Exploring clozapine pharmacokinetics in Tunisian schizophrenic patients: A population-based modelling approach investigating the impact of genetic and non-genetic variables.

Clozapine is characterized by a large within- and between-patient variability in its pharmacokinetics, attributed to non-genetic and genetic factors. A cross-sectional analysis of clozapine trough concentration (Clz C0) issued from Tunisian schizophrenic patients was collected and analysed using a nonparametric modelling approach. We assessed the impact of demographic covariates (age, weight and sex), patient's habits (smoking status, alcohol and caffeine intake) and the genetic factors (CYP1A2*1C, CYP1A2*1F and CYP2C19*2 polymorphisms) on each pharmacokinetic parameter. An external validation of this pharmacokinetic model using an independent data set was performed. Fit goodness between observed- and individual-predicted data was evaluated using the mean prediction error (% MPE), the mean absolute prediction error (% MAPE) as a measure of bias, and the root mean squared error (% RMSE) as a measure of precision. Sixty-three CLz C0 values issued from 51 schizophrenic patients were assessed in this study and divided into building and validation groups. CYP1A2*1F polymorphism and smoking status were the only covariates significantly associated with clozapine clearance. Precision parameters were as follows: 1.02%, 0.95% and 22.4%, respectively, for % MPE, % MAPE and % RMSE. We developed and validated an accurate pharmacokinetic model able to predict Clz C0 in Tunisian schizophrenic patients using the two parameters CYP1A2*1F polymorphism and smoking.

Vestibular disorders following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: A retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: There are few publications regarding manifestations of vestibular disorders (VDs) following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. PURPOSE: We describe cases of VD potentially related to BNT162b2 vaccination and calculate its reporting rate, in order to enlarge knowledge about this adverse effect. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of cases of VD following BNT162b2 vaccination reported to the pharmacovigilance centre of Georges-Pompidou European Hospital (France), in 2021 was performed. In order to identify these cases from the pharmacovigilance database containing all our registered cases, we used the Standardised MedDRA Query (SMQ) 'vestibular disorders'. Then we analysed cases with vestibular symptoms, based on the association of typical manifestations. The reporting rate was calculated based on the number of VD cases and the number of vaccinated patients. RESULTS: Among 6608 cases reported to our centre related to COVID-19 vaccines during 2021, 34 VDs associated with BNT162b2 administration were included. They were mainly reported in females (79%), 62% occurred after the first dose and 32% were serious. Symptoms had completely resolved in 13 cases (38%). Vertigo was the most common symptom followed by balance disorders. Three patients received second dose without reappearance of VD. The final diagnosis was reported in 10 patients (six cases of vestibular neuritis, two cases of central VD, two cases of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo). The regional reporting rate was 26 [95% CI: 17-34] cases of VD per 1 million persons vaccinated. CONCLUSION: Although the relationship between vaccination and VD cannot be established, clinicians should be aware of this rare adverse effect.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Tunisian Renal Transplant Patients during the Tuberculosis Infection: A Retrospective, Observational, Single-centre Analysis.

Tuberculosis is a challenge in organ transplantation due to the interaction between Anti- Tuberculosis Treatment (ATT) and immunosuppressive drugs, such as Tacrolimus (TAC). This study aimed to assess this interaction and discuss the guidelines used in this specific case. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, single-center analysis was performed at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology (National Centre of Pharmacovigilance, Tunisia). We analyzed the database of patients who received TAC from 2009 until 2018. We included samples provided from renal transplant patients infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis after transplantation. Trough blood levels (C0) were determined using an immunoassay analyzer. The Therapeutic Range (TR) of TAC was considered between 5 and 10 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between the period of co-administration of TAC/ATT (period A) and the period during which patients received only TAC (period B). RESULTS: Seven renal transplant patients treated by TAC were included. 41 samples were analyzed (16; period A, 25; period B). Only 6 % of C0 values were found within TR during period A, while this rate was 44% during period B. During period A, 88% of TAC C0 was under the lower limit of TR, indicating a high risk of transplant rejection. The mean C0 and C0/D were significantly lower during period A (3.11±1.53 ng/mL vs 7.11 ± 3.37 ng/mL; p = 0.001 and 33.06 ± 24.89 vs 83.14 ± 44.46; p = 0.0006, respectively), without difference in doses between periods. CONCLUSION: Considering the results of this study, clinicians are suggested to monitor TAC closely in this particular circumstance.

Frequency and factors associated with infusion-related local complications of vancomycin on peripheral venous catheters.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is a reference antibiotic against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Its administration is associated with infusion-related local complications (IRLC). To reduce this risk, it has been proposed to increase vancomycin dilution in the IV bag and to perform continuous infusion using the volumetric pump. The aim of our study was to assess the safety of peripheral infusion of vancomycin with the volumetric pump. OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of IRLC between patients receiving vancomycin and those receiving ß-lactam (BL) antibiotics. Our secondary objective was to assess factors associated with the occurrence of IRLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in a French tertiary hospital. Between February 2021 and November 2021, we included all patients receiving continuous infusions of vancomycin or BL through a peripherally inserted venous catheter (PIVC). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IRLC on Day 1 (D1). RESULTS: We included 168 patients (56 vancomycin, 112 BL). At D1, 14 patients (25%) presented IRLC in the vancomycin group versus 11 patients (10%) in the BL group (P = 0.01). There was significantly more IRLC in the group receiving vancomycin at an infused concentration above 5 mg/mL than those receiving BL (8/15, 53.3% versus 11/112, 10%, respectively, P < 0.01). However, no significant difference was observed between patients receiving infused vancomycin concentration ≤5 mg/mL and patients receiving BL (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Our data support safe administration of vancomycin if infused at a concentration under 5 mg/mL, through the volumetric pump on PIVC.

Cross-reactivity between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in fixed drug eruption: Two unusual cases and a literature review.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the main causes of fixed drug eruption (FDE). Cross-sensitivity between chemically unrelated NSAIDs has been rarely described in FDE. We report herein two cases of NSAID-induced FDE confirmed by oral provocation test (OPT) with a literature review. Case 1 is a 49-year-old woman who took mefenamic, naproxen and acetaminophen for lumbago. On the second day, she noticed three erythematous plaques, located in the upper lip, chin and the right hand, which faded spontaneously, leaving residual patches. Three months later, she took mefenamic acid with reactivation of the same plaques. She received naproxen. On the same day, she exhibited a reactivation of lesions with the development of a new one. These lesions have disappeared leaving hyperpigmented sequelae. After negative patch test to naproxen, an OPT was performed with positive reaction, observed on the third day. To establish the cross-reactivity, she underwent OPTs, which gave positive results to indomethacin, ketoprofen and tiaprofenic acid. Case 2 is a 52-year-old woman who presented painful dusky-red macules, located in the right and left wrists, 24 hours after taking mefenamic acid. She described two similar events that occurred in the past with an undefined drug and piroxicam. Patch tests to lysine acetylsalicylate, mefenamic acid, piroxicam, naproxen and celecoxib were negative. OPTs to the same NSAIDs gave positive results to lysine acetylsalicylate, piroxicam and mefenamic acid. Thirteen case reports, seven case series and one retrospective analysis, including cases with confirmed cross-reactivity between NSAIDs, were reported in literature. Clinicians should be aware of such phenomenon.

Clinical and genetic influencing factors on clozapine pharmacokinetics in Tunisian schizophrenic patients.

Clozapine (Clz) is an atypical antipsychotic, which its pharmacokinetics can be influenced by several factors. The CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, major enzymes implicated in Clz metabolism, present an interethnic variation on their activity caused by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The present study investigated the influence of genetic and nongenetic factors on Clz pharmacokinetics in a southern Mediterranean population. We included adult Tunisian schizophrenic patients having received Clz and undergone a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Clz by morning C0 monitoring. The genomic DNA was extracted using a salting-out procedure. CYP1A2*1F (rs762551;-163C>A), CYP1A2*1C (rs2069514;-3860 G>A) and CYP 2C19*2 (rs4244285; 681G>A) was analyzed using PCR-RFLP. Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. The mutant allele (CYP1A2*1F) was the most frequently detected (58.8%). For CYP1A2*1F, Clz dose-normalized (C0/D ratio) was as high as 1.28 ± 0.37 in CC versus 0.67 ± 0.32 ng mL-1 per mg day-1 in AA group (p < 0.001). The influence of genetic (CYP1A2*1F, CYP1A2*1C and CYP2C19*2) and nongenetic parameters (age, weight, gender, tobacco, coffee, and alcohol consumption) on the variation of the Clz C0/D ratio was investigated. Only the CYP1A2*1 F polymorphism correlates significantly with the Clz C0/D variation and could explain 24% of its variability. Our data support a critical role of the CYP1A2 -163C>A on the variation of Clz exposure in Tunisian schizophrenic patients. Considering its narrow therapeutic range, CYP1A2 genotyping combined with TDM of Clz may improve efficacy and safety of this drug. Further studies are needed to investigate this issue.

Clinical features, culprit drugs, and allergology workup in 41 cases of fixed drug eruption.

BACKGROUND: Fixed drug eruption (FDE) represents a drug-related cutaneous reaction. Many drugs been associated with this clinical entity, with continually evolving documentation of implicated agents and clinical presentations. A bullous form can occur although it is rare. OBJECTIVES: To assess the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of FDE. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all FDE cases who presented to the Clinical Pharmacology Department at the University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia, for allergy workup. RESULTS: The mean age of the 41 confirmed FDE cases was 43.8 ± 15.5 years. The time between first lesion onset and FDE diagnosis was less than 1 month for 13 patients (31.7%). Fifteen patients had bullous lesions. The upper limbs were the most common location (65.9% of cases). The patch tests were positive in 27 cases; a provocation test yielded a positive response in the four cases tested. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were involved in 51.2%, antibiotics in 24.4%, and other analgesics in 19.5%. The most common offending drug was mefenamic acid in 24.4% of cases. Bullous lesions were significantly associated with paracetamol intake (P = .014; odds ratio 16.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.76-158). CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs and antibiotics were the most implicated in inducing FDE; paracetamol was associated with bullous lesions.

Piroxicam-induced fixed drug eruption: Cross-reactivity with meloxicam.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs constitute a main cause of fixed drug eruption (FDE). A few cases of piroxicam-induced FDE have been reported; however, the cross-reactivity among oxicams has rarely been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To describe a series of patients with piroxicam-induced FDE, mostly confirmed by a positive patch test reaction, in whom cross-reactivity to meloxicam was assessed. METHODS: We included all cases of piroxicam-induced FDE diagnosed in the department of pharmacovigilance of Monastir. Patch tests for piroxicam and meloxicam were performed in the involved skin according to the European Network on Drug Allergy recommendations. Oral provocation tests (OPTs) were performed for patients with negative skin test results. RESULTS: Seven patients were included in this study. FDE was multiple for five patients and solitary for two. Bullous eruption was noticed in two cases. Lesional patch tests for piroxicam gave positive results in six patients. To assess cross-reactivity with meloxicam, this was patch tested. The test gave a positive result in only one patient. OPTs with meloxicam gave positive results in two patients with negative patch test results. CONCLUSION: Meloxicam is not a safe alternative for the treatment of piroxicam-induced FDE, and OPTs can be used to confirm tolerance before this drug is prescribed as a safer alternative.