RESUMEN
Perinatal depression occurs during pregnancy or within the first year of life. It has a negative effect on the quality of life of parents and the relationship with the child. In Denmark perinatal depression affects up to 12% of mothers and 8% of fathers. There is stigmatisation in relation to recognition and referral for symptoms of perinatal depression which may in part be due to insufficient knowledge among professionals. This review presents the main barriers to help-seeking for perinatal depression and the status regarding early detection and possibilities for the reduction of stigmatisation.
RESUMEN
The European Court of Justice's recent ruling that the new techniques for crop development are to be considered as genetically modified organisms under the European Union's regulations exacerbates the need for a critical evaluation of those regulations. The paper analyzes the regulation from the perspective of moral and political philosophy. It considers whether influential arguments for restrictions of genetically modified organisms provide cogent justifications for the policies that are in place, in particular a pre-release authorization requirement, mandatory labelling, and de facto bans (in the form of withholding or opting out of authorizations). It is argued that arguments pertaining to risk can justify some form of pre-release authorization scheme, although not necessarily the current one, but that neither de facto bans nor mandatory labelling can be justified by reference to common arguments concerning naturalness, agricultural policy (in particular the promotion of organic farming), socio-economic effects, or consumers' right to choose.
Asunto(s)
Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Alimentos Modificados Genéticamente , Ingeniería Genética/legislación & jurisprudencia , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente , Medición de Riesgo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Administración de la Seguridad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Unión Europea , Ingeniería Genética/métodos , Ingeniería Genética/normas , Humanos , Legislación Alimentaria , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Administración de la Seguridad/normasRESUMEN
The domestication of new crops would promote agricultural diversity and could provide a solution to many of the problems associated with intensive agriculture. We suggest here that genome editing can be used as a new tool by breeders to accelerate the domestication of semi-domesticated or even wild plants, building a more varied foundation for the sustainable provision of food and fodder in the future. We examine the feasibility of such plants from biological, social, ethical, economic, and legal perspectives.
Asunto(s)
Agricultura/métodos , Productos Agrícolas/fisiología , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Productos Agrícolas/metabolismo , DomesticaciónRESUMEN
What does it take for an individual to be personally responsible for behaviors that lead to increased risk of disease? We examine three approaches to responsibility that cover the most important aspects of the discussion of responsibility and spell out what it takes, according to each of them, to be responsible for behaviors leading to increased risk of disease. We show that only what we call the causal approach can adequately accommodate widely shared intuitions to the effect that certain causal influences-such as genetic make-up or certain social circumstances-diminish, or undermine personal responsibility. However, accepting the causal approach most likely makes personal responsibility impossible. We therefore need either to reject these widely shared intuitions about what counts as responsibility-softening or undermining or to accept that personal responsibility for behaviors leading to increased risk of disease rests on premises so shaky that personal responsibility is probably impossible.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Estilo de Vida , Responsabilidad Social , Conducta de Elección , Humanos , Motivación , Autonomía Personal , Filosofía MédicaRESUMEN
Organic farming is based on the concept of working 'with nature' instead of against it; however, compared with conventional farming, organic farming reportedly has lower productivity. Ideally, the goal should be to narrow this yield gap. In this review, we specifically discuss the feasibility of new breeding techniques (NBTs) for rewilding, a process involving the reintroduction of properties from the wild relatives of crops, as a method to close the productivity gap. The most efficient methods of rewilding are based on modern biotechnology techniques, which have yet to be embraced by the organic farming movement. Thus, the question arises of whether the adoption of such methods is feasible, not only from a technological perspective, but also from conceptual, socioeconomic, ethical, and regulatory perspectives.
Asunto(s)
Agricultura Orgánica , Fitomejoramiento , Estudios de FactibilidadRESUMEN
Sustainable agriculture in response to increasing demands for food depends on development of high-yielding crops with high nutritional value that require minimal intervention during growth. To date, the focus has been on changing plants by introducing genes that impart new properties, which the plants and their ancestors never possessed. By contrast, we suggest another potentially beneficial and perhaps less controversial strategy that modern plant biotechnology may adopt. This approach, which broadens earlier approaches to reverse breeding, aims to furnish crops with lost properties that their ancestors once possessed in order to tolerate adverse environmental conditions. What molecular techniques are available for implementing such rewilding? Are the strategies legally, socially, economically, and ethically feasible? These are the questions addressed in this review.
Asunto(s)
Agricultura/métodos , Cruzamiento/métodos , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Agricultura/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/métodos , Cruzamiento/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
It is a common belief that obesity is wholly or partially a question of personal choice and personal responsibility. It is also widely assumed that when individuals are responsible for some unfortunate state of affairs, society bears no burden to compensate them. This article focuses on two conceptualizations of responsibility: backward-looking and forward-looking conceptualizations. When ascertaining responsibility in a backward-looking sense, one has to determine how that state of affairs came into being or where the agent stood in relation to it. In contrast, a forward-looking conceptualization of responsibility puts aside questions of the past and holds a person responsible by reference to some desirable future state of affairs and will typically mean that he or she is subjected to criticism, censure, or other negative appraisals or that he or she is held cost-responsible in some form, for example, in terms of demanded compensation, loss of privileges, or similar. One example of this view is the debate as to whether the obese should be denied, wholly or partially, free and equal access to healthcare, not because they are somehow personally responsible in the backward-looking sense but simply because holding the obese responsible will have positive consequences. Taking these two conceptions of responsibility into account, the authors turn their analysis toward examining the relevant moral considerations to be taken into account when public policies regarding obesity rely on such a conception of responsibility.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/ética , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Política Nutricional , Obesidad , Conducta Social , Responsabilidad Social , Índice de Masa Corporal , Compensación y Reparación/ética , Toma de Decisiones/ética , Humanos , Obligaciones Morales , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This article examines two current debates in Denmark--assisted suicide and the prioritization of health resources--and proposes that such controversial bioethical issues call for distinct philosophical analyses: first-order examinations, or an applied philosophy approach, and second-order examinations, what might be called a political philosophical approach. The authors argue that although first-order examination plays an important role in teasing out different moral points of view, in contemporary democratic societies, few, if any, bioethical questions can be resolved satisfactorily by means of first-order analyses alone, and that bioethics needs to engage more closely with second-order enquiries and the question of legitimacy in general.