Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
1.
Biomedicines ; 11(11)2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38001955

RESUMEN

Belatacept, a CTLA4-Ig, was designed to prevent rejection and graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. This immunotherapy showed a long-term clinical benefit mainly on renal function and better glycemic control but was also associated with a higher number of severe infectious diseases, particularly CMV disease, and lymphoproliferative disease. Therapeutic drug monitoring usually guides the benefit-risk assessment of long-term immunosuppression. In this study, an analytical method by LC-MS/MS was developed in 20 microL of plasma for the belatacept quantification. Intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy were lower than 20% for the limit of quantification, and 15% for higher concentrations. The method was implemented in our lab and provided data about the inter-variability (N = 108) and intra-variability (N = 33) of belatacept concentrations in kidney transplant recipients with a stable renal function, after conversion from a CNI- to a belatacept-based regimen.

2.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11328, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37554319

RESUMEN

The first COVID-19 stay-at-home order came into effect in France on 17 March 2020. Immunocompromised patients were asked to isolate themselves, and outpatient clinic visits were dramatically reduced. In order to avoid visits to the hospital by belatacept-treated kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) during the initial period of the pandemic, we promptly converted 176 KTRs at two French transplant centers from once-monthly 5 mg/kg in-hospital belatacept infusion to once-weekly 125 mg subcutaneous abatacept injection. At the end of follow-up (3 months), 171 (97.16%) KTRs survived with a functioning graft, 2 (1.14%) had died, and 3 (1.70%) had experienced graft loss. Two patients (1.1%) experienced acute T cell-mediated rejection. Nineteen patients (10.80%) discontinued abatacept; 47% of the KTRs found the use of abatacept less restrictive than belatacept, and 38% would have preferred to continue abatacept. Mean eGFR remained stable compared to baseline. Seven patients (3.9%) had COVID-19; among these, two developed severe symptoms but survived. Only one patient had a de novo DSA. Side effects of abatacept injection were uncommon and non-severe. Our study reports for the first time in a large cohort that once-weekly injection of abatacept appears to be feasible and safe in KTRs previously treated with belatacept.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia de Injerto , COVID-19/etiología , Receptores de Trasplantes
3.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11244, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37448448

RESUMEN

Imlifidase recently received early access authorization for highly sensitized adult kidney transplant candidates with a positive crossmatch against an ABO-compatible deceased donor. These French consensus guidelines have been generated by an expert working group, in order to homogenize patient selection, associated treatments and follow-up. This initiative is part of an international effort to analyze properly the benefits and tolerance of this new costly treatment in real-life. Eligible patients must meet the following screening criteria: cPRA ≥ 98%, ≤ 65-year of age, ≥ 3 years on the waiting list, and a low risk of biopsy-related complications. The final decision to use Imlifidase will be based on the two following criteria. First, the results of a virtual crossmatch on recent serum, which shall show a MFI for the immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) > 6,000 but the value of which does not exceed 5,000 after 1:10 dilution. Second, the post-Imlifidase complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch must be negative. Patients treated with Imlifidase will receive an immunosuppressive regimen based on steroids, rATG, high dose IVIg, rituximab, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Frequent post-transplant testing for DSA and systematic surveillance kidney biopsies are highly recommended to monitor post-transplant DSA rebound and subclinical rejection.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Humanos , Preescolar , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/métodos , Antígenos HLA , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos , Isoanticuerpos
5.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 33(5): NP47-NP50, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36112857

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Belatacept is associated with a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and atypical presentations. Ocular manifestations are rare, representing up to 5% of disease manifestations and previous cases consisted in isolated retinitis. CASE DESCRIPTION: Herein, we report the case of an 81-year-old kidney transplant recipient who developed an anterior and intermediate uveitis under belatacept therapy. The diagnosis was established using quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction assays in the aqueous humor. Belatacept was interrupted and oral and topical valganciclovir treatments were instituted. Lesions however extended, leading to intensify the treatment by intra-venous and intra-vitreal ganciclovir injections. Visual acuity stabilized and ocular inflammation was finally controlled after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of CMV infection as a cause of anterior uveitis under belatacept-based regimen, even in the absence of symptoms suggestive of systemic CMV replication.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Riñón , Uveítis Anterior , Uveítis Intermedia , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Ganciclovir/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Uveítis Anterior/diagnóstico , Uveítis Anterior/tratamiento farmacológico , Uveítis Intermedia/tratamiento farmacológico
8.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e052845, 2022 03 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35351701

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Expanded-criteria donors (ECDs) are used to reduce the shortage of kidneys for transplantation. However, kidneys from ECDs are associated with an increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF), a risk factor for allograft loss and mortality. HYPOREME will be a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing targeted hypothermia to normothermia in ECDs, in a country where the use of machine perfusion for organ storage is the standard of care. We hypothesise that hypothermia will decrease the incidence of DGF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: HYPOREME is a multicentre RCT comparing the effect on kidney function in recipients of targeted hypothermia (34°C-35°C) and normothermia (36.5°C-37.5°C) in the ECDs. The temperature intervention starts from randomisation and is maintained until aortic clamping in the operating room. We aim to enrol 289 ECDs in order to analyse the kidney function of 516 recipients in the 53 participating centres. The primary outcome is the occurrence of DGF in kidney recipients, defined as a requirement for renal replacement therapy within 7 days after transplantation (not counting a single session for hyperkalemia during the first 24 hours). Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with individual organs transplanted in each group; the number of organs transplanted from each ECD and the vital status and kidney function of the recipients 7 days, 28 days, 3 months and 1 year after transplantation. An interim analysis is planned after the enrolment of 258 kidney recipients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society (CE-SRLF-16-07) on 26 April 2016 and by the competent French authorities on 20 April 2016 (Comité de Protection des Personnes-TOURS-Région Centre-Ouest 1, registration #2016-S3). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented during national and international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03098706.


Asunto(s)
Hipotermia , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplantes , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Hipotermia/etiología , Riñón , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Donantes de Tejidos
9.
Am J Transplant ; 22(8): 2099-2103, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35150193

RESUMEN

Immunocompromised patients may experience prolonged viral shedding after their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, however, symptomatic relapses after remission currently remain rare. We herein describe a severe COVID-19 relapse case of a kidney transplant recipient (KTR) following rituximab therapy, 3 months after a moderate COVID-19 infection, despite viral clearance after recovery of the first episode. During the clinical relapse, the diagnosis was established on a broncho-alveolar lavage specimen (BAL) by RT-PCR. The infectivity of the BAL sample was confirmed on a cell culture assay. Whole genome sequencing confirmed the presence of an identical stain (Clade 20A). However, it had an acquired G142D mutation and a larger deletion of 3-amino-acids at position 143-145. These mutations located within the N-terminal domain are suggested to play a role in viral entry. The diagnosis of a COVID-19 relapse should be considered in the setting of unexplained persistent fever and/or respiratory symptoms in KTRs (especially for those after rituximab therapy), even in patients with previous negative naso-pharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2/genética
10.
EMBO Mol Med ; 13(11): e14146, 2021 11 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34725920

RESUMEN

The mechanisms underlying the development of glomerular lesions during aging are largely unknown. It has been suggested that senescence might play a role, but the pathophysiological link between senescence and lesion development remains unexplained. Here, we uncovered an unexpected role for glomerular endothelial cells during aging. In fact, we discovered a detrimental cross-talk between senescent endothelial cells and podocytes, through PAI-1. In vivo, selective inactivation of PAI-1 in endothelial cells protected glomeruli from lesion development and podocyte loss in aged mice. In vitro, blocking PAI-1 in supernatants from senescent endothelial cells prevented podocyte apoptosis. Consistently, depletion of senescent cells prevented podocyte loss in old p16 INK-ATTAC transgenic mice. Importantly, these experimental findings are relevant to humans. We showed that glomerular PAI-1 expression was predictive of poor outcomes in transplanted kidneys from elderly donors. In addition, we observed that in elderly patients, urinary PAI-1 was associated with age-related chronic kidney disease. Altogether, these results uncover a novel mechanism of kidney disease and identify PAI-1 as a promising biomarker of kidney dysfunction in allografts from elderly donors.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Podocitos , Anciano , Animales , Senescencia Celular , Células Endoteliales , Humanos , Glomérulos Renales , Ratones , Inhibidor 1 de Activador Plasminogénico
11.
Am J Transplant ; 21(12): 4043-4051, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34431207

RESUMEN

Poor responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine have been reported after 2 vaccine injections in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated with belatacept. We analyzed the humoral response in belatacept-treated KTRs without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection who received three injections of BNT162b2-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We also investigated vaccine immunogenicity in belatacept-treated KTRs with prior COVID-19 and characterized symptomatic COVID-19 infections after the vaccine in belatacept-treated KTRs. Among the 62 belatacept-treated KTRs (36 [58%] males), the median age (63.5 years IQR [51-72]), without COVID-19 history, only four patients (6.4%) developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG with low antibody titers (median 209, IQR [20-409] AU/ml). 71% were treated with mycophenolic acid and 100% with steroids in association with belatacept. In contrast, in all the 5 KTRs with prior COVID-19 history, mRNA vaccine induced a strong antibody response with high antibody titers (median 10 769 AU/ml, IQR [6410-20 069]) after two injections. Seroprevalence after three-vaccine doses in 35 non-belatacept-treated KTRs was 37.1%. Twelve KTRs developed symptomatic COVID-19 after vaccination, including severe forms (50% of mortality). Breakthrough COVID-19 occurred in 5% of fully vaccinated patients. Administration of a third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine did not improve immunogenicity in KTRs treated with belatacept without prior COVID-19. Other strategies aiming to improve patient protection are needed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Formación de Anticuerpos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Vacunas Sintéticas , Vacunas de ARNm
13.
Transpl Int ; 34(8): 1506-1516, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34097778

RESUMEN

The utility of zero-time kidney biopsies (KB) in deciding to accept expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys remains controversial. However, zero-time histology is one of the main causes for discarding kidneys in the United States. In a single-centre study, we examined the utility and impact on outcome of the use of frozen section zero-time KB among ECD. Ninety-two zero-time KB were analysed for accept/discard decision between 2005 and 2015 among ECD. 53% of kidneys were rejected after zero-time KB analysis; there was no difference in individual clinical and biological data between accepted/rejected groups. However, histology of rejected kidneys showed more sclerotic glomeruli (20% vs. 8%; P < 0.001), increased interstitial fibrosis (1.25 ± 0.12 vs. 0.47 ± 0.09; P < 0.0001), more arteriosclerosis (2.14 ± 0.17 vs. 1.71 ± 0.11; P = 0.0032) and arteriolar hyalinosis (2.15 ± 0.12 vs. 1.55 ± 0.11; P = 0.0006). Using propensity score matching, we generated a group of 42 kidney allograft recipients who received a transplant matched for donor zero-time histology and clinical characteristics with donors whose kidneys were rejected. Interestingly, their 1- and 5-year graft survival and function were similar to the global cohort of ECD recipients. In conclusion, when performed, zero-time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero-time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Riñón , Nefrectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , Estados Unidos
16.
Am J Transplant ; 21(3): 1285-1294, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33252201

RESUMEN

Higher rates of severe COVID-19 have been reported in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to nontransplant patients. We aimed to determine if poorer outcomes were specifically related to chronic immunosuppression or underlying comorbidities. We used a 1:1 propensity score-matching method to compare survival and severe disease-free survival (defined as death and/or need for intensive care unit [ICU]) incidence in hospitalized KTRs and nontransplant control patients between February 26 and May 22, 2020. Patients were matched for risk factors of severe COVID-19: age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, preexisting cardiopathy, chronic lung disease, and basal renal function. We included 100 KTRs (median age [interquartile range (IQR)]) 64.7 years (55.3-73.1) in three French transplant centers. After a median follow-up of 13 days (7-30), transfer to ICU was required for 34 patients (34%) and death occurred in 26 patients (26%). Overall, 43 patients (43%) developed a severe disease during a median follow-up of 8.5 days (2-14). Propensity score matching to a large French cohort of 2017 patients hospitalized in 24 centers, revealed that survival was similar between KTRs and matched nontransplant patients with respective 30-day survival of 62.9% and 71% (p = .38) and severe disease-free 30-day survival of 50.6% and 47.5% (p = .91). These findings suggest that severity of COVID-19 in KTRs is related to their associated comorbidities and not to chronic immunosuppression.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Trasplante de Riñón , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de Trasplantes , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Am J Transplant ; 21(7): 2448-2458, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33283406

RESUMEN

Belatacept may increase cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease risk after conversion from CNI-based therapy. We analyzed CMV disease characteristics after belatacept conversion. Propensity score matching was used to compare CMV disease incidence in belatacept- and CNI-treated kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). CMV disease characteristics and risk factors under belatacept were analyzed. In total, 223 KTRs (median age [IQR] 59.2 years [45.4-68.5]) were converted to belatacept (median of 11.5 months [2.5-37.0] post-transplantation); 40/223 (17.9%) developed CMV disease. Independent risk factors included increased age (p = .0164), D+/R- CMV serostatus (p = .0220), and low eGFR at conversion (p = .0355). Among 181 belatacept-treated patients matched to 181 controls, 32/181 (17.7%) experienced CMV disease (vs. 5/181 controls [2.8%]). CMV disease cumulative incidences were 6.33 and 0.91/100 person-years (p-y) in belatacept and control groups, respectively. CMV disease risk was particularly high in elderly patients (converted >70 years) and those with eGFR <30 ml/min; cumulative incidences were 18.4 and 5.2/100 p-y, respectively. CMV diseases under belatacept were atypical, with late-onset disease (24/40 patients [60%]), high CMV seropositivity (27/40, 67%), increased severe and tissue-invasive disease rates (gastrointestinal involvement in 32/40 [80%]) and life-threatening diseases (4/40 [10%]). These findings should stimulate further research to secure the use of belatacept as a valuable rescue therapy in KTRs.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Riñón , Abatacept , Anciano , Preescolar , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes
19.
Am J Transplant ; 20(12): 3462-3476, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32342614

RESUMEN

The urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are promising noninvasive diagnostic markers of acute rejection (AR) in kidney recipients, but their levels might be confounded by urinary tract infection (UTI) and BK virus (BKV) reactivation. Multiparametric model development and validation addressed these confounding factors in a training set of 391 samples, optimizing the diagnostic performance of urinary chemokines. CXCL9/creatinine increased in UTI and BKV viremia with or without nephropathy (BKVN) (no UTI/leukocyturia/UTI: -0.10/1.61/2.09, P = .0001 and no BKV/viremia/BKVN: -0.10/1.90/2.29, P < .001) as well as CXCL10/creatinine (1.17/2.09/1.98, P < .0001 and 1.13/2.21/2.51, P < .001, respectively). An optimized 8-parameter model (recipient age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, donor specific antibodies, UTI, BKV blood viral load, CXCL9, and CXCL10) diagnosed AR with high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-0.89) and remained highly accurate at the time of screening (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.48-1) or indication biopsies (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.90) and within the first year (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.91) or later (AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.96), achieving AR diagnosis with an AUC of 0.85 and 0.92 (P < .0001) in 2 external validation cohorts. Decision curve analyses demonstrated the clinical utility of the model. Considering confounding factors rather than excluding them, we optimized a noninvasive multiparametric diagnostic model for AR of kidney allografts with unprecedented accuracy.


Asunto(s)
Virus BK , Trasplante de Riñón , Infecciones por Polyomavirus , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus , Aloinjertos , Quimiocina CXCL10 , Quimiocina CXCL9 , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/diagnóstico
20.
Transplantation ; 104(12): 2625-2631, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044892

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation therapy is frequently prescribed to kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) for prevention and treatment of thrombotic events. Over the past 10 y, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown similar efficacy with a safety profile equal or superior to that of vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (VKAs) in the general population. However, little data are available on kidney transplantation. METHODS: We investigated the efficacy (thrombotic events) and safety (hemorrhagic and other adverse events and graft outcomes) of DOACs in a cohort of KTRs with a renal function >30 mL/min. We then compared these patients to a control group treated by VKA. RESULTS: Fifty-two KTRs treated by DOACs between 2013 and 2018 at Necker Hospital were included. Patients were with a mean age of 62 ± 13 y old and a mean glomerular filtration rate of 59 ± 20 mL/min/1.73m. The major indication was atrial fibrillation (n = 31 [60%]). Apixaban was the most commonly used agent (n = 36 [69%]). No thrombotic complications were reported under DOAC until last follow-up (14.1 ± 13 mo). In comparison to 50 controls under VKA during the same period, the bleeding rate under DOAC was significantly lower (11.5 versus 22.9 per 100 patient-y, P = 0.037) with a hazard ratio of 0.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.85, P = 0.041). No significant changes in kidney function, rejection rate, or hemoglobin level were reported. CONCLUSIONS: DOACs appear to be effective and safe anticoagulants in KTRs with stable renal function.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/prevención & control , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...