Regional anesthesia for transplantation surgery - A White Paper Part 2: Abdominal transplantation surgery.

Transplantation surgery continues to evolve and improve through advancements in transplant technique and technology. With the increased availability of ultrasound machines as well as the continued development of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols, regional anesthesia has become an essential component of providing analgesia and minimizing opioid use perioperatively. Many centers currently utilize peripheral and neuraxial blocks during transplantation surgery, but these techniques are far from standardized practices. The utilization of these procedures is often dependent on transplantation centers' historical methods and perioperative cultures. To date, no formal guidelines or recommendations exist which address the use of regional anesthesia in transplantation surgery. In response, the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) identified experts in both transplantation surgery and regional anesthesia to review available literature concerning these topics. The goal of this task force was to provide an overview of these publications to help guide transplantation anesthesiologists in utilizing regional anesthesia. The literature search encompassed most transplantation surgeries currently performed and the multitude of associated regional anesthetic techniques. Outcomes analyzed included analgesic effectiveness of the blocks, reduction in other analgesic modalities-particularly opioid use, improvement in patient hemodynamics, as well as associated complications. The findings summarized in this systemic review support the use of regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control after transplantation surgeries. Part 1 of the manuscript focused on regional anesthesia performed in thoracic transplantation surgeries, and part 2 in abdominal transplantations. Specifically, regional anesthesia in liver, kidney, pancreas, intestinal, and uterus transplants or applicable surgeries are discussed.

Regional anesthesia for transplantation surgery - A white paper part 1: Thoracic transplantation surgery.

Transplantation surgery continues to evolve and improve through advancements in transplant technique and technology. With the increased availability of ultrasound machines as well as the continued development of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, regional anesthesia has become an essential component of providing analgesia and minimizing opioid use perioperatively. Many centers currently utilize peripheral and neuraxial blocks during transplantation surgery, but these techniques are far from standardized practices. The utilization of these procedures is often dependent on transplantation centers' historical methods and perioperative cultures. To date, no formal guidelines or recommendations exist which address the use of regional anesthesia in transplantation surgery. In response, the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) identified experts in both transplantation surgery and regional anesthesia to review available literature concerning these topics. The goal of this task force was to provide an overview of these publications to help guide transplantation anesthesiologists in utilizing regional anesthesia. The literature search encompassed most transplantation surgeries currently performed and the multitude of associated regional anesthetic techniques. Outcomes analyzed included analgesic effectiveness of the blocks, reduction in other analgesic modalities-particularly opioid use, improvement in patient hemodynamics, as well as associated complications. The findings summarized in this systemic review support the use of regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control after transplantation surgeries. Part 1 of the manuscript focuses on regional anesthesia performed in thoracic transplantation surgeries, and part 2 in abdominal transplantations.

Video education to improve clinical skills in the prevention of and response to vasovagal syncopal episodes.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope is a common clinical occurrence during routine outpatient dermatology procedures, such as injections and biopsies. Despite its prevalence, many medical students and health care professionals do not know how to respond appropriately to a syncopal episode. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a health education video in teaching medical students and health care professionals the appropriate management steps for vasovagal syncope and its prodromal symptoms in a clinical setting. METHODS: With input from dermatologists and an anesthesiologist, an instructional video was developed to demonstrate basic management for a presyncopal and syncopal patient. A pre- and post-video quiz was used to assess comprehension. A total of 124 medical students and health care professionals were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: After viewing the video, the proportion of respondents who were able to correctly identify how long to monitor a patient after a syncopal episode increased from pre- to post-intervention (44% vs. 71%; p < .001). Participants expressed higher levels of agreement with the statement "I am aware of the appropriate steps in managing a patient during an episode of vasovagal syncope" after the intervention (p < .001). Respondents reported increased confidence in managing a patient during a syncopal episode after this intervention (p < .001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that this health education video is a useful tool for educating medical students and nursing professionals about the management of vasovagal syncope in a clinical setting. We propose the use of video education as an efficient means of increasing recognition and standardizing therapeutic response to the prodromal symptoms of syncope and syncopal episodes.

Pseudohypoxic Brain Swelling After Uncomplicated Lumbar Decompression and Fusion for Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Pseudohypoxic brain swelling (PHBS), also known as postoperative intracranial hypotension-associated venous congestion, is a rare complication after neurosurgery characterized by rapid and often severe postoperative deterioration in consciousness and distinct imaging findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging findings associated with PHBS include computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings that resemble hypoxic changes and intracranial hypotensive changes in basal ganglia and thalamus, telencephalic, and infratentorial regions without notable changes in intracranial vasculature. CASE DESCRIPTION: This report describes the case of an L4-5 microdiskectomy with posterior decompression and fusion complicated by clinical and radiographic findings resembling PHBS without a known intraoperative durotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Spine surgeons should be alerted to the possibility that PHBS may occur in patients even after an operation without known durotomy or cerebrospinal fluid leakage and with spontaneous clinical resolution unrelated to suction drainage changes or epidural blood patches.