Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Hematol ; 101(9): 2045-2052, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35763062

RESUMEN

Despite the low risk of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion-related bleeding, the practice of administering prophylactic platelets varies greatly. Limiting unnecessary blood product transfusions reduces transfusion-related adverse events, financial cost, and delays in care. We assessed the impact of lowering prophylactic platelet administration threshold on blood product utilization patterns and bleeding events. This quasi-experimental study was conducted in an urban academic tertiary medical center. The study population included patients with platelet counts ≥ 10,000/µL and < 50,000/µL undergoing PICC placement in 2018 and 2019 when the minimum platelet thresholds were 50,000/µL and 10,000/µL, respectively. The primary outcome was blood product utilization and the secondary outcome was PICC insertion-related bleeding complications. Thirty-five patients using the 10,000/µL (10 K) platelet threshold and 46 patients using the 50,000/µL (50 K) platelet threshold were enrolled. The 50 K group received more platelets before PICC insertion (0.870 ± 0.885 and 0.143 ± 0.430 pools of platelets-per-person, p < 0.001). No patients experienced clinically significant bleeding. Immediately following PICC insertion, minor bleeding occurred in five patients (two [4.3%] and three [8.6%] in the 50 K and 10 K groups, respectively). Bleeding rates between the two cohorts did not differ (p = 0.647). Lowering the minimum platelet threshold from 50,000/µL to 10,000/µL resulted in less prophylactic platelet and total blood product administration with no appreciable difference in PICC insertion-related bleeding.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Trombocitopenia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Catéteres/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/complicaciones , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Humanos , Recuento de Plaquetas , Transfusión de Plaquetas/efectos adversos , Trombocitopenia/etiología
2.
Respir Med Case Rep ; 34: 101489, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34401315

RESUMEN

Pulmonary talcosis is a rare pneumoconiosis that is difficult to diagnose and may progress to debilitating lung disease. Four types of talcosis are described in literature: talc-silicosis and talc-asbestosis secondary to inhalation in industry workers and talc-emboli in intravenous drug users that self-inject talc-containing oral tablets. Although found in common household products, talc is overlooked as a cause of pneumoconiosis. Talcosis caused by cosmetic face powder is even rarer. Here we discuss a woman in her 50s who developed talcosis from inhalation of cutaneous cosmetics two years prior, and how comprehensive history may be crucial in diagnosing this rare disease.

3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(3)2021 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33674290

RESUMEN

The cardiovascular effects of electronic cigarette use are unknown. Here we present a case describing a young, previously healthy patient without prior cardiopulmonary comorbidities who developed severe, acute cardiac dysfunction in the setting of e-cigarette use, in addition to the more commonly encountered respiratory symptoms. While pulmonary manifestations are characteristic of e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI), the acute and reversible cardiomyopathy seen here has not been previously described in association with either EVALI or e-cigarette use.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Lesión Pulmonar , Productos de Tabaco , Vapeo , Humanos , Pulmón , Lesión Pulmonar/etiología , Vapeo/efectos adversos
4.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 55(7)2019 Jul 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31336732

RESUMEN

We present two cases demonstrating the nuances that must be considered when determining if a patient could benefit from low dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening. Our case report discusses the available literature, where it exists, on lung cancer screening with special attention to the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and poor functional status. Patients with COPD and concurrent smoking history are at higher risk of lung cancer and may therefore benefit from lung cancer screening. However, this population is at increased risk for complications related to biopsies and lobar resections. Appropriate interventions other than surgical resection exist for COPD patients with poor pulmonary reserve. Risks and benefits of lung cancer screening are unique to each patient and require shared decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA