Detection of Gastric Cancer with Novel Methylated DNA Markers: Discovery, Tissue Validation, and Pilot Testing in Plasma.

Purpose: Gastric adenocarcinoma is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Accurate and affordable noninvasive detection methods have potential value for screening and surveillance. Herein, we identify novel methylated DNA markers (MDM) for gastric adenocarcinoma, validate their discrimination for gastric adenocarcinoma in tissues from geographically separate cohorts, explore marker acquisition through the oncogenic cascade, and describe distributions of candidate MDMs in plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls.Experimental Design: Following discovery by unbiased whole-methylome sequencing, candidate MDMs were validated by blinded methylation-specific PCR in archival case-control tissues from U.S. and South Korean patients. Top MDMs were then assayed by an analytically sensitive method (quantitative real-time allele-specific target and signal amplification) in a blinded pilot study on archival plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls.Results: Whole-methylome discovery yielded novel and highly discriminant candidate MDMs. In tissue, a panel of candidate MDMs detected gastric adenocarcinoma in 92% to 100% of U.S. and South Korean cohorts at 100% specificity. Levels of most MDMs increased progressively from normal mucosa through metaplasia, adenoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma with variation in points of greatest marker acquisition. In plasma, a 3-marker panel (ELMO1, ZNF569, C13orf18) detected 86% (95% CI, 71-95) of gastric adenocarcinomas at 95% specificity.Conclusions: Novel MDMs appear to accurately discriminate gastric adenocarcinoma from normal controls in both tissue and plasma. The point of aberrant methylation during oncogenesis varies by MDM, which may have relevance to marker selection in clinical applications. Further exploration of these MDMs for gastric adenocarcinoma screening and surveillance is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 24(22); 5724-34. ©2018 AACR.

Novel Approach to Fecal Occult Blood Testing by Assay of Erythrocyte-Specific microRNA Markers.

BACKGROUND: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) has historically relied on methods to detect hemoglobin with no fundamental innovations in decades. AIM: To examine microRNA (miRNA) as a new marker class for FOBT. METHODS: Candidate miRNA markers were identified by small RNA sequencing of human whole blood compared to colorectal epithelia. Markers were tested in human blood cell subsets and blood from non-human species. We assessed assay linearity in blood spiking and marker stability in stool over incubation experiments. Levels of candidate erythrocyte markers were explored in stools from colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and controls. RESULTS: Based on small RNA sequencing and validation RT-qPCR, expression level of each of the top blood-enriched markers (hsa-miR-144-3p, 144-5p, 451a, 486-5p, 363-3p, 20b-5p) could perfectly discriminate blood from colorectal epithelia. All six markers arose from and showed specificity to human erythrocytes. Marker levels increased linearly with erythrocyte concentration in saline or stool and demonstrated a broader dynamic range than did immunochemical test for hemoglobin. Degradation of markers occurred in stool but was reduced with preservative buffers. Erythrocyte marker candidates for stool testing were selected in an exploratory set of stools (20 CRC, 40 normal). Candidates were then further tested in a feasibility set (29 CRC, 31 advanced adenoma, and 115 normal); a miRNA panel (hsa-miR-451a, 144-5p, and 200b-3p as normalizer) yielded an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.95, P < .0001) for CRC. CONCLUSIONS: A novel miRNA-based approach accurately quantifies fecal blood levels over a broad, clinically relevant range.

Molecular Detection of Gastrointestinal Neoplasia: Innovations in Early Detection and Screening.

Emerging molecular tools promise to extend the diagnostic reach of the endoscopist and open doors to population screening for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This review briefly addresses biological considerations in marker detection and types of markers, highlights examples of tools under development at each organ site, and appraises the possibility of universal GI cancer screening. The outlook is positive, but further technical refinement and rigorous clinical validation are needed before most of these new approaches are ready for clinical application.

Endoscopic overestimation of colorectal polyp size.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polyp size ≥ 1 cm triggers more frequent colonoscopic surveillance, yet size is typically based on subjective endoscopic estimates. We sought to compare contemporary assessments of polyp size by endoscopic estimation and pathology measurement. METHODS: Colonoscopy and pathology reports were reviewed from the 2012 medical records at a large institution. Only polyps resected in toto with both endoscopic estimates and pathology measurements were included. Pathology measurements were considered the criterion standard. Factors affecting endoscopic miscall rates were assessed by multivariate analyses. RESULTS: From 6067 polyps resected, both endoscopic and pathology sizes were available on 1528. Distribution of polyp size appraised by endoscopy but not by pathology revealed modal clustering, particularly around 1 cm. Among 99 polyps endoscopically called 1 cm, 72% were <1 cm on pathology. Of all 222 polyps estimated as ≥ 1 cm on endoscopy, 46% were <1 cm on pathology; of 1306 polyps estimated as <1 cm, 3.9% were ≥ 1 cm on pathology. By histology, 39% of adenomatous, 59% of sessile serrated, and 73% of hyperplastic polyps were overcalled; P = .008. By configuration, 34% of pedunculated, 49% of sessile, and 61% of flat polyps were overcalled; P = .014. Endoscopic overestimation was more common in women (54%) than in men (40%) (P = .03) and with proximal (56%) than distal (40%) sites; P = .02. Miscall rates were unaffected by endoscopist covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial discordance exists between endoscopic and pathology-based assessments of polyp size. Almost half of polyps called advanced on endoscopic estimates of size ≥ 1 cm fell below this threshold on actual pathology measurements.

Ureteral cannulation as a complication of urethral catheterization.

Urinary catheterization is a common procedure, particularly among patients with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury. Urethral catheterization is associated with the well-recognized complications of catheter-associated urinary tract infections and limited genitourinary trauma. Unintentional ureteral cannulation represents a rare complication of urethral catheterization and has been previously described in only eight cases within the literature. We describe two cases of aberrant ureteral cannulation involving two patients with quadriplegia. These cases along with prior reports identify the spastic, insensate bladder and altered pelvic sensorium found in upper motor neuron syndromes as major risk factors for ureteral cannulation with a urinary catheter.

Capsule endoscopy device retention and magnetic resonance imaging.

A 55-year-old man was hospitalized for a neurologic and infectious workup after having hallucinations and productive cough for 2 days. During hospitalization, he experienced dark stools with an acute drop in hemoglobin. Upper endoscopy and colonoscopy were negative for an identifiable source of bleed. Capsule endoscopy was later done and subsequently an anteroposterior abdominal radiograph confirmed the presence of a retained capsule near the junction of the descending and distal transverse colon, likely contained within a colonic diverticulum. In the interim, the patient developed acute right-sided lumbar radiculopathy prompting emergent lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). During the scanning process, the retained capsule was seen and the test was immediately terminated without harm to the patient. Device retention is a complication unique to capsule endoscopy, occurring at a rate of 1% to 1.7%; retained devices are considered a danger and contraindication to MRI.