Comparison between air and gas as tamponade in 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for primary superior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes and postoperative characteristics, between eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for RRD, with air or different gas agents as tamponade. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The records of 262 patients that underwent PPV for RRD with air or different gas tamponades and a follow-up of at least 6 months were examined. Only cases with superior retinal breaks were included. Demographic, pre-, intra- and postoperative characteristics including rate of recurrence and complications were analysed. RESULTS: 48 patients were treated with air and 214 were treated with gas. No differences were found in success rate between air and gas group at both 3 and 6 months (respectively, 93.8% vs 93.6 and 100% vs 100%, all P values > 0.05). Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly higher in the air group compared with the gas group 7 days and 1 month postoperatively (respectively, 0.2 ± 0.4 vs 2.6 ± 0.5, P < 0.001 and 0.1 ± 0.4 vs 0.4±0.9, P = 0.04). The occurrence ocular hypertension at 1 month postoperatively was significantly higher in the gas group compared with the air group (15.4 % vs 0%, P < 0.001). At 6 months, the prevalence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) was significantly higher in the gas group compared with air group (4.2% vs 16.8%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Air was comparable to gas tamponades in terms of surgical outcome and BCVA at 6 months. In addition, air allowed an earlier visual recovery and resulted in a lower rate of postoperative ocular hypertension and ERM.

Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerance of Subliminal Subthreshold Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation With a Duty Factor of 25% Versus 31.3% for Advanced Glaucoma.

PRéCIS:: Subliminal subthreshold transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (SS-TSCPC) with duty cycles 25% and 31.3% seems to be an effective approach to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma that is refractory to medical management. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and the tolerance of SS-TSCPC with a duty cycle of 25% versus 31.3% with Supra 810 nm Subliminal Quantel Medical laser stimulation for advanced glaucoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, comparative case series of patients treated by SS-TSCPC between January 2017 and July 2017. The diagnostic and inclusion criteria were patients with advanced and refractory glaucoma, defined as IOP >21 mm Hg on maximal tolerated medical therapy with or without previous glaucoma surgical procedures, a minimum follow-up of 12 months, and patients who refused or were poor candidates for additional filtering surgery or implantation of glaucoma drainage devices. The primary endpoint was surgical success defined as an IOP of 6 to 21 mm Hg or a reduction of IOP by 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medication from baseline. The secondary endpoints were the mean IOP and best visual corrected acuity best-corrected visual acuity at 12 months after surgery, retreatment outcomes, glaucoma medications, and complications such as inflammation, uveitis, cataract, mydriasis, and phthisis. RESULTS: Forty eyes of 32 patients were included: 20 eyes were subjected to SS-TSCPC with 31.3% duty cycle and 20 eyes with a 25% duty cycle. The surgical success of the TSCPC 12 months after the first procedure was better in the 31.3% duty cycle group (83.5%) than in the 25% duty cycle group (65%). The most common complications were inflammation (50%, 1 mo after surgery) and IOP spikes (increase in IOP of >25% from baseline within 1 mo of laser) in both groups. Inflammation was higher in the 31.3% duty cycle group. CONCLUSIONS: SS-TSCPC at 31.3% and 25% duty cycle seems to be an effective approach to reduce IOP in glaucoma that is refractory to medical management. SS-TSCPC at 31.3% duty cycle is more effective than the 25% duty cycle SS-TSCPC. However, the 31.3% duty cycle SS-TSCPC induces more inflammation than the 25% duty cycle SS-TSCPC. Each procedure should be considered on a case by case basis.