Adolescents with type 1 diabetes' perspectives on digital health interventions to enhance health literacy: a qualitative study.

Introduction: Digital health intervention offers the potential to enhance health literacy, which is crucial for effective diabetes management, especially among adolescents. Diabetes is a major global public health issue, leading to devastating complications and increasing mortality rates. The incidence of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is also on the rise, particularly among adolescents, necessitating multisectoral strategies to combat this disease. This study explores the perceptions of adolescents with T1DM in Germany regarding digital health interventions, with the aim of improving healthcare by addressing specific needs and guiding future research. Methodology: This study employed a qualitative approach using semi-structured individual interviews with adolescents with T1DM (n = 20) aged 14 to 18 years old in Germany to explore their perspectives on digital interventions for health literacy promotion. The study adopted content analysis according to Kuckartz et al. and the research followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Ethical considerations were paramount and data were rigorously analyzed using coding and iterative processes to ensure data quality and reliability. Results: The findings indicate that within three prominent domains, namely the utilization of digital health intervention for accessing and comprehending information, facilitating peer-to-peer interactions, and enhancing physician-patient communication and interaction, digital health interventions are either underutilized or insufficiently deployed. In addition, a notable observation is the apparent lack of patient-centered approaches for adolescents with T1DM in relation to digital health interventions and health literacy. Conclusion: In order to enhance the utilization of digital health interventions and enhance health literacy it is essential to focus on capacity building through a patient-centered approach, to promote digital health literacy, and foster the cultivation of a participatory culture. The outcomes of this study offer valuable insights that can inform practical applications, further research endeavors, and influence policymaking.

Impact of digital health interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus on health literacy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Evidence shows that living with diabetes mellitus type 1 (T1DM) in adolescent age is particularly challenging and difficult to manage. A high level of health literacy is important to prevent and avoid debilitating complications. Despite the increasing prevalence and incidence of T1DM by adolescent and the large use of digital health interventions, little is known about the association between this use and health literacy. This systematic review provides an overview on the impact of digital health interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes on health literacy and derive recommendations for further research. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed in five databases in Medline (Medline, PubMed + via PubMed), The Cochrane Library, EMBASE (via Ovid), Web of Science and PsycINFO from 2011 to 2021. In addition, grey literature searches were conducted in Google Scholar, OAlster and Trip. Relevant studies that have been missed by electronic and hand-searching strategies were searched in the reference lists of all included studies. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Two researchers independently screened abstracts for initial eligibility and applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria to the relevant full-text articles. Quality was assessed using the tools RoB2 Cochrane, ROBINS I, NOS (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale), CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) for primary studies and Amstar-2 for secondary studies. RESULTS: Out of 981 studies, 22 were included in the final review. Most primary studies included in this review were judged as moderate overall risk of bias or with some concerns and most of the secondary studies as critically low quality reviews. Our findings suggest that the interplay of health care providers (HCP) and patients through social media helps the management of the disease. This corroborates Bröder et al.' (2017) dimension of 'communication and interactions' in their concept of health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: For adolescents with T1DM, social media may be a specific and beneficial intervention for an improved communication and interaction with their HCP. Further research should investigate what specific form of social media suits best for which adolescents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on the 15th of November 2021 on Prospero (reg. NR: CRD42021282199).

[10 Years Accountable Care Organizations in the USA: Impulses for Health Care Reform in Germany?] / 10 Jahre Accounable Care Organizations in den USA: Impulse für Reformen in Deutschland?

GOAL OF THE STUDY: An intent of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Acts (ACA), also know as Obama Care, was to slow the expenditure growth in the public Medicare-System by shifting the accountability for health care outcomes and costs to the provider. For this purpose, provider were allowed to form networks, which would then take accountability for a defined population - Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). Ten years after the introduction of ACOs, this paper looks at the impact of ACOs both on quality of care and costs of care to assess if ACOs can be a model of care delivery for Germany. METHODS: In a mixed-method approach, a rapid review was conducted in Health System Evidence and PubMed. This was supported with further papers identified using the snowballing-technique. After screening the abstracts, we included articles containing information on cost- and/or quality impact of US-Medicare-ACOs. The findings of the rapid review were challenged with 16 ACO-experts and stakeholder in the USA. RESULTS: In total, we included 60 publications which incorporated 6 reports that were either conducted directly by governmental institutions or ordered by them, along with 3 previous reviews. Among these, 31 contained information on costs of care, 18 contained information on quality of care and 11 had information on both aspects. The publications show that ACOs reduced costs of of care. Cost reductions were achieved compared to historic costs, to populations not cared for in ACOs, and counterfactuals. Quality of care stayed the same or improved. CONCLUSION: ACOs contributed to slowing the cost growth in US Medicare without compromising quality of care. Thus, a transferal of this model of care to Germany should be considered. However, various policies have led to ACOs failing to unleash their full potential. Against this background, and against the background of stark differences between US Medicare and the German health care system, a critical reflection of the necessary policies underlying ACOs-like structures in Germany, needs to be undertaken.

A multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial on coaching and telemonitoring in patients with cystic fibrosis: conneCT CF.

BACKGROUND: The extend of lung disease remains the most important prognostic factor for survival in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), and lack of adherence is the main reason for treatment failure. Early detection of deterioration in lung function and optimising adherence are therefore crucial in CF care. We implement a randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy of telemonitoring of adherence, lung function, and health condition in combination with behavior change interventions using innovative digital technologies. METHODS: This is a multi-centre, randomized, controlled, non-blinded trial aiming to include 402 patients ≥ 12 years-of-age with CF. A standard-of-care arm is compared to an arm receiving objective, continuous monitoring of adherence to inhalation therapies, weekly home spirometry using electronic devices with data transmission to patients and caring physicians combined with video-conferencing, a self-management app and professional telephone coaching. The duration of the intervention phase is 18 months. The primary endpoint is time to the first protocol-defined pulmonary exacerbation. Secondary outcome measures include number of and time between pulmonary exacerbations, adherence to inhalation therapy, changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline, number of hospital admissions, and changes in health-related quality of life. CF-associated medical treatment and care, and health care related costs will be assessed by explorative analysis in both arms. DISCUSSION: This study offers the opportunity to evaluate the effect of adherence interventions using telemedicine capable devices on adherence and lung health, possibly paving the way for implementation of telemedicine in routine care for patients with CF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (Identifier: DRKS00024642, date of registration 01 Mar 2021, URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00024642 ).

Subgroups in chronic low back pain patients - a step toward cluster-based, tailored treatment in inpatient standard care: On the need for precise targeting of treatment for chronic low back pain.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to find applicable clusters for the development of different treatment pathways in an inpatient multimodal pain-therapy setting based on the multifaceted nature of CLBP. Methods: Based on data of questionnaires (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Marburg Questionnaire on Habitual Health Findings (MFHW), quality of life assessment using the Short-Form 12 (SF 12)), a retrospective two-step cluster analysis involving a sample of chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients (N=320) was calculated. Subsequently, the clusters were precisely described and compared on the basis of further data collected during the patients' standard care: pain characteristics, socio-demographic data and the general state of health, psychological variables, therapy intensity, and Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) data. Results: We found a three-cluster solution: little psychological interference but marginal physical and mental quality of life (Cluster 1); poor well-being, low physical quality of life, and marginal mental quality of life (Cluster 2); and heavy mental strain and marginal physical quality of life (Cluster 3). Conclusions: Similar to previous studies, our results suggest that patients suffering from CLBP differ with regard to the magnitude of mental burden and the presence of physical impairment. These differences ascertain the need for precise targeting of treatment for CLBP. Inpatient pain centers therefore should offer different multimodal therapy pathways and integrate a meaningful triage, taking into account the multifaceted nature of CLBP based on sophisticated knowledge about forms, differences, and relationships among the biopsychosocial components of CLBP.

Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany - a discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: Primary care is a central element of healthcare and addresses the main health problems of the population. While primary care gains in importance due to an aging population, there is an ongoing debate on physician shortages in German rural regions. The study aims on analyzing the population's preferences on primary healthcare and, therefore, on helping policy makers to make care delivery more responsive to patients' needs when planning political reforms of primary care. METHODS: A paper-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to assess preferences of the population of eight rural regions in Germany. Based on literature search and qualitative research, six attributes were selected and included in the choice experiment. The survey presented participants with eight choice sets in which they had to choose between two possible scenarios of care. A conditional logistic regression as well as a latent class model (LCM) were used to analyze preferences for primary healthcare. RESULTS: Nine hundred four participants completed the survey (response rate 46.1%). The conditional logistic regression showed significant impact of the attributes "home visits", "distance to practice", "number of healthcare providers", "opening hours of the practice", and "diagnostic facilities" on the respondents' choices of primary healthcare alternatives. Moreover, the LCM identified four classes that can be characterized by preference homogeneity within and heterogeneity between the classes. CONCLUSION: Although the study revealed heterogeneous preferences among the latent classes, several similarities in preferences for primary care could be detected. The knowledge on these public preferences may help policy makers when implementing new models of primary care and, thus, raise the populations' acceptance of future primary care provision and innovative care models.

[Primary Healthcare Provision and Introduction of New Models of Care in Hard to Serve Regions: A Population Survey]. / Hausärztliche Versorgungssituation und Einführung neuer Versorgungsformen in schwer zu versorgenden Regionen: Eine Befragung der Bevölkerung.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: One of the central challenges in health policy is to ensure nationwide provision of primary healthcare services. However, it is not clear how the general public rates the current primary healthcare provision in their region. Furthermore, there is very little information on whether people are willing to make use of new models of care that could contribute to ensuring a nationwide provision of healthcare services. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyse the general public's ratings of the local primary healthcare provision as well as their acceptance of selected new models of care. Furthermore, potential differences in the ratings of the population between hard to serve regions and normal regions will be analysed. METHODOLOGY: Focus group discussions and a literature review were conducted in order to develop a questionnaire to elicit the expectations of the population concerning the local provision of primary healthcare as well as their acceptance of new models of care. A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 2,000 persons in 8 regions in Lower Saxony. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate of the postal survey was 51% (n=996). 97% of respondents saw a general practitioner regularly, with 5.4 visits per year on average. Patients could reach the practice in 13 min on average. Respondents predominantly rated the current healthcare provision as being good. However, the majority of respondents expected the local primary healthcare provision to deteriorate in the future. New models of care most preferred by the respondents were the delegation of medical tasks to non-medical professionals and mobility-oriented models. On the other hand, the provision of healthcare via telemedicine was rejected. DISCUSSION: According to the results of this study, respondents believe that new models of care can play an important role in ensuring the nationwide provision of healthcare services. Introducing, at an early stage, those new models of care that people accept could contribute to ensuring a sustainable provision of primary healthcare services. Furthermore, the introduction of these new models of care could reduce the public's concerns regarding a worsening provision of primary healthcare services in their regions. Additionally, pilot projects with those new models of care that are rather rejected might increase acceptance with these models of care if they prove to be successful.

Potential savings in the treatment pathway of liver transplantation: an inter-sectorial analysis of cost-rising factors.

INTRODUCTION: Identification of cost-driving factors in patients undergoing liver transplantation is essential to target reallocation of resources and potential savings. AIM: The aim of this study is to identify main cost-driving factors in liver transplantation from the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance. METHODS: Variables were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression to determine their influence on high cost cases (fourth quartile) in the outpatient, inpatient and rehabilitative healthcare sectors as well as for medications. RESULTS: Significant cost-driving factors for the inpatient sector of care were a high labMELD-score (OR 1.042), subsequent re-transplantations (OR 7.159) and patient mortality (OR 3.555). Expenditures for rehabilitative care were significantly higher in patients with a lower adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (OR 0.601). The indication of viral cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma resulted in significantly higher costs for medications (OR 21.618 and 7.429). For all sectors of care and medications each waiting day had a significant impact on high treatment costs (OR 1.001). Overall, cost-driving factors resulted in higher median treatment costs of 211,435 €. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment costs in liver transplantation were significantly influenced by identified factors. Long pre-transplant waiting times that increase overall treatment costs need to be alleviated by a substantial increase in donor organs to enable transplantation with lower labMELD-scores. Disease management programs, the implementation of a case management for vulnerable patients, medication plans and patient tracking in a transplant registry may enable cost savings, e.g., by the avoidance of otherwise necessary re-transplants or incorrect medication.

Decision modelling for economic evaluation of liver transplantation.

As the gap between a shortage of organs and the immense demand for liver grafts persists, every available donor liver needs to be optimized for utility, urgency and equity. To overcome this challenge, decision modelling might allow us to gather evidence from previous studies as well as compare the costs and consequences of alternative options. For public health policy and clinical intervention assessment, it is a potentially powerful tool. The most commonly used types of decision analytical models include decision trees, the Markov model, microsimulation, discrete event simulation and the system dynamic model. Analytic models could support decision makers in the field of liver transplantation when facing specific problems by synthesizing evidence, comprising all relevant options, generalizing results to other contexts, extending the time horizon and exploring the uncertainty. For modeling studies of economic evaluation for transplantation, understanding the current nature of the disease is crucial, as well as the selection of appropriate modelling techniques. The quality and availability of data is another key element for the selection and development of decision analytical models. In addition, good practice guidelines should be complied, which is important for standardization and comparability between economic outputs.

[The Role of Municipalities in Lower Saxony for Future Physician's Care - A Survey of Mayors and District Administrators]. / Die Rolle von niedersächsischen Kommunen für die zukünftige ärztliche Versorgung ­ Eine Befragung der Bürgermeister und Landräte.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive outpatient medical care is being increasingly threatened due to the decreasing willingness of physicians to establish their practices in rural areas. Partly, municipalities feel impelled to support doctors setting up their practices with their own resources. The aim of this study was to get the community perspective on the ambulatory care situation and to examine the role and influence of the local authorities. METHODS: The mayors (n=411) and district administrators (n=38) in Lower Saxony received a self-developed written questionnaire in September 2015 (comprehensive survey). RESULTS: The response rate was 72%. Availability of general practitioners was considered as inadequate by 30% of those surveyed and 71% described specialist care as being insufficient. Two-thirds of respondents saw local problems with filling vacant doctors' offices. 42% of mayors and 65% of district administrators said they had already supported outpatient doctors. The most frequent measures carried out so far included financial support, consulting services and the development of cooperation and networks. The majority considered the model of medical care centers being operated under municipal sponsorship to be unsuitable in principle. CONCLUSIONS: Local governments prevalently see problems with filling vacant doctors' offices as well as a need for local support. A significant proportion of municipalities has already implemented various support measures. Community participation in the outpatient care with medical care centers under municipal sponsorship is assessed rather critically.

Would German physicians opt for pay-for-performance programs? A willingness-to-accept experiment in a large general practitioners' sample.

BACKGROUND: Implementing pay-for-performance (P4P) programs is a non-trivial task. As evaluation studies showed, P4P programs often failed to improve performance quality. A crucial element for the successful implementation of P4P is to gain acceptance with health care providers. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to determine, if (and at what bonus rate) German general practitioners (GPs) would participate in a P4P program. We further examined differences between respondents who would participate in a P4P program (participants) versus respondents who would not participate (non-participants). METHODS: A mail survey was conducted among 2493 general practitioners (GPs) in Lower Saxony (with a response rate of 36.2%). The questionnaire addressed attitudes toward P4P and included a willingness to accept experiment concerning P4P implementation. RESULTS: The participation rate increased from 28% (at a bonus of 2.5%) to 50% (at a bonus of 20%). Participants showed better performance in target achievement and expected higher gains from P4P than non-participants. Major attitude differences were found in assessing feasibility of P4P, incentivizing performance and unintended consequences. The crucial factor for (not) accepting P4P might be the sense of (un)fairness of P4P. CONCLUSION: To convince GPs to participate in P4P, better evidence for the effectiveness of P4P is required. To address the concerns of GPs, future endeavors should be directed to tailoring P4P programs. Finally, program implementation must be well communicated and thoroughly discussed with health care providers.

[The influence of framework conditions for integrated care programs on their potential of evaluation]. / Wie beeinflussen die Rahmenbedingungen integrierter Versorgungsprogramme die Möglichkeiten der Evaluation?

AIM AND METHODS: A common justification of the failure to perform scientific evaluations of integrated care programs (in accordance with Sect. 140 SGB V) is the high level of expenditure which is strongly influenced by the conditions of the particular program. Two practical examples will be used to outline frameworks of integrated care programs that may create obstacles to evaluation. If possible, appropriate solutions that may help to avoid or at least reduce these obstacles will be presented. RESULTS: In many programs target groups and program objectives are inaccurately defined. Especially disease-specific programs bear the risk of having too small a sample size to exclude random effects. Only a few integrated care programs include evaluations that have been proactively planned from the outdet. CONCLUSION: In particular, early planning of evaluations plays an important role in avoiding distortions of results and additional expenses. It may also have a positive influence on all other frameworks.

Can branding by health care provider organizations drive the delivery of higher technical and service quality?

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of branding in nearly all other major industries, most health care service delivery organizations have not fully embraced the practices and processes of branding. PURPOSES: Facilitating the increased and appropriate use of branding among health care delivery organizations may improve service and technical quality for patients. This article introduces the concepts of branding, as well as making the case that the use of branding may improve the quality and financial performance of organizations. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The concepts of branding are reviewed, with examples from the literature used to demonstrate their potential application within health care service delivery. The role of branding for individual organizations is framed by broader implications for health care markets. RESULTS: Branding strategies may have a number of positive effects on health care service delivery, including improved technical and service quality. This may be achieved through more transparent and efficient consumer choice, reduced costs related to improved patient retention, and improved communication and appropriateness of care. Patient satisfaction may be directly increased as a result of branding. CONCLUSIONS: More research into branding could result in significant quality improvements for individual organizations, while benefiting patients and the health system as a whole.

German physicians "on strike"--shedding light on the roots of physician dissatisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Over the past few years, students in Germany have been dropping out of medical school at increasing rates, and the number of physicians choosing to work abroad or in non-medical professions has been growing. A recent study (the "Ramboll Study") commissioned by the Health Ministry concluded that German physicians' dissatisfaction with existing monetary and non-monetary incentive systems during training and subsequent practice was the main reason for these trends. Among those physicians who have remained in the workforce, there is a similar dissatisfaction, reflected in part by a general strike in 2006 by German physicians in favour of higher wages and better working conditions. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the decision-making process of physicians which is highly determined by the satisfaction they experience in their work life and to extract the factors that contribute to their satisfaction. METHODS: We surveyed all physicians who spent more than 50% of their time in patient care (and less than 50% in research) at the teaching hospital of the Hannover Medical School (839, after exclusion of pre-test participants). Based on existing satisfaction studies, we designed a self-administered questionnaire that contained 28 items, including items measuring several dimensions of physician job satisfaction; the monetary and non-monetary incentives the physicians experienced in the recent past; other job-related potential confounding factors and socio-demographic questions. Respondents were asked to rate each job satisfaction item on five-point Likert scales regarding both satisfaction with and importance of the item. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, factor and correlation analyses. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our data suggest that non-monetary factors are important determinants of physician job satisfaction, perhaps more important than monetary incentives that may augment or reduce physicians' base incomes. Factor analysis revealed seven principal factors of which decision-making and recognition, continuous education and job security, administrative tasks and collegial relationships were highly significant, specialized technology and patient contact were significant and research and teaching and international exchange were not significant in contributing to physician job satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This study sheds light to the underlying factors that contribute to physician job satisfaction in Germany, and it provides insights into the reasons for physicians leaving medical practice. In order for a health system to recruit and retain physicians, it may be necessary for a system's physician strategy to shift from focusing primarily on hard, monetary and compensation-related factors to a broader focus that incorporates the soft, non-monetary factors. The implementation of policies and management practices that reduce the time burden on physicians, and enhance physicians' participation in the development of patient care management processes and in managerial decisions that affect patient care appears to be crucial. The result will be increased job satisfaction among physicians, which is important to the future recruitment and retention of doctors, as well as to the productivity and quality of the services provided by this essential component of our medical care systems.

[How does executive staff of home care nursing services estimate the situation of palliative care?]. / Wie schätzen leitende Mitarbeiter ambulanter Pflegedienste die Palliativversorgung ein?

Experts criticise heavily the current situation of palliative care in the home care setting in Germany. They claim that the education in palliative care of all involved professional groups should be improved and specialized services should be adjusted. Only few is known in this context about the perspectives and attitudes of nursing staff, who is significantly involved in palliative care. Therefore, interviews with executive stuff of home care nursing services in the Federal State of Brandenburg were performed in the context of an evaluative opinion survey. 88 of 100 planned interviews took place. The nursing services estimated the current situation predominantly good. This does not support the experts' opinions found in the literature. Nevertheless, the respondents saw serious needs for improvements, in particular concerning psycho-social issues. Although palliative patients numerically seem to be in the background of every day work life, great interest in further qualification and new concepts of care was shown. So far, only few home care nursing services employ palliative care-trained staff.

Hospital doctors' attitudes towards palliative care in Germany.

Experts from different areas strongly criticize the current level of palliative care in Germany, both inpatient and home care services. Apart from the experts' opinions, little is known in this context about the perspectives of hospital doctors working in different disciplines, such as surgery, internal medicine, gynaecology or anaesthesia. These doctors presumably treat many incurably ill patients with palliative care needs, but they usually have very little experience in palliative medicine. Their attitudes are particularly important because they are affected by the criticism and by future improvement strategies. To study their viewpoints, questionnaire surveys in five hospitals in the federal state of Brandenburg were performed, with 203 (69%) physicians participating. The results showed that the level of palliative care in hospitals was graded better than in the home care setting. Main needs for improvement were seen in the psychosocial support services and in the co-operation with outpatient services. In [corrected] the hospital physicians' view, palliative nursing care was of a higher standard than medical aspects [corrected] of care [corrected] The physicians showed great interest in improving their knowledge of [corrected] palliative care and in new specialist palliative care services. The conclusions were that three main strategies for improvement should be embarked on: (1) the establishment of integrated care systems to overcome financial and structural barriers between in- and outpatient care; (2) the establishment of further specialist palliative care services (eg, hospital-based palliative care teams); and (3) better education in palliative medicine.