Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Lupus ; 29(9): 1011-1020, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32571142

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The understanding of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) pathogenesis remains incomplete. This review assessed LN development in SLE, within-LN progression and progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: A keyword-based literature search was conducted, and 26 publications were included. RESULTS: Overall, 7-31% of patients had LN at SLE diagnosis; 31-48% developed LN after SLE diagnosis, most within 5 years. Class IV was the most commonly found LN class and had the worst prognosis. Histological transformation occurred in 40-76% of patients, more frequently from non-proliferative rather than proliferative lesions. Cumulative 5- and 10-year ESRD incidences in patients with SLE were 3% and 4%, respectively, and 3-11% and 6-19%, respectively, in patients with SLE and LN. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated serum creatinine was identified as a predictor of worsening disease state, and progression within LN classes and from SLE/LN to ESRD. This review highlights the substantial risk for developing LN and progressing to ESRD amongst patients with SLE.


Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Nefritis Lúpica/patología , Creatinina/sangre , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Nefritis Lúpica/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Lupus Sci Med ; 7(1): e000357, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32341790

RESUMEN

Objective: To examine the effects of belimumab initiation on healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and costs in SLE. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study used healthcare administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database to identify patients with SLE billing codes who received ≥1 intravenous belimumab infusion between March 2011 and December 2015. The first belimumab administration was the 'index date'. During the 6-month postindex period, nine belimumab infusions were recommended: three during the initiation period and six during the maintenance period. HCRU and cost data for inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, physician office visits, hospital-based outpatient visits, laboratory services, other outpatient services and outpatient pharmacy prescriptions were compared in the 6-month pre/postindex periods. Results: Of the 1879 patients with SLE included, 43% received ≥3 intravenous initiation administrations. An average of 5.3 (SD: 2.4) of the nine recommended belimumab administrations were received within 6 months. In the 6-month preindex versus postindex periods, significant reductions were noted for inpatient hospitalisations (18% vs 9%, p<0.001; mean visits: 0.3 vs 0.14, p<0.001) and emergency department visits (40% vs 24%, p<0.001; mean visits; 3.53 vs 1.96, p<0.001). Mean total costs were higher in the 6-month postindex versus preindex period ($41 426 vs $29 270; p<0.001). Conclusions: In this study of real-world intravenous belimumab for SLE, adherence to recommended infusion schedules was low. Outpatient healthcare and associated costs were higher in the 6 months after belimumab was initiated, although inpatient costs were lower. Reasons for non-adherence with belimumab and implications should be investigated.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Recursos en Salud/economía , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/economía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud/economía , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Costo de Enfermedad , Manejo de Datos , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Pulm Ther ; 5(1): 81-95, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32026429

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective database study explored treatment patterns and potential off-label prescribing among patients newly prescribed fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) in a UK primary care setting. METHODS: In Europe, FF/VI is approved in two strengths: 100/25 µg for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 100/25 µg or 200/25 µg for treatment of asthma in patients aged 12 or older. Using electronic health records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, new users of FF/VI or other inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist fixed-dose combination products were identified and classified into one of three groups: COPD diagnosis, asthma diagnosis, and other diagnosis (not COPD or asthma). RESULTS: During 2014-2015, 4373 patients initiated FF/VI: 3380 on FF/VI 100/25 (65% in the COPD diagnosis group) and 993 on FF/VI 200/25 (51% in the asthma diagnosis group). During up to 12 months of follow-up, the median number (interquartile range) of prescriptions of the index strength issued per patient was 7 (2-8) for FF/VI 100/25 and 5 (2-8) for FF/VI 200/25; most new users did not change from the index strength prescribed (93.0% COPD; 89.7% asthma, of all patients initiating treatment with FF/VI). Potential off-label FF/VI prescribing in children < 12 years old was rare (< 0.29% in the combined asthma and other diagnosis groups), and up to one in five new users of FF/VI with COPD were potentially prescribed FF/VI 200/25 off-label during the study period. Much of the potential off-label prescribing in COPD occurred in patients with a history of asthma, those presenting with greater disease severity, and/or prior treatment with high-dose steroids. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of FF/VI is rare in children under 12 years of age in the UK, according to our findings, but up to one in five COPD patients in the UK may have been prescribed FF/VI 200/25, some of which may have been off-label. FUNDING: This study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline plc (study 205052). STUDY REGISTRATION: GlaxoSmithKline plc Clinical Trial Registry study number 205052.

4.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 167(2): 517-528, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28948396

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We developed and validated algorithms to identify metastases and breast cancer recurrence in Danish medical registries. We computed the incidence rate (IR) and hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate predictors of these outcomes in stage II/III breast cancer patients. METHODS: We included all women in Denmark diagnosed during 1999-2011 with regional or stage II/III breast cancer. Demographic, tumor, and treatment data were ascertained from population-based health registries. To facilitate diagnostic work-up of the primary cancer, follow-up began 180 days after diagnosis and continued until recurrence/metastases, death, or 31 December 2012, whichever occurred first. We computed the positive predictive values (PPVs) of recurrence, bone metastases, and visceral metastases using medical records as a gold standard. We calculated the cumulative incidence, IR per 10,000 person years, and used Cox regression to compute the HRs and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for each outcome. RESULTS: Among 23,478 patients, 7073 had regional stage and 16,405 had stage II/III breast cancer. The PPV for recurrence was 72.6% (95% CI 59.3, 83.3%). The PPVs for bone and visceral metastases were 92.3% (95% CI 69.3-99.2%) and 70.8% (95% CI 51.1, 85.9%), but had low sensitivity. Five-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, bone metastases, and visceral metastases were 18.4, 2.2, and 5.2%, with corresponding 5-year IRs of 540 (95% CI 524, 557), 60 (95% CI 55, 65), and 144 (95% CI 136, 152), respectively. Predictors of recurrence and metastases included age, stage, hormone receptor status, and cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: Our algorithms show moderate to high PPVs for recurrence and metastases. The IRs of metastases were lower compared with other registry-based cohort studies, so may be underestimated in Danish registries.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
5.
Pharmaceut Med ; 31(4): 257-266, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28824275

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traditional methods for assessing prescriber knowledge can take several years to deliver results. This study was undertaken to obtain insights into the potential for using existing online communities to educate prescribers on therapy-related safety risks. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe approaches to measuring prescribers' knowledge of safety risk (osteonecrosis of the jaw) outlined in the European Medicine Agency's summary of product characteristics for denosumab (XGEVA®). METHODS: Short multiple-choice online instruments were administered as (1) a two-round cross-sectional survey fielded in January 2013-May 2015 (traditional, nine European countries, study duration: 3 years), (2) a survey targeting the online Medscape community (seven European countries, study duration: 3 weeks), and (3) a continuing medical education module with pre-/post-assessment in an online Medscape community (Medscape Education, USA). All respondents were oncologists; treated five or more patients with bone metastases from solid tumours in the previous 3 months; and prescribed denosumab within the previous 12 months. Medscape (a WebMD company, New York, NY, USA) is the leading online medical information resource, serving approximately 3 million physicians worldwide and 400,000 within Europe. RESULTS: In the traditional 29-month study, 420 (n = 210 per round; 14% of screened physicians) individuals participated. Knowledge levels exceeded 75% correct on five questions (incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw, concomitant risk factors and prevention of osteonecrosis of the jaw during denosumab treatment, importance of ensuring oral hygiene, and care for patients who have or develop osteonecrosis of the jaw) with less awareness of optimal osteonecrosis of the jaw treatment. The Medscape survey (n = 207; 32.1% of 645 eligible) provided similar results in a 3-week post-survey launch. The Medscape Education study (n = 264) documented knowledge acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments that target physicians through online platforms where they seek information about drug-related safety risks may result in increased efficiencies, informing regulators about prescribers' knowledge of safe use within weeks rather than years. Online communities or professional societies may provide venues in which to implement knowledge-acquisition surveys tied to training/education modules that address safety topics.

6.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 165(2): 433-444, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28624978

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Unaffected women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations face difficult choices about reducing their breast cancer risk. Understanding their treatment preferences could help us improve patient counseling and inform drug trials. The objective was to explore preferences for various risk-reducing options among women with germline BRCA1/2 mutations using a discrete-choice experiment survey and to compare expressed preferences with actual behaviors. METHODS: A discrete-choice experiment survey was designed wherein women choose between hypothetical treatments to reduce breast cancer risk. The hypothetical treatments were characterized by the extent of breast cancer risk reduction, treatment duration, impact on fertility, hormone levels, risk of uterine cancer, and ease and mode of administration. Data were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model. Women were also asked to express their preference between surgical and chemoprevention options and to report on their actual risk-reduction actions. Women aged 25-55 years with germline BRCA1/2 mutations who were unaffected with breast or ovarian cancer were recruited through research registries at five clinics and a patient advocacy group. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and March 2016, 622 women completed the survey. Breast cancer risk reduction was the most important consideration expressed, followed by maintaining fertility. Among the subset of women who wished to have children in future, the ability to maintain fertility was the most important factor, followed by the extent of risk reduction. Many more women said they would take a chemoprevention drug than had actually taken chemoprevention. CONCLUSIONS: Women with BRCA1/2 mutations indicated strong preferences for breast cancer risk reduction and maintaining fertility. The expressed desire to have a safe chemoprevention drug available to them was not met by current chemoprevention options.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Heterocigoto , Mutación , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Femenino , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
7.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 115: 67-80, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28602171

RESUMEN

A systematic literature review was conducted to quantify populations of patients with primary breast cancer in whom bone metastases were detected at study start or during follow-up. Searches were performed in PubMed and EMBASE using terms related to breast cancer and bone metastases. Articles had to have been published 01/01/99-31/12/13, and to report data on the proportion of patients with bone metastases among patients with breast cancer. In total, 156 articles were included in the meta-analysis. A median of 12% of patients with stage I-III breast cancer developed bone metastases during a median follow-up of 60 months. Of patients who developed metastatic disease during follow-up, 55% (median) had bone metastases. Of those with metastatic breast cancer at study start, 58% (median) had bone metastases. These data help to inform on the global burden of bone metastases by defining patient populations that are at risk of developing bone metastases.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias
8.
Eur J Dermatol ; 26(5): 477-486, 2016 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27628317

RESUMEN

There is anecdotal evidence of variation in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. We aimed to describe the decision-making process physicians use to define resectability and injectability in patients with metastatic melanoma, and to identify patient characteristics associated with unresectable and injectable lesions. Physicians in Germany, France and the UK who manage patients with metastatic melanoma completed a questionnaire and case report forms on lesion resectability and injectability. In total, 122 physicians participated in the study, collecting data on 1,193 patients. Physicians' resection history was the main factor impacting their resection decisions; those who had frequently performed resections in the past were more likely to consider a lesion resectable than those who had rarely performed resections. A physician's decision to resect varied according to field of expertise; 46% of oncologists rarely performed resections, but this was the case for only 10% of dermatologists and 26% of dermato-oncologists. Another important factor affecting resectability status was the number of in-transit lesions; 49% of patients with three or more in-transit lesions were considered resectable compared with 73% of patients with fewer than three in-transit lesions. Lesion location impacted on injectability status; cutaneous and regional lymph node lesions were often considered injectable, whereas distant lesions in the bone, brain, lung, and liver were considered uninjectable. Assessment of resectability status was influenced by physicians' resection history; this varied according to field of expertise, and may reflect the lack of clear guidance on resection for patients with advanced melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Esperanza de Vida , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Dermatología , Francia , Alemania , Humanos , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Oncología Médica , Melanoma/secundario , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Selección de Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido
9.
Int J Cancer ; 139(12): 2722-2729, 2016 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27563839

RESUMEN

Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) incidence is increasing globally, making a thorough understanding of the disease and its outcomes essential for optimizing care even more urgent. In this population-based, retrospective study, we investigated stage-specific survival and recurrence/progression rates of CMM among patients diagnosed in Stockholm County Council during 2005-2012, before the wide introduction of targeted therapy. A total of 3,554 CMM patients from the Stockholm Melanoma Register were included. Information on comorbidities, progression, death, and treatments was obtained from nationwide registers and hospital electronic medical records. Unadjusted 5-year survival varied from 91.4% for stage I to 24.6% for stage IV patients. Stage, age and gender were predictors of survival, with gender an independent predictor of survival for stages IA and IIA. 74.6% of patients remained recurrence/progression-free during follow-up, with 5-year recurrence/progression-free survival rates varying from 85.3% to 12.9% among stages I and IV patients, respectively. In addition to stage, male gender, and age, circulatory system comorbidities increased the risk for recurrence/progression. No statistically significant differences in progression rate for operated and non-operated patients could be detected, possibly due to high rate (98.9%) of surgery. Our estimates of survival and recurrence rates are consistent with historical and global expectations and can serve as a baseline to gauge population-level improvements with use of novel melanoma treatments.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Vigilancia de la Población , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suecia/epidemiología , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno
10.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 42: 82-9, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27060625

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive histologically benign neoplasm with a less common malignant counterpart. Longitudinal data sources on GCTB are sparse, limited to single institution case series or surgical outcomes studies. The Swedish Cancer Registry is one of the few national population-based databases recording GCTB, representing a unique source to study GCTB epidemiology. We estimated incidence rate (IR) and overall mortality rates based on registry data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with a GCTB diagnosis in the Swedish Cancer Registry from 1983 to 2011: benign (ICD-7 196.0-196.9; PAD 741) and malignant (PAD 746). Results were stratified by age at diagnosis, gender, and anatomical lesion location. RESULTS: The cohort included 337 GCTB cases (IR of 1.3 per million persons per year). The majority (n=310) had primary benign GCTB (IR of 1.2 per million per year). Median age at diagnosis was 34 years (range 10-88) with 54% (n=183) females. Malignant to benign ratio for women was 0.095 (16/167) and for men 0.077 (11/143). Incidence was highest in the 20-39 years age group (IR of 2.1 per million per year). The most common lesion sites were distal femur and proximal tibia. Mortality at 20 years from diagnosis was 14% (n=48) and was slightly higher for axial (17%; n=6) and pelvic (17%; n=4) lesions. Recurrence occurred in 39% of primary benign cases and 75% of primary malignant cases. CONCLUSIONS: In our modern population-based series primary malignant cases were uncommon (8%), peak incidence 20-39 years with slight predominance in women. Recurrence rates remain significant with overall 39% occurring in benign GCTB, and 75% in malignant form. The linkage between databases allowed the first population based estimates of the proportion of patients who received surgery at initial GCTB diagnosis, and those who also received subsequent surgeries.


Asunto(s)
Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/epidemiología , Niño , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia , Adulto Joven
11.
Eur J Cancer ; 60: 179-89, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27118416

RESUMEN

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: With the recent emergence of immunotherapies and novel targeted treatments for advanced and metastatic melanoma such as selective B-Raf inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors, the treatment landscape in Europe has changed considerably. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of current treatment pathways in Europe for the treatment of advanced melanoma, unresectable stage III-IV. METHODS: A literature search of four databases was conducted to identify publications reporting on the treatment patterns of advanced and metastatic melanoma (stage III-IV) in European populations. RESULTS: Seven full-text publications and two conference abstracts reported on observational studies of melanoma treatment practices in France, Italy and the United Kingdom. Treatment patterns were identified for two time periods: 2005-2009 and 2011-2012. Common treatments reported for both periods included chemotherapy with dacarbazine, fotemustine or temozolomide. The main differences between the two periods were the introduction and prescription of immunotherapy ipilimumab and targeted therapy vemurafenib between 2011 and 2012. Across the three countries studied, the types of treatments prescribed between 2005 and 2009 were relatively similar, however, with noticeable differences in the frequency and priority of administration. CONCLUSION: Treatment practices for advanced melanoma vary markedly across different European countries and continue to evolve with the introduction of new therapies. The results of this review highlight a considerable evidence gap with regards to recent treatment patterns for advanced melanoma in Europe, especially post-2011 after the introduction of novel therapeutic agents, and more recently with the introduction of programmed cell death 1 inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia/métodos , Melanoma/terapia , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Vías Clínicas , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas
12.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 119(1): 3-9, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26707367

RESUMEN

Antibacterials are frequently associated with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of macrolides and amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC) on DILI. We conducted a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) with studies retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library Plus, Web of Knowledge, clinicaltrials.gov, Livertox and Toxline (1980-2014). We searched for macrolides, AMC and MeSH and synonym terms for DILI. We included all study designs except case reports/series, all population ages and studies with a placebo/non-user comparator. We summarized the evidence with a random-effects MA. Quality of the studies was appraised with a checklist developed for SR of adverse effects. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed with different exploratory tools. We finally included 10 (two randomized clinical trials, six case-control, one cohort and one case-population studies) and 9 (case-population excluded) articles in the SR and MA, respectively. The overall summary relative risk of DILI for macrolides was 2.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.81-4.47], p < 0.0001, I(2) = 57%. Three studies were perceived to be missing in the area of low statistical significance. Year of study and selected exposure window partly explained the variability between studies. For AMC, the risk of DILI was 9.38 (95% CI 0.65-135.41) p = 0.3, I2 = 95%. In conclusion, although spontaneous reports and case series have long established an association between macrolides and AMC with acute liver injury, these SR and MA have assessed the magnitude of this association. The low incidence of DILI and the therapeutic place of these antibiotics might tilt the balance in favour of their benefits.


Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/patología , Ácido Clavulánico/efectos adversos , Macrólidos/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Humanos , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Hígado/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
13.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 97(21): 1756-66, 2015 Nov 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26537163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Swedish Cancer Registry (founded in 1958) constitutes a unique resource for epidemiological studies of giant cell tumor of bone with potential for use for population-based studies of incidence over time. The aim of this study was to provide what we believe is the first modern population-based assessment of the incidence trends of giant cell tumor, a unique osteoclastogenic lytic stromal tumor with both benign and malignant histological forms, and to compare the findings with data from the same registry on osteosarcoma, a tumor that may display similar histological characteristics. METHODS: Cases were identified with use of codes for pathological bone tumor (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-7 196). Specific morphological coding distinguishes benign (PAD 741) from malignant giant cell tumor (PAD 746) and osteosarcoma (PAD 766). RESULTS: During the period of 1958 to 2011, 4625 bone tumors were reported, including 505 giant cell tumors (383 benign and 122 malignant) and 1152 osteosarcomas. From 1958 to 1982 the ratio of malignant to benign giant cell tumors was 1.3, whereas from 1983 to 2011 the ratio inverted to 0.09, suggesting a change in the reporting or diagnosis of malignant or benign cases. Cases of giant cell tumor diagnosed from 1983 to 2011 displayed an age and sex distribution (median age at diagnosis, 34.0 years; 54% female) that were consistent with those in large published case series but differed from those in 1958 to 1982 (median age at diagnosis, 31.5 years; 48% female). The most current data (1983 to 2011) showed the giant cell tumor incidence in Sweden to be 1.3 per million per year, while the osteosarcoma incidence was 2.3 per million per year. CONCLUSIONS: Early Swedish Cancer Registry data (1958 to 1982) revealed a higher proportion of malignant giant cell tumors than seen in large sequential case series and a distinct age and sex profile compared with more recent data (1983 to 2011). This likely represents changes in the diagnostic workup and introduction of multidisciplinary review of giant-cell-containing tumors around 1982. Recent data may reflect the impact of expert centralized biopsy and multidisciplinary case review and more comprehensive reporting of benign giant cell tumors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/epidemiología , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/epidemiología , Osteosarcoma/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/patología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteosarcoma/patología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Suecia/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
14.
BMC Pulm Med ; 15: 55, 2015 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25943421

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: After the SMART trial evaluating the safety of salmeterol (long-acting beta-2-agonist (LABA)) in asthma patients, regulatory actions were taken to promote a guideline-adherent prescribing of LABA only to patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). We aim to analyse LABA- and ICS-related prescription patterns after the SMART trial in Germany. METHODS: Patients documented in the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians database (approximately 10.5 million people) were included if they had a diagnosis of asthma and at least one prescription of LABA and/or ICS between 2004 and 2008. Annual period prevalence rates (PPRs) were estimated and Cochrane Armitage tests were used for time trend analyses. RESULTS: Highest annual PPRs were found for budesonide and the fixed combination of salmeterol/fluticasone. The proportion of "concomitant LABA and ICS users" increased from 52.0 to 57.6% within the study period, whereas for "LABA users without ICS" a slight decrease from 6.5 to 5.4% was found. In 2008, the proportion of patients with at least one quarter with a LABA prescription without concomitant ICS was highest in elderly, male patients (≈20%). In the majority of these patients, a concomitant diagnosis of COPD (i.e. asthma-COPD overlap syndrome [ACOS]) was present. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2004 and 2008, we found a moderate increase in guideline-adherent LABA prescribing in a representative German population. Elderly men received a significant number of LABA prescriptions without concomitant ICS probably due to ACOS.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Beclometasona/uso terapéutico , Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Combinación Budesonida y Fumarato de Formoterol/uso terapéutico , Niño , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol/uso terapéutico , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Furoato de Mometasona/uso terapéutico , Xinafoato de Salmeterol/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
15.
BMC Cancer ; 14: 364, 2014 May 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24884940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumourgst (GIST) who fail currently available treatments imatinib and sunitinib (third-line treatment-eligible GIST) is unknown, but is expected to be below an ultra-orphan disease threshold of 2/100,000 population used in England and Wales. Our study was designed to estimate the prevalence and absolute number of UK patients with unresectable/metastatic GIST at first-, second- and eventually third-line treatment. METHODS: Our open population model estimates the probability that the prevalence of UK third-line treatment-eligible GIST patients will remain under the ultra-orphan disease threshold. Model parameters for incidence, proportion of unresectable/metastatic disease and survival estimates for GIST patients were obtained from a targeted literature review and a UK cancer register. The robustness of the results was checked through differing scenarios taking extreme values of the input parameters. RESULTS: The base-case scenario estimated a prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST of 1/100,000 and a prevalence count of 598 with a 99.9% likelihood of being below the ultra-orphan disease threshold. The extreme scenarios, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and threshold analysis confirmed the robustness of these results. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST is very low and highly likely below the ultra-orphan disease threshold.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Raras/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Raras/epidemiología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/secundario , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib , Incidencia , Modelos Estadísticos , Prevalencia , Enfermedades Raras/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Sunitinib , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Reino Unido/epidemiología
16.
Neuroepidemiology ; 42(2): 107-20, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24401764

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) report on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and suicide risk was released (2008), several studies have been published on this controversial relationship. This systematic review (SR) gives an updated approach to this health issue. SUMMARY: We searched 6 databases. We ultimately included 11 publications: 4 cohort studies, 1 case-crossover study, 2 community case-control studies, and 4 SRs. Overall, 1 SR described studies already included; 3 studies reported a 2- to 4-fold overall increase in risk; 1 study reported an increased risk of suicide among epilepsy patients on AEDs with high risk of depression; 1study showed a protective effect among epilepsy patients; 2 studies were conducted with patients with bipolar disorder (1 showed a protective effect, whereas the other showed a 3-fold increase in risk of suicide), and the other 3 studies reported results for single AEDs. Several biases affected the published results. KEY MESSAGES: There is no clear evidence of an association between the use of AEDs and an increased risk of suicide because of the heterogeneity in the studies at the clinical and methodological level. A future study should cover all indications for use, retrieve information from a healthcare database, and include a defined set of covariates to avoid bias.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Suicidio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...