study (n = 63), abstracts or reviews (n = 8), and studies that failed to present interesting research findings (n = 36). The eligibility of the remaining 10 full-text publications was evaluated. Ten articles passed the inclusion tests and were added to the research after a thorough evaluation. Lifestyle modifications are important and have a significant impact on controlling hypertension and a positive impact on reducing blood pressure. Combination therapy is more effective; however, adherence to the modifications is the most important factor affecting the outcomes.
RESUMEN
Acute appendicitis is a prevalent condition that requires accurate and timely diagnosis and management to avoid potential complications. Classically, the diagnosis of appendicitis is made using the appendicular outer-to-outer wall diameter. In this study, we examined the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) scans for diagnosing acute appendicitis using wall thickness and lumen thickness rather than diameter. This study included data from 350 patients who presented to the emergency department with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. All patients underwent a CT scan, and 62 radiologically positive patients underwent surgery. A radiological diagnosis was made using the conventional outer-to-outer wall diameter with a cut-off of 6 mm for a positive diagnosis. These 62 positive CT scans were reviewed and compared with surgical results. The study showed that a threshold of 2.25 mm for appendicular lumen thickness is an excellent diagnostic tool for acute appendicitis, demonstrating a high sensitivity of 96.4% and a lower specificity of 67%. In contrast, 1.6 mm wall thickness indicates acute appendicitis, with 81.8% sensitivity and 84% specificity. However, the wall thickness remains inferior to the conventionally used measurement of 6.75 mm for appendicular diameter, with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 100%.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It was hypothesized that the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and migraine and their co-existence are higher among medical students. In this study, we aim to establish the prevalence of IBS and migraine in the medical and non-medical students at Al-Baha University, Saudi Arabia, and to observe the association and relationship between IBS and migraine using the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for IBS and the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 criteria for migraine. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was done on the Saudi Arabian campus of Al-Baha University between July 2022 and July 2023. Al-Baha city-dwelling male and female college students aged 18 to 29 comprised the study population. A self-administered electronic questionnaire was sent online to determine the prevalence of IBS and migraine, in addition to associated risk factors. The questionnaire consisted of three sections: demographic and lifestyle data, the Rome IV criteria for diagnosing and subclassifying IBS, and the ICHD-3 criteria for diagnosing migraine. RESULTS: The study was conducted among 452 participants with a mean age of 21.64 years. The majority of participants were not from medical schools. The majority of medical and non-medical participants were male, at 66.6% and 63.1%, respectively. In our study, 36.9% of the individuals reported having a first-degree relative diagnosed with IBS, whereas 2.7% reported having IBS themselves. Regarding migraine, 17.9% of respondents claimed to have a first-degree relative with migraine, while 6.9% of respondents themselves reported experiencing migraine. Regarding IBS prevalence, there was no significant difference between participants from non-MBBS colleges and MBBS colleges. Similarly, there was no significant difference in migraine prevalence between these two groups (92.0% vs. 95.4%, p=0.185). CONCLUSION: The current study contributes significantly to our understanding of the prevalence of IBS and migraines among medical students, as well as these individuals' demographic characteristics, familial histories, and aggravating variables.
RESUMEN
Background Gastric cancer is a significant health concern worldwide, and its incidence varies across different populations. This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge and awareness of gastric cancer among the general population in Al-Baha City, Saudi Arabia. Methodology This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted among the residents of Al-Baha city older than 18 years. The study was conducted based on a questionnaire that has been developed by a previous study. Data were initially recorded in an Excel sheet before being exported to the SPSS program, version 25 for data analysis. Results The survey included 426 respondents from Al-Baha city, Saudi Arabia, with 56.8% being females and the majority being in the age groups (21-30 years). Alcohol consumption (mean=4.5, SD= 0.77), smoking cigarettes or Shisha (mean= 4.38, SD=0.852), family history of gastric cancer (mean= 4, SD=1.008), a past medical history of gastric cancer (mean= 3.99, SD=0.911), stomach ulcer (mean=3.76, SD=0.898), and consumption of smoked food (mean= 3.69, SD=0.956) are the most widely recognized risk factors. The most highly recognized symptoms are gastrointestinal bleeding (mean= 4.03, SD=0.875), abdominal lump (mean= 3.94, SD=0.926), weight loss (mean= 3.93, SD=0.963), recurrent nausea and vomiting (mean=3.76, SD=0.956), and abdominal pain (mean= 3.57, SD=0.995). The study also identified several subgroups of the population that may benefit from targeted educational programs, including individuals in the age group of 41-50 years and those in non-medical occupations. Conclusion The study found that participants had a moderate level of knowledge about the risk factors and symptoms of gastric cancer, with significant variability among different subgroups of the population. Further research is needed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of gastric cancer in Saudi Arabia and other similar populations, to develop effective prevention and management strategies for this disease.
RESUMEN
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has negatively affected many aspects of daily life. In Saudi Arabia, many studies, using a range of assessment approaches, have examined how the pandemic has affected the mental health of both the general public and healthcare workers. However, to develop effective public-health initiatives for such crisis events, it would also be relevant to determine the pandemic's impact on the behavioral, emotional, and social lives of Saudi children. Objective To assess, among Saudi children aged 3-15 years, the behavioral, emotional, and social changes that have occurred in their daily lives due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods This study featured a cross-sectional design. Potential participants were approached through the most popular social media in Saudi Arabia, and the final sample size was 651 parents. As, at the time of data collection, the members of the Saudi public were requested to avoid face-to-face meetings where possible, a well-designed electronic questionnaire featuring closed-ended questions was used. Results Descriptive statistics showed that the mean age of the parents was 29±7 years (range: 20-60 years); over half (58%) were female. During the COVID-19 outbreak, one-third of children had asked to sleep in their parents' beds. Furthermore, approximately 30% of children demonstrated increased irritability and mood swings when compared with the period before the pandemic. Concerning adaptive social behaviors, during the pandemic, 22% of children appeared calmer and 14% of children seemed more thoughtful. Our study reports more screen time, less physical activity, and reduced sleep time among children compared with the pre-pandemic period. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has psychologically affected children. The present results highlight the need to reduce this psychological burden by enhancing children's emotional resilience and involving parents in health-promotion programs aimed at mitigating the negative impacts of such public-health crises.