Identifying patients at risk for hereditary myeloid malignancy syndromes incorporating a novel, self-administered questionnaire to an initial screening platform.

INTRODUCTION: Four to 10% of cases of myeloid malignancies are inherited. We report our experience on hereditary myeloid malignancy syndromes (HMMS) incorporating a novel questionnaire in the screening platform for patients with myeloid malignancies and aplastic anemia. METHODS: The questionnaire was sent via electronic patient portal prior to clinic visits. Patients screened positive based on responses to questionnaire items, presence of suspicion disease characteristics (young age, family history, monosomy 7 etc.) and/or presence of signs of HMMS. Those deemed at-risk based on questionnaire responses, clinical features and/or somatic mutation profile were offered germline testing. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients were screened, 141 (35%) were deemed at-risk. Fifty-four (38%) of at-risk patients were seen in the genetics clinic. Forty-one (76%) of the patients seen agreed to germline testing and 13 declined due to cost or personal decision. Twenty pathogenic (P)/likely-pathogenic (LP) germline mutations were identified in 16 (39%) of the tested patients. Five patients also had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) and an additional 13 had at least 1 VUS without P/LP mutations (total 29 VUS's were found in 18 (44%) of tested patients). The median age of diagnosis for patients with P/LP mutations was 56 years versus 66 years in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: Incorporating an electronic questionnaire is an effective screening method for HMMS. Many patients declined testing due to cost. These results highlight the importance of germline testing in patients with myeloid malignancies, further research in HMMS, and coverage by healthcare plans.

The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study for Patients on a Direct Oral Anticoagulant Who Need an Elective Surgery or Procedure: Design and Rationale.

Background The perioperative management of patients who take a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for atrial fibrillation and require treatment interruption for an elective surgery/procedure is a common clinical scenario for which best practices are uncertain. The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) study is designed to address this unmet clinical need. We discuss the rationale for the PAUSE design and analysis plan as well as the rationale supporting the perioperative DOAC protocol. Methods PAUSE is a prospective study with three parallel cohorts, one for each DOAC, to assess a standardized but patient-specific perioperative management protocol for DOAC-treated patients with atrial fibrillation. The perioperative protocol accounts for DOAC type, patient's renal function and surgery/procedure-related bleeding risk. The primary study aim is to demonstrate the safety of the PAUSE protocol for the perioperative management of each DOAC. The secondary aim is to determine the effect of the pre-procedure interruption on residual anticoagulation when measured by the dilute thrombin time for dabigatran and anti-factor Xa levels for rivaroxaban and apixaban. The study hypothesis is that the perioperative management protocol for each DOAC is safe for patient care, defined by expected risks for major bleeding of 1% (80% power to exclude 2%), and for arterial thromboembolism of 0.5% (80% power to exclude 1.5%) in each DOAC group. Conclusion The PAUSE study has the potential to establish a standard-of-care approach for the perioperative management of DOAC-treated patients. The PAUSE management protocol is designed to be easily applied in clinical practice, as it is standardized and also patient specific.