TP53 Alterations Correlate with Response to VEGF/VEGFR Inhibitors: Implications for Targeted Therapeutics.

TP53 tumor-suppressor gene mutations are among the most frequent abnormalities in cancer, affecting approximately 40% of patients. Yet, there is no accepted way to target these alterations in the clinic. At the same time, antagonists of VEGFR or its ligand are best-selling oncology drugs, with multiple, expensive compounds approved. Although only a subset of patients benefit from these antiangiogenesis agents, no relevant biomarker has been identified. Interestingly, TP53 mutations upregulate VEGF-A and VEGFR2. We prospectively enrolled 500 patients, to be interrogated by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) (next-generation sequencing, 236 genes), and to be matched, whenever possible, with targeted agents. Herein, we analyze outcomes based on VEGF/VEGFR inhibitor treatment and presence of TP53 mutations. Of the 500 patients, 188 (37.6%; with ≥1 alteration) were treated; 106 (56% of 188) had tumors that harbored TP53 mutations. VEGF/VEGFR inhibitor therapy was independently associated with improvement in all outcome parameters [rate of stable disease (SD) ≥6 months/partial and complete remission (PR/CR); (31% versus 7%; TP53-mutant patients (who received no other molecular-matched agents) treated with versus without VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors), time-to-treatment failure, and overall survival (multivariate analysis: all P ≤ 0.01)] for the patients harboring TP53-mutant cancers, but improvement was not seen in any of these parameters for patients with TP53 wild-type neoplasms. We conclude that TP53 mutations predict sensitivity to VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors in the clinic. TP53 alterations may therefore be a ready biomarker for treatment with antiangiogenesis agents, a finding of seminal importance across the cancer field. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(10); 2475-85. ©2016 AACR.

Cancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling: A Single Center Study.

Innovative molecular diagnostics deployed in the clinic enable new ways to stratify patients into appropriate treatment regimens. These approaches may resolve a major challenge for early-phase clinical trials, which is to recruit patients who, while having failed previous treatments, may nevertheless respond to molecularly targeted drugs. We report the findings of a prospective, single-center study conducted in patients with diverse refractory cancers who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP; next-generation sequencing, 236 genes). Of the 500 patients enrolled, 188 (37.6%) received either matched (N = 122/188, 65%) or unmatched therapy (N = 66/188, 35%). The most common reasons that patients were not evaluable for treatment included insufficient tissue, death, or hospice transfer. The median number of molecular alterations per patient was five (range, 1-14); median number of prior therapies, four. The most common diagnoses were ovarian cancer (18%), breast cancer (16%), sarcoma (13%), and renal cancer (7%). Of the 339 successfully profiled patients, 317 (93.5%) had at least one potentially actionable alteration. By calculating matching scores, based on the number of drug matches and genomic aberrations per patient, we found that high scores were independently associated with a greater frequency of stable disease ≥6 months/partial/complete remission [22% (high scores) vs. 9% (low scores), P = 0.024], longer time-to-treatment failure [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.36-0.74; P = 0.0003], and survival (HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.43-1.0; P = 0.05). Collectively, this study offers a clinical proof of concept for the utility of CGP in assigning therapy to patients with refractory malignancies, especially in those patients with multiple genomic aberrations for whom combination therapies could be implemented. Cancer Res; 76(13); 3690-701. ©2016 AACR.

Cytokine Panel for Response to Intravesical Therapy (CyPRIT): Nomogram of Changes in Urinary Cytokine Levels Predicts Patient Response to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin.

UNLABELLED: The response of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to intravesical immunotherapy with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) depends on adequate stimulation of an immune response. Although BCG has been used for decades, we lack tools to accurately predict response in individual patients. To address this deficiency, we initiated a clinical trial in patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. BCG was administered according to the Southwest Oncology Group protocol. Urine samples were collected for cytokine assay at baseline, immediately before and after BCG instillation at 6 wk, and immediately before and after the third BCG instillation of the first maintenance course. Levels of 12 cytokines were measured, and changes from baseline were calculated after treatment. A total of 130 patients were enrolled. Increases in single cytokines correlated with recurrence, but the best predictor of recurrence was changes in a combination of cytokines. A nomogram (CyPRIT) constructed using urinary levels of nine inducible cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, IL-1ra, TRAIL, IFN-γ, IL-12[p70], and TNF-α) predicted the likelihood of recurrence with 85.5% accuracy (95% confidence interval 77.9­93.1%)." This cytokine panel and nomogram have potential for identifying patients at risk of tumor recurrence during BCG treatment to guide modification of the dose and duration of BCG immunotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01007058.

Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization to predict response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for bladder cancer: results of a prospective trial.

PURPOSE: No reliable methods currently exist to predict patient response to intravesical immunotherapy with bacillus Calmette-Guérin given after transurethral resection for high risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. We initiated a prospective clinical trial to determine whether fluorescence in situ hybridization results during bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy can predict therapy failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Candidates for standard of care bacillus Calmette-Guérin were offered participation in a clinical trial. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed before bacillus Calmette-Guérin, and at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months during bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy with maintenance. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the relationship between fluorescence in situ hybridization results and tumor recurrence or progression. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate recurrence-free and progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients participated in the study. At a median followup of 24 months 31% of patients had recurrent tumors and 14% experienced disease progression. Patients who had positive fluorescence in situ hybridization results during bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy were 3 to 5 times more likely than those who had negative fluorescence in situ hybridization results to experience recurrent tumors and 5 to 13 times more likely to have disease progression (p <0.01). The timing of positive fluorescence in situ hybridization results also affected outcomes. For example, patients with a negative fluorescence in situ hybridization result at baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months demonstrated an 8.3% recurrence rate compared to 48.1% for those with a positive result at all 3 points. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization results can identify patients at risk for tumor recurrence and progression during bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy. This information may be used to counsel patients about alternative treatment strategies.

Robot assisted extended pelvic lymphadenectomy at radical cystectomy: lymph node yield compared with second look open dissection.

PURPOSE: Robot assisted radical cystectomy outcomes show feasibility and potential benefits for patient recovery. However, it is difficult to judge the completeness of extended robot assisted vs open pelvic lymph node dissection using only the lymph node count and template description. We performed a prospective protocol in which radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection done in robot assisted fashion were followed by second look open pelvic lymph node dissection. Our primary objective was to determine the fraction of lymph nodes yielded by robot assisted pelvic lymph node dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with pure transitional cell carcinoma and no locally advanced features were selected for robot assisted radical cystectomy. A team of 2 urological oncologists performed radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in robot assisted fashion, followed by second look open pelvic lymph node dissection. Lymph nodes from robot assisted dissection were submitted in up to 8 separate specimens by anatomical location. Any additional specimens retrieved at open dissection were submitted separately. RESULTS: The protocol was completed in 11 patients from October 2007 to June 2009. The median yield of robot assisted and second look open pelvic lymph node dissection was 43 (range 19 to 63) and 4 (range 0 to 8), respectively, for an overall robot assisted yield of 93%. Of second look open pelvic lymph node dissections 67% were clear of residual tissue, 13% had tissue without lymph nodes and 20% had 1 or more lymph nodes. Median operative time for robot assisted pelvic lymph node dissection was 117 minutes. Concurrently open radical cystectomy without required multiple lymph node specimen submission yielded a median 24 nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showing a robot assisted pelvic lymph node dissection yield of 93% of that of open surgery should allay concern that the robot assisted technique limits the completeness of pelvic lymph node dissection.