Measurement of lactate in pleural fluid rapidly identify infection and guide therapy.

BACKGROUND: Measurements of pleural fluid biomarkers for rapid identification of complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE) are crucial for optimal management. Previous studies for biomarker evaluation were however based on pleura culture, not modern DNA technique. Lactate has not been thoroughly studied earlier as a potential biomarker in this regard. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the routine biomarkers pH, glucose, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) measured in pleural fluid in a microbiological well characterised cohort could differentiate simple parapneumonic effusion (SPPE) from CPPE and if pleural fluid lactate could be of additional use in this discrimination. METHODS: Pleural fluid prospectively collected from adult patients (n = 112) with PPE admitted to the Departments of Infectious Diseases (DIDs) at four Stockholm County hospitals were characterised microbiologically with bacterial culture and 16S rDNA sequencing, and biochemically with pH, glucose, LDH and lactate. RESULTS: Forty and seventy two patients were categorised as SPPE/CPPE. The median values between SPPE/CPPE differed significantly for all biomarkers with varying overlap. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves showed the area under the curve (AUC) for pH 0.905 (CI 0.847-0.963), glucose 0.861 (CI 0.79-0.932), LDH 0.917 (CI 0.860-0.974) and lactate 0.927 (CI 0.877-0.977), corresponding to best cut-off levels and sensitivity/specificity for pH of 7.255, 0.819/0.9, glucose 5.35 mmol/L, 0.847/0.775, LDH 9.8 µcat/L, 0.905/0.825 and lactate 4.9 mmol/L, 0.875/0.85. CONCLUSIONS: To distinguish between SPPE/CPPE, pH and LDH performed well, but optimal cut-off values differed from earlier established recommendations. Pleura lactate had the largest AUC of the investigated biomarkers and may be used in the analyses of PPE-staging.

The bacteriology in adult patients with pneumonia and parapneumonic effusions: increased yield with DNA sequencing method.

The aim of this study was to use a 16S rDNA sequencing method in combination with conventional culture in patients with parapneumonic effusions (PPE) to evaluate the methods, study the microbiological spectrum, and examine the presence of bacteria within the different stages of PPE. Adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and PPE (n = 197) admitted to the Departments of Infectious Diseases at four hospitals in Stockholm County during 2011-2014 were prospectively studied. All patients underwent thoracentesis. Twenty-seven non-infectious pleural effusions were used as controls. The pleural samples were analyzed with culture, 16S rDNA sequencing, pH, glucose, and lactate dehydrogenase. Microbiological etiology was found in 99/197 (50%) of the patients with mixed infections in 20 cases. The most common pathogens were viridans streptococci (n = 37) and anaerobic bacteria (n = 40). Among the 152 patients with both methods performed, 26/152 (17%) and 94/152 (62%) had bacteria identified with culture and 16S rDNA sequencing respectively (p < 0.001). In 24/26 (92%) culture-positive cases, the same organism was identified by 16S rDNA. All controls were negative in both methods. Among the patients with complicated PPE and complete sampling, bacteria were found in 69/74 patients (93%), all detected with 16S rDNA sequencing, compared to 23/74 (31%) culture-positive samples (p < 0.001). Compared with culture, 16S rDNA sequencing substantially improved the microbiological yield, a microbiological diagnosis was achieved in almost all patients with complicated PPE, and the specificity seemed to be high. 16S rDNA sequencing should be used together with culture in patients with PPE to guide antibiotic therapy.