RESUMEN
Background@#and purpose In acute stroke patients, plasma concentrations of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) at hospital admission only poorly mirror DOAC exposure or the coagulation status at the time of the event. Here, we evaluated whether DOAC exposure and DOAC plasma concentration at the time of transient ischemic attacks (TIA) and ischemic strokes correlate with their likelihood of occurrence. @*Methods@#Prospectively, consecutive DOAC patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA were included. Admission DOAC plasma concentrations were measured by ultraperformance liquid chromatography– tandem mass spectrometry. Individual DOAC exposure (area under the curve) and DOAC concentrations at event onset were derived from population pharmacokinetic analyses. @*Results@#DOAC exposure was successfully modeled in 211 patients (ischemic stroke 74.4%, TIA 25.6%). Compared to published values, 63.0% had relatively lower DOAC exposure and they more often received lower DOAC doses than recommended (odds ratio [OR], 2.125; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.039 to 4.560; P=0.044). These patients more likely suffered ischemic strokes than TIA (OR, 2.411; 95% CI, 1.254 to 4.638; P=0.008) and their strokes were more severe (slope, 3.161; 95% CI, 0.741 to 5.58; P=0.011). Low relative DOAC concentrations at event onset were likewise associated with ischemic strokes (OR, 4.123; 95% CI, 1.834 to 9.268; P=0.001), but not to stroke severity (P=0.272). DOAC exposure had a higher explanatory value for stroke severity than concentrations at event. @*Conclusions@#Low DOAC exposure is strongly associated to ischemic stroke and its severity. By monitoring DOAC plasma concentrations, patients prone to ischemic stroke might be identified.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Urinary calprotectin has recently been identified as a promising biomarker for the differentiation between prerenal and intrinsic acute kidney injury (AKI) in the nontransplant population. The present study investigates whether calprotectin is able to differentiate between these 2 entities in transplant recipients as well. METHODS: Urinary calprotectin was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 328 subjects including 125 cases of intrinsic acute allograft failure, 27 prerenal graft failures, 118 patients with stable graft function, and 58 healthy controls. Acute graft failure was defined as AKI stages 1 to 3 (Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria), exclusion criteria were obstructive uropathy, urothelial carcinoma, and metastatic cancer. The clinical differentiation of prerenal and intrinsic graft failure was performed either by biopsy or by a clinical algorithm including response to fluid repletion, history, physical examination, and urine dipstick examination. RESULTS: Reasons for intrinsic graft failure comprised rejection, acute tubular necrosis, urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis, viral nephritis, and interstitial nephritis. Calprotectin concentrations of patients with stable graft function (50.4 ng/mL) were comparable to healthy controls (54.8 ng/mL, P = 0.70) and prerenal graft failure (53.8 ng/mL, P = 0.62). Median urinary calprotectin was 36 times higher in intrinsic AKI (1955 ng/mL) than in prerenal AKI (P < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a high accuracy of calprotectin (area under the curve, 0.94) in the differentiation of intrinsic versus prerenal AKI. A cutoff level of 134.5 ng/mL provided a sensitivity of 90.4% and a specificity of 74.1%. Immunohistochemical stainings for calprotectin in renal allograft biopsy specimens confirmed the serological results. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary calprotectin is a promising biomarker for the differentiation of prerenal and intrinsic acute renal allograft failure.