Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common forms of cancer. Therefore, diagnosing the condition early and accurately is critical for improved patient outcomes and effective treatment. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms such as support vector machine (SVM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) have demonstrated promise in medical image analysis. This paper, conducted from a systematic review perspective, aimed to determine the effectiveness of AI integration in CRC diagnosis, emphasizing accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. From a methodological perspective, articles that were included were those that had been conducted in the past decade. Also, the articles needed to have been documented in English, with databases such as Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar used to obtain relevant research studies. Similarly, keywords were used to arrive at relevant articles. These keywords included AI, CRC, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, efficacy, effectiveness, disease diagnosis, screening, machine learning, area under the curve (AUC), and deep learning. From the results, most scholarly studies contend that AI is superior in medical image analysis, the development of subtle patterns, and decision support. However, while deploying these algorithms, a key theme is that the collaboration between medical experts and AI systems needs to be seamless. In addition, the AI algorithms ought to be refined continuously in the current world of big data and ensure that they undergo rigorous validation to provide more informed decision-making for or against adopting those AI tools in clinical settings. In conclusion, therefore, balancing between human expertise and technological innovation is likely to pave the way for the realization of AI's full potential concerning its promising role in improving CRC diagnosis, upon which there might be significant patient outcome improvements, disease detection, and the achievement of a more effective healthcare system.

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (LSG): A Comparative Review.

Obesity is one of the most debilitating conditions. In a quest to mitigate disease severity, various interventions have been proposed, with endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) and laparoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (LSG) being among the recent interventions that have received growing attention. This systematic review sought to conduct a comparative analysis regarding the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of both interventions. The study involved a systematic review in which key search engines were used to select articles documented and published in the last decade. The articles for inclusion were those existing as peer-reviewed studies touching upon the aforementioned subject, with both controlled and uncontrolled trials included. Furthermore, there was the implementation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol that governs systematic reviews, in which the article selection process entailed four key procedures in the form of identification, screening, determining eligibility, and the inclusion process. In the findings, the selected articles documented mixed outcomes, but a common denominator was that the safety profile of ESG tends to be superior to that of LSG due to the observations that ESG comes with fewer adverse events such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and severe nausea and vomiting. However, the majority of the studies contended that LSG proved superior to ESG in terms of effectiveness and efficacy. Hence, individuals with mild-to-moderate obesity are more likely to benefit from ESG, but those with severe obesity whose goal is to achieve long-term weight management might benefit more from LSG. In conclusion, the management of obesity and the decision to employ ESG or LSG ought to be patient-centered and dictated by factors such as patient preferences, safety, and the sustainability of the devised plan of care.

Revision Endoscopic Gastroplasty: An Overview and Review of Literature.

The main aim of this paper was to examine the efficacy and safety of revision endoscopic gastroplasty and some of the adverse events likely to arise from the procedure, as well as the implications for future scholarly research. The study is a systematic review in which the PRISMA protocol was used to govern the article's inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected studies include those on revising endoscopic gastroplasty's effectiveness and safety. The studies were selected based on multiple parameters. The outcome included weight recidivism, excessive BMI loss, and absolute, total, or percentage weight loss. The outcome of this review confirmed that revision endoscopic gastroplasty is effective and safe. Mainly, revision endoscopic gastroplasty (R-EG) was found to counter-weight recidivism, especially short-term and mid-term. However, there is a need for additional scholarly investigations that would last several years to decades to inform the long-term efficacy of R-EG with precision.

Gender and racial disparities in the incidence and mortality of pancreatic cancer in Mississippi State from 2003 to 2019.

Background: In the United States, the incidence and prevalence of pancreatic cancer are well-established relative to the factors of gender and race. These rates can be seen to be dictated by biological, behavioral, socio-environmental, socioeconomic, and structural factors. This paper focused on the context of Mississippi, with a particular emphasis on racial and gender-linked mortality and incidence from 2003 to 2019. Methods: Data were obtained from the Mississippi Cancer Registry. Specific parameters that were focused upon included the data source in the form of all cancer incidents and cancer mortality, geography in terms of cancer coalition regions, cancer sites in the form of the digestive system as a category to which pancreatic cancer belongs, and the year, ranging from 2003 to 2019. Results: From the findings, the rates were more dominant in blacks than their white counterparts, suggesting racial disparity. Additionally, regardless of race, females exhibited lower rates compared to males. In the state, there were also marked geographical variations in disease incidence and mortality rates, with the Delta cancer coalition region faring the worst in terms of incidence rates for both races and genders. Conclusions: It was concluded that in Mississippi, being a black male poses the highest risk. In the future, certain additional factors that will need to be investigated as per their probable moderating role to inform the coining of health care interventions at the state level. They include lifestyle and behavioral factors, comorbidities, stage of disease, and geographical variations or remoteness.

Endoscopic Transcecal Appendectomy (ETA): A Literature Review on Risks and Benefits.

Different colorectal lesions have attracted different procedures in their management. One of the novel approaches that have been documented in recent times is endoscopic transcecal appendectomy (ETA). ETA is an endoscopic and less invasive approach to the excision of lesions within the appendix. The appendix is also completely resected in the process. The main aim of this paper is to establish some of the benefits and risks that come with ETA. The study was conducted from a systematic review perspective using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, which governs the implementation of systematic reviews. Key considerations in the PRISMA framework used in this article include identifying the articles, screening them, and determining their eligibility and their final inclusion or exclusion based on the specified criteria. To arrive at relevant articles, some keywords were used in the various search engines of the databases that were consulted. Some of the keywords that were used included ETA, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), adverse events, risks, safety, efficacy, and the appendiceal orifice. It was established that the key benefits of the ETA include the ability to avoid postoperative appendicitis and residual lesions in tissue. On the other hand, some risks that could come with ETA were found to include potential tumor seeding and postoperative bleeding. However, the key study limitation is that most of the referenced studies in this literature review are retrospective case series and case reports that are prone to selection bias. Furthermore, most ETA procedures in this literature review were performed by a few experienced and highly skilled endoscopists, making the ability to make such results generalizable to all endoscopists and patient populations a debatable issue. In the future, there is a need for more multicenter and large studies to be conducted with longer follow-up periods to ascertain the results obtained in this review. This will ensure a more informed decision-making process for or against ETA implementation in real-world clinical environments.

The Use of Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A Review of the Literature.

Around the world, about 15 to 40% of individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) rely on cannabis and cannabinoids to reduce the need for other medications, as well as increase appetite and reduce pain. Whereas more and more patients continue to report benefits accruing from cannabis and cannabinoid usage in IBD, agreement relative to the use of cannabis and its derivatives in IBD remains unclear. This paper reviewed the interplay between cannabinoid use and IBD disease treatment, remission, or symptom relief. The study was conducted from a systematic review perspective. It involved consulting literature from published original research articles, noting outcomes, and performing a meta-analysis to identify trends and draw conclusions. The selected articles were those that had been published in a 10-year period ranging between 2012 and 2022. The motivation was to ensure recency and also relevance to contemporary scientific research and clinical environment practices. Indeed, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework helped in answering the focal question of the investigation, which revolved around whether cannabinoids are beneficial to IBD treatment and to what extent. The aim of using this protocol was to ensure the satisfaction of the article exclusion and inclusion criteria, as well as ensure the utilization of articles directly contributing to the central subject under investigation. In the findings, it was established that on the one hand, cannabinoid usage in IBD treatment comes with promising results as reported in the majority of the selected studies which reported reduced clinical complications which were assessed using Mayo scores, Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score, weight gain, enhanced patient health perception, Lichtiger Index and Harvey-Bradshaw Index or general wellbeing. On the other hand, cannabinoid use remains questionable because evidence of high quality is yet to surface vividly, especially in terms of the mode of administration and the appropriate dose. It is also notable that the findings were characterized by a state of high heterogeneity in terms of the study designs of the studies that were selected, disease activity indices, the duration of treatment by different scholarly researchers, the difference in the modes of administration of cannabinoid and cannabis by different researchers, variations in cannabis dosage, differences in the selected studies' inclusion criteria, and variations in their case definitions. The implication is that whereas the efficacy of cannabinoid use in IBD treatment was reported in most studies, outcome generalizability from the review was highly likely to be restricted. In the future, it is recommended that randomized controlled trials center, set universal parameters for IBD treatment using cannabis and cannabinoids to determine intervention safety and effectiveness as well as having homogenous outcomes that can be compared between different studies. In so doing, the appropriate dose and ideal mode of administration of cannabis and its derivatives might be discerned, ensuring relevance based on patient characteristics such as gender and age, as well as the appropriate administration mode and dose as per IBD symptom severity.

Endoscopic Gastric Sleeve: A Review of Literature.

For morbid obesity, one of the treatment options that have been deemed the most effective is bariatric surgery. Specifically, endoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (ESG) has emerged as one of the minimally invasive procedures for weight loss to be developed recently. In this procedure, there is the endoscopic placement of sutures in a quest to ensure reductions in the stomach volume. In this review, the main aim was to review the literature concerning ESG's efficacy and safety. Secondary sources of data were used and electronic databases were searched to identify articles focused on assessing the safety or efficacy of ESG. They included several databases such as Clinicaltrials.gov, Embase (Excerpta Medica Database), and MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, or MEDLARS Online) to select relevant articles. Both the titles and abstracts of the articles were used to determine their inclusion or exclusion from the current review. Additionally, some keywords were used to search and obtain relevant articles such as: ESG, obesity, bariatric surgery, and total body weight loss. This review relied on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework for the identification of articles, screening, determination of eligibility, and inclusion and exclusion as deemed appropriate. From the findings, the review established that ESG is effective when used as an alternative intervention for obesity. The beneficial effects are felt particularly in terms of the procedure's capacity to ensure that the total body weight loss mean percentage is significant. Apart from the benefit of ensuring weight loss, ESG was also found to impair gastric emptying, pose metabolic effects that are key to controlling obesity-associated metabolic dysregulation, and the ability to increase satiety. However, the procedure was documented to yield a few adverse events in some studies. Some of the notable adverse events include pulmonary embolism, potential pneumoperitoneum, and possible post-procedure leak in the posterior aspect of the gastric fundus as sutures exert tension and also cause thin walls. Emerging as a minimally-invasive procedure, ESG is a cost-effective alternative through which weight loss can be achieved significantly in obese populations. It leads to a slowdown of gastric emptying, causes an increase in satiety, and leads to an improvement in the metabolic profile. Therefore, for obese individuals not undergoing bariatric surgery, ESG can be an ideal treatment option, including individuals in need of a bridge to surgery and also those diagnosed with moderate obesity. Overall, when it comes to the management of obesity, this review established that ESG provides a paradigm shift targeting existing therapeutic gaps.

Safety and Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation and Epidural Steroid Injection for Management of Cervicogenic Headaches and Neck Pain: Meta-Analysis and Literature Review.

Dysfunction of the cervical spine and its anatomical features, mostly innervated by the C1, C2, and C3 spinal nerves, can result in a secondary headache known as cervicogenic headache (CHA), mainly characterized by unilateral pain. The usefulness of pharmaceutical medications and physical therapy is currently the subject of scant literature. Interventional pain management techniques can be applied when conservative treatment is unsuccessful. This study looks at radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and epidural steroid injection (ESI) to identify their safety and efficacy in managing patients with cervicogenic headaches and neck pain. Three databases - PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL Library, and Embase were searched, and 110 studies were identified. Nine screening processes were included for review and meta-analysis. Statistical evaluation was conducted through STATA version 17 (College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC) and effect measures were reported through random effects model risk ratios. The main subject of focus included three following outcomes: incidences of pain relief, degree and duration of pain, and incidences of adverse effects. The findings showed both interventions relieved pain by a factor of >50%, demonstrating a relative effects risk ratio of 1.45 (-0.50, 3.39) for RFA: pain relief, 84.76 (82.82, 86.69) RFA: adverse effects, and 19.46 (18.80, 20.11) ESI: pain relief at 95% confidence interval. The efficacy of RFA and ESI differ. Both interventions are effective in the reduction of cervicogenic headache pain intensity. However, their complication rates and pain duration are considerably different. With ESI, the headaches can still recur weekly, demanding the use of oral analgesics to deal with them. On the other hand, RFA has a low complication rate. Improving guidance from imaging technologies, RFA has the potential to be the most effective interventional treatment.

Health Records Database and Inherent Security Concerns: A Review of the Literature.

The use of electronic health records (EHRs) has grown significantly in the past decade. Health information databases contain sensitive patient information, including their names and addresses, tests, diagnoses, treatment, and medical history. This information should be secured and protected from manipulation and fraudulent use by third parties. EHRs are expected to increase efficiency in healthcare delivery, improve healthcare quality, and relieve increased financial pressure. Despite these expected benefits, EHRs are potentially vulnerable to security concerns that may affect the confidentiality and privacy of patients' personal information. This paper presents a literature review of EHRs, factors that support the security and safety of health records, potential security breaches, and solutions to inherent security concerns. The study collects data through a systematic review of past studies that have addressed the topic of EHRs and security issues, and other relevant publications on EHR systems, and procedures that help safeguard health records databases. A total of 30 sources are analyzed for all pertinent information regarding security concerns of health records databases. These sources were obtained through an internet search on credible databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. The results of the current study reveal the perceived vulnerability of EHRs to security concerns, common security issues, the nature of these common security concerns, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act rules, provider responsibilities, and recommendations for reducing EHR security risks. This paper also reveals effective strategies such as privacy-protection awareness and staff training to enhance the security of health records databases.

Falling Trend in the Epidemiology of Gastric Cancer in Mississippi From 2003 to 2019: What Mississippi Got Right.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to give insight into the falling trend in gastric cancer epidemiology in the state of Mississippi. The period in focus is between 2003 and 2019. The aim of this study is to uncover what the state got right and the implications for future healthcare. METHODOLOGY: The data for this study was collected from the Mississippi state cancer registry. The geographic locations in focus are the state's cancer coalition regions. The data is presented in tables and graphs, with descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. RESULTS: An assessment of the respective cancer coalition regions reveals a notable decline in gastric cancer incidence rates between 2003 and 2009. The areas where the state got right were found to include evaluation and surveillance, environmental, systems, and policy changes, treatment, survivorship, early detection, and prevention. CONCLUSION: Given that the state is predominantly rural, it is recommended that additional innovative approaches are explored and implemented, including telemedicine implementation to foster real-time services regarding community health education and dissemination or messaging about actions such as gastric cancer screening and the needed environmental changes such as nutrition guideline adherence.

Geographical Distribution of Pancreatic Cancer in the State of Mississippi by Incidence and Mortality From 2003 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer can be a very debilitating disease. In the USA and around the world, pancreatic cancer is among the causes of cancer-related deaths. This study aims to highlight mortality and incidence rates of pancreatic cancer by geographic location. METHODS: The study area is the state of Mississippi with a targeted time period between 2003 and 2019. The Mississippi Cancer Registry is the source of data for this study. The subject under investigation was divided into two phases. The first phase involved analyzing data on the incidence rate while the second phase entailed data analysis of the pancreatic cancer mortality rate in Mississippi. In both phases, the focus was on three categories of geographic locations in Mississippi, which include public health districts, the regional cancer coalitions in the state, and the interplay between rural and urban locations. Descriptive and inferential statistical approaches with graphical techniques and tabulations were utilized in data presentation. RESULTS: The results of this study demonstrate there are variations in the incidence rates of pancreatic cancer by geographic location in Mississippi. In the data analysis of the Mississippi public health districts, the worst-hit areas include the rural communities in the rural-urban regional analysis, the Delta region among the cancer coalition regions, and the Central District (incidence rates) and North District (mortality rates). CONCLUSION: In Mississippi, there is a need for aggressive community-based participation and education. This approach will help improve screening and early detection of pancreatic cancer. Healthcare intake should be boosted and geared toward a reduction in mortality rates. To minimize disparities that eventually lead to differences in disease incidence and mortality from different locations, legislative and non-legislative authorities should advocate for equitable distribution of healthcare resources. An understanding of the geographic distribution of pancreatic cancer in a state will aid in the designation of specific primary prevention measures targeted in the worst-hit communities.

Incidence of Primary Central Nervous System Tumors Among the Hispanic Population in Texas 1995-2013.

INTRODUCTION: Primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors constitute a group of rare and heterogeneous tumors. A rising incidence rate in the United States has been linked to modern changes in early diagnosis and reporting. This study aims to examine temporal incidence trends, geographic variation, and the average annual age-adjusted rates among Hispanic populations in Texas from 1995 to 2013. METHODS: SEER*STAT (Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute (seer.cancer.gov/seerstat) version 8.3.2) and Joinpoint Regression 4.4.0.0 (Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute) software were used to analyze incidence of primary brain and CNS tumors among Texas residents. Data were obtained from the Texas Cancer Registry of the Texas Department of State Health Services. RESULTS: From the 30,122 cases of primary CNS tumors diagnosed throughout the state of Texas from 2008 to 2012, the overall average annual age-adjusted incidence rate for Hispanics and non-Hispanics combined was 25.35 per 100,000 persons. Among Hispanics, West Texas had the highest incidence trends and the highest average age-adjusted incidence rate of 27.17, followed by North Texas at 26.01 and the Panhandle at 23.63. East Texas had the lowest incidence rate of 16.23. The incidence trend among Hispanics has decreased consistently at a rate of 0.83 % from 1995 to 2013. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of tumors was more pronounced in the Hispanic population in northern Texas compared with southern Texas. The presence of oil and gas production industries with farming and construction could play a role in the observed incidence of disease. Further studies with a focus on occupational health among Hispanics in Texas will be needed to elucidate the cause of such distribution.

Racial Disparities in Malignant Primary Brain Tumor Survival in Texas From 1995 to 2013.

BACKGROUND: Differences among the top five races in Texas will be explored to determine if racial, geographic, and healthcare disparities exist in patients undergoing treatment for a primary malignant brain tumor. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Texas Cancer Registry from 1995 to 2013. SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) and SEER*Stat 8.3.2 (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) software were used to analyze death from malignant brain tumors and cause-specific survival. Survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-Rank tests. Hazard ratios were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Median survival was highest among Asians at 92 months (95% CI: 72, 142) and least among Whites at 20 months (95% CI: 19, 21). Patients living in the Upper Gulf Coast region of Texas had the longest survival time at 31 months (95% CI 29-35%), while those patients in the Texas Panhandle had the shortest survival time at 18 months (95% CI 14-23%). Patients with a poverty index of 0-5% had the highest median survival time of 32 months (95% CI 29-35%), as compared to patients with a poverty index of 10-20% who had a median survival of 22 months (95% CI 21-24%). CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic minorities and higher socioeconomic class demonstrated survival advantage. White males had the worst survival of those with primary malignant brain tumors. Other significant factors affecting a patient's survival rate included geographic location, poverty index, sex, and age, thus suggesting a potential genetic and environmental influence.

Outcomes with acyclovir treatment in herpes simplex encephalitis after surgery for solid CNS tumors: a case report and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) occurring within 30 days after neurosurgery for solid CNS tumors is underrecognized and underreported but remains important because of high morbidity and mortality. We present the case of a 41-year-old woman who had HSE after craniopharyngioma surgery, and delayed recognition and treatment led to a poor outcome. Subsequently, we review reported HSE cases after neurosurgery for solid CNS tumors and describe outcomes after treatment with and without acyclovir. METHODS: A literature search was performed for cases meeting the above criteria. Information was gathered regarding patient demographics, tumor types, symptoms, diagnostic workup, therapy, and outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen cases were studied. Encephalopathy, fever, and seizures were the most common symptoms. A majority of patients (78%) received IV acyclovir, with a 79% survival rate with treatment. Mortality rate was 100% in untreated cases. The median time to starting acyclovir was 17 postoperative days (range, 8-53 days). Most patients received steroids, but its use was not associated with a specific outcome. CONCLUSIONS: HSE may develop following neurosurgical resection, and the threshold for suspicion of this condition should be extremely low in a patient who shows compatible symptoms (encephalopathy, fever, or seizures) or does not recover as planned. Moreover, in case of suspicion of HSE, acyclovir should be promptly started until infection can be definitely ruled out. A delay in diagnosis of HSE and failure to treat may result in severe morbidity as well as mortality. This observation may warrant further study.

Incidence trends, rates, and ethnic variations of primary CNS tumors in Texas from 1995 to 2013.

BACKGROUND: Although rare, primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Texas is a representative sample of the United States population given its large population, ethnic disparities, geographic variations, and socio-economic differences. This study used Texas data to determine if variations in incidence trends and rates exist among different ethnicities in Texas. METHODS: Data from the Texas Cancer Registry from 1995 to 2013 were examined. Joinpoint Regression Program software was used to obtain the incidence trends and SEER*Stat software was used to produce average annual age-adjusted incidence rates for both nonmalignant and malignant tumors in Texas from 2009 to 2013. RESULTS: The incidence trend of malignant primary CNS tumors in whites was stable from 1995 to 2002, after which the annual percent change decreased by 0.99% through 2013 (95% CI, -1.4, -0.5; P = .04). Blacks and Asian/Pacific Islanders showed unchanged incidence trends from 1995 to 2013. Hispanics had an annual percent change of -0.83 (95% CI, -1.4, -0.2; P = .009) per year from 1995 through 2013. From 2009 to 2013, the incidence rates of nonmalignant and malignant primary CNS tumors were highest among blacks, followed by whites, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians/Alaskan Natives. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the 2016 Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States report, the black population in Texas showed the highest total incidence of CNS tumors of any other race studied. Many factors have been proposed to account for the observed differences in incidence rate including geography, socioeconomic factors, and poverty factors, although the evidence for these external factors is lacking.